Cuddle Bugs Learning Center
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
35 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
March 12, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Cuddle Bugs Learning Center
- License number
- 1407606
- Location
- 12765 SH 64 E, Tyler, TX 75707
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 33.0/100
- Inspection record
- 35 inspections, last inspected March 12, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
Quality Rating
Rated by Texas Rising Star, the state quality rating and improvement system.
40
Total Violations
Mar 12, 2026
Last Inspection
74
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (40)
During an inspection it was brought to licensing attention a caregiver was arrested and received conditions on their background. This operation received notification of the change on May 8, 2025. This was not notified to their licensing inspector.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During an observation of the center, it was observed two caregivers with conditions supervising two groups of children. One group who had 9 students age range from 2/3 and the second with 8 students age range from 18/ 19 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-14
During an observation of the center, it was observed two caregivers with conditions supervising two groups of children. One group who had 9 students age range from 2/3 and the second with 8 students age range from 18/ 19 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-14
During an inspection it was brought to licensing attention a caregiver was arrested and received conditions on their background. This operation received notification of the change on May 8, 2025. This was not notified to their licensing inspector.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During an observation of the center, it was observed two caregivers with conditions supervising two groups of children. One group who had 9 students age range from 2/3 and the second with 8 students age range from 18/ 19 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-14
During an observation of the center, it was observed two caregivers with conditions supervising two groups of children. One group who had 9 students age range from 2/3 and the second with 8 students age range from 18/ 19 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-14
During an inspection it was brought to licensing attention a caregiver was arrested and received conditions on their background. This operation received notification of the change on May 8, 2025. This was not notified to their licensing inspector.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During an inspection it was brought to licensing attention a caregiver was arrested and received conditions on their background. This operation received notification of the change on May 8, 2025. This was not notified to their licensing inspector.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
At the inspection, the operation did not complete the documentation for practice drills.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-31
At the inspection, the operation did not complete the documentation for practice drills.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-31
At the inspection, the operation did not complete the documentation for practice drills.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-31
At the inspection, the operation did not complete the documentation for practice drills.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-31
During inspection it was observed 1 teacher had 21 children ages 18 - 23m and 1 teacher had 29 children ages 2yr - 11yr (SAG 4). This was corrected when the operation called all parents to pick up children for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, the schoolers classroom was observed with Netflix on that was not educational and did not correspond to the daily activities.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
The operation did not show good judgement when they accepted children that put them out of ratio. The operation did not show good judgement when leaving school age children alone in a classroom watching tv. The operation did not show good judgment when they left 11 children ages 18m - 23m alone in a classroom with 3 children strapped into high chairs. The operation did not use good judgement when allowing a new hire to work in the operation without a background check completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, 1 classroom was observed with 11 children ages 18m - 23m alone in a classroom. 3 children were buckled into high chairs. 1 classroom with 15 schoolers was observed alone in a classroom watching tv. This was corrected when classes were combined with a teacher present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, 1 staff member was observed in the operation without a background check. The operation advised it was the staff members third day of employment. The operation closed for the day and all staff and children left. The staff file was unavailable to review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection it was observed 1 teacher had 21 children ages 18 - 23m and 1 teacher had 29 children ages 2yr - 11yr (SAG 4). This was corrected when the operation called all parents to pick up children for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, 1 classroom was observed with 11 children ages 18m - 23m alone in a classroom. 3 children were buckled into high chairs. 1 classroom with 15 schoolers was observed alone in a classroom watching tv. This was corrected when classes were combined with a teacher present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
The operation did not show good judgement when they accepted children that put them out of ratio. The operation did not show good judgement when leaving school age children alone in a classroom watching tv. The operation did not show good judgment when they left 11 children ages 18m - 23m alone in a classroom with 3 children strapped into high chairs. The operation did not use good judgement when allowing a new hire to work in the operation without a background check completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
The operation did not show good judgement when they accepted children that put them out of ratio. The operation did not show good judgement when leaving school age children alone in a classroom watching tv. The operation did not show good judgment when they left 11 children ages 18m - 23m alone in a classroom with 3 children strapped into high chairs. The operation did not use good judgement when allowing a new hire to work in the operation without a background check completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, the schoolers classroom was observed with Netflix on that was not educational and did not correspond to the daily activities.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection it was observed 1 teacher had 21 children ages 18 - 23m and 1 teacher had 29 children ages 2yr - 11yr (SAG 4). This was corrected when the operation called all parents to pick up children for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, 1 staff member was observed in the operation without a background check. The operation advised it was the staff members third day of employment. The operation closed for the day and all staff and children left. The staff file was unavailable to review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, 1 classroom was observed with 11 children ages 18m - 23m alone in a classroom. 3 children were buckled into high chairs. 1 classroom with 15 schoolers was observed alone in a classroom watching tv. This was corrected when classes were combined with a teacher present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, the schoolers classroom was observed with Netflix on that was not educational and did not correspond to the daily activities.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, 1 staff member was observed in the operation without a background check. The operation advised it was the staff members third day of employment. The operation closed for the day and all staff and children left. The staff file was unavailable to review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
The operation did not show good judgement when they accepted children that put them out of ratio. The operation did not show good judgement when leaving school age children alone in a classroom watching tv. The operation did not show good judgment when they left 11 children ages 18m - 23m alone in a classroom with 3 children strapped into high chairs. The operation did not use good judgement when allowing a new hire to work in the operation without a background check completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, 1 classroom was observed with 11 children ages 18m - 23m alone in a classroom. 3 children were buckled into high chairs. 1 classroom with 15 schoolers was observed alone in a classroom watching tv. This was corrected when classes were combined with a teacher present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection it was observed 1 teacher had 21 children ages 18 - 23m and 1 teacher had 29 children ages 2yr - 11yr (SAG 4). This was corrected when the operation called all parents to pick up children for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, the schoolers classroom was observed with Netflix on that was not educational and did not correspond to the daily activities.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
During inspection, 1 staff member was observed in the operation without a background check. The operation advised it was the staff members third day of employment. The operation closed for the day and all staff and children left. The staff file was unavailable to review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12
Both vans do not have fire extinguishers installed on the vehicles. The Director will be purchasing them and installing them tomorrow.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-04
A child with food allergies documented on the admission form does not have physician signature on the food allergy emergency care plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-11
Both vans do not have fire extinguishers installed on the vehicles. The Director will be purchasing them and installing them tomorrow.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-04
A child with food allergies documented on the admission form does not have physician signature on the food allergy emergency care plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-11
Both vans do not have fire extinguishers installed on the vehicles. The Director will be purchasing them and installing them tomorrow.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-04
Both vans do not have fire extinguishers installed on the vehicles. The Director will be purchasing them and installing them tomorrow.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-04
A child with food allergies documented on the admission form does not have physician signature on the food allergy emergency care plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-11
A child with food allergies documented on the admission form does not have physician signature on the food allergy emergency care plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-11
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Cuddle Bugs Learning Center.
Nearby Daycares in Tyler
Legacy Foundations Residential Campus
14023 STATE HIGHWAY 155 S
Kids Kaleidoscope
3030 COPELAND RD
Tiny Hugs Learning Academy
956 FM 757
Yuridia Gomez
430 S PARKDALE DR
GETCAP Head Start and Early Head Start at Tyler
4000 SOUTHPARK DR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cuddle Bugs Learning Center's safety grade?
Cuddle Bugs Learning Center has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 33.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Cuddle Bugs Learning Center have?
Cuddle Bugs Learning Center has 40 total violations on record, including 32 critical, 8 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Cuddle Bugs Learning Center last inspected?
Cuddle Bugs Learning Center was last inspected on March 12, 2026.