Azleway Children's Services Tyler

15892 COUNTRY RD 26, Tyler, TX 75707Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

253 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

March 30, 2026

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
Azleway Children's Services Tyler
License number
510293- 132
Location
15892 COUNTRY RD 26, Tyler, TX 75707
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 0.0/100
Inspection record
253 inspections, last inspected March 30, 2026
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor0.0 / 100
Health0/100
Safety0/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

185

Total Violations

Mar 30, 2026

Last Inspection

0

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (185)

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Mar 6, 2026

During a sampling inspection completed on 03/03/26, lighter fluid, lighters, and insect killer were found stored accessible to children. Before leaving the home, foster parents stored the items appropriately to reduce potential risks to children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Mar 6, 2026

During a sampling inspection completed on 03/03/26, lighter fluid, lighters, and insect killer were found stored accessible to children. Before leaving the home, foster parents stored the items appropriately to reduce potential risks to children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Mar 6, 2026

During a sampling inspection completed on 03/03/26, lighter fluid, lighters, and insect killer were found stored accessible to children. Before leaving the home, foster parents stored the items appropriately to reduce potential risks to children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-13

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Feb 25, 2026

During a sampling inspection, several over the counter medications were not stored locked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Feb 25, 2026

During a sampling inspection lighter fluid was observed stored within reach of children in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-03

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Feb 25, 2026

During a sampling inspection, several over the counter medications were not stored locked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-03

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)Feb 25, 2026

During a sampling inspection, the verification certificate included treatment services for PMN however the home screening does not verify the home to provide the services.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-03

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Feb 25, 2026

During a sampling inspection, several over the counter medications were not stored locked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-03

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)Feb 25, 2026

During a sampling inspection, the verification certificate included treatment services for PMN however the home screening does not verify the home to provide the services.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Feb 25, 2026

During a sampling inspection lighter fluid was observed stored within reach of children in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Feb 25, 2026

During a sampling inspection lighter fluid was observed stored within reach of children in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-03

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)Feb 25, 2026

During a sampling inspection, the verification certificate included treatment services for PMN however the home screening does not verify the home to provide the services.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-03

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(A)Nov 24, 2025

Licensing was not made aware of a child's fractured finger within the allotted 24-hour timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(A)Nov 24, 2025

Licensing was not made aware of a child's fractured finger within the allotted 24-hour timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(A)Nov 24, 2025

Licensing was not made aware of a child's fractured finger within the allotted 24-hour timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(A)Nov 24, 2025

Licensing was not made aware of a child's fractured finger within the allotted 24-hour timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-08

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3147Oct 31, 2025

During a heightened monitoring inspection completed on 10/24/25, it was noted that a hot tub did not have a locking cover. The hot tub had cover that was not locking and sagged in the middle due to standing water.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3147Oct 31, 2025

During a heightened monitoring inspection completed on 10/24/25, it was noted that a hot tub did not have a locking cover. The hot tub had cover that was not locking and sagged in the middle due to standing water.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3147Oct 31, 2025

During a heightened monitoring inspection completed on 10/24/25, it was noted that a hot tub did not have a locking cover. The hot tub had cover that was not locking and sagged in the middle due to standing water.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3147Oct 31, 2025

During a heightened monitoring inspection completed on 10/24/25, it was noted that a hot tub did not have a locking cover. The hot tub had cover that was not locking and sagged in the middle due to standing water.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-01

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 15, 2025

During a review conducted on 09/15/2025 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-16

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 15, 2025

During a review conducted on 09/15/2025 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-16

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 15, 2025

During a review conducted on 09/15/2025 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-16

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 15, 2025

During a review conducted on 09/15/2025 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-16

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(A)Aug 27, 2025

During an investigation, a foster home did not report a serious incident within required time frames.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-05

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(A)Aug 27, 2025

During an investigation, a foster home did not report a serious incident within required time frames.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-05

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(A)Aug 27, 2025

During an investigation, a foster home did not report a serious incident within required time frames.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-05

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(A)Aug 27, 2025

During an investigation, a foster home did not report a serious incident within required time frames.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-05

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 14, 2025

During a review conducted on 03/14/2025 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 02/28/2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2453(a)(2) During the investigation, it was determined that an addendum to the home screening was not completed when a member of the family moved in. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-15

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 14, 2025

During a review conducted on 03/14/2025 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 02/28/2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2453(a)(2) During the investigation, it was determined that an addendum to the home screening was not completed when a member of the family moved in. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-15

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 14, 2025

During a review conducted on 03/14/2025 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 02/28/2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2453(a)(2) During the investigation, it was determined that an addendum to the home screening was not completed when a member of the family moved in. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-15

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 14, 2025

During a review conducted on 03/14/2025 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 02/28/2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2453(a)(2) During the investigation, it was determined that an addendum to the home screening was not completed when a member of the family moved in. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-15

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 9, 2024

During a review conducted on 09/09/2024 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 08/19/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2593(a)(2). During the investigation, it was found that a caregiver failed to supervise children in care, resulting in inappropriate contact with a household member. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 9, 2024

During a review conducted on 09/09/2024 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 08/19/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2593(a)(2). During the investigation, it was found that a caregiver failed to supervise children in care, resulting in inappropriate contact with a household member. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 9, 2024

During a review conducted on 09/09/2024 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 08/19/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2593(a)(2). During the investigation, it was found that a caregiver failed to supervise children in care, resulting in inappropriate contact with a household member. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 9, 2024

During a review conducted on 09/09/2024 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 08/19/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2593(a)(2). During the investigation, it was found that a caregiver failed to supervise children in care, resulting in inappropriate contact with a household member. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-10

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1187(a)Apr 29, 2024

In one of the child's records reviewed there was no documentation completed for the admissions assessment. The child was admitted to the placement 3/12/24 as an emergency placement. The assessment was due to be completed by 4/21/24.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-10

CRITICALHEALTH749.2905(a)Apr 29, 2024

In one of the home records reviewed the health inspection was conducted 4/5/24. The previous health inspection was conducted 3/21/23. The documentation shows it to have been conducted 14 days past due.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1187(a)Apr 29, 2024

In one of the child's records reviewed there was no documentation completed for the admissions assessment. The child was admitted to the placement 3/12/24 as an emergency placement. The assessment was due to be completed by 4/21/24.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-10

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1187(a)Apr 29, 2024

In one of the child's records reviewed there was no documentation completed for the admissions assessment. The child was admitted to the placement 3/12/24 as an emergency placement. The assessment was due to be completed by 4/21/24.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-10

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1187(a)Apr 29, 2024

In one of the child's records reviewed there was no documentation completed for the admissions assessment. The child was admitted to the placement 3/12/24 as an emergency placement. The assessment was due to be completed by 4/21/24.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-10

CRITICALHEALTH749.2905(a)Apr 29, 2024

In one of the home records reviewed the health inspection was conducted 4/5/24. The previous health inspection was conducted 3/21/23. The documentation shows it to have been conducted 14 days past due.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH749.2905(a)Apr 29, 2024

In one of the home records reviewed the health inspection was conducted 4/5/24. The previous health inspection was conducted 3/21/23. The documentation shows it to have been conducted 14 days past due.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH749.2905(a)Apr 29, 2024

In one of the home records reviewed the health inspection was conducted 4/5/24. The previous health inspection was conducted 3/21/23. The documentation shows it to have been conducted 14 days past due.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Apr 13, 2024

A child in care got into a physical altercation with an adopted adult who resides in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Apr 12, 2024

A child in care got into a physical altercation with an adopted adult who resides in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Apr 12, 2024

A child in care got into a physical altercation with an adopted adult who resides in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Apr 12, 2024

A child in care got into a physical altercation with an adopted adult who resides in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-27

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 7, 2024

During a review conducted on 03/07/2024 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 03/05/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2447(7)(A) It was found that a staff person treated a child in care unfairly by giving unnecessary discipline and/or excessive consequences to this child. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 7, 2024

During a review conducted on 03/07/2024 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 03/05/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2447(7)(A) It was found that a staff person treated a child in care unfairly by giving unnecessary discipline and/or excessive consequences to this child. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 7, 2024

During a review conducted on 03/07/2024 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 03/05/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2447(7)(A) It was found that a staff person treated a child in care unfairly by giving unnecessary discipline and/or excessive consequences to this child. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 7, 2024

During a review conducted on 03/07/2024 it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plan, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 03/05/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2447(7)(A) It was found that a staff person treated a child in care unfairly by giving unnecessary discipline and/or excessive consequences to this child. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 5, 2023

During a review conducted on September 5, 2023, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-06

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 5, 2023

During a review conducted on September 5, 2023, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-06

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 5, 2023

During a review conducted on September 5, 2023, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-06

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 5, 2023

During a review conducted on September 5, 2023, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Jun 15, 2023

In one of the records reviewed there was no documentation for the initial service plan. The plan was due 5/7/23..

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Jun 15, 2023

In one of the records reviewed there was no documentation for the initial service plan. The plan was due 5/7/23..

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Jun 15, 2023

In one of the records reviewed there was no documentation for the initial service plan. The plan was due 5/7/23..

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Jun 15, 2023

In one of the records reviewed there was no documentation for the initial service plan. The plan was due 5/7/23..

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Apr 3, 2023

The initial service plan for the child's record review did not have documentation of the initial service plan being completed within the 45 day time frame.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Apr 3, 2023

The initial service plan for the child's record review did not have documentation of the initial service plan being completed within the 45 day time frame.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Apr 3, 2023

The initial service plan for the child's record review did not have documentation of the initial service plan being completed within the 45 day time frame.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Apr 3, 2023

The initial service plan for the child's record review did not have documentation of the initial service plan being completed within the 45 day time frame.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-13

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Feb 28, 2023

During a review conducted on 2/28/2023, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plans; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plans for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-01

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Feb 28, 2023

During a review conducted on 2/28/2023, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plans; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plans for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-01

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Feb 28, 2023

During a review conducted on 2/28/2023, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plans; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plans for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-01

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Feb 28, 2023

During a review conducted on 2/28/2023, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plans; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plans for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-01

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.509(a)Jan 11, 2023

The foster parents failed to report a communicable disease to licensing within 24 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.509(a)Jan 11, 2023

The foster parents failed to report a communicable disease to licensing within 24 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.509(a)Jan 11, 2023

The foster parents failed to report a communicable disease to licensing within 24 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.509(a)Jan 11, 2023

The foster parents failed to report a communicable disease to licensing within 24 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-27

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Aug 26, 2022

During a review conducted on 8/26/2022 it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plans; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plans for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring;

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-27

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Aug 26, 2022

During a review conducted on 8/26/2022 it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plans; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plans for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring;

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-27

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Aug 26, 2022

During a review conducted on 8/26/2022 it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plans; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plans for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring;

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-27

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Aug 26, 2022

During a review conducted on 8/26/2022 it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plans; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plans for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring;

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Mar 18, 2022

Arrayah's queen size bed did not have a mattress protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2961(a)(1)(A)Mar 18, 2022

Weapons were reportedly in a locked closet, but mom did not have a key. Ammunition was in a large drawer in the hall way - without a lock

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2961(a)(1)(A)Mar 18, 2022

Weapons were reportedly in a locked closet, but mom did not have a key. Ammunition was in a large drawer in the hall way - without a lock

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2961(a)(1)(A)Mar 18, 2022

Weapons were reportedly in a locked closet, but mom did not have a key. Ammunition was in a large drawer in the hall way - without a lock

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Mar 18, 2022

Arrayah's queen size bed did not have a mattress protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Mar 18, 2022

Arrayah's queen size bed did not have a mattress protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2961(a)(1)(A)Mar 18, 2022

Weapons were reportedly in a locked closet, but mom did not have a key. Ammunition was in a large drawer in the hall way - without a lock

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Mar 18, 2022

Arrayah's queen size bed did not have a mattress protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Mar 16, 2022

The caregiver has used corporal punishment on a child in care. The siblings have also been threatened with a belt, but they have not been spanked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Mar 16, 2022

The caregiver has used corporal punishment on a child in care. The siblings have also been threatened with a belt, but they have not been spanked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Mar 16, 2022

The caregiver has used corporal punishment on a child in care. The siblings have also been threatened with a belt, but they have not been spanked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Mar 16, 2022

The caregiver has used corporal punishment on a child in care. The siblings have also been threatened with a belt, but they have not been spanked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 12, 2022

Pictures taken during the inspection part of the investigation, show the home to be dirty and in need of cleaning. Along with the testimonies from the children's CVS worker, the LPS worker and the Casa worker who support this statement.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 11, 2022

Pictures taken during the inspection part of the investigation, show the home to be dirty and in need of cleaning. Along with the testimonies from the children's CVS worker, the LPS worker and the Casa worker who support this statement.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 11, 2022

Pictures taken during the inspection part of the investigation, show the home to be dirty and in need of cleaning. Along with the testimonies from the children's CVS worker, the LPS worker and the Casa worker who support this statement.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 11, 2022

Pictures taken during the inspection part of the investigation, show the home to be dirty and in need of cleaning. Along with the testimonies from the children's CVS worker, the LPS worker and the Casa worker who support this statement.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Mar 1, 2022

Children in care reported that a child in care was spanked by a person that frequently visits the home. The person that frequently visits the home states that she threatens to spank the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALSTAFFING745.641Mar 1, 2022

The foster parent allowed a relative to be present at their home without notifying the CPA.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALSTAFFING745.641Mar 1, 2022

The foster parent allowed a relative to be present at their home without notifying the CPA.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Mar 1, 2022

Children in care reported that a child in care was spanked by a person that frequently visits the home. The person that frequently visits the home states that she threatens to spank the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALSTAFFING745.641Mar 1, 2022

The foster parent allowed a relative to be present at their home without notifying the CPA.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALSTAFFING745.641Mar 1, 2022

The foster parent allowed a relative to be present at their home without notifying the CPA.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Mar 1, 2022

Children in care reported that a child in care was spanked by a person that frequently visits the home. The person that frequently visits the home states that she threatens to spank the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Mar 1, 2022

Children in care reported that a child in care was spanked by a person that frequently visits the home. The person that frequently visits the home states that she threatens to spank the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Nov 15, 2021

One of the boys' twin beds did not have a mattress protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-25

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Nov 15, 2021

One of the boys' twin beds did not have a mattress protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-25

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Nov 15, 2021

One of the boys' twin beds did not have a mattress protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-25

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Nov 15, 2021

One of the boys' twin beds did not have a mattress protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-25

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Oct 20, 2021

The foster care documentation for medication ended on August 9th, 2021. Ms. Russell would like to make her own logs for documentation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-29

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Oct 20, 2021

The foster care documentation for medication ended on August 9th, 2021. Ms. Russell would like to make her own logs for documentation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-29

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Oct 20, 2021

The foster care documentation for medication ended on August 9th, 2021. Ms. Russell would like to make her own logs for documentation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-29

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Oct 20, 2021

The foster care documentation for medication ended on August 9th, 2021. Ms. Russell would like to make her own logs for documentation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-29

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2961(a)(1)(A)Oct 5, 2021

A gun was found in the master closet/bathroom by the biological child. The gun has been secured in a locked box- separate from the ammunition by the time I arrived.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-10

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2961(a)(1)(A)Oct 5, 2021

A gun was found in the master closet/bathroom by the biological child. The gun has been secured in a locked box- separate from the ammunition by the time I arrived.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-10

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2961(a)(1)(A)Oct 5, 2021

A gun was found in the master closet/bathroom by the biological child. The gun has been secured in a locked box- separate from the ammunition by the time I arrived.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-10

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2961(a)(1)(A)Oct 5, 2021

A gun was found in the master closet/bathroom by the biological child. The gun has been secured in a locked box- separate from the ammunition by the time I arrived.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2931(b)Sep 30, 2021

The foster children and a caseworker have `witnessed Ms. Thompson smoking inside the house.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2931(b)Sep 30, 2021

The foster children and a caseworker have `witnessed Ms. Thompson smoking inside the house.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2931(b)Sep 30, 2021

The foster children and a caseworker have `witnessed Ms. Thompson smoking inside the house.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2931(b)Sep 30, 2021

The foster children and a caseworker have `witnessed Ms. Thompson smoking inside the house.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(3)(E)Jul 23, 2021

Children in care were denied the right to call their CPS caseworker.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-23

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(8)Jul 23, 2021

Six out of Six children interviewed reported being yelled at by the caregiver when they get in trouble.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-23

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(8)Jul 23, 2021

Six out of Six children interviewed reported being yelled at by the caregiver when they get in trouble.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-23

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(3)(E)Jul 23, 2021

Children in care were denied the right to call their CPS caseworker.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-23

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(8)Jul 23, 2021

Six out of Six children interviewed reported being yelled at by the caregiver when they get in trouble.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-23

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(3)(E)Jul 23, 2021

Children in care were denied the right to call their CPS caseworker.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-23

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(8)Jul 23, 2021

Six out of Six children interviewed reported being yelled at by the caregiver when they get in trouble.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-23

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(3)(E)Jul 23, 2021

Children in care were denied the right to call their CPS caseworker.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-23

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Jul 16, 2021

There was mold in the shower. The caregiver also failed to clean blood in the vehicle from OV menstrual cycle days after the incident.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-31

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Jul 15, 2021

There was mold in the shower. The caregiver also failed to clean blood in the vehicle from OV menstrual cycle days after the incident.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-31

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Jul 15, 2021

There was mold in the shower. The caregiver also failed to clean blood in the vehicle from OV menstrual cycle days after the incident.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-31

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Jul 15, 2021

There was mold in the shower. The caregiver also failed to clean blood in the vehicle from OV menstrual cycle days after the incident.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-31

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(6)Jul 9, 2021

It was determined a 2y/o child in care was bitten by the caregiver in an effort to teach the child not to bite.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-26

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(6)Jul 9, 2021

It was determined a 2y/o child in care was bitten by the caregiver in an effort to teach the child not to bite.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-26

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(6)Jul 9, 2021

It was determined a 2y/o child in care was bitten by the caregiver in an effort to teach the child not to bite.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-26

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(6)Jul 9, 2021

It was determined a 2y/o child in care was bitten by the caregiver in an effort to teach the child not to bite.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-26

CRITICALSTAFFING749.4155(1)(B)(i)Jul 1, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the foster parent completed 22.5 hours of annual training for 2020.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALSTAFFING749.983Jul 1, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the First Aid/CPR training for one of the foster parents expired 6/1/21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALSTAFFING749.4155(1)(B)(i)Jul 1, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the foster parent completed 22.5 hours of annual training for 2020.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALSTAFFING749.4155(1)(B)(i)Jul 1, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the foster parent completed 22.5 hours of annual training for 2020.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALSTAFFING749.4155(1)(B)(i)Jul 1, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the foster parent completed 22.5 hours of annual training for 2020.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALSTAFFING749.983Jul 1, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the First Aid/CPR training for one of the foster parents expired 6/1/21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALSTAFFING749.983Jul 1, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the First Aid/CPR training for one of the foster parents expired 6/1/21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALSTAFFING749.983Jul 1, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the First Aid/CPR training for one of the foster parents expired 6/1/21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALHEALTH749.2917Jun 29, 2021

A pet vaccination on a foster home expired in April 2020 and still has not been completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

SERIOUSHEALTH749.511(8)Jun 29, 2021

Interventions was not documented on one of the serious incident reports.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.511(6)Jun 29, 2021

The nature of the incident was not listed on one of the serious incident reports.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

SERIOUSHEALTH749.511(8)Jun 29, 2021

Interventions was not documented on one of the serious incident reports.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.511(6)Jun 29, 2021

The nature of the incident was not listed on one of the serious incident reports.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

CRITICALHEALTH749.2917Jun 29, 2021

A pet vaccination on a foster home expired in April 2020 and still has not been completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

CRITICALHEALTH749.2917Jun 29, 2021

A pet vaccination on a foster home expired in April 2020 and still has not been completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.511(6)Jun 29, 2021

The nature of the incident was not listed on one of the serious incident reports.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

CRITICALHEALTH749.2917Jun 29, 2021

A pet vaccination on a foster home expired in April 2020 and still has not been completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

SERIOUSHEALTH749.511(8)Jun 29, 2021

Interventions was not documented on one of the serious incident reports.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

SERIOUSHEALTH749.511(8)Jun 29, 2021

Interventions was not documented on one of the serious incident reports.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.511(6)Jun 29, 2021

The nature of the incident was not listed on one of the serious incident reports.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-06

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(a)May 25, 2021

In one of the records reviewed there was no documentation of notice for the Initial Service Plan being sent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1131May 25, 2021

In the two child's records reviewed the Admission Assessment was completed after placement for non-emergency placements.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)May 25, 2021

The verification for one of the ones reviewed does not match what is listed as a service provided in CLASS.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.4155(1)(B)May 25, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the total Annual Training for 2020 was 23 hours. This is a single foster home and the annual requirement is 30.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1131May 25, 2021

In the two child's records reviewed the Admission Assessment was completed after placement for non-emergency placements.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)May 25, 2021

The verification for one of the ones reviewed does not match what is listed as a service provided in CLASS.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)May 25, 2021

The verification for one of the ones reviewed does not match what is listed as a service provided in CLASS.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(a)May 25, 2021

In one of the records reviewed there was no documentation of notice for the Initial Service Plan being sent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1131May 25, 2021

In the two child's records reviewed the Admission Assessment was completed after placement for non-emergency placements.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.4155(1)(B)May 25, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the total Annual Training for 2020 was 23 hours. This is a single foster home and the annual requirement is 30.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)May 25, 2021

The verification for one of the ones reviewed does not match what is listed as a service provided in CLASS.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(a)May 25, 2021

In one of the records reviewed there was no documentation of notice for the Initial Service Plan being sent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1131May 25, 2021

In the two child's records reviewed the Admission Assessment was completed after placement for non-emergency placements.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.4155(1)(B)May 25, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the total Annual Training for 2020 was 23 hours. This is a single foster home and the annual requirement is 30.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(a)May 25, 2021

In one of the records reviewed there was no documentation of notice for the Initial Service Plan being sent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.4155(1)(B)May 25, 2021

In one of the foster home records reviewed the total Annual Training for 2020 was 23 hours. This is a single foster home and the annual requirement is 30.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-04

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)May 10, 2021

There were multiple instances in which the foster parent used profanity towards the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)May 10, 2021

There were multiple instances in which the foster parent used profanity towards the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)May 10, 2021

There were multiple instances in which the foster parent used profanity towards the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)May 10, 2021

There were multiple instances in which the foster parent used profanity towards the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-28

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.4155(4)(A)Mar 25, 2021

There are no annual training hours found for one of the staff records reviewed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-05

MINORSTAFFING749.555(a)Mar 25, 2021

There is no training record for one of the staff record reviewed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-05

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(9)Mar 19, 2021

Foster parents failed to send medication with child in care to their new placement.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-27

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(9)Mar 19, 2021

Foster parents failed to send medication with child in care to their new placement.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-27

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(9)Mar 19, 2021

Foster parents failed to send medication with child in care to their new placement.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-27

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(9)Mar 19, 2021

Foster parents failed to send medication with child in care to their new placement.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCEHRC42.04412(a)Mar 12, 2021

During the DFPS investigation, the foster parents refused to take a drug test when asked by the DFPS investigator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCEHRC42.04412(a)Mar 12, 2021

During the DFPS investigation, the foster parents refused to take a drug test when asked by the DFPS investigator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCEHRC42.04412(a)Mar 12, 2021

During the DFPS investigation, the foster parents refused to take a drug test when asked by the DFPS investigator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCEHRC42.04412(a)Mar 12, 2021

During the DFPS investigation, the foster parents refused to take a drug test when asked by the DFPS investigator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-13

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Feb 3, 2021

The living room and children bedroom were cluttered with cards, trash, and clothing. Soap scum was located around the children bathtub.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-03-01

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Feb 3, 2021

The living room and children bedroom were cluttered with cards, trash, and clothing. Soap scum was located around the children bathtub.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-03-01

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Feb 3, 2021

The living room and children bedroom were cluttered with cards, trash, and clothing. Soap scum was located around the children bathtub.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-03-01

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Azleway Children's Services Tyler.

Nearby Daycares in Tyler

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Azleway Children's Services Tyler's safety grade?

Azleway Children's Services Tyler has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.

How many violations does Azleway Children's Services Tyler have?

Azleway Children's Services Tyler has 185 total violations on record, including 128 critical, 45 serious, and 12 minor.

When was Azleway Children's Services Tyler last inspected?

Azleway Children's Services Tyler was last inspected on March 30, 2026.

Parent Resources