Tiger Cubs Learning Academy
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
19 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
May 18, 2026
Latest inspection
March 5, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated May 18, 2026
- Provider
- Tiger Cubs Learning Academy
- License number
- 1776236
- Location
- 302 E MCKAY ST, Troup, TX 75789
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- C (Average), score 71.5/100
- Inspection record
- 19 inspections, last inspected March 5, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed May 18, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
18
Total Violations
Mar 5, 2026
Last Inspection
70
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (18)
This standard was reviewed during an investigation and found deficient. The operation did not have an incident report filled out.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-31
This standard was reviewed during an investigation and found deficient. The operation did not have an incident report filled out.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-31
This standard was reviewed during an investigation and found deficient. The operation did not have an incident report filled out.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-31
This standard was reviewed during an investigation and found deficient. The operation did not have an incident report filled out.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. There is sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver put their leg on the child to force a child down on a mat a nap and hold the child down and not let the child up at nap when the child asked to get up. The caregiver is no longer employed at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-31
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Tiger Cubs Learning Academy.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Tiger Cubs Learning Academy's safety grade?
Tiger Cubs Learning Academy has a safety grade of C (Average) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 71.5 out of 100.
How many violations does Tiger Cubs Learning Academy have?
Tiger Cubs Learning Academy has 18 total violations on record, including 0 critical, 18 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Tiger Cubs Learning Academy last inspected?
Tiger Cubs Learning Academy was last inspected on March 5, 2026.