A New Day Foundation

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing a statement signed and dated by the employee documenting that the employee has read a copy of the operational policies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Four records were reviewed and all were missing personal reference checks.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's evacuation diagrams does not have a designated "shelter in place" location.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing the required notarized affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

During the monitoring inspection, four records were reviewed and all four records were missing the pre-employment affidavit for applicants for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The most recent severe weather drill was completed in April 2025 and not within the last 6 months.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

During the monitoring inspection, four records were reviewed and all four records were missing the pre-employment affidavit for applicants for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Four records were reviewed and all were missing personal reference checks.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing the required notarized affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's Serious Incident Report forms did not include the child's age, gender, or date of admission as required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The operation's evacuation diagrams does not have a designated "shelter in place" location.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The most recent severe weather drill was completed in April 2025 and not within the last 6 months.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing a statement signed and dated by the employee documenting that the employee has read a copy of the operational policies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing the required notarized affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Four records were reviewed and all were missing personal reference checks.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's Serious Incident Report forms did not include the child's age, gender, or date of admission as required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

During the monitoring inspection, four records were reviewed and all four records were missing the pre-employment affidavit for applicants for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing a statement signed and dated by the employee documenting that the employee has read a copy of the operational policies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The most recent severe weather drill was completed in April 2025 and not within the last 6 months.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's evacuation diagrams does not have a designated "shelter in place" location.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's evacuation diagrams does not have a designated "shelter in place" location.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing a statement signed and dated by the employee documenting that the employee has read a copy of the operational policies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The most recent severe weather drill was completed in April 2025 and not within the last 6 months.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing the required notarized affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

During the monitoring inspection, four records were reviewed and all four records were missing the pre-employment affidavit for applicants for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's Serious Incident Report forms did not include the child's age, gender, or date of admission as required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Four records were reviewed and all were missing personal reference checks.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's Serious Incident Report forms did not include the child's age, gender, or date of admission as required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The most recent severe weather drill was completed in April 2025 and not within the last 6 months.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing the required notarized affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Four records were reviewed and all were missing personal reference checks.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's evacuation diagrams does not have a designated "shelter in place" location.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing a statement signed and dated by the employee documenting that the employee has read a copy of the operational policies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

During the monitoring inspection, four records were reviewed and all four records were missing the pre-employment affidavit for applicants for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's Serious Incident Report forms did not include the child's age, gender, or date of admission as required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The most recent severe weather drill was completed in April 2025 and not within the last 6 months.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Four records were reviewed and all were missing personal reference checks.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing the required notarized affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

During the monitoring inspection, four records were reviewed and all four records were missing the pre-employment affidavit for applicants for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing a statement signed and dated by the employee documenting that the employee has read a copy of the operational policies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's evacuation diagrams does not have a designated "shelter in place" location.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Four records were reviewed and all were missing personal reference checks.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's Serious Incident Report forms did not include the child's age, gender, or date of admission as required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The operation's evacuation diagrams does not have a designated "shelter in place" location.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing a statement signed and dated by the employee documenting that the employee has read a copy of the operational policies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The most recent severe weather drill was completed in April 2025 and not within the last 6 months.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing the required notarized affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

During the monitoring inspection, four records were reviewed and all four records were missing the pre-employment affidavit for applicants for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

During the monitoring inspection, four records were reviewed and all four records were missing the pre-employment affidavit for applicants for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's evacuation diagrams does not have a designated "shelter in place" location.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing the required notarized affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's Serious Incident Report forms did not include the child's age, gender, or date of admission as required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing a statement signed and dated by the employee documenting that the employee has read a copy of the operational policies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The most recent severe weather drill was completed in April 2025 and not within the last 6 months.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Four records were reviewed and all were missing personal reference checks.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing a statement signed and dated by the employee documenting that the employee has read a copy of the operational policies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's Serious Incident Report forms did not include the child's age, gender, or date of admission as required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Of the four records reviewed, one was missing the required notarized affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

Four records were reviewed and all were missing personal reference checks.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

During the monitoring inspection, four records were reviewed and all four records were missing the pre-employment affidavit for applicants for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's evacuation diagrams does not have a designated "shelter in place" location.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The most recent severe weather drill was completed in April 2025 and not within the last 6 months.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-06

The operation's Serious Incident Report forms did not include the child's age, gender, or date of admission as required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed the thermometer in the refrigerator read 60 degrees and was loose in its housing. The thermometer housing for the freezer contained the gradient grid but not the thermometer itself.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four child medication records reflected an inaccurate count of 17 pills on the med sheet and 16.5 pills in the blister pack.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

During the inspection, I observed one of four children's records reviewed contained a medication log lacking the reason for the prescription.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-04-02

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

A serious incident took place during the time the operation's caregiver was responsible for a total of four children. At least one of the children the caregiver was responsible for; was required 1:1 supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

Two children in care were left unattended for a short period of time. Upon the caregivers return to the presence of the children; they were observed in a compromising position.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

There were several incident reports documenting what caregivers observed upon entering any particular area. Repetitively the same child in care was either making inappropriate comments or interacting inappropriately with peers.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

The operation failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent inappropriate child on child interaction. One of the two children required heighten supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

There were several incident reports documenting what caregivers observed upon entering any particular area. Repetitively the same child in care was either making inappropriate comments or interacting inappropriately with peers.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

A serious incident took place during the time the operation's caregiver was responsible for a total of four children. At least one of the children the caregiver was responsible for; was required 1:1 supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

Two children in care were left unattended for a short period of time. Upon the caregivers return to the presence of the children; they were observed in a compromising position.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

The operation failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent inappropriate child on child interaction. One of the two children required heighten supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

There were several incident reports documenting what caregivers observed upon entering any particular area. Repetitively the same child in care was either making inappropriate comments or interacting inappropriately with peers.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

A serious incident took place during the time the operation's caregiver was responsible for a total of four children. At least one of the children the caregiver was responsible for; was required 1:1 supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

The operation failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent inappropriate child on child interaction. One of the two children required heighten supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

Two children in care were left unattended for a short period of time. Upon the caregivers return to the presence of the children; they were observed in a compromising position.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21