A New Day Foundation

17202 GARDEN CREEK DR, Spring, TX 77379Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

339 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

March 26, 2026

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
A New Day Foundation
License number
892238
Location
17202 GARDEN CREEK DR, Spring, TX 77379
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 0.0/100
Inspection record
339 inspections, last inspected March 26, 2026
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor0.0 / 100
Health0/100
Safety0/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

176

Total Violations

Mar 26, 2026

Last Inspection

13

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (176)

CRITICALSAFETY748.2455(a)(1)Nov 14, 2025

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALHEALTH748.2455(a)(2)Nov 14, 2025

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2551(b)(2)Nov 14, 2025

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2463(3)Nov 14, 2025

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2455(a)(1)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2551(b)(2)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2455(a)(1)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2463(3)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALHEALTH748.2455(a)(2)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2551(b)(2)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALHEALTH748.2455(a)(2)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2463(3)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2455(a)(1)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the case documentation, it was discerned a staff member restrained a child without first exhausting less restrictive behavior interventions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2551(b)(2)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the case documentation, it is evident staff utilized an unapproved restraint procedure in picking a child up by the waist to carry the child to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALSAFETY748.2463(3)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the investigation documentation, it is evident the staff utilized restraint as a method of getting the child to comply with exiting to the van.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALHEALTH748.2455(a)(2)Nov 13, 2025

In reviewing the investigation, it is evident the child?s refusal to exit the building did not constitute an emergent situation requiring restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-16

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(8)Aug 14, 2024

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(8)Aug 14, 2024

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(8)Aug 14, 2024

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(8)Aug 14, 2024

There is sufficient evidence to show that staff have been yelling at the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(11)Apr 6, 2024

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(11)Apr 6, 2024

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(11)Apr 6, 2024

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(11)Apr 6, 2024

During the course of the investigation it was determined that children in care has time out for up to 2 hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(4)Feb 5, 2024

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2553(1)(B)Feb 5, 2024

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2553(1)(B)Feb 5, 2024

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2553(1)(B)Feb 5, 2024

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(4)Feb 5, 2024

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2553(1)(B)Feb 5, 2024

A staff member conducted a personal restraint on a child in care for a minute and a half.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(4)Feb 5, 2024

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(4)Feb 5, 2024

A staff member referenced to a child in care by an unnecessary name when the child was escalated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2551(b)(3)Jan 12, 2024

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2551(c)(2)Jan 12, 2024

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2551(c)(2)Jan 11, 2024

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2551(b)(3)Jan 11, 2024

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2551(c)(2)Jan 11, 2024

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2551(b)(3)Jan 11, 2024

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2551(c)(2)Jan 11, 2024

It was found during the investigation that a child in care received significant bruising to their shoulder after a short personal restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

CRITICALSTAFFING748.2551(b)(3)Jan 11, 2024

It was found during the investigation that a child was restrained near the stairs, which creates an increased risk of harm. Additionally, the child was rubbing their head on the carpet as a means of self-harm, which posed less risk than the actual restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(10)(A)May 22, 2023

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(10)(A)May 22, 2023

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(10)(A)May 22, 2023

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(10)(A)May 22, 2023

The administrator reported becoming aware of the child's absence around 4pm of 05/19/23; the report was made to SWI at 1:24am on 05/20/23.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-29

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Mar 31, 2023

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Mar 31, 2023

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Mar 31, 2023

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Mar 31, 2023

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citation issued on September 22, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation met compliance on October 7, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 748.535(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Sep 30, 2022

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Sep 30, 2022

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Sep 30, 2022

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Sep 30, 2022

During a review conducted on September 30, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific "planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on September 22, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 748.685(a)(5) Caregiver responsibility - being able to intervene when necessary to ensure child's safety. The operation has not met compliance. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-01

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Sep 21, 2022

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Sep 21, 2022

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Sep 21, 2022

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Sep 21, 2022

Several medication records did not align with the medication count.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-28

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(5)Aug 14, 2022

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(5)Aug 14, 2022

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(5)Aug 14, 2022

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(5)Aug 14, 2022

Staff was not able to intervene fast enough due to the fact she was driving when the altercation started and the children in care where able to punch one another in the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1217(a)Jul 11, 2022

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1583(a)Jul 11, 2022

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

SERIOUSHEALTH748.1223(a)Jul 11, 2022

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1583(a)Jul 11, 2022

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

SERIOUSHEALTH748.1223(a)Jul 11, 2022

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1217(a)Jul 11, 2022

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1217(a)Jul 11, 2022

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

SERIOUSHEALTH748.1223(a)Jul 11, 2022

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1583(a)Jul 11, 2022

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1583(a)Jul 11, 2022

Upon viewing child's file, there was no documentation of TB test for child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

SERIOUSHEALTH748.1223(a)Jul 11, 2022

One child file reviewed was found that the medical annual check up was due in May 2022 however it was completed today July 11, 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1217(a)Jul 11, 2022

It was observed in the child's file reviewed, that the admission assessment was completed a day after the child was placed at operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(9)(A)May 8, 2022

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.453(c)May 8, 2022

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.453(c)May 8, 2022

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(9)(A)May 8, 2022

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.453(c)May 8, 2022

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.453(c)May 8, 2022

The operation did not have an annual summary log to review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(9)(A)May 8, 2022

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(9)(A)May 8, 2022

The operation did not report to licensing when a child ran away for three hours.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-13

CRITICALSTAFFING748.4653(a)(2)May 3, 2022

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALSTAFFING748.4653(a)(2)May 3, 2022

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALSTAFFING748.4653(a)(2)May 3, 2022

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALSTAFFING748.4653(a)(2)May 3, 2022

Upon viewing staff file, 4 hours of EBI was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALSAFETY748.3101(2)Apr 27, 2022

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.941(a)(3)Apr 27, 2022

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSSAFETY748.393(b)(4)Apr 27, 2022

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1209(a)Apr 27, 2022

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1205(a)(2)Apr 27, 2022

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.311(2)Apr 27, 2022

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1437(1)Apr 27, 2022

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSSAFETY748.393(b)(4)Apr 27, 2022

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY748.3101(2)Apr 27, 2022

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1437(1)Apr 27, 2022

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1209(a)Apr 27, 2022

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1205(a)(2)Apr 27, 2022

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSSAFETY748.393(b)(4)Apr 27, 2022

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.311(2)Apr 27, 2022

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.941(a)(3)Apr 27, 2022

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

CRITICALSAFETY748.3101(2)Apr 27, 2022

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1209(a)Apr 27, 2022

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSSAFETY748.393(b)(4)Apr 27, 2022

The medication log was observed on a shelf in the common area.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.941(a)(3)Apr 27, 2022

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.311(2)Apr 27, 2022

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1437(1)Apr 27, 2022

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1205(a)(2)Apr 27, 2022

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

CRITICALSAFETY748.3101(2)Apr 27, 2022

The fire inspection has not been completed within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1209(a)Apr 27, 2022

Two of four child files reviewed did not include the required orientation documentation such as policies on mail or gifts.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.941(a)(3)Apr 27, 2022

Three of three staff files reviewed did not contain an evaluation or assessment tool.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.311(2)Apr 27, 2022

Several serious incident reports reviewed in two children's files did not include the date or start time the incidents occurred. The serious incident report documentation doesn't include the operation's contact information. The incident reports do not include surrounding circumstances of the incident that occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1437(1)Apr 27, 2022

Two of two discharged children's file reviewed does not contain the required discharge documentation such as the discussion with the child about being discharged or the medication the child was prescribed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1205(a)(2)Apr 27, 2022

Two of four child files reviewed does not contain the managing conservator's contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-11

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.507(1)Mar 25, 2022

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.507(1)Mar 25, 2022

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.507(1)Mar 25, 2022

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.507(1)Mar 25, 2022

A caregiver at the operation has engaged in inappropriate behavior by pinching, punching, and pushing children in care. The same caregiver has intervened in behavioral intervention when it was not necessary as the situation was already being handled by another caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-24

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.2855(a)Dec 10, 2021

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.2855(a)Dec 9, 2021

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.2855(a)Dec 9, 2021

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.2855(a)Dec 9, 2021

It's confirmed that a physical restraint took place; the operation was unable to produce the necessary documentation following the intervention.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-04

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Nov 12, 2021

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.151(3)Nov 12, 2021

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1103(b)(1)Nov 12, 2021

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1103(b)(1)Nov 12, 2021

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.151(3)Nov 12, 2021

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Nov 12, 2021

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1103(b)(1)Nov 12, 2021

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.151(3)Nov 12, 2021

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Nov 12, 2021

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Nov 12, 2021

Three of thirteen children medication inventory proved to be inaccurate. The pill count did not match the documented pills remaining.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.1103(b)(1)Nov 12, 2021

One of four child files did not contain a child rights document.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.151(3)Nov 12, 2021

One child medication log recorded the incorrect dosage compared to the actual prescription. The employee list has the incorrect name of an employee compared to the background check system and employee file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-19

MINORCOMPLIANCE748.1339(b)Nov 1, 2021

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

MINORCOMPLIANCE748.1339(b)Nov 1, 2021

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

MINORCOMPLIANCE748.1339(b)Nov 1, 2021

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

MINORCOMPLIANCE748.1339(b)Nov 1, 2021

The child's Intial Service Plan did not have all signatures required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-08

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.505(b)(3)Oct 6, 2021

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.505(b)(3)Oct 6, 2021

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.505(b)(3)Oct 6, 2021

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.505(b)(3)Oct 6, 2021

An employee of the operation has demonstrated an unstable mental capacity by making concerning comments to others.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03

CRITICALSTAFFING748.1003(a)Jul 16, 2021

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING748.1003(a)Jul 16, 2021

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING748.1003(a)Jul 16, 2021

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING748.1003(a)Jul 16, 2021

Operation was out of ratio at art time transitioning into lunch. it was one staff with 6 children. The operation devided the children to meet ratio requirements.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.125(b)Jun 30, 2021

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.125(b)Jun 30, 2021

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.125(b)Jun 30, 2021

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

SERIOUSSTAFFING748.125(b)Jun 30, 2021

I reviewed one staff file and the job discription was not signed and dated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(a)Jun 17, 2021

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(a)Jun 17, 2021

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(a)Jun 17, 2021

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(a)Jun 17, 2021

The medication in a child's medication log was not properly documented. Ms. Fields corrected the med log during the inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Jun 7, 2021

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

MINORCOMPLIANCE748.1339(b)Jun 7, 2021

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

CRITICALSTAFFING748.1003(a)Jun 7, 2021

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

MINORCOMPLIANCE748.1339(b)Jun 7, 2021

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

MINORCOMPLIANCE748.1339(b)Jun 7, 2021

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

CRITICALSTAFFING748.1003(a)Jun 7, 2021

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

MINORCOMPLIANCE748.1339(b)Jun 7, 2021

One child's file reviewed only had one licensed professional signature.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-14

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Jun 7, 2021

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

CRITICALSTAFFING748.1003(a)Jun 7, 2021

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Jun 7, 2021

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

CRITICALSTAFFING748.1003(a)Jun 7, 2021

It was observed that one caregiver was supervising 8 children for at least 10 minutes. Staff returned to their assigned area, operation was back in ratio.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Jun 7, 2021

One medication log was found to be signed and dated for the following day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-09

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(1)(B)Oct 14, 2020

The operation failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent inappropriate child on child interaction. One of the two children required heighten supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)(A)Oct 14, 2020

A serious incident took place during the time the operation's caregiver was responsible for a total of four children. At least one of the children the caregiver was responsible for; was required 1:1 supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(3)(A)Oct 14, 2020

Two children in care were left unattended for a short period of time. Upon the caregivers return to the presence of the children; they were observed in a compromising position.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Oct 14, 2020

There were several incident reports documenting what caregivers observed upon entering any particular area. Repetitively the same child in care was either making inappropriate comments or interacting inappropriately with peers.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(3)(A)Oct 14, 2020

Two children in care were left unattended for a short period of time. Upon the caregivers return to the presence of the children; they were observed in a compromising position.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(1)(B)Oct 14, 2020

The operation failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent inappropriate child on child interaction. One of the two children required heighten supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)(A)Oct 14, 2020

A serious incident took place during the time the operation's caregiver was responsible for a total of four children. At least one of the children the caregiver was responsible for; was required 1:1 supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Oct 14, 2020

There were several incident reports documenting what caregivers observed upon entering any particular area. Repetitively the same child in care was either making inappropriate comments or interacting inappropriately with peers.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Oct 14, 2020

There were several incident reports documenting what caregivers observed upon entering any particular area. Repetitively the same child in care was either making inappropriate comments or interacting inappropriately with peers.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)(A)Oct 14, 2020

A serious incident took place during the time the operation's caregiver was responsible for a total of four children. At least one of the children the caregiver was responsible for; was required 1:1 supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(1)(B)Oct 14, 2020

The operation failed to provide the necessary supervision to prevent inappropriate child on child interaction. One of the two children required heighten supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(3)(A)Oct 14, 2020

Two children in care were left unattended for a short period of time. Upon the caregivers return to the presence of the children; they were observed in a compromising position.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-21

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for A New Day Foundation.

Nearby Daycares in Spring

Frequently Asked Questions

What is A New Day Foundation's safety grade?

A New Day Foundation has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.

How many violations does A New Day Foundation have?

A New Day Foundation has 176 total violations on record, including 104 critical, 64 serious, and 8 minor.

When was A New Day Foundation last inspected?

A New Day Foundation was last inspected on March 26, 2026.

Parent Resources