Special Parent Advocacy Group A NJ Nonprofit Corporation
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
112 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
March 26, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Special Parent Advocacy Group A NJ Nonprofit Corporation
- License number
- 1769797
- Location
- 13469 CHISUM RD, Sanger, TX 76266
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 112 inspections, last inspected March 26, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
129
Total Violations
Mar 26, 2026
Last Inspection
13
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (129)
The grass in the backyard needed to be mowed and there was a tree in the middle of the property that had fallen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-05-03
A child in care was not notified about their discharge. The discharge summary also did not indicate that the child's service plan's for the last 12 months were provided to the person who the child was discharged too.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-06
There were two bedrooms that are designated for male children that is not near a restroom. The children have to walk through the case manager's office, living room, two hallways and the master bedroom to reach the restroom that is designated for them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-05-03
The grass in the backyard needed to be mowed and there was a tree in the middle of the property that had fallen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-05-03
The grass in the backyard needed to be mowed and there was a tree in the middle of the property that had fallen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-05-03
A child in care medication log was not signed by staff. The medication log was seen in the child's binder.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-06
A child in care medication log was not signed by staff. The medication log was seen in the child's binder.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-06
A child in care was not notified about their discharge. The discharge summary also did not indicate that the child's service plan's for the last 12 months were provided to the person who the child was discharged too.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-06
There were two bedrooms that are designated for male children that is not near a restroom. The children have to walk through the case manager's office, living room, two hallways and the master bedroom to reach the restroom that is designated for them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-05-03
A child in care medication log was not signed by staff. The medication log was seen in the child's binder.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-06
A child in care was not notified about their discharge. The discharge summary also did not indicate that the child's service plan's for the last 12 months were provided to the person who the child was discharged too.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-06
There were two bedrooms that are designated for male children that is not near a restroom. The children have to walk through the case manager's office, living room, two hallways and the master bedroom to reach the restroom that is designated for them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-05-03
Condition 1: Met Condition 2: No met. A training for a staff member expired in December and there was no documentation showing the staff was notified of her expired training or when they were due. Condition 3: Met Condition 4: Not due yet. Condition 5: Not met. There were two noted concerns by a youth with no plan to follow up on the concerns.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The written incident report still does not include the phone number for the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
Condition 1: Met Condition 2: No met. A training for a staff member expired in December and there was no documentation showing the staff was notified of her expired training or when they were due. Condition 3: Met Condition 4: Not due yet. Condition 5: Not met. There were two noted concerns by a youth with no plan to follow up on the concerns.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The written incident report still does not include the phone number for the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
Condition 1: Met Condition 2: No met. A training for a staff member expired in December and there was no documentation showing the staff was notified of her expired training or when they were due. Condition 3: Met Condition 4: Not due yet. Condition 5: Not met. There were two noted concerns by a youth with no plan to follow up on the concerns.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The written incident report still does not include the phone number for the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
A child that was required 1:1 supervision was left unsupervised with another child resulting in inappropriate contact between the children. The children were also allowed to be on the couch together under blankets.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-04
A child that was required 1:1 supervision was left unsupervised with another child resulting in inappropriate contact between the children. The children were also allowed to be on the couch together under blankets.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-04
A child that was required 1:1 supervision was left unsupervised with another child resulting in inappropriate contact between the children. The children were also allowed to be on the couch together under blankets.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-04
A child that was required 1:1 supervision was left unsupervised with another child resulting in inappropriate contact between the children. The children were also allowed to be on the couch together under blankets.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-04
One report reviewed indicated two restraints were used on a child and both restraints did not have a time documented for how long the restraints lasted.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
EBI Quarterly reports were not submitted for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarters.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
EBI Quarterly reports were not submitted for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarters.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
EBI Quarterly reports were not submitted for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarters.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
One report reviewed indicated two restraints were used on a child and both restraints did not have a time documented for how long the restraints lasted.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
EBI Quarterly reports were not submitted for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd quarters.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
One report reviewed indicated two restraints were used on a child and both restraints did not have a time documented for how long the restraints lasted.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
One report reviewed indicated two restraints were used on a child and both restraints did not have a time documented for how long the restraints lasted.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
The incident report reviewed had incorrect documentation on whether the child loss consciousness or not. Also, the EBI reports did not document the restraints as separate documents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-23
The incident report reviewed had incorrect documentation on whether the child loss consciousness or not. Also, the EBI reports did not document the restraints as separate documents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-23
The incident report reviewed had incorrect documentation on whether the child loss consciousness or not. Also, the EBI reports did not document the restraints as separate documents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-23
Condition 1- Compliant Condition 2- The operation's timeframe to implement this condition has not expired. Pending Review. Condition 3- Compliant Condition 4-The operation's timeframe to implement this condition has not expired. Pending Review. Condition 5- Deficient-. The observation forms did not include the signature of the Governing Body within 48 hours of the observation. The observation log did ensure that all observations were conducted by the Administrator, Designee on record, or Designated person in Management (not to include Direct Staff or Direct Care Supervisors). The observation did not evaluate the interactions of the Direct Care Supervisors, Caregivers, and Children in Care
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
Condition 1- Compliant Condition 2- The operation's timeframe to implement this condition has not expired. Pending Review. Condition 3- Compliant Condition 4-The operation's timeframe to implement this condition has not expired. Pending Review. Condition 5- Deficient-. The observation forms did not include the signature of the Governing Body within 48 hours of the observation. The observation log did ensure that all observations were conducted by the Administrator, Designee on record, or Designated person in Management (not to include Direct Staff or Direct Care Supervisors). The observation did not evaluate the interactions of the Direct Care Supervisors, Caregivers, and Children in Care
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
Condition 1- Compliant Condition 2- The operation's timeframe to implement this condition has not expired. Pending Review. Condition 3- Compliant Condition 4-The operation's timeframe to implement this condition has not expired. Pending Review. Condition 5- Deficient-. The observation forms did not include the signature of the Governing Body within 48 hours of the observation. The observation log did ensure that all observations were conducted by the Administrator, Designee on record, or Designated person in Management (not to include Direct Staff or Direct Care Supervisors). The observation did not evaluate the interactions of the Direct Care Supervisors, Caregivers, and Children in Care
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
Condition 1- Compliant Condition 2- The operation's timeframe to implement this condition has not expired. Pending Review. Condition 3- Compliant Condition 4-The operation's timeframe to implement this condition has not expired. Pending Review. Condition 5- Deficient-. The observation forms did not include the signature of the Governing Body within 48 hours of the observation. The observation log did ensure that all observations were conducted by the Administrator, Designee on record, or Designated person in Management (not to include Direct Staff or Direct Care Supervisors). The observation did not evaluate the interactions of the Direct Care Supervisors, Caregivers, and Children in Care
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
A caregiver restrained a child by placing both arms behind the back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-06
The entry/exit doors to a room have child locking devices on the doorknobs. This room was used to isolate a child while escalated. The child was left alone in the room without a method to supervise. The operation is not permitted to provide seclusion services as a behavior intervention.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-06
The entry/exit doors to a room have child locking devices on the doorknobs. This room was used to isolate a child while escalated. The child was left alone in the room without a method to supervise. The operation is not permitted to provide seclusion services as a behavior intervention.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-06
The entry/exit doors to a room have child locking devices on the doorknobs. This room was used to isolate a child while escalated. The child was left alone in the room without a method to supervise. The operation is not permitted to provide seclusion services as a behavior intervention.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-06
A caregiver restrained a child by placing both arms behind the back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-06
The entry/exit doors to a room have child locking devices on the doorknobs. This room was used to isolate a child while escalated. The child was left alone in the room without a method to supervise. The operation is not permitted to provide seclusion services as a behavior intervention.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-06
A caregiver restrained a child by placing both arms behind the back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-06
A caregiver restrained a child by placing both arms behind the back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-06
A child in care was not given his prescription eye drops as instructed by the doctor.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-21
The medication log did not have a specific time as to when the medication was given.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-21
The medication log did not have a specific time as to when the medication was given.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-21
The medication log did not have a specific time as to when the medication was given.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-21
A child in care was not given his prescription eye drops as instructed by the doctor.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-21
A child in care was not given his prescription eye drops as instructed by the doctor.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-21
A child in care was not given his prescription eye drops as instructed by the doctor.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-21
The medication log did not have a specific time as to when the medication was given.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-21
A staff member did not complete annual trainings in a timely manner nor by the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-02
A staff member did not complete annual trainings in a timely manner nor by the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-02
A staff member did not complete annual trainings in a timely manner nor by the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-02
A staff member did not complete annual trainings in a timely manner nor by the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-02
The child in care did not receive his insulin according to the management plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
Multiple medication logs reviewed did not have the reason medication was prescribed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
A child did not receive their medication for 03/13/25 and there was not a documentation addressing the error completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
Multiple medication logs reviewed did not have the reason medication was prescribed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
A child did not receive their medication for 03/13/25 and there was not a documentation addressing the error completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
A child did not receive their medication for 03/13/25 and there was not a documentation addressing the error completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
The child in care did not receive his insulin according to the management plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
Multiple medication logs reviewed did not have the reason medication was prescribed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
The child in care did not receive his insulin according to the management plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
Multiple medication logs reviewed did not have the reason medication was prescribed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
A child did not receive their medication for 03/13/25 and there was not a documentation addressing the error completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
The child in care did not receive his insulin according to the management plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-18
A child in care requires 1:1 supervision. The child is being provided line of sight supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-19
A staff member provided medications to a child in care without being trained.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-24
A child in care requires 1:1 supervision. The child is being provided line of sight supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-19
A staff member provided medications to a child in care without being trained.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-24
A child in care requires 1:1 supervision. The child is being provided line of sight supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-19
A child in care requires 1:1 supervision. The child is being provided line of sight supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-19
A staff member provided medications to a child in care without being trained.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-24
A staff member provided medications to a child in care without being trained.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-24
The Treatment Director's case file does not support a hire date. The case file also is missing numbers 3, 4, 6-9, and 11-14 of this rule.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Personnel file support that trainings were completed online through DFPS. The instructor lead portion is not being completed by a medical professional.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two children files did not have TB Test results
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
1 out 3 staffs files didnt have thier First Aid completed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
On January 12, 2024 medical documentation indicates that a child should take Ondansetron and fluocinolone to manage their medical condition. These prescriptions were not filled by the operation.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The three children files reviewed did not have vision or hearing exams.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The three children files reviewed did not have vision or hearing exams.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
On January 12, 2024 medical documentation indicates that a child should take Ondansetron and fluocinolone to manage their medical condition. These prescriptions were not filled by the operation.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Personnel file support that trainings were completed online through DFPS. The instructor lead portion is not being completed by a medical professional.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
1 out 3 staffs files didnt have thier First Aid completed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The Treatment Director's case file does not support a hire date. The case file also is missing numbers 3, 4, 6-9, and 11-14 of this rule.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The three children files reviewed did not have vision or hearing exams.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
1 out 3 staffs files didnt have thier First Aid completed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two children files did not have TB Test results
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
On January 12, 2024 medical documentation indicates that a child should take Ondansetron and fluocinolone to manage their medical condition. These prescriptions were not filled by the operation.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Personnel file support that trainings were completed online through DFPS. The instructor lead portion is not being completed by a medical professional.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The Treatment Director's case file does not support a hire date. The case file also is missing numbers 3, 4, 6-9, and 11-14 of this rule.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The three children files reviewed did not have vision or hearing exams.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
1 out 3 staffs files didnt have thier First Aid completed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two children files did not have TB Test results
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
On January 12, 2024 medical documentation indicates that a child should take Ondansetron and fluocinolone to manage their medical condition. These prescriptions were not filled by the operation.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Personnel file support that trainings were completed online through DFPS. The instructor lead portion is not being completed by a medical professional.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two children files did not have TB Test results
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The Treatment Director's case file does not support a hire date. The case file also is missing numbers 3, 4, 6-9, and 11-14 of this rule.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Child in care was hit by a staff member.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-19
Child in care was hit by a staff member.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-19
Child in care was hit by a staff member.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-19
Child in care was hit by a staff member.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-19
Prescription medication for two siblings was administered incorrectly which resulted in one sibling being given the other siblings medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-29
The caregiver did not use prudent judgement when distributing medication to two non-verbal children in care, resulting in the children receiving the wrong medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-29
Prescription medication for two siblings was administered incorrectly which resulted in one sibling being given the other siblings medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-29
The caregiver did not use prudent judgement when distributing medication to two non-verbal children in care, resulting in the children receiving the wrong medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-29
Prescription medication for two siblings was administered incorrectly which resulted in one sibling being given the other siblings medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-29
The caregiver did not use prudent judgement when distributing medication to two non-verbal children in care, resulting in the children receiving the wrong medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-29
The caregiver did not use prudent judgement when distributing medication to two non-verbal children in care, resulting in the children receiving the wrong medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-29
Prescription medication for two siblings was administered incorrectly which resulted in one sibling being given the other siblings medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-29
A staff member with a provisional status is not following all the conditions of the restrictions by administering medication to children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A staff member with a provisional status is not following all the conditions of the restrictions by administering medication to children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A staff member with a provisional status is not following all the conditions of the restrictions by administering medication to children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A staff member with a provisional status is not following all the conditions of the restrictions by administering medication to children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A staff member who was using EBI on a child in care was assisted by a staff member who was not trained in EBI.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-09
Two staff members were not properly supervising a child who was attempting to cause harm to own wrist and was able to gain access to an item and place around the neck.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-09
Two staff members were not properly supervising a child who was attempting to cause harm to own wrist and was able to gain access to an item and place around the neck.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-09
Two staff members were not properly supervising a child who was attempting to cause harm to own wrist and was able to gain access to an item and place around the neck.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-09
A staff member who was using EBI on a child in care was assisted by a staff member who was not trained in EBI.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-09
Two staff members were not properly supervising a child who was attempting to cause harm to own wrist and was able to gain access to an item and place around the neck.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-09
A staff member who was using EBI on a child in care was assisted by a staff member who was not trained in EBI.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-09
A staff member who was using EBI on a child in care was assisted by a staff member who was not trained in EBI.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-09
Employee records missing ceritifcations or memorandum of training completed per minimum standard requirement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-07-21
Employee records missing ceritifcations or memorandum of training completed per minimum standard requirement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-07-21
Employee records missing ceritifcations or memorandum of training completed per minimum standard requirement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-07-21
Employee records missing ceritifcations or memorandum of training completed per minimum standard requirement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-07-21
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Special Parent Advocacy Group A NJ Nonprofit Corporation.
Nearby Daycares in Sanger
AlphaBEST @ Chisholm-Sanger
812 KEATON RD N
The Bridge Enrichment and Learning Center at Sanger
808 KEATON RD N
Tammy Welborn
44 N HIGHLAND DR
AlphaBEST @ Butterfield-Sanger
291 INDIAN LN
Alphabest @ Clear Creek-Sanger
1901 S I-35 FRONTAGE RD
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Special Parent Advocacy Group A NJ Nonprofit Corporation's safety grade?
Special Parent Advocacy Group A NJ Nonprofit Corporation has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Special Parent Advocacy Group A NJ Nonprofit Corporation have?
Special Parent Advocacy Group A NJ Nonprofit Corporation has 129 total violations on record, including 78 critical, 45 serious, and 6 minor.
When was Special Parent Advocacy Group A NJ Nonprofit Corporation last inspected?
Special Parent Advocacy Group A NJ Nonprofit Corporation was last inspected on March 26, 2026.