Lemus Learning Academy

412 W BUS-83, San Juan, TX 78589Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

22 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

December 30, 2025

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
Lemus Learning Academy
License number
1702914
Location
412 W BUS-83, San Juan, TX 78589
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 31.1/100
Inspection record
22 inspections, last inspected December 30, 2025
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor31.1 / 100
Health78/100
Safety10/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance33/100

27

Total Violations

Dec 30, 2025

Last Inspection

68

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (27)

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(5)Oct 23, 2025

Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, a caregiver did not take into consideration the circumstances and the surroundings when putting a group of children in line for an amount of time that allowed children to start pushing each other resulting in a child hitting their eyebrow and needing medical treatment. Caregiver did not intervene on time.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-18

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(5)Oct 23, 2025

Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, a caregiver did not take into consideration the circumstances and the surroundings when putting a group of children in line for an amount of time that allowed children to start pushing each other resulting in a child hitting their eyebrow and needing medical treatment. Caregiver did not intervene on time.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-18

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(5)Oct 23, 2025

Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, a caregiver did not take into consideration the circumstances and the surroundings when putting a group of children in line for an amount of time that allowed children to start pushing each other resulting in a child hitting their eyebrow and needing medical treatment. Caregiver did not intervene on time.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-18

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Jul 30, 2025

In the infant room, a single caregiver was responsible for 5 infants aged between 0 and 11 months, which surpasses the permitted limit of 4 infants per caregiver for that age group. Note: This was corrected by moving the 18 month old to another room.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-07

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Jul 30, 2025

In the infant room, a single caregiver was responsible for 5 infants aged between 0 and 11 months, which surpasses the permitted limit of 4 infants per caregiver for that age group. Note: This was corrected by moving the 18 month old to another room.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-07

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Jul 30, 2025

In the infant room, a single caregiver was responsible for 5 infants aged between 0 and 11 months, which surpasses the permitted limit of 4 infants per caregiver for that age group. Note: This was corrected by moving the 18 month old to another room.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-07

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Jun 10, 2024

There were 7 infants in the classroom with one caregiver. The 2nd caregiver had stepped out to close the door to the kitchen before returning to the classroom. (NOTE: Corrected during inspection as the 2nd ccaregiver stepped back into the room while inspector was present.)

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Jun 10, 2024

There were 7 infants in the classroom with one caregiver. The 2nd caregiver had stepped out to close the door to the kitchen before returning to the classroom. (NOTE: Corrected during inspection as the 2nd ccaregiver stepped back into the room while inspector was present.)

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Jun 10, 2024

There were 7 infants in the classroom with one caregiver. The 2nd caregiver had stepped out to close the door to the kitchen before returning to the classroom. (NOTE: Corrected during inspection as the 2nd ccaregiver stepped back into the room while inspector was present.)

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1605(1)May 9, 2024

There was a difference of 18 months as there was an 6 week old infant and a child who was 20 months old. (NOTE: Infant was picked up and taken home.) (Corrected during inspection)

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1605(1)May 9, 2024

There was a difference of 18 months as there was an 6 week old infant and a child who was 20 months old. (NOTE: Infant was picked up and taken home.) (Corrected during inspection)

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1605(1)May 9, 2024

There was a difference of 18 months as there was an 6 week old infant and a child who was 20 months old. (NOTE: Infant was picked up and taken home.) (Corrected during inspection)

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09

CRITICALHEALTH746.3805(c)(4)Jun 28, 2022

Employee administering medication did not have the employees full name written. NOTE: Corrected at the time of inspection as employee's full name was updated at the time of inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.5202(1)Jun 28, 2022

Emergency preparedness evacuation plan is incomplete as it is missing how staff will continue to care for the children until each child has been released and how they will reunify the children with their parents as the evacuation, relocation, or sheltering/lock-down is lifted.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-04

CRITICALHEALTH746.3805(c)(4)Jun 28, 2022

Employee administering medication did not have the employees full name written. NOTE: Corrected at the time of inspection as employee's full name was updated at the time of inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.631(a)Jun 28, 2022

The sign in/out logs do not match the number of children present in the building. There are only 2 children signed in and there are 25 children present in the building. NOTE: This was corrected at inspection. The sign in and out log was updated.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.5202(1)Jun 28, 2022

Emergency preparedness evacuation plan is incomplete as it is missing how staff will continue to care for the children until each child has been released and how they will reunify the children with their parents as the evacuation, relocation, or sheltering/lock-down is lifted.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-04

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.631(a)Jun 28, 2022

The sign in/out logs do not match the number of children present in the building. There are only 2 children signed in and there are 25 children present in the building. NOTE: This was corrected at inspection. The sign in and out log was updated.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.631(a)Jun 28, 2022

The sign in/out logs do not match the number of children present in the building. There are only 2 children signed in and there are 25 children present in the building. NOTE: This was corrected at inspection. The sign in and out log was updated.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH746.3805(c)(4)Jun 28, 2022

Employee administering medication did not have the employees full name written. NOTE: Corrected at the time of inspection as employee's full name was updated at the time of inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.5202(1)Jun 28, 2022

Emergency preparedness evacuation plan is incomplete as it is missing how staff will continue to care for the children until each child has been released and how they will reunify the children with their parents as the evacuation, relocation, or sheltering/lock-down is lifted.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-04

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2909(3)Aug 31, 2021

Nap mats were observed to close to each other not allowing sufficient space for caregivers to walk or work in between.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2909(3)Aug 31, 2021

Nap mats were observed to close to each other not allowing sufficient space for caregivers to walk or work in between.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2909(3)Aug 31, 2021

Nap mats were observed to close to each other not allowing sufficient space for caregivers to walk or work in between.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426Aug 10, 2021

7 month old infant was observed sleeping in a restrictive device. Note: This was corrected during inspection as infant was removed from restrictive device.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426Aug 10, 2021

7 month old infant was observed sleeping in a restrictive device. Note: This was corrected during inspection as infant was removed from restrictive device.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426Aug 10, 2021

7 month old infant was observed sleeping in a restrictive device. Note: This was corrected during inspection as infant was removed from restrictive device.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Lemus Learning Academy.

Nearby Daycares in San Juan

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Lemus Learning Academy's safety grade?

Lemus Learning Academy has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 31.1 out of 100.

How many violations does Lemus Learning Academy have?

Lemus Learning Academy has 27 total violations on record, including 27 critical, 0 serious, and 0 minor.

When was Lemus Learning Academy last inspected?

Lemus Learning Academy was last inspected on December 30, 2025.

Parent Resources