Miller Child Development Center
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
33 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 1, 2026
Latest inspection
March 23, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 1, 2026
- Provider
- Miller Child Development Center
- License number
- 1377546
- Location
- 102 S MEL WAITERS WAY, San Antonio, TX 78203
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 12.0/100
- Inspection record
- 33 inspections, last inspected March 23, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 1, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
46
Total Violations
Mar 23, 2026
Last Inspection
140
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (46)
An infant was moved directly to the group feeding table after having their diaper changed without having their hands washed. This was corrected at inspection when the caregiver was advised to remove the child and wash their hands.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
An infant was moved directly to the group feeding table after having their diaper changed without having their hands washed. This was corrected at inspection when the caregiver was advised to remove the child and wash their hands.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The infant room had six children, five of which were 11 months or under, with one caregiver. This was corrected at inspection when a second caregiver was brought into the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-22
The infant room had six children, five of which were 11 months or under, with one caregiver. This was corrected at inspection when a second caregiver was brought into the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-22
Seven children whose ages ranged from 18 to 23 months were observed having screen time. This was corrected at inspection when the caregiver opened up the centers in the room.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Seven children whose ages ranged from 18 to 23 months were observed having screen time. This was corrected at inspection when the caregiver opened up the centers in the room.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
An infant was observed sleeping in a bouncer and another was observed sleeping in a swing. This was corrected at inspection when the children were moved to their cribs.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-05
A provisional employee was observed in charge of a group of children by herself.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There were two rooms running with nap time ratios and one caregiver in the infant room with no one else was in the building. This was corrected at inspection when a controlling person was called in.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
A provisional employee was observed in charge of a group of children by herself.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
An infant was observed sleeping in a bouncer and another was observed sleeping in a swing. This was corrected at inspection when the children were moved to their cribs.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-05
There were two rooms running with nap time ratios and one caregiver in the infant room with no one else was in the building. This was corrected at inspection when a controlling person was called in.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Based on the information gathered during the course of the investigation it was determined that minimum standards regarding ratios and supervision were regularly disregarded due to staffing issues. No effort was made to adjust the student population in order to meet minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-14
Based on the information gathered during the course of the investigation it was determined that minimum standards regarding ratios and supervision were regularly disregarded due to staffing issues. No effort was made to adjust the student population in order to meet minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-14
During the inspection two classrooms that were combined for nap were observed in their room without a caregiver present. Another class was left unattended when the caregiver left it to open the front door. This was corrected at inspection when the cook moved to the room and the other teacher returned to the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-05
During the inspection eight children, whose ages ranged from 3 to 17 months, were observed with one caregiver. The specified age group was 0 to 11 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-05
Based on the information gathered during the course of the investigation it was determined that disciplinary techniques used with children have not been positive.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-14
Based on the information gathered during the course of the investigation it was determined that disciplinary techniques used with children have not been positive.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-14
During the inspection eight children, whose ages ranged from 3 to 17 months, were observed with one caregiver. The specified age group was 0 to 11 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-05
During the inspection two classrooms that were combined for nap were observed in their room without a caregiver present. Another class was left unattended when the caregiver left it to open the front door. This was corrected at inspection when the cook moved to the room and the other teacher returned to the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-05
The PreK teacher in classroom 129 stated there were 10 children in care when we verified there were only eight children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-02
The PreK teacher in classroom 129 stated there were 10 children in care when we verified there were only eight children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-02
Based on information gathered, ratios have not been met with the mixed age group.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-26
Based on information gathered, ratios have not been met with the mixed age group.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-26
The infant's feeding instructions were not followed on 7/12/2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-11
Evidence gathered for this investigation determined the daily report for an infant had incorrect information on the third feeding on time and ounces served to the infant.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-11
The infant's feeding instructions were not followed on 7/12/2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-11
Evidence gathered for this investigation determined the daily report for an infant had incorrect information on the third feeding on time and ounces served to the infant.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-11
The exit gate on the Pre-K playground was open and unsecured.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-15
The exit gate on the Pre-K playground was open and unsecured.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-15
It is found parents are not being given completed infant daily reports daily.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
It is found parents are not being given completed infant daily reports daily.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
During an investigation, it was found that a caregiver did not have an eligible background check on file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-02
During an investigation, it was found that a caregiver did not have an eligible background check on file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-02
A young infant's hands were not wiped with a wash cloth after a diaper change.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-25
There were training cups in the refrigerator containing milk with labels that were illegible..
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-25
One of five employee's files did not contain evidence of a high school diploma or GED.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-01
A young infant's hands were not wiped with a wash cloth after a diaper change.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-25
There were training cups in the refrigerator containing milk with labels that were illegible..
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-25
The infant caregiver did not wash her hands after changing a diaper. She was observed using hand sanitizer when a sink was available.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-25
One of five employee's files did not contain evidence of a high school diploma or GED.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-01
The infant caregiver did not wash her hands after changing a diaper. She was observed using hand sanitizer when a sink was available.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-25
Gaps in the shock absorbing tiles in the two-year-old playground have separated creating gaps large enough to create a trip and fall hazard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-01
The operation does not have a current Fire Inspection. The last inspection date is 9.20.2020.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-01
Gaps in the shock absorbing tiles in the two-year-old playground have separated creating gaps large enough to create a trip and fall hazard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-01
The operation does not have a current Fire Inspection. The last inspection date is 9.20.2020.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-01
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Miller Child Development Center.
Nearby Daycares in San Antonio
Jessenia Montanez
6234 DIEGO LN
Brionna Sandoval
12214 MEDINA ML
Nature and STEM Kids College LLC
12502 LA MANANA ST
Liberated Montessori at San Antonio
3427 NORTHEAST PKWY
Adoption Angels Inc
1511 FREDERICKSBURG RD
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Miller Child Development Center's safety grade?
Miller Child Development Center has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 12.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Miller Child Development Center have?
Miller Child Development Center has 46 total violations on record, including 42 critical, 4 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Miller Child Development Center last inspected?
Miller Child Development Center was last inspected on March 23, 2026.