La Mision Child Care and Kid Kamp

2211 S HACKBERRY, San Antonio, TX 78210Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

42 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 1, 2026

Latest inspection

September 29, 2025

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 1, 2026

Provider
La Mision Child Care and Kid Kamp
License number
1524251
Location
2211 S HACKBERRY, San Antonio, TX 78210
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 33.0/100
Inspection record
42 inspections, last inspected September 29, 2025
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 1, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor33.0 / 100
Health85/100
Safety0/100
Staffing30/100
Compliance0/100

44

Total Violations

Sep 29, 2025

Last Inspection

90

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (44)

CRITICALSAFETY746.5625(b)Sep 8, 2025

The electronic child safety alarm was observed not functioning in one of the operation's vans used to transport the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-26

CRITICALSAFETY746.5625(b)Sep 8, 2025

The electronic child safety alarm was observed not functioning in one of the operation's vans used to transport the children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-26

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.613(b)Mar 19, 2025

1 out of 10 child immunization records were not current at the time of inspection.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.613(b)Mar 19, 2025

1 out of 10 child immunization records were not current at the time of inspection.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.603(a)(4)Sep 12, 2024

I reviewed 10 records and 2 children did not have up to date immunizations at the time of inspection.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.603(a)(4)Sep 12, 2024

I reviewed 10 records and 2 children did not have up to date immunizations at the time of inspection.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-27

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Jul 19, 2024

It was determined through an investigation that proper supervision was not practiced when a child was able to exit the building without a caregiver present/being aware.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-06

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Jul 19, 2024

It was determined through an investigation that proper supervision was not practiced when a child was able to exit the building without a caregiver present/being aware.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.303(b)Jan 19, 2024

The operation failed to submit the number of employees that have left their employment in 2023 by January 15th.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.303(b)Jan 19, 2024

The operation failed to submit the number of employees that have left their employment in 2023 by January 15th.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-21

SERIOUSSAFETY746.3309(c)Aug 16, 2023

The operation failed to safely store the child's formula by misplacing it.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-02

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.1003(2)Aug 16, 2023

After parent notified the director/owner of the child's needs, it was not ensured that the caregivers were following infant care instructions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-02

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.1003(2)Aug 16, 2023

After parent notified the director/owner of the child's needs, it was not ensured that the caregivers were following infant care instructions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-02

SERIOUSSAFETY746.3309(c)Aug 16, 2023

The operation failed to safely store the child's formula by misplacing it.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-02

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(10)Aug 16, 2023

The AM and PM caregivers were not effectively communicating information which resulted in the child being sent home in LUVS diapers on multiple occasions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-02

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(10)Aug 16, 2023

The AM and PM caregivers were not effectively communicating information which resulted in the child being sent home in LUVS diapers on multiple occasions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-02

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Aug 8, 2023

A caregiver was obserrved to be sitting a doorway supervising two separate classrooms during naptime.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-08

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Aug 8, 2023

A caregiver was obserrved to be sitting a doorway supervising two separate classrooms during naptime.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-08

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Jul 28, 2023

Children are receiving injuries (biting) due to improper supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-22

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Jul 28, 2023

The parent was not notified of the bite the child received while in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-22

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Jul 28, 2023

The parent was not notified of the bite the child received while in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-22

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Jul 28, 2023

Children are receiving injuries (biting) due to improper supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-22

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2417(2)(A)Feb 17, 2023

Infants were restricted to their cribs due to being combined in the classroom with older children for longer than fifteen minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-17

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.801(5)Feb 17, 2023

The Director does not have proof of attendance records that documents time and hours present at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2417(2)(A)Feb 17, 2023

Infants were restricted to their cribs due to being combined in the classroom with older children for longer than fifteen minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-17

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.801(5)Feb 17, 2023

The Director does not have proof of attendance records that documents time and hours present at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Feb 8, 2023

There was only one caregiver observed to be caring for 16 children ranging from 3 months to 4 years old in the infant room.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-17

SERIOUSSTAFFING746.1615Feb 8, 2023

Four infants were being cared for with children over eighteen months old in the first 45 minutes of opening the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-17

SERIOUSSTAFFING746.1615Feb 8, 2023

Four infants were being cared for with children over eighteen months old in the first 45 minutes of opening the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Feb 8, 2023

There was only one caregiver observed to be caring for 16 children ranging from 3 months to 4 years old in the infant room.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2419(6)Jan 5, 2023

Four out of five bottles in the infant room were not labeled by name as required. This was corrected at inspection when the names were added to the bottles.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Jan 5, 2023

There were six infants ages two months to thirteen months with one caregiver. The maximum amount of infants for this age group is four infants per one caregiver, therefore this group was not compliant for proper ratio. This was corrected at inspection when another caregiver arrived to bring the ratio into compliance.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-05

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701(1)Jan 5, 2023

There was one outlet in the toddler room that was not covered or protected. This was corrected at inspection when an electrical outlet cover was provided.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2419(6)Jan 5, 2023

Four out of five bottles in the infant room were not labeled by name as required. This was corrected at inspection when the names were added to the bottles.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Jan 5, 2023

There were six infants ages two months to thirteen months with one caregiver. The maximum amount of infants for this age group is four infants per one caregiver, therefore this group was not compliant for proper ratio. This was corrected at inspection when another caregiver arrived to bring the ratio into compliance.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-05

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701(1)Jan 5, 2023

There was one outlet in the toddler room that was not covered or protected. This was corrected at inspection when an electrical outlet cover was provided.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4135(b)May 25, 2022

The operation did not have the required Child Product Safety Commission Form. This was corrected at inspection when the director downloaded the form, signed it, and posted it.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.605(6)May 25, 2022

Three out of eight children's records evaluated were missing the required emergency contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4135(b)May 25, 2022

The operation did not have the required Child Product Safety Commission Form. This was corrected at inspection when the director downloaded the form, signed it, and posted it.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.605(6)May 25, 2022

Three out of eight children's records evaluated were missing the required emergency contact information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1605May 25, 2022

During naptime, it was observed that a four month old infant was combined in the same room with older children up to four years in age. Minimum standards state that children under eighteen months of age are only allowed to be combined with older children as long as the oldest child is less than eighteen months older than the youngest child, therefore the operation was not in compliance. This was corrected when another caregiver arrived, and the infants were separated from the older children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-25

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1605May 25, 2022

During naptime, it was observed that a four month old infant was combined in the same room with older children up to four years in age. Minimum standards state that children under eighteen months of age are only allowed to be combined with older children as long as the oldest child is less than eighteen months older than the youngest child, therefore the operation was not in compliance. This was corrected when another caregiver arrived, and the infants were separated from the older children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-25

CRITICALHEALTH746.3805(a)(1)Aug 4, 2021

Based on information gathered during the course of the investigation, caregiver did not give child his medication at 10:30 am as indicated on the medication log.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-09

CRITICALHEALTH746.3805(a)(1)Aug 4, 2021

Based on information gathered during the course of the investigation, caregiver did not give child his medication at 10:30 am as indicated on the medication log.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-09

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for La Mision Child Care and Kid Kamp.

Nearby Daycares in San Antonio

Frequently Asked Questions

What is La Mision Child Care and Kid Kamp's safety grade?

La Mision Child Care and Kid Kamp has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 33.0 out of 100.

How many violations does La Mision Child Care and Kid Kamp have?

La Mision Child Care and Kid Kamp has 44 total violations on record, including 28 critical, 16 serious, and 0 minor.

When was La Mision Child Care and Kid Kamp last inspected?

La Mision Child Care and Kid Kamp was last inspected on September 29, 2025.

Parent Resources