Bair Foundation of Texas
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
166 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
March 31, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Bair Foundation of Texas
- License number
- 247527- 347
- Location
- 1550 NE LOOP 410 STE 400, San Antonio, TX 78209
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 166 inspections, last inspected March 31, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
106
Total Violations
Mar 31, 2026
Last Inspection
0
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (106)
During the inspection, medication was observed inside a weekly organizer, which was placed in an unlocked drawer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22
During the inspection, medication was observed inside a weekly organizer, which was placed in an unlocked drawer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22
During the inspection, medication was observed inside a weekly organizer, which was placed in an unlocked drawer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22
It was confirmed by both the caregiver and the case manager that a caregiver who administered psychotropic medication did not have the required annual training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31
It was confirmed by both the caregiver and the case manager that a caregiver who administered psychotropic medication did not have the required annual training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31
It was confirmed by both the caregiver and the case manager that a caregiver who administered psychotropic medication did not have the required annual training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31
The background role was ran as a frequent visitor when it should have been run as a household member when the change occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
The background role was ran as a frequent visitor when it should have been run as a household member when the change occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
The background role was ran as a frequent visitor when it should have been run as a household member when the change occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
During a review conducted on April 8, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on February 7, 2025, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a medium -high weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 2/7/25. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.503(a)(2)(A): Serious Incident Reporting- The foster parents did not report the child in care critical illness to the agency within 24 hours, it is pending. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plan. An administrative penalty will be assessed as a result of this citation, in accordance with Texas Human Resources Code Sec. 42.078. The maximum daily penalty for your operation is $500.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-09
During a review conducted on April 8, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on February 7, 2025, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a medium -high weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 2/7/25. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.503(a)(2)(A): Serious Incident Reporting- The foster parents did not report the child in care critical illness to the agency within 24 hours, it is pending. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plan. An administrative penalty will be assessed as a result of this citation, in accordance with Texas Human Resources Code Sec. 42.078. The maximum daily penalty for your operation is $500.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-09
During a review conducted on April 8, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on February 7, 2025, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a medium -high weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 2/7/25. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.503(a)(2)(A): Serious Incident Reporting- The foster parents did not report the child in care critical illness to the agency within 24 hours, it is pending. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plan. An administrative penalty will be assessed as a result of this citation, in accordance with Texas Human Resources Code Sec. 42.078. The maximum daily penalty for your operation is $500.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-09
Foster parent's son and niece both visit every Thursday. They both meet the criteria definition of what a frequent visitor is, and both did not have a background check completed prior to their visits.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26
Foster parent's son and niece both visit every Thursday. They both meet the criteria definition of what a frequent visitor is, and both did not have a background check completed prior to their visits.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26
Foster parent's son and niece both visit every Thursday. They both meet the criteria definition of what a frequent visitor is, and both did not have a background check completed prior to their visits.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26
Unsecured medications (approximately 5 bottles) to include old prescription medications were observed in the foster parent's bedroom bathroom medication cabinet.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-02
A new controlling person was not added to the controlling person list within the required timeframe.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06
A new controlling person was not added to the controlling person list within the required timeframe.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06
A new controlling person was not added to the controlling person list within the required timeframe.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06
The foster parent doesn't ensure the children in care take their medication as prescribed by admitting she does not always observe the children take their medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-04
The foster parent doesn't ensure the children in care take their medication as prescribed by admitting she does not always observe the children take their medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-04
The foster parent doesn't ensure the children in care take their medication as prescribed by admitting she does not always observe the children take their medication.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-04
Licensing was not notified about personal restraint changes in operation's behavior intervention policy.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-11
Licensing was not notified about personal restraint changes in operation's behavior intervention policy.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-11
Licensing was not notified about personal restraint changes in operation's behavior intervention policy.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-11
A healthcare professional has not been found to teach the instructor led portion of the psychotropic medication training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-25
A healthcare professional has not been found to teach the instructor led portion of the psychotropic medication training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-25
A healthcare professional has not been found to teach the instructor led portion of the psychotropic medication training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-25
Two PM medications were not administered to child in care for 1 day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-08
Two PM medications were not administered to child in care for 1 day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-08
Two PM medications were not administered to child in care for 1 day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-08
During a review conducted on April 3, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-04
During a review conducted on April 3, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-04
During a review conducted on April 3, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-04
Staff member who has not been employed with the agency since 10/6/2023 was not inactivated until 3/27/2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15
Staff member who has not been employed with the agency since 10/6/2023 was not inactivated until 3/27/2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15
Staff member who has not been employed with the agency since 10/6/2023 was not inactivated until 3/27/2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15
During a review conducted on October 2, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-03
During a review conducted on October 2, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-03
During a review conducted on October 2, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-03
Both foster parents confirmed the use of discipline techniques that are against the agency's policy and procedures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent confirmed that he used a restraint by holding the child in care on the arm of a chair for 20 minutes preventing her from leaving the hold.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The guardian of the child in care stated that she did not know interventions have been used on the child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent used a seclusion restraint by leaving the child alone in a room and preventing her from leaving by holding the door shut.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent confirmed that she had the bedroom door removed on multiple occasions due to the child's behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
Both foster parents confirmed the use of an emergency behavior intervention as a means to get the child in care to comply on multiple occasions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
According to the agency, no emergency behavior intervention documentation has been completed for any of the interventions used in the foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent confirmed pulling the child in care by her wrists upstairs while the child in care complained of pain.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
Both foster parents confirmed the use of discipline techniques that are against the agency's policy and procedures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent confirmed that he used a restraint by holding the child in care on the arm of a chair for 20 minutes preventing her from leaving the hold.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The guardian of the child in care stated that she did not know interventions have been used on the child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent used a seclusion restraint by leaving the child alone in a room and preventing her from leaving by holding the door shut.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent confirmed that she had the bedroom door removed on multiple occasions due to the child's behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
Both foster parents confirmed the use of an emergency behavior intervention as a means to get the child in care to comply on multiple occasions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
According to the agency, no emergency behavior intervention documentation has been completed for any of the interventions used in the foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent confirmed pulling the child in care by her wrists upstairs while the child in care complained of pain.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
Both foster parents confirmed the use of discipline techniques that are against the agency's policy and procedures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The guardian of the child in care stated that she did not know interventions have been used on the child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent confirmed that she had the bedroom door removed on multiple occasions due to the child's behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
Both foster parents confirmed the use of an emergency behavior intervention as a means to get the child in care to comply on multiple occasions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent confirmed pulling the child in care by her wrists upstairs while the child in care complained of pain.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent confirmed that he used a restraint by holding the child in care on the arm of a chair for 20 minutes preventing her from leaving the hold.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
According to the agency, no emergency behavior intervention documentation has been completed for any of the interventions used in the foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
The foster parent used a seclusion restraint by leaving the child alone in a room and preventing her from leaving by holding the door shut.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30
One of the 5 dogs did not have a current rabies vaccination.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-09
Over the counter medication was left out in unlocked left kitchen cabinet.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-02
One of the 5 dogs did not have a current rabies vaccination.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-09
One of the 5 dogs did not have a current rabies vaccination.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-09
Over the counter medication was left out in unlocked left kitchen cabinet.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-02
Over the counter medication was left out in unlocked left kitchen cabinet.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-02
When conducting an inspection of the home and requesting documentation of the child the foster parent had no documentation provided from the facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21
When requesting for documentation on subsequent pre-placement visits there was none available.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21
when reviewing documentation day care was not provided in a timely manner as stated in the agencies policy.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21
When conducting an inspection of the home and requesting documentation of the child the foster parent had no documentation provided from the facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21
When requesting for documentation on subsequent pre-placement visits there was none available.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21
when reviewing documentation day care was not provided in a timely manner as stated in the agencies policy.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21
When conducting an inspection of the home and requesting documentation of the child the foster parent had no documentation provided from the facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21
When requesting for documentation on subsequent pre-placement visits there was none available.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21
when reviewing documentation day care was not provided in a timely manner as stated in the agencies policy.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21
A foster child ran away from (and returned to) the foster home on a Friday night and then again two days later. The foster parent indicated the operation did not implement any type of extra supervision nor notify the foster parent that the operation would discharge the foster child the next day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26
A foster child ran away from (and returned to) the foster home on a Friday night and then again two days later. The foster parent indicated the operation did not implement any type of extra supervision nor notify the foster parent that the operation would discharge the foster child the next day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26
A foster child ran away from (and returned to) the foster home on a Friday night and then again two days later. The foster parent indicated the operation did not implement any type of extra supervision nor notify the foster parent that the operation would discharge the foster child the next day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26
Three foster parents do not have active background checks completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-20
Three foster parents do not have active background checks completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-20
Operation did not call in to report when they became aware of an allegation made by child in care being hit by the foster parent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-25
Three foster parents do not have active background checks completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-20
Operation did not call in to report when they became aware of an allegation made by child in care being hit by the foster parent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-25
Operation did not call in to report when they became aware of an allegation made by child in care being hit by the foster parent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-25
During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01
During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01
During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01
Child in care ran away from the home on 12/01/2022 at 11pm, this was not reported to Licensing until 12/02/2022 at 9:14am. The child in care is 15 years old and the runaway was reported 10 hours later, exceeding the 6-hour timeframe to report.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-14
Child in care ran away from the home on 12/01/2022 at 11pm, this was not reported to Licensing until 12/02/2022 at 9:14am. The child in care is 15 years old and the runaway was reported 10 hours later, exceeding the 6-hour timeframe to report.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-14
Child in care ran away from the home on 12/01/2022 at 11pm, this was not reported to Licensing until 12/02/2022 at 9:14am. The child in care is 15 years old and the runaway was reported 10 hours later, exceeding the 6-hour timeframe to report.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-14
Failure to report a serious incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-20
Failure to report a serious incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-20
Failure to report a serious incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-20
One communicable disease was not reported within timeframes. The positive result was received on 8/1 and it was reported on 8/3 to Licensing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-13
One communicable disease was not reported within timeframes. The positive result was received on 8/1 and it was reported on 8/3 to Licensing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-13
One communicable disease was not reported within timeframes. The positive result was received on 8/1 and it was reported on 8/3 to Licensing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-13
A report to Licensing of a child contracting a communicable disease is required no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the communicable disease. Child Odis R. tested positive for COVID on 7.24.21 at 8 AM; Licensing was not notified until the afternoon of 7.26.21.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-29
A report to Licensing of a child contracting a communicable disease is required no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the communicable disease. Child Odis R. tested positive for COVID on 7.24.21 at 8 AM; Licensing was not notified until the afternoon of 7.26.21.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-29
A report to Licensing of a child contracting a communicable disease is required no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the communicable disease. Child Odis R. tested positive for COVID on 7.24.21 at 8 AM; Licensing was not notified until the afternoon of 7.26.21.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-29
A child in care was not supervised appropriately several times in the foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-27
A child in care was not supervised appropriately several times in the foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-27
A child in care was not supervised appropriately several times in the foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-27
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Bair Foundation of Texas.
Nearby Daycares in San Antonio
Sweet Sunsets Learning Academia
1056 E BORGFELD DR
Adoption Angels Inc
1511 FREDERICKSBURG RD
Nature and STEM Kids College LLC
12502 LA MANANA ST
Jessenia Montanez
6234 DIEGO LN
arianna lee
14839 CAVE SWALLOW
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bair Foundation of Texas's safety grade?
Bair Foundation of Texas has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Bair Foundation of Texas have?
Bair Foundation of Texas has 106 total violations on record, including 70 critical, 36 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Bair Foundation of Texas last inspected?
Bair Foundation of Texas was last inspected on March 31, 2026.