Bair Foundation of Texas

1550 NE LOOP 410 STE 400, San Antonio, TX 78209Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

166 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

March 31, 2026

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
Bair Foundation of Texas
License number
247527- 347
Location
1550 NE LOOP 410 STE 400, San Antonio, TX 78209
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 0.0/100
Inspection record
166 inspections, last inspected March 31, 2026
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor0.0 / 100
Health0/100
Safety0/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

106

Total Violations

Mar 31, 2026

Last Inspection

0

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (106)

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Sep 18, 2025

During the inspection, medication was observed inside a weekly organizer, which was placed in an unlocked drawer.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Sep 18, 2025

During the inspection, medication was observed inside a weekly organizer, which was placed in an unlocked drawer.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Sep 18, 2025

During the inspection, medication was observed inside a weekly organizer, which was placed in an unlocked drawer.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

CRITICALHEALTH749.930(c)(4)Sep 18, 2025

It was confirmed by both the caregiver and the case manager that a caregiver who administered psychotropic medication did not have the required annual training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31

CRITICALHEALTH749.930(c)(4)Sep 18, 2025

It was confirmed by both the caregiver and the case manager that a caregiver who administered psychotropic medication did not have the required annual training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31

CRITICALHEALTH749.930(c)(4)Sep 18, 2025

It was confirmed by both the caregiver and the case manager that a caregiver who administered psychotropic medication did not have the required annual training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(5)Sep 6, 2025

The background role was ran as a frequent visitor when it should have been run as a household member when the change occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(5)Sep 6, 2025

The background role was ran as a frequent visitor when it should have been run as a household member when the change occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(5)Sep 6, 2025

The background role was ran as a frequent visitor when it should have been run as a household member when the change occurred.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Apr 8, 2025

During a review conducted on April 8, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on February 7, 2025, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a medium -high weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 2/7/25. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.503(a)(2)(A): Serious Incident Reporting- The foster parents did not report the child in care critical illness to the agency within 24 hours, it is pending. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plan. An administrative penalty will be assessed as a result of this citation, in accordance with Texas Human Resources Code Sec. 42.078. The maximum daily penalty for your operation is $500.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-09

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Apr 8, 2025

During a review conducted on April 8, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on February 7, 2025, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a medium -high weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 2/7/25. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.503(a)(2)(A): Serious Incident Reporting- The foster parents did not report the child in care critical illness to the agency within 24 hours, it is pending. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plan. An administrative penalty will be assessed as a result of this citation, in accordance with Texas Human Resources Code Sec. 42.078. The maximum daily penalty for your operation is $500.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-09

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Apr 8, 2025

During a review conducted on April 8, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plan for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on February 7, 2025, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a medium -high weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 2/7/25. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.503(a)(2)(A): Serious Incident Reporting- The foster parents did not report the child in care critical illness to the agency within 24 hours, it is pending. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plan. An administrative penalty will be assessed as a result of this citation, in accordance with Texas Human Resources Code Sec. 42.078. The maximum daily penalty for your operation is $500.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-09

CRITICALSTAFFING745.641Feb 21, 2025

Foster parent's son and niece both visit every Thursday. They both meet the criteria definition of what a frequent visitor is, and both did not have a background check completed prior to their visits.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26

CRITICALSTAFFING745.641Feb 21, 2025

Foster parent's son and niece both visit every Thursday. They both meet the criteria definition of what a frequent visitor is, and both did not have a background check completed prior to their visits.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26

CRITICALSTAFFING745.641Feb 21, 2025

Foster parent's son and niece both visit every Thursday. They both meet the criteria definition of what a frequent visitor is, and both did not have a background check completed prior to their visits.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(2)Dec 30, 2024

Unsecured medications (approximately 5 bottles) to include old prescription medications were observed in the foster parent's bedroom bathroom medication cabinet.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-02

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.153(a)(3)(B)Nov 22, 2024

A new controlling person was not added to the controlling person list within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.153(a)(3)(B)Nov 22, 2024

A new controlling person was not added to the controlling person list within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.153(a)(3)(B)Nov 22, 2024

A new controlling person was not added to the controlling person list within the required timeframe.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(5)Oct 29, 2024

The foster parent doesn't ensure the children in care take their medication as prescribed by admitting she does not always observe the children take their medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-04

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(5)Oct 29, 2024

The foster parent doesn't ensure the children in care take their medication as prescribed by admitting she does not always observe the children take their medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-04

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(5)Oct 29, 2024

The foster parent doesn't ensure the children in care take their medication as prescribed by admitting she does not always observe the children take their medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-04

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.153(a)(2)(B)Sep 27, 2024

Licensing was not notified about personal restraint changes in operation's behavior intervention policy.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.153(a)(2)(B)Sep 27, 2024

Licensing was not notified about personal restraint changes in operation's behavior intervention policy.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.153(a)(2)(B)Sep 27, 2024

Licensing was not notified about personal restraint changes in operation's behavior intervention policy.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-11

CRITICALHEALTH749.939(d)Sep 10, 2024

A healthcare professional has not been found to teach the instructor led portion of the psychotropic medication training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-25

CRITICALHEALTH749.939(d)Sep 10, 2024

A healthcare professional has not been found to teach the instructor led portion of the psychotropic medication training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-25

CRITICALHEALTH749.939(d)Sep 10, 2024

A healthcare professional has not been found to teach the instructor led portion of the psychotropic medication training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-25

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(3)Jul 8, 2024

Two PM medications were not administered to child in care for 1 day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(3)Jul 8, 2024

Two PM medications were not administered to child in care for 1 day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(3)Jul 8, 2024

Two PM medications were not administered to child in care for 1 day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-08

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Apr 3, 2024

During a review conducted on April 3, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-04

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Apr 3, 2024

During a review conducted on April 3, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-04

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Apr 3, 2024

During a review conducted on April 3, 2024, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-04

SERIOUSSTAFFING745.651(1)Apr 1, 2024

Staff member who has not been employed with the agency since 10/6/2023 was not inactivated until 3/27/2024.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

SERIOUSSTAFFING745.651(1)Apr 1, 2024

Staff member who has not been employed with the agency since 10/6/2023 was not inactivated until 3/27/2024.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

SERIOUSSTAFFING745.651(1)Apr 1, 2024

Staff member who has not been employed with the agency since 10/6/2023 was not inactivated until 3/27/2024.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Oct 2, 2023

During a review conducted on October 2, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-03

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Oct 2, 2023

During a review conducted on October 2, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-03

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Oct 2, 2023

During a review conducted on October 2, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1951(b)(1)Aug 23, 2023

Both foster parents confirmed the use of discipline techniques that are against the agency's policy and procedures.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2153(2)(C)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent confirmed that he used a restraint by holding the child in care on the arm of a chair for 20 minutes preventing her from leaving the hold.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2307(a)Aug 23, 2023

The guardian of the child in care stated that she did not know interventions have been used on the child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSTAFFING749.1021(1)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent used a seclusion restraint by leaving the child alone in a room and preventing her from leaving by holding the door shut.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3023(c)(3)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent confirmed that she had the bedroom door removed on multiple occasions due to the child's behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSAFETY749.2063(3)Aug 23, 2023

Both foster parents confirmed the use of an emergency behavior intervention as a means to get the child in care to comply on multiple occasions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.2305(a)Aug 23, 2023

According to the agency, no emergency behavior intervention documentation has been completed for any of the interventions used in the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2151(c)(2)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent confirmed pulling the child in care by her wrists upstairs while the child in care complained of pain.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1951(b)(1)Aug 23, 2023

Both foster parents confirmed the use of discipline techniques that are against the agency's policy and procedures.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2153(2)(C)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent confirmed that he used a restraint by holding the child in care on the arm of a chair for 20 minutes preventing her from leaving the hold.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2307(a)Aug 23, 2023

The guardian of the child in care stated that she did not know interventions have been used on the child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSTAFFING749.1021(1)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent used a seclusion restraint by leaving the child alone in a room and preventing her from leaving by holding the door shut.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3023(c)(3)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent confirmed that she had the bedroom door removed on multiple occasions due to the child's behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSAFETY749.2063(3)Aug 23, 2023

Both foster parents confirmed the use of an emergency behavior intervention as a means to get the child in care to comply on multiple occasions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.2305(a)Aug 23, 2023

According to the agency, no emergency behavior intervention documentation has been completed for any of the interventions used in the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2151(c)(2)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent confirmed pulling the child in care by her wrists upstairs while the child in care complained of pain.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1951(b)(1)Aug 23, 2023

Both foster parents confirmed the use of discipline techniques that are against the agency's policy and procedures.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2307(a)Aug 23, 2023

The guardian of the child in care stated that she did not know interventions have been used on the child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3023(c)(3)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent confirmed that she had the bedroom door removed on multiple occasions due to the child's behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSAFETY749.2063(3)Aug 23, 2023

Both foster parents confirmed the use of an emergency behavior intervention as a means to get the child in care to comply on multiple occasions.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2151(c)(2)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent confirmed pulling the child in care by her wrists upstairs while the child in care complained of pain.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2153(2)(C)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent confirmed that he used a restraint by holding the child in care on the arm of a chair for 20 minutes preventing her from leaving the hold.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.2305(a)Aug 23, 2023

According to the agency, no emergency behavior intervention documentation has been completed for any of the interventions used in the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSTAFFING749.1021(1)Aug 23, 2023

The foster parent used a seclusion restraint by leaving the child alone in a room and preventing her from leaving by holding the door shut.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-30

CRITICALSAFETY749.3663(b)Jul 24, 2023

One of the 5 dogs did not have a current rabies vaccination.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-09

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(2)Jul 24, 2023

Over the counter medication was left out in unlocked left kitchen cabinet.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-02

CRITICALSAFETY749.3663(b)Jul 24, 2023

One of the 5 dogs did not have a current rabies vaccination.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-09

CRITICALSAFETY749.3663(b)Jul 24, 2023

One of the 5 dogs did not have a current rabies vaccination.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-09

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(2)Jul 24, 2023

Over the counter medication was left out in unlocked left kitchen cabinet.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-02

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(2)Jul 24, 2023

Over the counter medication was left out in unlocked left kitchen cabinet.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-02

CRITICALHEALTH749.1115(b)Jun 9, 2023

When conducting an inspection of the home and requesting documentation of the child the foster parent had no documentation provided from the facility.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1281(a)(3)Jun 9, 2023

When requesting for documentation on subsequent pre-placement visits there was none available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.121(7)Jun 9, 2023

when reviewing documentation day care was not provided in a timely manner as stated in the agencies policy.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21

CRITICALHEALTH749.1115(b)Jun 9, 2023

When conducting an inspection of the home and requesting documentation of the child the foster parent had no documentation provided from the facility.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1281(a)(3)Jun 9, 2023

When requesting for documentation on subsequent pre-placement visits there was none available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.121(7)Jun 9, 2023

when reviewing documentation day care was not provided in a timely manner as stated in the agencies policy.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21

CRITICALHEALTH749.1115(b)Jun 9, 2023

When conducting an inspection of the home and requesting documentation of the child the foster parent had no documentation provided from the facility.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1281(a)(3)Jun 9, 2023

When requesting for documentation on subsequent pre-placement visits there was none available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.121(7)Jun 9, 2023

when reviewing documentation day care was not provided in a timely manner as stated in the agencies policy.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-21

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(3)May 20, 2023

A foster child ran away from (and returned to) the foster home on a Friday night and then again two days later. The foster parent indicated the operation did not implement any type of extra supervision nor notify the foster parent that the operation would discharge the foster child the next day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(3)May 20, 2023

A foster child ran away from (and returned to) the foster home on a Friday night and then again two days later. The foster parent indicated the operation did not implement any type of extra supervision nor notify the foster parent that the operation would discharge the foster child the next day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(3)May 20, 2023

A foster child ran away from (and returned to) the foster home on a Friday night and then again two days later. The foster parent indicated the operation did not implement any type of extra supervision nor notify the foster parent that the operation would discharge the foster child the next day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-26

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(3)Apr 18, 2023

Three foster parents do not have active background checks completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-20

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(3)Apr 18, 2023

Three foster parents do not have active background checks completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-20

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(3)(A)Apr 18, 2023

Operation did not call in to report when they became aware of an allegation made by child in care being hit by the foster parent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-25

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(3)Apr 18, 2023

Three foster parents do not have active background checks completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-20

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(3)(A)Apr 18, 2023

Operation did not call in to report when they became aware of an allegation made by child in care being hit by the foster parent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-25

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(3)(A)Apr 18, 2023

Operation did not call in to report when they became aware of an allegation made by child in care being hit by the foster parent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-25

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 31, 2023

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 31, 2023

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 31, 2023

During a review conducted on March 31, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring.? As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-01

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(10)(A)Dec 3, 2022

Child in care ran away from the home on 12/01/2022 at 11pm, this was not reported to Licensing until 12/02/2022 at 9:14am. The child in care is 15 years old and the runaway was reported 10 hours later, exceeding the 6-hour timeframe to report.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(10)(A)Dec 3, 2022

Child in care ran away from the home on 12/01/2022 at 11pm, this was not reported to Licensing until 12/02/2022 at 9:14am. The child in care is 15 years old and the runaway was reported 10 hours later, exceeding the 6-hour timeframe to report.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(10)(A)Dec 3, 2022

Child in care ran away from the home on 12/01/2022 at 11pm, this was not reported to Licensing until 12/02/2022 at 9:14am. The child in care is 15 years old and the runaway was reported 10 hours later, exceeding the 6-hour timeframe to report.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(10)(A)Jan 13, 2022

Failure to report a serious incident.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-20

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(10)(A)Jan 13, 2022

Failure to report a serious incident.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-20

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(10)(A)Jan 13, 2022

Failure to report a serious incident.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-20

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(e)(3)(A)Aug 3, 2021

One communicable disease was not reported within timeframes. The positive result was received on 8/1 and it was reported on 8/3 to Licensing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(e)(3)(A)Aug 3, 2021

One communicable disease was not reported within timeframes. The positive result was received on 8/1 and it was reported on 8/3 to Licensing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(e)(3)(A)Aug 3, 2021

One communicable disease was not reported within timeframes. The positive result was received on 8/1 and it was reported on 8/3 to Licensing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(10)(A)Jul 26, 2021

A report to Licensing of a child contracting a communicable disease is required no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the communicable disease. Child Odis R. tested positive for COVID on 7.24.21 at 8 AM; Licensing was not notified until the afternoon of 7.26.21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-29

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(10)(A)Jul 26, 2021

A report to Licensing of a child contracting a communicable disease is required no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the communicable disease. Child Odis R. tested positive for COVID on 7.24.21 at 8 AM; Licensing was not notified until the afternoon of 7.26.21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-29

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(10)(A)Jul 26, 2021

A report to Licensing of a child contracting a communicable disease is required no later than 24 hours after becoming aware of the communicable disease. Child Odis R. tested positive for COVID on 7.24.21 at 8 AM; Licensing was not notified until the afternoon of 7.26.21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-29

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)Jul 6, 2021

A child in care was not supervised appropriately several times in the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-27

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)Jul 6, 2021

A child in care was not supervised appropriately several times in the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-27

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)Jul 6, 2021

A child in care was not supervised appropriately several times in the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-27

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Bair Foundation of Texas.

Nearby Daycares in San Antonio

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Bair Foundation of Texas's safety grade?

Bair Foundation of Texas has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.

How many violations does Bair Foundation of Texas have?

Bair Foundation of Texas has 106 total violations on record, including 70 critical, 36 serious, and 0 minor.

When was Bair Foundation of Texas last inspected?

Bair Foundation of Texas was last inspected on March 31, 2026.

Parent Resources