Stepping Stones Academy
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
23 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 24, 2026
Latest inspection
April 21, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 24, 2026
- Provider
- Stepping Stones Academy
- License number
- 1627730
- Location
- 3806 AVENUE I STE 24, Rosenberg, TX 77471
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 30.0/100
- Inspection record
- 23 inspections, last inspected April 21, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 24, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
169
Total Violations
Apr 21, 2026
Last Inspection
76
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (169)
A child used an inflatable in violation of the manufacturer?s label and instructions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-30
A child used an inflatable in violation of the manufacturer?s label and instructions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-30
A child used an inflatable in violation of the manufacturer?s label and instructions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-30
A child used an inflatable in violation of the manufacturer?s label and instructions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-30
A child used an inflatable in violation of the manufacturer?s label and instructions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-30
A child used an inflatable in violation of the manufacturer?s label and instructions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-30
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024 data revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-24
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024 data revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-24
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024 data revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-24
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024 data revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-24
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024 data revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-24
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024 data revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-24
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024 data revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-24
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024 data revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-24
The operation was unable to provide documentation showing fire drills were completed in May and June 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-15
The operation was unable to provide documentation showing fire drills were completed in May and June 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-15
The operation was unable to provide documentation showing fire drills were completed in May and June 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-15
The operation was unable to provide documentation showing fire drills were completed in May and June 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-15
The operation was unable to provide documentation showing fire drills were completed in May and June 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-15
The operation was unable to provide documentation showing fire drills were completed in May and June 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-15
The operation was unable to provide documentation showing fire drills were completed in May and June 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-15
The operation did not have posted the most recent investigation letter that was provided on 2/22/24.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not validate the employee list after 2 caregivers left and are no longer employed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
One caregiver who's employment ended more than 7 days ago has not been inactivated from the staff list.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not have posted the most recent investigation letter that was provided on 2/22/24.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not have posted the most recent investigation letter that was provided on 2/22/24.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
One caregiver who's employment ended more than 7 days ago has not been inactivated from the staff list.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not validate the employee list after 2 caregivers left and are no longer employed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not validate the employee list after 2 caregivers left and are no longer employed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
One caregiver who's employment ended more than 7 days ago has not been inactivated from the staff list.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not have posted the most recent investigation letter that was provided on 2/22/24.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
One caregiver who's employment ended more than 7 days ago has not been inactivated from the staff list.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not validate the employee list after 2 caregivers left and are no longer employed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not have posted the most recent investigation letter that was provided on 2/22/24.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
One caregiver who's employment ended more than 7 days ago has not been inactivated from the staff list.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not validate the employee list after 2 caregivers left and are no longer employed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
One caregiver who's employment ended more than 7 days ago has not been inactivated from the staff list.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not have posted the most recent investigation letter that was provided on 2/22/24.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not validate the employee list after 2 caregivers left and are no longer employed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not have posted the most recent investigation letter that was provided on 2/22/24.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not validate the employee list after 2 caregivers left and are no longer employed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
One caregiver who's employment ended more than 7 days ago has not been inactivated from the staff list.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not validate the employee list after 2 caregivers left and are no longer employed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
One caregiver who's employment ended more than 7 days ago has not been inactivated from the staff list.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
The operation did not have posted the most recent investigation letter that was provided on 2/22/24.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-01
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to prove that director placed an infant in another room without a caregiver present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-22
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to prove that director placed an infant in a restrictive device instead of comforting the infant who was upset.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-22
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to prove that director placed an infant in another room without a caregiver present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-22
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to prove that director placed an infant in a restrictive device instead of comforting the infant who was upset.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-22
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to prove that director placed an infant in another room without a caregiver present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-22
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to prove that director placed an infant in a restrictive device instead of comforting the infant who was upset.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-22
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to prove that director placed an infant in a restrictive device instead of comforting the infant who was upset.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-22
Based on the information obtained during the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to prove that director placed an infant in another room without a caregiver present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-22
A child was placed in high chair to keep them from running around.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
Both caregivers present had to participate in activities that kept them from supervising children such as opening the door and preparing lunch. They had to leave children unattended multiple times throughout the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A 6 month old infant again was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A caregiver was present around and responsible for children prior to receiving an eligible background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
One infant was present in the infant room without a caregiver present. A toddler aged child was observed alone in a hallway without a caregiver present. Children were in 3 different rooms for naptime with only 2 caregivers present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A child was placed in high chair to keep them from running around.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
An infant was observed asleep in a bouncer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A caregiver was present around and responsible for children prior to receiving an eligible background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A child was placed in high chair to keep them from running around.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
One infant was present in the infant room without a caregiver present. A toddler aged child was observed alone in a hallway without a caregiver present. Children were in 3 different rooms for naptime with only 2 caregivers present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
Both caregivers present had to participate in activities that kept them from supervising children such as opening the door and preparing lunch. They had to leave children unattended multiple times throughout the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A 6 month old infant again was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
An infant was observed asleep in a bouncer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
One infant was present in the infant room without a caregiver present. A toddler aged child was observed alone in a hallway without a caregiver present. Children were in 3 different rooms for naptime with only 2 caregivers present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A child was placed in high chair to keep them from running around.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A caregiver was present around and responsible for children prior to receiving an eligible background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
Both caregivers present had to participate in activities that kept them from supervising children such as opening the door and preparing lunch. They had to leave children unattended multiple times throughout the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
One infant was present in the infant room without a caregiver present. A toddler aged child was observed alone in a hallway without a caregiver present. Children were in 3 different rooms for naptime with only 2 caregivers present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A 6 month old infant again was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
An infant was observed asleep in a bouncer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A caregiver was present around and responsible for children prior to receiving an eligible background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A 6 month old infant again was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
An infant was observed asleep in a bouncer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
Both caregivers present had to participate in activities that kept them from supervising children such as opening the door and preparing lunch. They had to leave children unattended multiple times throughout the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
An infant was observed asleep in a bouncer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
Both caregivers present had to participate in activities that kept them from supervising children such as opening the door and preparing lunch. They had to leave children unattended multiple times throughout the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A caregiver was present around and responsible for children prior to receiving an eligible background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
One infant was present in the infant room without a caregiver present. A toddler aged child was observed alone in a hallway without a caregiver present. Children were in 3 different rooms for naptime with only 2 caregivers present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A 6 month old infant again was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A child was placed in high chair to keep them from running around.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
An infant was observed asleep in a bouncer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
Both caregivers present had to participate in activities that kept them from supervising children such as opening the door and preparing lunch. They had to leave children unattended multiple times throughout the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A caregiver was present around and responsible for children prior to receiving an eligible background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
One infant was present in the infant room without a caregiver present. A toddler aged child was observed alone in a hallway without a caregiver present. Children were in 3 different rooms for naptime with only 2 caregivers present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A 6 month old infant again was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A child was placed in high chair to keep them from running around.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
Both caregivers present had to participate in activities that kept them from supervising children such as opening the door and preparing lunch. They had to leave children unattended multiple times throughout the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A caregiver was present around and responsible for children prior to receiving an eligible background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A child was placed in high chair to keep them from running around.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A 6 month old infant again was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
One infant was present in the infant room without a caregiver present. A toddler aged child was observed alone in a hallway without a caregiver present. Children were in 3 different rooms for naptime with only 2 caregivers present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
An infant was observed asleep in a bouncer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A 6 month old infant again was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
Both caregivers present had to participate in activities that kept them from supervising children such as opening the door and preparing lunch. They had to leave children unattended multiple times throughout the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A child was placed in high chair to keep them from running around.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
An infant was observed asleep in a bouncer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
One infant was present in the infant room without a caregiver present. A toddler aged child was observed alone in a hallway without a caregiver present. Children were in 3 different rooms for naptime with only 2 caregivers present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A caregiver was present around and responsible for children prior to receiving an eligible background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-16
A 6 month old infant was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed. This was corrected when the infant left for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A 6 month old infant was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed. This was corrected when the infant left for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A 6 month old infant was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed. This was corrected when the infant left for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A 6 month old infant was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed. This was corrected when the infant left for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A 6 month old infant was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed. This was corrected when the infant left for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A 6 month old infant was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed. This was corrected when the infant left for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
A 6 month old infant was present in a room with a specified age of 3, exceeding the 18 month age gap allowed. This was corrected when the infant left for the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-13
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was present around children prior to receiving a notice of eligibility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-15
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was present around children prior to receiving a notice of eligibility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-15
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was present around children prior to receiving a notice of eligibility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-15
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was present around children prior to receiving a notice of eligibility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-15
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was present around children prior to receiving a notice of eligibility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-15
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was present around children prior to receiving a notice of eligibility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-15
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was present around children prior to receiving a notice of eligibility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-15
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was present around children prior to receiving a notice of eligibility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-15
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was providing transportation without having transportation training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-10
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director used derogatory language when relating to and talking about children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director has been yelling at children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director used derogatory language when relating to and talking about children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was providing transportation without having transportation training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-10
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director has been yelling at children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was providing transportation without having transportation training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-10
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director used derogatory language when relating to and talking about children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director has been yelling at children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director used derogatory language when relating to and talking about children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was providing transportation without having transportation training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-10
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director used derogatory language when relating to and talking about children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director has been yelling at children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was providing transportation without having transportation training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-10
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director used derogatory language when relating to and talking about children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director has been yelling at children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director has been yelling at children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was providing transportation without having transportation training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-10
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director used derogatory language when relating to and talking about children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director used derogatory language when relating to and talking about children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was providing transportation without having transportation training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-10
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director has been yelling at children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
There is sufficient evidence to prove that a caregiver was providing transportation without having transportation training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-10
There is sufficient evidence to prove that the director has been yelling at children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-07
Three caregivers did not have current CPR training that included a hands- on portion as required by minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-30
Three caregivers did not have current CPR training that included a hands- on portion as required by minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-30
Three caregivers did not have current CPR training that included a hands- on portion as required by minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-30
Three caregivers did not have current CPR training that included a hands- on portion as required by minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-30
Three caregivers did not have current CPR training that included a hands- on portion as required by minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-30
Three caregivers did not have current CPR training that included a hands- on portion as required by minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-30
Three caregivers did not have current CPR training that included a hands- on portion as required by minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-30
There was a mop bucket filled with water inside of the kitchen accessible to children. ** Director emptied the bucket and put it inside of the utility closet. **
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
There was a mop bucket filled with water inside of the kitchen accessible to children. ** Director emptied the bucket and put it inside of the utility closet. **
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
A caregiver was out of ratio in the infant room. The caregiver had 8 children in her care with a SAG of 12 - 17 months old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
A caregiver was out of ratio in the infant room. The caregiver had 8 children in her care with a SAG of 12 - 17 months old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
There was a mop bucket filled with water inside of the kitchen accessible to children. ** Director emptied the bucket and put it inside of the utility closet. **
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
A caregiver was out of ratio in the infant room. The caregiver had 8 children in her care with a SAG of 12 - 17 months old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
There was a mop bucket filled with water inside of the kitchen accessible to children. ** Director emptied the bucket and put it inside of the utility closet. **
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
A caregiver was out of ratio in the infant room. The caregiver had 8 children in her care with a SAG of 12 - 17 months old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
There was a mop bucket filled with water inside of the kitchen accessible to children. ** Director emptied the bucket and put it inside of the utility closet. **
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
A caregiver was out of ratio in the infant room. The caregiver had 8 children in her care with a SAG of 12 - 17 months old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
There was a mop bucket filled with water inside of the kitchen accessible to children. ** Director emptied the bucket and put it inside of the utility closet. **
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
A caregiver was out of ratio in the infant room. The caregiver had 8 children in her care with a SAG of 12 - 17 months old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
There was a mop bucket filled with water inside of the kitchen accessible to children. ** Director emptied the bucket and put it inside of the utility closet. **
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
A caregiver was out of ratio in the infant room. The caregiver had 8 children in her care with a SAG of 12 - 17 months old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
There was a mop bucket filled with water inside of the kitchen accessible to children. ** Director emptied the bucket and put it inside of the utility closet. **
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
A caregiver was out of ratio in the infant room. The caregiver had 8 children in her care with a SAG of 12 - 17 months old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-08
There were two children sleeping in highchairs that were laid back during walk through.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-09
There were two children sleeping in highchairs that were laid back during walk through.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-09
There were two children sleeping in highchairs that were laid back during walk through.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-09
There were two children sleeping in highchairs that were laid back during walk through.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-09
There were two children sleeping in highchairs that were laid back during walk through.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-09
There were two children sleeping in highchairs that were laid back during walk through.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-09
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Stepping Stones Academy.
Nearby Daycares in Rosenberg
Abol Cottage Care LLC
3106 FERN BROOK LN
Monez RTC
3107 DOGWOOD KNOLL TRL
Vida RTC
5927 WATFORD BND
Anchor of Hope Residential Treatment Center LLC
1711 HAVEN POINT DR
Divine Hands Residential Treatment Center LLC
8614 PAMUNKY LN
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Stepping Stones Academy's safety grade?
Stepping Stones Academy has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 30.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Stepping Stones Academy have?
Stepping Stones Academy has 169 total violations on record, including 130 critical, 39 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Stepping Stones Academy last inspected?
Stepping Stones Academy was last inspected on April 21, 2026.