Heavenly Light Christian Academy
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
22 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
July 7, 2025
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Heavenly Light Christian Academy
- License number
- 1790452
- Location
- 205 S CHURCH ST, Prosper, TX 75078
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 18.0/100
- Inspection record
- 22 inspections, last inspected July 7, 2025
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
60
Total Violations
Jul 7, 2025
Last Inspection
131
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (60)
Two bottles in the infant room were not labeled.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-14
One staff out of seven had a CPR/First aid that did not consist of the use of CPR manikin or hands on skill based instruction with practice.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22
One staff out of seven had a CPR/First aid that did not consist of the use of CPR manikin or hands on skill based instruction with practice.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22
One staff out of seven had a CPR/First aid that did not consist of the use of CPR manikin or hands on skill based instruction with practice.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22
Two bottles in the infant room were not labeled.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-14
Two bottles in the infant room were not labeled.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-14
One staff out of seven had a CPR/First aid that did not consist of the use of CPR manikin or hands on skill based instruction with practice.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22
Two bottles in the infant room were not labeled.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-14
Based on the information gathered during the investigation, it has been determined that child was left unattended, and caregiver was not at a physical proximity which did not allow visual and/or auditory awareness of the child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-05
Based on the gatherings during the investigation, it was determined concrete evidence exists to support that the parents of a child in risk were not notified immediately after the incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-05
Based on the information gathered during the investigation, it has been determined that child was left unattended, and caregiver was not at a physical proximity which did not allow visual and/or auditory awareness of the child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-05
Based on the gatherings during the investigation, it was determined concrete evidence exists to support that the parents of a child in risk were not notified immediately after the incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-05
Based on the information gathered during the investigation, it has been determined that child was left unattended, and caregiver was not at a physical proximity which did not allow visual and/or auditory awareness of the child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-05
Based on the information gathered during the investigation, it has been determined that child was left unattended, and caregiver was not at a physical proximity which did not allow visual and/or auditory awareness of the child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-05
Based on the gatherings during the investigation, it was determined concrete evidence exists to support that the parents of a child in risk were not notified immediately after the incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-05
Based on the gatherings during the investigation, it was determined concrete evidence exists to support that the parents of a child in risk were not notified immediately after the incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-05
A mat and several cots were not labeled with name or number during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
An 11 month old child infant feeding schedule was not available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
The 18-36M old classroom had 11 children in care with 1 caregiver. Four of the children were sleeping but the others were crying, standing, and walking around. Caregiver was carrying a child but the other children were following her and myself around the room. The caregiver was unable to intervene to ensure each children in the room was being properly supervised.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The 18-36 month old classroom did not have enough walking space between the cots.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
One out of two crib is not labeled with a child's name or number.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
An 11 month old child infant feeding schedule was not available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
The 18-36 month old classroom did not have enough walking space between the cots.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
The 18-36M old classroom had 11 children in care with 1 caregiver. Four of the children were sleeping but the others were crying, standing, and walking around. Caregiver was carrying a child but the other children were following her and myself around the room. The caregiver was unable to intervene to ensure each children in the room was being properly supervised.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One out of two crib is not labeled with a child's name or number.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One out of two crib is not labeled with a child's name or number.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The 18-36 month old classroom did not have enough walking space between the cots.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
An 11 month old child infant feeding schedule was not available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
The 18-36M old classroom had 11 children in care with 1 caregiver. Four of the children were sleeping but the others were crying, standing, and walking around. Caregiver was carrying a child but the other children were following her and myself around the room. The caregiver was unable to intervene to ensure each children in the room was being properly supervised.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
A mat and several cots were not labeled with name or number during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
An 11 month old child infant feeding schedule was not available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
The 18-36 month old classroom did not have enough walking space between the cots.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
A mat and several cots were not labeled with name or number during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
The 18-36M old classroom had 11 children in care with 1 caregiver. Four of the children were sleeping but the others were crying, standing, and walking around. Caregiver was carrying a child but the other children were following her and myself around the room. The caregiver was unable to intervene to ensure each children in the room was being properly supervised.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One out of two crib is not labeled with a child's name or number.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
A mat and several cots were not labeled with name or number during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-29
One of the volunteer's file was not available during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16
There was a 14M old infant in the room with his teacher joining the 4-12 year old class. The specified age group of the class wa 7 years of age.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The building maintenance sheet or any form showing the playground and building is being checked daily was not available for review during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One of the volunteer's file was not available during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16
There was a 14M old infant in the room with his teacher joining the 4-12 year old class. The specified age group of the class wa 7 years of age.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The building maintenance sheet or any form showing the playground and building is being checked daily was not available for review during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One of the volunteer's file was not available during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16
There was a 14M old infant in the room with his teacher joining the 4-12 year old class. The specified age group of the class wa 7 years of age.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The building maintenance sheet or any form showing the playground and building is being checked daily was not available for review during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One of the volunteer's file was not available during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16
The building maintenance sheet or any form showing the playground and building is being checked daily was not available for review during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was a 14M old infant in the room with his teacher joining the 4-12 year old class. The specified age group of the class wa 7 years of age.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
2 out of 8 children's files did not have immunization record available for review during the visit and 2 out of 8 did not have a health statement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-20
The parent policies were missing several items to include promotion of indoor and outdoor activity. This was reviwed and not available during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-27
Two volunteers were present having direct access to the children in care while having a pending background check status.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
2 out of 8 children's files did not have immunization record available for review during the visit and 2 out of 8 did not have a health statement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-20
The parent policies were missing several items to include promotion of indoor and outdoor activity. This was reviwed and not available during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-27
Two volunteers were present having direct access to the children in care while having a pending background check status.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The parent policies were missing several items to include promotion of indoor and outdoor activity. This was reviwed and not available during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-27
2 out of 8 children's files did not have immunization record available for review during the visit and 2 out of 8 did not have a health statement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-20
The parent policies were missing several items to include promotion of indoor and outdoor activity. This was reviwed and not available during the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-27
Two volunteers were present having direct access to the children in care while having a pending background check status.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
2 out of 8 children's files did not have immunization record available for review during the visit and 2 out of 8 did not have a health statement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-20
Two volunteers were present having direct access to the children in care while having a pending background check status.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Heavenly Light Christian Academy.
Nearby Daycares in Prosper
AlphaBEST @ Smothermon - Prosper
4600 LAMPLIGHTS DR.
Whispering Farms Montessori Academy
2460 E PROSPER TRL
Gowsika Kandasamy
3743 KEECHI CREEK DR
Sunrise Montessori
3504 HIGHLAND BAYOU DR
Bright Sunshine Daycare
1405 CROCUS CT
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Heavenly Light Christian Academy's safety grade?
Heavenly Light Christian Academy has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 18.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Heavenly Light Christian Academy have?
Heavenly Light Christian Academy has 60 total violations on record, including 32 critical, 28 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Heavenly Light Christian Academy last inspected?
Heavenly Light Christian Academy was last inspected on July 7, 2025.