New Life Ministry DBA Discovery Kidz
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
12 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
May 18, 2026
Latest inspection
May 13, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated May 18, 2026
- Provider
- New Life Ministry DBA Discovery Kidz
- License number
- 1799939
- Location
- 3901 SPENCER HWY STE 150, Pasadena, TX 77504
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 12 inspections, last inspected May 13, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed May 18, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
150
Total Violations
May 13, 2026
Last Inspection
125
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (150)
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
The emergency practices did not contain fire drills for the months of June and July.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-03
One students food allergy emergency plan did not contain the required health care professional signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-09
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the support inclusive services section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The operational policy did not contain the safe sleep for infants section.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not ensure that all children had been accounted for.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle unattended.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver of the vehicle did not conduct a walk through of the vehicle prior to disarming the child safety alarm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the driver did not sign in the students at pick up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred at the operation when a five-year-old child was left on the vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a five-year-old child was left unsupervised in a vehicle for approximately one hour.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
A two month old infant was observed sleeping in a swing with a blanket. Note: Pictures were taken and this was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-07
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for New Life Ministry DBA Discovery Kidz.
Nearby Daycares in Pasadena
The Learning Treehouse
1502 CHERRYBROOK LN
Kid N Play Learning Academy
1803 KENWICK PL
Diem Thach
4234 BURKE RIDGE DR
Nhien Thi Nguyen
4303 LAKEWOOD DR
Kreative Kidz Academy
2304 VIEW ST
Frequently Asked Questions
What is New Life Ministry DBA Discovery Kidz's safety grade?
New Life Ministry DBA Discovery Kidz has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does New Life Ministry DBA Discovery Kidz have?
New Life Ministry DBA Discovery Kidz has 150 total violations on record, including 123 critical, 27 serious, and 0 minor.
When was New Life Ministry DBA Discovery Kidz last inspected?
New Life Ministry DBA Discovery Kidz was last inspected on May 13, 2026.