Premier Christian Academy
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
50 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
January 20, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Premier Christian Academy
- License number
- 1669637
- Location
- 14501 CLEVELAND GIBBS RD, Northlake, TX 76262
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 12.0/100
- Inspection record
- 50 inspections, last inspected January 20, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
68
Total Violations
Jan 20, 2026
Last Inspection
284
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (68)
Medication was observed to no be in the original container with child's name.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-23
Medication was observed to no be in the original container with child's name.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-23
Medication was observed to no be in the original container with child's name.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-23
Medication was observed to no be in the original container with child's name.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-23
The operation has not had a fire inspection completed since March of 2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-06
The operation has not updated their operational policies to include parents rights or inclusive care statement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-06
The operation has not had a fire inspection completed since March of 2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-06
The operation has not had a fire inspection completed since March of 2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-06
The operation has not updated their operational policies to include parents rights or inclusive care statement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-06
The operation has not had a fire inspection completed since March of 2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-06
The operation has not updated their operational policies to include parents rights or inclusive care statement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-06
The operation has not updated their operational policies to include parents rights or inclusive care statement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-06
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-01
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-01
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-01
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-01
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-15
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-15
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-15
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-15
The operation was found to not follow conditions of a background check for one individual.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-27
I observed a group of 34 children playing on the big playground with a specified age group of 3. The max group for this age range is 30.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-27
The operation was found to not follow conditions of a background check for one individual.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-27
I observed a group of 34 children playing on the big playground with a specified age group of 3. The max group for this age range is 30.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-27
The operation was found to not follow conditions of a background check for one individual.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-27
I observed a group of 34 children playing on the big playground with a specified age group of 3. The max group for this age range is 30.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-27
The operation was found to not follow conditions of a background check for one individual.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-27
I observed a group of 34 children playing on the big playground with a specified age group of 3. The max group for this age range is 30.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-27
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-26
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-26
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-26
The operation is missing the testing data for the inpact rating for the unitary surfacing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-26
Caregivers use candy as a reard for "star sleepers", kids who sleep well during naptime.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Caregivers use candy as a reard for "star sleepers", kids who sleep well during naptime.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Caregivers use candy as a reard for "star sleepers", kids who sleep well during naptime.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Caregivers use candy as a reard for "star sleepers", kids who sleep well during naptime.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
3 people who reportedly worked directly with the caregiver, confirmed that a preschool teacher was humiliating children to redirect behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-24
3 people who reportedly worked directly with the caregiver, confirmed that a preschool teacher was humiliating children to redirect behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-24
3 people who reportedly worked directly with the caregiver, confirmed that a preschool teacher was humiliating children to redirect behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-24
3 people who reportedly worked directly with the caregiver, confirmed that a preschool teacher was humiliating children to redirect behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-24
The caregiver who administered first aid did not have a current certificate at the time of the incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
The caregiver who administered first aid did not have a current certificate at the time of the incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
The caregiver who administered first aid did not have a current certificate at the time of the incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
The caregiver who administered first aid did not have a current certificate at the time of the incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that a caregiver was present at the operation with an ineligible letter from the CBCU. The DOH was 12/1/2021, the ineligible letter was dated 2/9/2022, and the person was still allowed to work at the center through March 2022.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that the director knowingly allowed a caregiver to be present and in charge of children without having a complete background check on file and then with an ineligible letter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that a caregiver was present at the operation with an ineligible letter from the CBCU. The DOH was 12/1/2021, the ineligible letter was dated 2/9/2022, and the person was still allowed to work at the center through March 2022.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that the director knowingly allowed a caregiver to be present and in charge of children without having a complete background check on file and then with an ineligible letter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that a caregiver was present at the operation with an ineligible letter from the CBCU. The DOH was 12/1/2021, the ineligible letter was dated 2/9/2022, and the person was still allowed to work at the center through March 2022.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that the director knowingly allowed a caregiver to be present and in charge of children without having a complete background check on file and then with an ineligible letter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that a caregiver was present at the operation with an ineligible letter from the CBCU. The DOH was 12/1/2021, the ineligible letter was dated 2/9/2022, and the person was still allowed to work at the center through March 2022.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that the director knowingly allowed a caregiver to be present and in charge of children without having a complete background check on file and then with an ineligible letter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-21
One caregiver was observed in a classroom with children prior to the operation receiving notification from the CBCU regarding the background check. The caregiver was removed from the classroom and sent home during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed in a classroom with children prior to the operation receiving notification from the CBCU regarding the background check. The caregiver was removed from the classroom and sent home during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed in a classroom with children prior to the operation receiving notification from the CBCU regarding the background check. The caregiver was removed from the classroom and sent home during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed in a classroom with children prior to the operation receiving notification from the CBCU regarding the background check. The caregiver was removed from the classroom and sent home during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that an 11 month old non-walking infant was being placed on a cot for naptime rather than in a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-07
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that on March 9th and 10th, the infant room had 11 children, all ages 11m or younger. The exceeds the allowed group size by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-07
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that an 11 month old non-walking infant was being placed on a cot for naptime rather than in a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-07
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that an 11 month old non-walking infant was being placed on a cot for naptime rather than in a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-07
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that on March 9th and 10th, the infant room had 11 children, all ages 11m or younger. The exceeds the allowed group size by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-07
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that an 11 month old non-walking infant was being placed on a cot for naptime rather than in a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-07
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that on March 9th and 10th, the infant room had 11 children, all ages 11m or younger. The exceeds the allowed group size by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-07
This standard was part of an investigation. It was determined that on March 9th and 10th, the infant room had 11 children, all ages 11m or younger. The exceeds the allowed group size by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-07
A child in care sustained an injury that required medical attention, and was not reported to Child Care Regulation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-14
A child in care sustained an injury that required medical attention, and was not reported to Child Care Regulation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-14
A child in care sustained an injury that required medical attention, and was not reported to Child Care Regulation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-14
A child in care sustained an injury that required medical attention, and was not reported to Child Care Regulation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-14
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Premier Christian Academy.
Nearby Daycares in Northlake
Geetha Srirangapuri
1605 18TH ST
Jane Ruestmann Elementary Preschool
6610 CLEVELAND GIBBS RD
Julie Littleton
1601 18TH ST
St. Peter Preschool
15701 CLEVELAND GIBBS RD
The Hive- Northlake LLC
1485 COMMONS CIR STE 200
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Premier Christian Academy's safety grade?
Premier Christian Academy has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 12.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Premier Christian Academy have?
Premier Christian Academy has 68 total violations on record, including 52 critical, 16 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Premier Christian Academy last inspected?
Premier Christian Academy was last inspected on January 20, 2026.