Clayton Youth Enrichment @ Walker Creek Elementary
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
13 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
February 19, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Clayton Youth Enrichment @ Walker Creek Elementary
- License number
- 850576- 1128
- Location
- 8780 BRIDGE ST, North Richland Hills, TX 76180
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 23.1/100
- Inspection record
- 13 inspections, last inspected February 19, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
36
Total Violations
Feb 19, 2026
Last Inspection
60
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (36)
The operation had two expired medications.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-10
The operation had two expired medications.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-10
One child's file was missing the permission to administer medication form.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-05
The operation had two expired medications.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-10
One child's file was missing the permission to administer medication form.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-05
One child's file was missing the permission to administer medication form.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-05
At the time of the inspection the operation had not conducted fire drills for 2 of the last 5 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
At the time of the inspection 1 of the 6 children's records reviewed did not have an accurate birth date recorded for the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-05
At the time of the inspection a child with a noted food allergy on their admission form did not have an allergy action signed by their physician on file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
At the time of the inspection the operation had not conducted fire drills for 2 of the last 5 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
At the time of the inspection a child with a noted food allergy on their admission form did not have an allergy action signed by their physician on file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
At the time of the inspection 1 of the 6 children's records reviewed did not have an accurate birth date recorded for the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-05
At the time of the inspection 6 of the 6 children's records reviewed did not have the name, address, and contact number for the child's physician or an emergency medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-05
At the time of the inspection the operation had not conducted fire drills for 2 of the last 5 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
At the time of the inspection 6 of the 6 children's records reviewed did not have the name, address, and contact number for the child's physician or an emergency medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-05
At the time of the inspection 6 of the 6 children's records reviewed did not have the name, address, and contact number for the child's physician or an emergency medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-05
At the time of the inspection a child with a noted food allergy on their admission form did not have an allergy action signed by their physician on file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
At the time of the inspection 1 of the 6 children's records reviewed did not have an accurate birth date recorded for the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-05
At the time of review 1 employee had incomplete training records. The remaining required hours were stored in a manner that made them inaccessible at the time of the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-08
At the time of review 1 employee had incomplete training records. The remaining required hours were stored in a manner that made them inaccessible at the time of the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-08
At the time of review 1 employee had incomplete training records. The remaining required hours were stored in a manner that made them inaccessible at the time of the visit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-08
At the time of the inspection it was found that a child has an epi pen stored at the operation in a ziploc bag with the child's name on written on the bag. The epi pen itself has no identifying information for who it was prescribed to and the prescription box for the epi pen was not on site at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-10
At the time of the inspection it was found that a child has an epi pen stored at the operation in a ziploc bag with the child's name on written on the bag. The epi pen itself has no identifying information for who it was prescribed to and the prescription box for the epi pen was not on site at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-10
At the time of the inspection it was found that a child has an epi pen stored at the operation in a ziploc bag with the child's name on written on the bag. The epi pen itself has no identifying information for who it was prescribed to and the prescription box for the epi pen was not on site at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-10
Based on information obtained caregivers released a child in care to their sibling, who was under the age of 18. In doing this the caregivers did not check enrollment documents to verify information of individuals giving permission to release the child and they did not check ID or record identity verification of the sibling picking the child up. All of this violates the operational policy for release of children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-25
Based on information obtained the operation did not obtain ID and record the identity of an individual picking a child up from the operation who had not picked up the child before.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-25
Based on information obtained caregivers released a child in care to their sibling, who was under the age of 18. In doing this the caregivers did not check enrollment documents to verify information of individuals giving permission to release the child and they did not check ID or record identity verification of the sibling picking the child up. All of this violates the operational policy for release of children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-25
Based on information obtained the operation did not obtain ID and record the identity of an individual picking a child up from the operation who had not picked up the child before.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-25
Based on information obtained the operation did not obtain ID and record the identity of an individual picking a child up from the operation who had not picked up the child before.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-25
Based on information obtained caregivers released a child in care to their sibling, who was under the age of 18. In doing this the caregivers did not check enrollment documents to verify information of individuals giving permission to release the child and they did not check ID or record identity verification of the sibling picking the child up. All of this violates the operational policy for release of children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-25
This standard was evaluated in regards to a report and was found to be deficient. The operation was aware that an employee tested positive for COVID-19 on January 21, 2022 . The report was not made to Licensing until February 1, 2022.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
This standard was evaluated in regards to a report and was found to be deficient. The operation was aware that an employee tested positive for COVID-19 on January 21, 2022 . The report was not made to Licensing until February 1, 2022.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
This standard was evaluated in regards to a report and was found to be deficient. The operation was aware that an employee tested positive for COVID-19 on January 21, 2022 . The report was not made to Licensing until February 1, 2022.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The program allowed a person to be present at the operation before receiving notice from the CBCU regarding the person s eligibility. The operation submitted a background request during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-27
The program allowed a person to be present at the operation before receiving notice from the CBCU regarding the person s eligibility. The operation submitted a background request during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-27
The program allowed a person to be present at the operation before receiving notice from the CBCU regarding the person s eligibility. The operation submitted a background request during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-27
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Clayton Youth Enrichment @ Walker Creek Elementary.
Nearby Daycares in North Richland Hills
Ft. Worth Christian School
6200 HOLIDAY LN
Terri Lunsford
6886 ROLLING RIDGE DR
Patricia Geyer
7825 ODELL ST
Cheri Prewitt
6322 MARK CT
This Rock Weekday Childcare
7025 MID CITIES BLVD
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Clayton Youth Enrichment @ Walker Creek Elementary's safety grade?
Clayton Youth Enrichment @ Walker Creek Elementary has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 23.1 out of 100.
How many violations does Clayton Youth Enrichment @ Walker Creek Elementary have?
Clayton Youth Enrichment @ Walker Creek Elementary has 36 total violations on record, including 27 critical, 9 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Clayton Youth Enrichment @ Walker Creek Elementary last inspected?
Clayton Youth Enrichment @ Walker Creek Elementary was last inspected on February 19, 2026.