The Goddard School - Sienna Plantation
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
14 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
May 11, 2026
Latest inspection
June 18, 2025
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated May 11, 2026
- Provider
- The Goddard School - Sienna Plantation
- License number
- 1732287
- Location
- 6111 SIENNA RANCH RD, Missouri City, TX 77459
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- D (Below Average), score 62.5/100
- Inspection record
- 14 inspections, last inspected June 18, 2025
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed May 11, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
47
Total Violations
Jun 18, 2025
Last Inspection
244
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (47)
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the walk through, multiple rooms were observed to have the following: play materials such as baskets and magnetic tiles were observed to be damaged and cracked. Corrected at Inspection: the operation removed all play materials such as the baskets and magnetic tiles that were observed to be damaged.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
During the walkthrough inspection a caregiver was observed in the pre-k classroom caring for 27 children without a cleared background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-01
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
In the infant classroom there were 11 children ages ranged from 2-12 months. According to the specified age group the operation is allowed to have 10 children with two caregivers. The operation was out of ratio by 1 child. This was corrected at the inspection when the director removed one infant and placed them in another classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-23
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for The Goddard School - Sienna Plantation.
Nearby Daycares in Missouri City
Naomi Raziano
3111 SABINE POINT WAY
Visionary PreK Academy
7215 W FUQUA DR BLDG 7
Ekaterina Korobkova
1922 QUAIL PLACE DR
Life Time Kids Camp
8421 HIGHWAY 6
Sienna Kids Academy
8717 SCANLAN TRCE
Frequently Asked Questions
What is The Goddard School - Sienna Plantation's safety grade?
The Goddard School - Sienna Plantation has a safety grade of D (Below Average) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 62.5 out of 100.
How many violations does The Goddard School - Sienna Plantation have?
The Goddard School - Sienna Plantation has 47 total violations on record, including 35 critical, 12 serious, and 0 minor.
When was The Goddard School - Sienna Plantation last inspected?
The Goddard School - Sienna Plantation was last inspected on June 18, 2025.