The Cartwright School
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
13 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 29, 2026
Latest inspection
April 23, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 29, 2026
- Provider
- The Cartwright School
- License number
- 1729639
- Location
- 1647 CARTWRIGHT RD, Missouri City, TX 77489
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 39.8/100
- Inspection record
- 13 inspections, last inspected April 23, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 29, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
80
Total Violations
Apr 23, 2026
Last Inspection
51
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (89)
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that a caregiver did not use good judgment when she made a child retrieve an item that fell into the toilet
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-01
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that a caregiver did not use good judgment when she made a child retrieve an item that fell into the toilet
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-01
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that a caregiver did not use good judgment when she made a child retrieve an item that fell into the toilet
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-01
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that a caregiver did not use good judgment when she made a child retrieve an item that fell into the toilet
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-01
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that a caregiver did not use good judgment when she made a child retrieve an item that fell into the toilet
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-01
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that a caregiver did not use good judgment when she made a child retrieve an item that fell into the toilet
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-01
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that a caregiver did not use good judgment when she made a child retrieve an item that fell into the toilet
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-01
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that a caregiver did not use good judgment when she made a child retrieve an item that fell into the toilet
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-01
There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that a caregiver did not use good judgment when she made a child retrieve an item that fell into the toilet
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-01
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The caregiver in the mixed classroom did not know the ages of all the children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
The outdoor play area did not have loose fill nor unitary surfacing materials installed underrneath or around the play equipment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The use zones of the play structures with slides did not extend six feet around the perimeter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
The mixed age group classroom did not have adequate lighting while the children were napping. This was corrected when the caregiver turned on a light.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed during naptime with 31 children in care. The SAG was 3 years of age.The operation was over ratio by one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-09
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A caregiver who was caring for children did not have an eligible result from CBCU.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-15
The paint in the reading room was chipping off of the wall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
A child with a diagnosed food allergy did not have any medication on file, making it impossible for their food allergy action plan to be followed if the child is exposed to the allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-22
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for The Cartwright School.
Nearby Daycares in Missouri City
Naomi Raziano
3111 SABINE POINT WAY
Life Time Kids Camp
8421 HIGHWAY 6
Visionary PreK Academy
7215 W FUQUA DR BLDG 7
Ekaterina Korobkova
1922 QUAIL PLACE DR
Sienna Kids Academy
8717 SCANLAN TRCE
Frequently Asked Questions
What is The Cartwright School's safety grade?
The Cartwright School has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 39.8 out of 100.
How many violations does The Cartwright School have?
The Cartwright School has 80 total violations on record, including 80 critical, 0 serious, and 0 minor.
When was The Cartwright School last inspected?
The Cartwright School was last inspected on April 23, 2026.