Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
92 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
November 25, 2025
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney
- License number
- 1673087
- Location
- 7900 STACY RD, McKinney, TX 75070
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 92 inspections, last inspected November 25, 2025
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
Quality Rating
Rated by Texas Rising Star, the state quality rating and improvement system.
100
Total Violations
Nov 25, 2025
Last Inspection
240
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (100)
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a director did not supervise a caregiver that transports children to ensure transportation procedures/protocols were followed which resulted in a child left on a vehicle for 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a child was left on a vehicle unattended for 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a caregiver did not adequately supervise a child which resulted in a child left behind on a transporting vehicle which placed a child at risk of bodily harm or injury.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a caregiver did not adequately supervise a child which resulted in a child left behind on a transporting vehicle which placed a child at risk of bodily harm or injury.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a director did not supervise a caregiver that transports children to ensure transportation procedures/protocols were followed which resulted in a child left on a vehicle for 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a child was left on a vehicle unattended for 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a child was left on a vehicle unattended for 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a director did not supervise a caregiver that transports children to ensure transportation procedures/protocols were followed which resulted in a child left on a vehicle for 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a caregiver did not adequately supervise a child which resulted in a child left behind on a transporting vehicle which placed a child at risk of bodily harm or injury.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a child was left on a vehicle unattended for 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a director did not supervise a caregiver that transports children to ensure transportation procedures/protocols were followed which resulted in a child left on a vehicle for 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a caregiver did not adequately supervise a child which resulted in a child left behind on a transporting vehicle which placed a child at risk of bodily harm or injury.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17
Based on interviews with staff, a caregiver did not consider a child's cognitive development to adequately supervise a child. The caregiver was not in close proximity or visual aware of a child's on-going activity during outdoor play which resulted in the child's head entrapped between 2 parallel bars that encloses a drain on the pre-k playground.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
Based on an interview with staff, management did not report a situation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
Based on interviews with the parent and staff, a metal fence that encloses a landscape drainage on the pre-k playground is a safety hazard. A young child was able to get their head entrapped between 2 parallel bars.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
The area at the front of the operation where infant care seats are stored was not labeled with the child's name. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the director labeled the car seats/ storage area with the child's first and last name.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The area at the front of the operation where infant care seats are stored was not labeled with the child's name. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the director labeled the car seats/ storage area with the child's first and last name.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Based on interviews with the parent and staff, a metal fence that encloses a landscape drainage on the pre-k playground is a safety hazard. A young child was able to get their head entrapped between 2 parallel bars.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
Based on an interview with staff, management did not report a situation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
Based on interviews with the parent and staff, a metal fence that encloses a landscape drainage on the pre-k playground is a safety hazard. A young child was able to get their head entrapped between 2 parallel bars.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
Based on interviews with staff, a caregiver did not consider a child's cognitive development to adequately supervise a child. The caregiver was not in close proximity or visual aware of a child's on-going activity during outdoor play which resulted in the child's head entrapped between 2 parallel bars that encloses a drain on the pre-k playground.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
Based on an interview with staff, management did not report a situation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
The area at the front of the operation where infant care seats are stored was not labeled with the child's name. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the director labeled the car seats/ storage area with the child's first and last name.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Based on interviews with staff, a caregiver did not consider a child's cognitive development to adequately supervise a child. The caregiver was not in close proximity or visual aware of a child's on-going activity during outdoor play which resulted in the child's head entrapped between 2 parallel bars that encloses a drain on the pre-k playground.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
Based on an interview with staff, management did not report a situation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
Based on interviews with staff, a caregiver did not consider a child's cognitive development to adequately supervise a child. The caregiver was not in close proximity or visual aware of a child's on-going activity during outdoor play which resulted in the child's head entrapped between 2 parallel bars that encloses a drain on the pre-k playground.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
The area at the front of the operation where infant care seats are stored was not labeled with the child's name. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the director labeled the car seats/ storage area with the child's first and last name.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Based on interviews with the parent and staff, a metal fence that encloses a landscape drainage on the pre-k playground is a safety hazard. A young child was able to get their head entrapped between 2 parallel bars.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01
A child with a diagnosis food allergy did not have a complete food allergy plan on file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-04
A child with a diagnosis food allergy did not have a complete food allergy plan on file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-04
A child with a diagnosis food allergy did not have a complete food allergy plan on file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-04
A child with a diagnosis food allergy did not have a complete food allergy plan on file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-04
Based on the interview with the parent of a child and the staff, the operation was found not to be in compliance with the standard evaluated for a standard investigation. The parent was not notified of an injury that required medical treatment by a health care professional. Management notified a relative during pick-up instead.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-01
Based on the interview with the parent of a child and the staff, the operation was found not to be in compliance with the standard evaluated for a standard investigation. The parent was not notified of an injury that required medical treatment by a health care professional. Management notified a relative during pick-up instead.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-01
Based on the interview with the parent of a child and the staff, the operation was found not to be in compliance with the standard evaluated for a standard investigation. The parent was not notified of an injury that required medical treatment by a health care professional. Management notified a relative during pick-up instead.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-01
Based on the interview with the parent of a child and the staff, the operation was found not to be in compliance with the standard evaluated for a standard investigation. The parent was not notified of an injury that required medical treatment by a health care professional. Management notified a relative during pick-up instead.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-01
The standard is evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, a caregiver placed a child in a bathroom with the door closed for displaying inappropriate behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03
The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, it was determined that the caregiver did not demonstrate good judgment when a child was placed in the bathroom with the door closed as the caregiver stood in front of the bathroom door to speak to the child about their inappropriate behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03
The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, it was determined that the caregiver did not demonstrate good judgment when a child was placed in the bathroom with the door closed as the caregiver stood in front of the bathroom door to speak to the child about their inappropriate behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03
The standard is evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, a caregiver placed a child in a bathroom with the door closed for displaying inappropriate behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03
The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, it was determined that the caregiver did not demonstrate good judgment when a child was placed in the bathroom with the door closed as the caregiver stood in front of the bathroom door to speak to the child about their inappropriate behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03
The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, it was determined that the caregiver did not demonstrate good judgment when a child was placed in the bathroom with the door closed as the caregiver stood in front of the bathroom door to speak to the child about their inappropriate behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03
The standard is evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, a caregiver placed a child in a bathroom with the door closed for displaying inappropriate behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03
The standard is evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, a caregiver placed a child in a bathroom with the door closed for displaying inappropriate behavior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03
It was determined through an investigation that a child grabbed a child roughly during naptime after the child had gone to the wrong nap mat.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16
It was determined through an investigation that a child grabbed a child roughly during naptime after the child had gone to the wrong nap mat.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16
It was determined through an investigation that a child grabbed a child roughly during naptime after the child had gone to the wrong nap mat.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16
It was determined through an investigation that a child grabbed a child roughly during naptime after the child had gone to the wrong nap mat.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16
During this inspection, a caregiver allowed children between 18-24 months engaged in screen time. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the caregiver ended the screen time and removed the tablet and transition the children to another activity.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During this inspection, a caregiver allowed children between 18-24 months engaged in screen time. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the caregiver ended the screen time and removed the tablet and transition the children to another activity.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During this inspection, a caregiver allowed children between 18-24 months engaged in screen time. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the caregiver ended the screen time and removed the tablet and transition the children to another activity.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During this inspection, a caregiver allowed children between 18-24 months engaged in screen time. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the caregiver ended the screen time and removed the tablet and transition the children to another activity.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two infants were observed asleep in restrictive devices; one was asleep in a high chair and another infant was asleep while placed in an infant seat. After it was brought to the caregivers attention that young infants that are non-mobile must nap in a crib, the caregivers removed the infants and placed each infant in a face up position in a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-29
Two infants were observed asleep in restrictive devices; one was asleep in a high chair and another infant was asleep while placed in an infant seat. After it was brought to the caregivers attention that young infants that are non-mobile must nap in a crib, the caregivers removed the infants and placed each infant in a face up position in a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-29
Two infants were observed asleep in restrictive devices; one was asleep in a high chair and another infant was asleep while placed in an infant seat. After it was brought to the caregivers attention that young infants that are non-mobile must nap in a crib, the caregivers removed the infants and placed each infant in a face up position in a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-29
Two infants were observed asleep in restrictive devices; one was asleep in a high chair and another infant was asleep while placed in an infant seat. After it was brought to the caregivers attention that young infants that are non-mobile must nap in a crib, the caregivers removed the infants and placed each infant in a face up position in a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-29
The outdoor playgrounds have 4 holes that may cause a tripping hazard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
The outdoor playgrounds have 4 holes that may cause a tripping hazard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
The outdoor playgrounds have 4 holes that may cause a tripping hazard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
The outdoor playgrounds have 4 holes that may cause a tripping hazard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
Three infants did not have current infant feeding instructions. The feeding instructions were last shared with the parents March 2024. Caregivers reviewing the feeding instructions at least once a month ensure the caregivers have the most recent feeding instruction instructions feed the infants the proper nutrients each day at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not to be in compliance. Based on interviews with parents, it has been determined that infant daily reports are not shared with parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-15
Two infant bottles were labeled. Labeling the children's bottle with the child's first and last name will reduce the risk of infants' bottle feed the incorrect formula and causing an allergic reaction.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
Three infants did not have current infant feeding instructions. The feeding instructions were last shared with the parents March 2024. Caregivers reviewing the feeding instructions at least once a month ensure the caregivers have the most recent feeding instruction instructions feed the infants the proper nutrients each day at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not to be in compliance. Based on interviews with parents, it has been determined that infant daily reports are not shared with parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-15
Two infant bottles were labeled. Labeling the children's bottle with the child's first and last name will reduce the risk of infants' bottle feed the incorrect formula and causing an allergic reaction.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
Three infants did not have current infant feeding instructions. The feeding instructions were last shared with the parents March 2024. Caregivers reviewing the feeding instructions at least once a month ensure the caregivers have the most recent feeding instruction instructions feed the infants the proper nutrients each day at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not to be in compliance. Based on interviews with parents, it has been determined that infant daily reports are not shared with parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-15
Two infant bottles were labeled. Labeling the children's bottle with the child's first and last name will reduce the risk of infants' bottle feed the incorrect formula and causing an allergic reaction.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
Three infants did not have current infant feeding instructions. The feeding instructions were last shared with the parents March 2024. Caregivers reviewing the feeding instructions at least once a month ensure the caregivers have the most recent feeding instruction instructions feed the infants the proper nutrients each day at the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
Two infant bottles were labeled. Labeling the children's bottle with the child's first and last name will reduce the risk of infants' bottle feed the incorrect formula and causing an allergic reaction.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19
The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not to be in compliance. Based on interviews with parents, it has been determined that infant daily reports are not shared with parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-15
This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient. It was determined during the investigation that the caregiver in charge of the child did not properly communicate with the incoming staff or parent about the whereabouts of the child's device when needed. This caused confusion overall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-18
This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient. It was determined during the investigation that the caregiver in charge of the child did not properly communicate with the incoming staff or parent about the whereabouts of the child's device when needed. This caused confusion overall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-18
This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient. It was determined during the investigation that the caregiver in charge of the child did not properly communicate with the incoming staff or parent about the whereabouts of the child's device when needed. This caused confusion overall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-18
This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient. It was determined during the investigation that the caregiver in charge of the child did not properly communicate with the incoming staff or parent about the whereabouts of the child's device when needed. This caused confusion overall.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-18
At the time of inspection infants were observed not having their hands washed after diaper changes. The caregivers also did not wash their hands following the diapering procedures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10
During the inspection time we observed three cribs without crib bedding present. The sheets had been washed and were placed back on the cribs during the inspection time.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
At the time of inspection infants were observed not having their hands washed after diaper changes. The caregivers also did not wash their hands following the diapering procedures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10
During the inspection time we observed three cribs without crib bedding present. The sheets had been washed and were placed back on the cribs during the inspection time.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the inspection time we observed three cribs without crib bedding present. The sheets had been washed and were placed back on the cribs during the inspection time.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
At the time of inspection infants were observed not having their hands washed after diaper changes. The caregivers also did not wash their hands following the diapering procedures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10
At the time of inspection infants were observed not having their hands washed after diaper changes. The caregivers also did not wash their hands following the diapering procedures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10
During the inspection time we observed three cribs without crib bedding present. The sheets had been washed and were placed back on the cribs during the inspection time.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient during the physical inspection. A few of the infants in care were observed crying for a period of time, placed in a rocker for over 15 minutes, and observed crying and standing in their cribs.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-03
This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient during the physical inspection. A few of the infants in care were observed crying for a period of time, placed in a rocker for over 15 minutes, and observed crying and standing in their cribs.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-03
This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient during the physical inspection. A few of the infants in care were observed crying for a period of time, placed in a rocker for over 15 minutes, and observed crying and standing in their cribs.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-03
This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient during the physical inspection. A few of the infants in care were observed crying for a period of time, placed in a rocker for over 15 minutes, and observed crying and standing in their cribs.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-03
This standard was evaluated as part of the investigation and was found to be deficient. A caregiver leaving for the day did not share information with an incoming caregiver concerning a child who had received a minor injury earlier in the day while the child was in care
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13
This standard was evaluated as part of the investigation and was found to be deficient. A caregiver leaving for the day did not share information with an incoming caregiver concerning a child who had received a minor injury earlier in the day while the child was in care
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13
This standard was evaluated as part of the investigation and was found to be deficient. A caregiver leaving for the day did not share information with an incoming caregiver concerning a child who had received a minor injury earlier in the day while the child was in care
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13
This standard was evaluated as part of the investigation and was found to be deficient. A caregiver leaving for the day did not share information with an incoming caregiver concerning a child who had received a minor injury earlier in the day while the child was in care
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13
The immunization exemption form had expired for one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-18
The immunization exemption form had expired for one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-18
The immunization exemption form had expired for one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-18
The immunization exemption form had expired for one child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-18
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney.
Nearby Daycares in McKinney
Quanika Logan
9305 AMBER DOWNS DR
Kiddie Academy of McKinney
6300 VIRGINIA PKWY
Daffodils Montessori Preschool
4901 ARROYO TRL
Kellees Child Care
2701 CANYON BAY
Vani Akula
4409 FAYETTE DR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney's safety grade?
Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney have?
Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney has 100 total violations on record, including 80 critical, 20 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney last inspected?
Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney was last inspected on November 25, 2025.