Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney

7900 STACY RD, McKinney, TX 75070Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

92 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

November 25, 2025

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney
License number
1673087
Location
7900 STACY RD, McKinney, TX 75070
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 0.0/100
Inspection record
92 inspections, last inspected November 25, 2025
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor0.0 / 100
Health0/100
Safety0/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

Quality Rating

2 Stars

Rated by Texas Rising Star, the state quality rating and improvement system.

100

Total Violations

Nov 25, 2025

Last Inspection

240

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (100)

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1003(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a director did not supervise a caregiver that transports children to ensure transportation procedures/protocols were followed which resulted in a child left on a vehicle for 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSAFETY746.5605(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a child was left on a vehicle unattended for 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a caregiver did not adequately supervise a child which resulted in a child left behind on a transporting vehicle which placed a child at risk of bodily harm or injury.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(4)Aug 27, 2025

This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a caregiver did not adequately supervise a child which resulted in a child left behind on a transporting vehicle which placed a child at risk of bodily harm or injury.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1003(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a director did not supervise a caregiver that transports children to ensure transportation procedures/protocols were followed which resulted in a child left on a vehicle for 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(4)Aug 27, 2025

This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSAFETY746.5605(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a child was left on a vehicle unattended for 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(4)Aug 27, 2025

This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSAFETY746.5605(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a child was left on a vehicle unattended for 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1003(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a director did not supervise a caregiver that transports children to ensure transportation procedures/protocols were followed which resulted in a child left on a vehicle for 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a caregiver did not adequately supervise a child which resulted in a child left behind on a transporting vehicle which placed a child at risk of bodily harm or injury.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(4)Aug 27, 2025

This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSAFETY746.5605(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a child was left on a vehicle unattended for 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1003(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a director did not supervise a caregiver that transports children to ensure transportation procedures/protocols were followed which resulted in a child left on a vehicle for 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Aug 27, 2025

Based on a review of information obtained during a DFPS investigation it was determined that a caregiver did not adequately supervise a child which resulted in a child left behind on a transporting vehicle which placed a child at risk of bodily harm or injury.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Jun 3, 2025

Based on interviews with staff, a caregiver did not consider a child's cognitive development to adequately supervise a child. The caregiver was not in close proximity or visual aware of a child's on-going activity during outdoor play which resulted in the child's head entrapped between 2 parallel bars that encloses a drain on the pre-k playground.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.305(a)(6)Jun 3, 2025

Based on an interview with staff, management did not report a situation that placed a child at risk.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701Jun 3, 2025

Based on interviews with the parent and staff, a metal fence that encloses a landscape drainage on the pre-k playground is a safety hazard. A young child was able to get their head entrapped between 2 parallel bars.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4505Jun 3, 2025

The area at the front of the operation where infant care seats are stored was not labeled with the child's name. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the director labeled the car seats/ storage area with the child's first and last name.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4505Jun 3, 2025

The area at the front of the operation where infant care seats are stored was not labeled with the child's name. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the director labeled the car seats/ storage area with the child's first and last name.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701Jun 3, 2025

Based on interviews with the parent and staff, a metal fence that encloses a landscape drainage on the pre-k playground is a safety hazard. A young child was able to get their head entrapped between 2 parallel bars.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.305(a)(6)Jun 3, 2025

Based on an interview with staff, management did not report a situation that placed a child at risk.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701Jun 3, 2025

Based on interviews with the parent and staff, a metal fence that encloses a landscape drainage on the pre-k playground is a safety hazard. A young child was able to get their head entrapped between 2 parallel bars.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Jun 3, 2025

Based on interviews with staff, a caregiver did not consider a child's cognitive development to adequately supervise a child. The caregiver was not in close proximity or visual aware of a child's on-going activity during outdoor play which resulted in the child's head entrapped between 2 parallel bars that encloses a drain on the pre-k playground.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.305(a)(6)Jun 3, 2025

Based on an interview with staff, management did not report a situation that placed a child at risk.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4505Jun 3, 2025

The area at the front of the operation where infant care seats are stored was not labeled with the child's name. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the director labeled the car seats/ storage area with the child's first and last name.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Jun 3, 2025

Based on interviews with staff, a caregiver did not consider a child's cognitive development to adequately supervise a child. The caregiver was not in close proximity or visual aware of a child's on-going activity during outdoor play which resulted in the child's head entrapped between 2 parallel bars that encloses a drain on the pre-k playground.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.305(a)(6)Jun 3, 2025

Based on an interview with staff, management did not report a situation that placed a child at risk.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Jun 3, 2025

Based on interviews with staff, a caregiver did not consider a child's cognitive development to adequately supervise a child. The caregiver was not in close proximity or visual aware of a child's on-going activity during outdoor play which resulted in the child's head entrapped between 2 parallel bars that encloses a drain on the pre-k playground.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4505Jun 3, 2025

The area at the front of the operation where infant care seats are stored was not labeled with the child's name. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the director labeled the car seats/ storage area with the child's first and last name.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701Jun 3, 2025

Based on interviews with the parent and staff, a metal fence that encloses a landscape drainage on the pre-k playground is a safety hazard. A young child was able to get their head entrapped between 2 parallel bars.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-01

CRITICALHEALTH746.605(15)May 28, 2025

A child with a diagnosis food allergy did not have a complete food allergy plan on file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-04

CRITICALHEALTH746.605(15)May 28, 2025

A child with a diagnosis food allergy did not have a complete food allergy plan on file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-04

CRITICALHEALTH746.605(15)May 28, 2025

A child with a diagnosis food allergy did not have a complete food allergy plan on file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-04

CRITICALHEALTH746.605(15)May 28, 2025

A child with a diagnosis food allergy did not have a complete food allergy plan on file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-04

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Apr 22, 2025

Based on the interview with the parent of a child and the staff, the operation was found not to be in compliance with the standard evaluated for a standard investigation. The parent was not notified of an injury that required medical treatment by a health care professional. Management notified a relative during pick-up instead.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-01

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Apr 22, 2025

Based on the interview with the parent of a child and the staff, the operation was found not to be in compliance with the standard evaluated for a standard investigation. The parent was not notified of an injury that required medical treatment by a health care professional. Management notified a relative during pick-up instead.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-01

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Apr 22, 2025

Based on the interview with the parent of a child and the staff, the operation was found not to be in compliance with the standard evaluated for a standard investigation. The parent was not notified of an injury that required medical treatment by a health care professional. Management notified a relative during pick-up instead.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-01

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Apr 22, 2025

Based on the interview with the parent of a child and the staff, the operation was found not to be in compliance with the standard evaluated for a standard investigation. The parent was not notified of an injury that required medical treatment by a health care professional. Management notified a relative during pick-up instead.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(7)Jan 17, 2025

The standard is evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, a caregiver placed a child in a bathroom with the door closed for displaying inappropriate behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Jan 17, 2025

The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, it was determined that the caregiver did not demonstrate good judgment when a child was placed in the bathroom with the door closed as the caregiver stood in front of the bathroom door to speak to the child about their inappropriate behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Jan 17, 2025

The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, it was determined that the caregiver did not demonstrate good judgment when a child was placed in the bathroom with the door closed as the caregiver stood in front of the bathroom door to speak to the child about their inappropriate behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(7)Jan 17, 2025

The standard is evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, a caregiver placed a child in a bathroom with the door closed for displaying inappropriate behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Jan 17, 2025

The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, it was determined that the caregiver did not demonstrate good judgment when a child was placed in the bathroom with the door closed as the caregiver stood in front of the bathroom door to speak to the child about their inappropriate behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Jan 17, 2025

The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, it was determined that the caregiver did not demonstrate good judgment when a child was placed in the bathroom with the door closed as the caregiver stood in front of the bathroom door to speak to the child about their inappropriate behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(7)Jan 17, 2025

The standard is evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, a caregiver placed a child in a bathroom with the door closed for displaying inappropriate behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(7)Jan 17, 2025

The standard is evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not compliant. Based on interviews with staff and a parent, a caregiver placed a child in a bathroom with the door closed for displaying inappropriate behavior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(3)Jun 17, 2024

It was determined through an investigation that a child grabbed a child roughly during naptime after the child had gone to the wrong nap mat.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(3)Jun 17, 2024

It was determined through an investigation that a child grabbed a child roughly during naptime after the child had gone to the wrong nap mat.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(3)Jun 17, 2024

It was determined through an investigation that a child grabbed a child roughly during naptime after the child had gone to the wrong nap mat.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(3)Jun 17, 2024

It was determined through an investigation that a child grabbed a child roughly during naptime after the child had gone to the wrong nap mat.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-16

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2207(a)Jun 6, 2024

During this inspection, a caregiver allowed children between 18-24 months engaged in screen time. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the caregiver ended the screen time and removed the tablet and transition the children to another activity.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2207(a)Jun 6, 2024

During this inspection, a caregiver allowed children between 18-24 months engaged in screen time. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the caregiver ended the screen time and removed the tablet and transition the children to another activity.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2207(a)Jun 6, 2024

During this inspection, a caregiver allowed children between 18-24 months engaged in screen time. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the caregiver ended the screen time and removed the tablet and transition the children to another activity.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2207(a)Jun 6, 2024

During this inspection, a caregiver allowed children between 18-24 months engaged in screen time. The deficiency was corrected during the inspection when the caregiver ended the screen time and removed the tablet and transition the children to another activity.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426(a)(1)May 29, 2024

Two infants were observed asleep in restrictive devices; one was asleep in a high chair and another infant was asleep while placed in an infant seat. After it was brought to the caregivers attention that young infants that are non-mobile must nap in a crib, the caregivers removed the infants and placed each infant in a face up position in a crib.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-29

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426(a)(1)May 29, 2024

Two infants were observed asleep in restrictive devices; one was asleep in a high chair and another infant was asleep while placed in an infant seat. After it was brought to the caregivers attention that young infants that are non-mobile must nap in a crib, the caregivers removed the infants and placed each infant in a face up position in a crib.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-29

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426(a)(1)May 29, 2024

Two infants were observed asleep in restrictive devices; one was asleep in a high chair and another infant was asleep while placed in an infant seat. After it was brought to the caregivers attention that young infants that are non-mobile must nap in a crib, the caregivers removed the infants and placed each infant in a face up position in a crib.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-29

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426(a)(1)May 29, 2024

Two infants were observed asleep in restrictive devices; one was asleep in a high chair and another infant was asleep while placed in an infant seat. After it was brought to the caregivers attention that young infants that are non-mobile must nap in a crib, the caregivers removed the infants and placed each infant in a face up position in a crib.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-29

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701Apr 18, 2024

The outdoor playgrounds have 4 holes that may cause a tripping hazard.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701Apr 18, 2024

The outdoor playgrounds have 4 holes that may cause a tripping hazard.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701Apr 18, 2024

The outdoor playgrounds have 4 holes that may cause a tripping hazard.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

CRITICALSAFETY746.3701Apr 18, 2024

The outdoor playgrounds have 4 holes that may cause a tripping hazard.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2421(b)Apr 16, 2024

Three infants did not have current infant feeding instructions. The feeding instructions were last shared with the parents March 2024. Caregivers reviewing the feeding instructions at least once a month ensure the caregivers have the most recent feeding instruction instructions feed the infants the proper nutrients each day at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2431Apr 16, 2024

The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not to be in compliance. Based on interviews with parents, it has been determined that infant daily reports are not shared with parents.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-15

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2419(6)Apr 16, 2024

Two infant bottles were labeled. Labeling the children's bottle with the child's first and last name will reduce the risk of infants' bottle feed the incorrect formula and causing an allergic reaction.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2421(b)Apr 16, 2024

Three infants did not have current infant feeding instructions. The feeding instructions were last shared with the parents March 2024. Caregivers reviewing the feeding instructions at least once a month ensure the caregivers have the most recent feeding instruction instructions feed the infants the proper nutrients each day at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2431Apr 16, 2024

The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not to be in compliance. Based on interviews with parents, it has been determined that infant daily reports are not shared with parents.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-15

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2419(6)Apr 16, 2024

Two infant bottles were labeled. Labeling the children's bottle with the child's first and last name will reduce the risk of infants' bottle feed the incorrect formula and causing an allergic reaction.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2421(b)Apr 16, 2024

Three infants did not have current infant feeding instructions. The feeding instructions were last shared with the parents March 2024. Caregivers reviewing the feeding instructions at least once a month ensure the caregivers have the most recent feeding instruction instructions feed the infants the proper nutrients each day at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2431Apr 16, 2024

The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not to be in compliance. Based on interviews with parents, it has been determined that infant daily reports are not shared with parents.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-15

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2419(6)Apr 16, 2024

Two infant bottles were labeled. Labeling the children's bottle with the child's first and last name will reduce the risk of infants' bottle feed the incorrect formula and causing an allergic reaction.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2421(b)Apr 16, 2024

Three infants did not have current infant feeding instructions. The feeding instructions were last shared with the parents March 2024. Caregivers reviewing the feeding instructions at least once a month ensure the caregivers have the most recent feeding instruction instructions feed the infants the proper nutrients each day at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2419(6)Apr 16, 2024

Two infant bottles were labeled. Labeling the children's bottle with the child's first and last name will reduce the risk of infants' bottle feed the incorrect formula and causing an allergic reaction.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-19

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2431Apr 16, 2024

The standard was evaluated for a standard investigation and was found not to be in compliance. Based on interviews with parents, it has been determined that infant daily reports are not shared with parents.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-15

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(10)Aug 31, 2023

This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient. It was determined during the investigation that the caregiver in charge of the child did not properly communicate with the incoming staff or parent about the whereabouts of the child's device when needed. This caused confusion overall.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-18

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(10)Aug 31, 2023

This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient. It was determined during the investigation that the caregiver in charge of the child did not properly communicate with the incoming staff or parent about the whereabouts of the child's device when needed. This caused confusion overall.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-18

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(10)Aug 31, 2023

This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient. It was determined during the investigation that the caregiver in charge of the child did not properly communicate with the incoming staff or parent about the whereabouts of the child's device when needed. This caused confusion overall.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-18

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(10)Aug 31, 2023

This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient. It was determined during the investigation that the caregiver in charge of the child did not properly communicate with the incoming staff or parent about the whereabouts of the child's device when needed. This caused confusion overall.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-18

CRITICALHEALTH746.3415(4)May 3, 2022

At the time of inspection infants were observed not having their hands washed after diaper changes. The caregivers also did not wash their hands following the diapering procedures.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALSAFETY746.2409(a)(2)May 3, 2022

During the inspection time we observed three cribs without crib bedding present. The sheets had been washed and were placed back on the cribs during the inspection time.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH746.3415(4)May 3, 2022

At the time of inspection infants were observed not having their hands washed after diaper changes. The caregivers also did not wash their hands following the diapering procedures.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALSAFETY746.2409(a)(2)May 3, 2022

During the inspection time we observed three cribs without crib bedding present. The sheets had been washed and were placed back on the cribs during the inspection time.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.2409(a)(2)May 3, 2022

During the inspection time we observed three cribs without crib bedding present. The sheets had been washed and were placed back on the cribs during the inspection time.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH746.3415(4)May 3, 2022

At the time of inspection infants were observed not having their hands washed after diaper changes. The caregivers also did not wash their hands following the diapering procedures.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALHEALTH746.3415(4)May 3, 2022

At the time of inspection infants were observed not having their hands washed after diaper changes. The caregivers also did not wash their hands following the diapering procedures.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALSAFETY746.2409(a)(2)May 3, 2022

During the inspection time we observed three cribs without crib bedding present. The sheets had been washed and were placed back on the cribs during the inspection time.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2401(4)May 2, 2022

This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient during the physical inspection. A few of the infants in care were observed crying for a period of time, placed in a rocker for over 15 minutes, and observed crying and standing in their cribs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2401(4)May 2, 2022

This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient during the physical inspection. A few of the infants in care were observed crying for a period of time, placed in a rocker for over 15 minutes, and observed crying and standing in their cribs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2401(4)May 2, 2022

This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient during the physical inspection. A few of the infants in care were observed crying for a period of time, placed in a rocker for over 15 minutes, and observed crying and standing in their cribs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2401(4)May 2, 2022

This standard was tasked over for this investigation and found to be deficient during the physical inspection. A few of the infants in care were observed crying for a period of time, placed in a rocker for over 15 minutes, and observed crying and standing in their cribs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-03

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(11)Mar 25, 2022

This standard was evaluated as part of the investigation and was found to be deficient. A caregiver leaving for the day did not share information with an incoming caregiver concerning a child who had received a minor injury earlier in the day while the child was in care

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(11)Mar 25, 2022

This standard was evaluated as part of the investigation and was found to be deficient. A caregiver leaving for the day did not share information with an incoming caregiver concerning a child who had received a minor injury earlier in the day while the child was in care

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(11)Mar 25, 2022

This standard was evaluated as part of the investigation and was found to be deficient. A caregiver leaving for the day did not share information with an incoming caregiver concerning a child who had received a minor injury earlier in the day while the child was in care

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1203(11)Mar 25, 2022

This standard was evaluated as part of the investigation and was found to be deficient. A caregiver leaving for the day did not share information with an incoming caregiver concerning a child who had received a minor injury earlier in the day while the child was in care

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.615(a)Oct 21, 2021

The immunization exemption form had expired for one child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.615(a)Oct 21, 2021

The immunization exemption form had expired for one child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.615(a)Oct 21, 2021

The immunization exemption form had expired for one child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.615(a)Oct 21, 2021

The immunization exemption form had expired for one child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-18

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney.

Nearby Daycares in McKinney

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney's safety grade?

Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.

How many violations does Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney have?

Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney has 100 total violations on record, including 80 critical, 20 serious, and 0 minor.

When was Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney last inspected?

Childrens Lighthouse of McKinney was last inspected on November 25, 2025.

Parent Resources