Texas Hill Country School
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
325 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
March 17, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Texas Hill Country School
- License number
- 1247466
- Location
- 5309 TEXAS LONE STAR TRL, Maxwell, TX 78656
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 3.0/100
- Inspection record
- 325 inspections, last inspected March 17, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
92
Total Violations
Mar 17, 2026
Last Inspection
26
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (92)
Through interviews and documentation it was determined that staff did not follow the 1:1 supervision requirement noted in the service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-19
Through interviews and documentation it was determined that staff did not follow the 1:1 supervision requirement noted in the service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-19
Through interviews and documentation it was determined that staff did not follow the 1:1 supervision requirement noted in the service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-19
Through interviews and documentation it was determined that staff did not follow the 1:1 supervision requirement noted in the service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-19
Child in care saw two staff sleeping while in ratio on their assigned overnight shift.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-12
Child in care saw two staff sleeping while in ratio on their assigned overnight shift.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-12
Child in care saw two staff sleeping while in ratio on their assigned overnight shift.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-12
Child in care saw two staff sleeping while in ratio on their assigned overnight shift.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-12
Through interviews with children and staff, a child in care obtained a nosebleed during a restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15
Through interviews with children and staff, a child in care obtained a nosebleed during a restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15
Through interviews with children and staff, a child in care obtained a nosebleed during a restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15
Through interviews with children and staff, a child in care obtained a nosebleed during a restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-15
It was confirmed that a staff member used profanity towards a child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-11
It was confirmed that a staff member used profanity towards a child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-11
It was confirmed that a staff member used profanity towards a child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-11
It was confirmed that a staff member used profanity towards a child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-11
Through interviews with staff and children in care, it was determined that a staff member slammed a child in care to the ground when performing a restraint on the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-21
Through interviews with children in care and staff, it was determined that a staff used an improper restraint on a child in care during a non-emergency situation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-21
Through interviews with children in care and staff, it was determined that a staff used an improper restraint on a child in care during a non-emergency situation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-21
Through interviews with staff and children in care, it was determined that a staff member slammed a child in care to the ground when performing a restraint on the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-21
Through interviews with children in care and staff, it was determined that a staff used an improper restraint on a child in care during a non-emergency situation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-21
Through interviews with staff and children in care, it was determined that a staff member slammed a child in care to the ground when performing a restraint on the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-21
Through interviews with children in care and staff, it was determined that a staff used an improper restraint on a child in care during a non-emergency situation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-21
Through interviews with staff and children in care, it was determined that a staff member slammed a child in care to the ground when performing a restraint on the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-21
Based on the review of the information gathered during the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to find that neglectful supervision of children in care occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-01
Children in care were able to take part in inappropriate behaviors because staff failed to supervise them appropriately.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-01
Based on the review of the information gathered during the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to find that neglectful supervision of children in care occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-01
Children in care were able to take part in inappropriate behaviors because staff failed to supervise them appropriately.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-01
Based on the review of the information gathered during the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to find that neglectful supervision of children in care occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-01
Children in care were able to take part in inappropriate behaviors because staff failed to supervise them appropriately.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-01
Children in care were able to take part in inappropriate behaviors because staff failed to supervise them appropriately.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-01
Based on the review of the information gathered during the investigation, there is sufficient evidence to find that neglectful supervision of children in care occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-01
The operation did not notify Licensing about the second injury the child sustained five days after the first injury.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-03
The operation did not notify Licensing about the second injury the child sustained five days after the first injury.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-03
The operation did not notify Licensing about the second injury the child sustained five days after the first injury.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-03
The operation did not notify Licensing about the second injury the child sustained five days after the first injury.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-03
It was confirmed all facilities incidents are not being reported in a timely matter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-03
There are concerns with children in care getting injured due to lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-03
It was confirmed all facilities incidents are not being reported in a timely matter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-03
There are concerns with children in care getting injured due to lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-03
It was confirmed all facilities incidents are not being reported in a timely matter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-03
There are concerns with children in care getting injured due to lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-03
It was confirmed all facilities incidents are not being reported in a timely matter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-03
There are concerns with children in care getting injured due to lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-03
A child in care was restrained in a non-emergency situation. The child refused to shower and had their homework taken away as a result. The child went to their room upset. The shadowing staff followed the child and began taking the child's clothes off. The child reacted and grabbed the staff's wrists, not attacking the staff but keeping the staff from taking their clothes off. The staff responded by completing a restraint on the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-24
A child in care was restrained in a non-emergency situation. The child refused to shower and had their homework taken away as a result. The child went to their room upset. The shadowing staff followed the child and began taking the child's clothes off. The child reacted and grabbed the staff's wrists, not attacking the staff but keeping the staff from taking their clothes off. The staff responded by completing a restraint on the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-24
A child in care was restrained in a non-emergency situation. The child refused to shower and had their homework taken away as a result. The child went to their room upset. The shadowing staff followed the child and began taking the child's clothes off. The child reacted and grabbed the staff's wrists, not attacking the staff but keeping the staff from taking their clothes off. The staff responded by completing a restraint on the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-24
A child in care was restrained in a non-emergency situation. The child refused to shower and had their homework taken away as a result. The child went to their room upset. The shadowing staff followed the child and began taking the child's clothes off. The child reacted and grabbed the staff's wrists, not attacking the staff but keeping the staff from taking their clothes off. The staff responded by completing a restraint on the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-02-24
Staff member was recorded sleeping on duty, which the administrator acknowledged during interview. Additionally, the staff member admitted to possibly dozing off in the past.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-01
Staff member was recorded sleeping on duty, which the administrator acknowledged during interview. Additionally, the staff member admitted to possibly dozing off in the past.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-01
Staff member was recorded sleeping on duty, which the administrator acknowledged during interview. Additionally, the staff member admitted to possibly dozing off in the past.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-01
Staff member was recorded sleeping on duty, which the administrator acknowledged during interview. Additionally, the staff member admitted to possibly dozing off in the past.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-01
During the investigation, it was determined a caregiver utilized inappropriate discipline that was demeaning, unnecessary, and contributed to negatively impacting children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-02
During the investigation, it was determined a caregiver utilized inappropriate discipline that was demeaning, unnecessary, and contributed to negatively impacting children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-02
During the investigation, it was determined a caregiver utilized inappropriate discipline that was demeaning, unnecessary, and contributed to negatively impacting children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-02
During the investigation, it was determined a caregiver utilized inappropriate discipline that was demeaning, unnecessary, and contributed to negatively impacting children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-02
It was found during the investigation that neglectful supervision occurred. A staff member violated a safety plan by not maintaining 1:1 supervision of a child which exposed the child to substantial risk of physical or mental harm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-12
It was found during the investigation that neglectful supervision occurred. A staff member violated a safety plan by not maintaining 1:1 supervision of a child which exposed the child to substantial risk of physical or mental harm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-12
It was found during the investigation that neglectful supervision occurred. A staff member violated a safety plan by not maintaining 1:1 supervision of a child which exposed the child to substantial risk of physical or mental harm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-12
It was found during the investigation that neglectful supervision occurred. A staff member violated a safety plan by not maintaining 1:1 supervision of a child which exposed the child to substantial risk of physical or mental harm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-12
A caregiver?s actions were noted to have escalated a situation which ultimately led to a child being placed in an inappropriate restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A staff member?s actions were noted to have presented a genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury to the child when the staff member placed the child in an inappropriate restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A caregiver was noted to have applied pressure to a child?s chest area, which was noted to have caused the child difficulty breathing. The information gathered during the investigation also establishes a reasonable likelihood to conclude that this action by the caregiver caused injury to the child?s person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A caregiver was noted to have applied pressure to a child?s chest area, which was noted to have caused the child difficulty breathing. The information gathered during the investigation also establishes a reasonable likelihood to conclude that this action by the caregiver caused injury to the child?s person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A caregiver was noted to have applied pressure to a child?s chest area, which was noted to have caused the child difficulty breathing. The information gathered during the investigation also establishes a reasonable likelihood to conclude that this action by the caregiver caused injury to the child?s person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A caregiver?s actions were noted to have escalated a situation which ultimately led to a child being placed in an inappropriate restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A staff member?s actions were noted to have presented a genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury to the child when the staff member placed the child in an inappropriate restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A caregiver?s actions were noted to have escalated a situation which ultimately led to a child being placed in an inappropriate restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A staff member?s actions were noted to have presented a genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury to the child when the staff member placed the child in an inappropriate restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A caregiver?s actions were noted to have escalated a situation which ultimately led to a child being placed in an inappropriate restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A caregiver was noted to have applied pressure to a child?s chest area, which was noted to have caused the child difficulty breathing. The information gathered during the investigation also establishes a reasonable likelihood to conclude that this action by the caregiver caused injury to the child?s person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
A staff member?s actions were noted to have presented a genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury to the child when the staff member placed the child in an inappropriate restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
The assigned caregiver did not provide the level of supervision specified in the service plan; subsequently, resulting in the child sustaining an injury requiring medical attention.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-06
The assigned caregiver did not provide the level of supervision specified in the service plan; subsequently, resulting in the child sustaining an injury requiring medical attention.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-06
The assigned caregiver did not provide the level of supervision specified in the service plan; subsequently, resulting in the child sustaining an injury requiring medical attention.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-06
The assigned caregiver did not provide the level of supervision specified in the service plan; subsequently, resulting in the child sustaining an injury requiring medical attention.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-06
The operation had a fire inspection in July, the fire marshal marked deficiencies. The operation has not followed up with the fire marshal. The operation still needs one building that was under construction in July to be inspected by the fire marshal.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-12
The operation had a fire inspection in July, the fire marshal marked deficiencies. The operation has not followed up with the fire marshal. The operation still needs one building that was under construction in July to be inspected by the fire marshal.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-12
The operation had a fire inspection in July, the fire marshal marked deficiencies. The operation has not followed up with the fire marshal. The operation still needs one building that was under construction in July to be inspected by the fire marshal.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-12
The operation had a fire inspection in July, the fire marshal marked deficiencies. The operation has not followed up with the fire marshal. The operation still needs one building that was under construction in July to be inspected by the fire marshal.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-12
A caregiver did not deny when questioned and was overheard by multiple individuals informing a child in care that they would force the child to throw up their food if the child did not comply.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-11
A caregiver did not deny when questioned and was overheard by multiple individuals informing a child in care that they would force the child to throw up their food if the child did not comply.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-11
A caregiver did not deny when questioned and was overheard by multiple individuals informing a child in care that they would force the child to throw up their food if the child did not comply.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-11
A caregiver did not deny when questioned and was overheard by multiple individuals informing a child in care that they would force the child to throw up their food if the child did not comply.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-11
Three of the five showers in one building were in need of cleaning. The counters next to one stove were in need of cleaning.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-30
Three of the five showers in one building were in need of cleaning. The counters next to one stove were in need of cleaning.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-30
Three of the five showers in one building were in need of cleaning. The counters next to one stove were in need of cleaning.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-30
Three of the five showers in one building were in need of cleaning. The counters next to one stove were in need of cleaning.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-30
The stoves and areas around the stoves were greasy and the floor was dirty and black with grease. Several of the showers in the chaparral building had think mildew in the corners.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-16
The stoves and areas around the stoves were greasy and the floor was dirty and black with grease. Several of the showers in the chaparral building had think mildew in the corners.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-16
The stoves and areas around the stoves were greasy and the floor was dirty and black with grease. Several of the showers in the chaparral building had think mildew in the corners.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-16
A staff member was observed to have hit a child in the back of the head, the staff member also physically picked the child up and moved them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-03-31
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Texas Hill Country School.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Texas Hill Country School's safety grade?
Texas Hill Country School has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 3.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Texas Hill Country School have?
Texas Hill Country School has 92 total violations on record, including 84 critical, 8 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Texas Hill Country School last inspected?
Texas Hill Country School was last inspected on March 17, 2026.