National Youth Advocate Program
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
31 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 1, 2026
Latest inspection
March 3, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 1, 2026
- Provider
- National Youth Advocate Program
- License number
- 1789411- 16311
- Location
- 2201 UNIVERSITY AVE, Lubbock, TX 79410
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 51.0/100
- Inspection record
- 31 inspections, last inspected March 3, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 1, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
54
Total Violations
Mar 3, 2026
Last Inspection
N/A
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (54)
The operation failed to report when a child in care was arrested.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The operation failed to complete a transfer summary for a child in care when transferring the child's foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The agency failed to report a child's unauthorized absence who has prior history of Human Trafficking and would only report the unauthorized absence if the child did not return with in the 6 hrs.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The operation did not document all of the child's unauthorized absence when at the foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The agency failed to report a child's unauthorized absence who has prior history of Human Trafficking and would only report the unauthorized absence if the child did not return with in the 6 hrs.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The agency failed to report a child's unauthorized absence who has prior history of Human Trafficking and would only report the unauthorized absence if the child did not return with in the 6 hrs.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The operation failed to report when a child in care was arrested.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The operation failed to complete a transfer summary for a child in care when transferring the child's foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The operation did not document all of the child's unauthorized absence when at the foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The operation failed to complete a transfer summary for a child in care when transferring the child's foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The operation did not document all of the child's unauthorized absence when at the foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
The operation failed to report when a child in care was arrested.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-04
Caregivers failed to consider the history of a child with high-risk behaviors for elopement when allowing the child to remain at home unsupervised for extended periods (hours). The child in care eloped from the house multiple times during this placement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-03
Caregivers failed to consider the history of a child with high-risk behaviors for elopement when allowing the child to remain at home unsupervised for extended periods (hours). The child in care eloped from the house multiple times during this placement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-03
Caregivers failed to consider the history of a child with high-risk behaviors for elopement when allowing the child to remain at home unsupervised for extended periods (hours). The child in care eloped from the house multiple times during this placement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-03
One child service plan did not include specific supervision requirements according to the the child's identified high-risk behaviors.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-13
One child service plan did not include specific supervision requirements according to the the child's identified high-risk behaviors.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-13
One child service plan did not include specific supervision requirements according to the the child's identified high-risk behaviors.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-13
Two child records admission assessment did was not completed within the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
One child's record did not have a discharge summary.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
A bio child over the age of 14 does not have a current background check under the agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-12
One out of two child records did not have suicide screening completed at intake.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
Two out of three child records did not have the preliminary service plan completed within the 72-hour timeframe.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
One out of two child records did not have suicide screening completed at intake.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
One child's record did not have a discharge summary.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
Two out of three child records did not have the preliminary service plan completed within the 72-hour timeframe.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
Two child records admission assessment did was not completed within the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
One out of two child records did not have suicide screening completed at intake.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
Two out of three child records did not have the preliminary service plan completed within the 72-hour timeframe.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
A bio child over the age of 14 does not have a current background check under the agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-12
One child's record did not have a discharge summary.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
A bio child over the age of 14 does not have a current background check under the agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-12
Two child records admission assessment did was not completed within the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
The caregiver permitted a frquent visitor to enter the premises on numerous occasions without undergoing a thorough background screening.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-01
The caregiver permitted a frquent visitor to enter the premises on numerous occasions without undergoing a thorough background screening.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-01
The caregiver permitted a frquent visitor to enter the premises on numerous occasions without undergoing a thorough background screening.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-01
The operation failed to provide a policy that includes the type and frequency of reports to parents, children's rights to receive gifts, and routine health care that will be provided to pregnant youth.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operations conflict-of-interest policy did not specify who could not be verified as a foster or adoptive parent due to being relatives of an employee or governing body.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation does not have a policy for admission assessment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation did not have a policy related to adoptive services such as qualifying and screening adoptive parents and training adoptive parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation s policy does not indicate training curriculum the operation will use.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation did not have policies that included training requirements for parents (2), how the agency and foster parent will communicate (3), the amount and timeframes regarding reimbursements (4), discretion regarding accepting and denying placements (6), and how the foster parent may review their home records.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation did not have policies that included training requirements for parents (2), how the agency and foster parent will communicate (3), the amount and timeframes regarding reimbursements (4), discretion regarding accepting and denying placements (6), and how the foster parent may review their home records.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation did not have a policy related to adoptive services such as qualifying and screening adoptive parents and training adoptive parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation failed to provide a policy that includes the type and frequency of reports to parents, children's rights to receive gifts, and routine health care that will be provided to pregnant youth.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operations conflict-of-interest policy did not specify who could not be verified as a foster or adoptive parent due to being relatives of an employee or governing body.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation does not have a policy for admission assessment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation s policy does not indicate training curriculum the operation will use.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation did not have policies that included training requirements for parents (2), how the agency and foster parent will communicate (3), the amount and timeframes regarding reimbursements (4), discretion regarding accepting and denying placements (6), and how the foster parent may review their home records.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation s policy does not indicate training curriculum the operation will use.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation does not have a policy for admission assessment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operations conflict-of-interest policy did not specify who could not be verified as a foster or adoptive parent due to being relatives of an employee or governing body.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation failed to provide a policy that includes the type and frequency of reports to parents, children's rights to receive gifts, and routine health care that will be provided to pregnant youth.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
The operation did not have a policy related to adoptive services such as qualifying and screening adoptive parents and training adoptive parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-16
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for National Youth Advocate Program.
Nearby Daycares in Lubbock
Beverly Fredenburg
5216 93RD ST
Kidz Kare
6405 34TH ST
Eddie Richardson
1110 40TH ST
YWCAre at Honey Elementary
3615 86TH ST
Depot Express 3
10020 UPLAND AVE
Frequently Asked Questions
What is National Youth Advocate Program's safety grade?
National Youth Advocate Program has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 51.0 out of 100.
How many violations does National Youth Advocate Program have?
National Youth Advocate Program has 54 total violations on record, including 12 critical, 39 serious, and 3 minor.
When was National Youth Advocate Program last inspected?
National Youth Advocate Program was last inspected on March 3, 2026.