Kepler Stem School
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
55 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
March 10, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Kepler Stem School
- License number
- 1672417
- Location
- 508 MUNICIPAL DR, Leander, TX 78641
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 55 inspections, last inspected March 10, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
86
Total Violations
Mar 10, 2026
Last Inspection
172
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (86)
One of the directors has not been present for 75% or 30 hours a week for the past 6 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-11
One of the directors has not been present for 75% or 30 hours a week for the past 6 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-11
One of the directors has not been present for 75% or 30 hours a week for the past 6 months.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-11
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported standards and found to be deficient. The operation did not share the incident report with the parent within 48 hours.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The operation did not notify the parent of the incident involving their child being placed at risk immediately as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. The operation did not report the child that was left unsupervised within the required 2 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standards was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The incident report was not completed at the time of the inspection and had to be requested.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. A child was left outside unsupervised.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported standards and found to be deficient. The operation did not share the incident report with the parent within 48 hours.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The operation did not notify the parent of the incident involving their child being placed at risk immediately as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. The operation did not report the child that was left unsupervised within the required 2 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported standards and found to be deficient. The operation did not share the incident report with the parent within 48 hours.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. The operation did not report the child that was left unsupervised within the required 2 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The operation did not notify the parent of the incident involving their child being placed at risk immediately as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standards was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The incident report was not completed at the time of the inspection and had to be requested.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. A child was left outside unsupervised.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standards was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The incident report was not completed at the time of the inspection and had to be requested.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. A child was left outside unsupervised.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. The caregiver was bringing in the children from outside and failed to follow center policy, this resulted in a child being left outside unsupervised.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. The caregiver was bringing in the children from outside and failed to follow center policy, this resulted in a child being left outside unsupervised.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. The caregiver was bringing in the children from outside and failed to follow center policy, this resulted in a child being left outside unsupervised.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31
This standard was reviewed in relation to the self-reported allegations and found to be deficient. The caregiver was bringing in the children from outside and failed to follow center policy, this resulted in a child being left outside unsupervised.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. There was sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver grabbed a child by the arm and pulled the child placing them in the chair forcefully.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient in relation to the DFPS investigation. The director failed to ensure that a caregiver that was previously cited for inappropriate discipline was following safe practices and disciplining the children correctly.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report an incident of a child injured by a caregiver with in the 2 day required timeframe to Child Care Regulation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. There was sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver grabbed a child by the arm and pulled the child placing them in the chair forcefully.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report an incident of a child injured by a caregiver with in the 2 day required timeframe to Child Care Regulation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient in relation to the DFPS investigation. The director failed to ensure that a caregiver that was previously cited for inappropriate discipline was following safe practices and disciplining the children correctly.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report an incident of a child injured by a caregiver with in the 2 day required timeframe to Child Care Regulation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient in relation to the DFPS investigation. The director failed to ensure that a caregiver that was previously cited for inappropriate discipline was following safe practices and disciplining the children correctly.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. There was sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver grabbed a child by the arm and pulled the child placing them in the chair forcefully.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report an incident of a child injured by a caregiver with in the 2 day required timeframe to Child Care Regulation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient in relation to the DFPS investigation. The director failed to ensure that a caregiver that was previously cited for inappropriate discipline was following safe practices and disciplining the children correctly.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. There was sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver grabbed a child by the arm and pulled the child placing them in the chair forcefully.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
One caregiver was observed grabbing and pulling a child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
One child was placed into a situation that may have caused harm, and the child's parents were not notified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
The operation became aware of an incident that placed a child at risk for injury or harm, but did not report the incident to CCR.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
There was sufficient evidence that a caregiver is yelling at the children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
One caregiver was observed grabbing and pulling a child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
There was sufficient evidence that a caregiver is yelling at the children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
One child was placed into a situation that may have caused harm, and the child's parents were not notified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
The operation became aware of an incident that placed a child at risk for injury or harm, but did not report the incident to CCR.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
One caregiver was observed grabbing and pulling a child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
The operation became aware of an incident that placed a child at risk for injury or harm, but did not report the incident to CCR.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
One child was placed into a situation that may have caused harm, and the child's parents were not notified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
There was sufficient evidence that a caregiver is yelling at the children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
One caregiver was observed grabbing and pulling a child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
There was sufficient evidence that a caregiver is yelling at the children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
One child was placed into a situation that may have caused harm, and the child's parents were not notified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
The operation became aware of an incident that placed a child at risk for injury or harm, but did not report the incident to CCR.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-29
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The caregiver was seen on video foot grabbing a child by the arm and taking the child to a time out.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-24
The standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. The caregiver had three 2 year olds in time out for a total of 9 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The caregiver was seen on video foot grabbing a child by the arm and taking the child to a time out.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-24
The standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. The caregiver had three 2 year olds in time out for a total of 9 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The caregiver was seen on video foot grabbing a child by the arm and taking the child to a time out.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-24
The standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. The caregiver had three 2 year olds in time out for a total of 9 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-24
The standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. The caregiver had three 2 year olds in time out for a total of 9 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-24
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. The caregiver was seen on video foot grabbing a child by the arm and taking the child to a time out.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-24
Food Allergy Alert Plans were reviewed and three did not have parent signatures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-17
Staff files were reviewed and one file was missing the notarized affidavit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-17
Food Allergy Alert Plans were reviewed and three did not have parent signatures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-17
Staff files were reviewed and one file was missing the notarized affidavit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-17
Staff files were reviewed and one file was missing the notarized affidavit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-17
Food Allergy Alert Plans were reviewed and three did not have parent signatures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-17
Food Allergy Alert Plans were reviewed and three did not have parent signatures.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-17
Staff files were reviewed and one file was missing the notarized affidavit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-17
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. There was sufficient evidence to support that a caregiver was inappropriately disciplining a child with a spray bottle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-13
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. There was sufficient evidence to support that a caregiver was inappropriately disciplining a child with a spray bottle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-13
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. There was sufficient evidence to support that a caregiver was inappropriately disciplining a child with a spray bottle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-13
This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be deficient. There was sufficient evidence to support that a caregiver was inappropriately disciplining a child with a spray bottle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-13
Three children were observed to have expired medications. This was corrected during the inspection when the director removed the medication and set it aside to return to the parent.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Three children were observed to have expired medications. This was corrected during the inspection when the director removed the medication and set it aside to return to the parent.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Three children were observed to have expired medications. This was corrected during the inspection when the director removed the medication and set it aside to return to the parent.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Three children were observed to have expired medications. This was corrected during the inspection when the director removed the medication and set it aside to return to the parent.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the inspection, first aid kits had supplies that were expired. This was corrected at inspection when the supplies were removed from the kits.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the inspection, first aid kits had supplies that were expired. This was corrected at inspection when the supplies were removed from the kits.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the inspection, first aid kits had supplies that were expired. This was corrected at inspection when the supplies were removed from the kits.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the inspection, first aid kits had supplies that were expired. This was corrected at inspection when the supplies were removed from the kits.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Out of ten children's records reviewed, one record was missing complete immunizations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-23
Out of ten children's records reviewed, one record was missing complete immunizations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-23
Out of ten children's records reviewed, one record was missing complete immunizations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-23
Out of ten children's records reviewed, one record was missing complete immunizations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-23
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Kepler Stem School.
Nearby Daycares in Leander
Armita Marasi
1901 TALL CHIEF
Building Kidz of Leander
2629 PALMERA RIDGE BLVD STE 301
Sparkle Daycare
2345 BASE BURNER PATH
Angels Within Childcare
505 EMMA ROSE
Bagdad YMCA of Central Texas
800 DEERCREEK LN
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kepler Stem School's safety grade?
Kepler Stem School has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Kepler Stem School have?
Kepler Stem School has 86 total violations on record, including 60 critical, 22 serious, and 4 minor.
When was Kepler Stem School last inspected?
Kepler Stem School was last inspected on March 10, 2026.