Kid Corral
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
10 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
May 11, 2026
Latest inspection
September 11, 2025
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated May 11, 2026
- Provider
- Kid Corral
- License number
- 887401
- Location
- 14352 N FM 81, Karnes City, TX 78118
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 30.0/100
- Inspection record
- 10 inspections, last inspected September 11, 2025
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed May 11, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
215
Total Violations
Sep 11, 2025
Last Inspection
12
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (215)
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
Primary caregiver did not have the required 30 hour annual trainings for review at the time of inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
A caregiver who was caring for the children did not have an active and eligible background check. The background check states it's pending.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
An assistant caregiver did not have five of the required 24 annual training hours from instructor-led training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-01
The infant on the swing did not have their safety straps fastened. This was corrected at inspection when the infant's safety straps were fastened.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-17
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
Proof of liability of insurance was not provided annually by the anniversary date of the issuance of the permit.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-16
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
The emergency relocation and evacuation diagram was not available for review during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
Three out of the four staff files reviewed did not include orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22
Hazards such as roach spray were observed in an unlocked cabinet sink located in the children's restroom. Note: This was corrected at inspection as the spray was removed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Children hands were not observed washed before eating snack. Note: This was corrected at inspection when children washed their hands before lunch was served.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One out of the four staff files reviewed during inspection did not have trainings available for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-15
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The liability insurance policy was unavailable for review.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The complete personnel records were unavailable for review at inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28
The annual Child Product Safety Commission form for recalled products was not available for review. This was corrected at inspection when the primary caregiver completed, signed, and posted the form.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was one caregiver providing care at the operation that did not have a background check.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with one caregiver. There were two children between the age of zero to seventeen months; eight children ages eighteen months to three years; and four children ages four years and older. The maximum number of children allowed for this age group was ten children to one caregiver. Therefore the child to caregiver ratio was deficient. This was corrected when one more caregiver was added and two children were picked up and removed from the operation. This left twelve children and two caregivers which is compliant for ratio.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Zero children were observed to wash hands prior to eating a morning snack.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
There were fourteen children in care with a maximum capacity of twelve. This was corrected when a parent was called and two children were picked up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-21
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Kid Corral.
Nearby Daycares in Karnes City
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kid Corral's safety grade?
Kid Corral has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 30.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Kid Corral have?
Kid Corral has 215 total violations on record, including 100 critical, 115 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Kid Corral last inspected?
Kid Corral was last inspected on September 11, 2025.