Caring Companions LLC
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
56 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 24, 2026
Latest inspection
April 14, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 24, 2026
- Provider
- Caring Companions LLC
- License number
- 1796998
- Location
- 3214 KILLDEER LN, Humble, TX 77396
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 9.8/100
- Inspection record
- 56 inspections, last inspected April 14, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 24, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
114
Total Violations
Apr 14, 2026
Last Inspection
10
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (114)
During the investigation inspection, the electrical socket was observed cracked, granting access to wires, the carpet on the second floor was ripped in one of the residents bedrooms, one of the window blinds had several broken panels, front of the dish washer is missing, paint needs to be replaced in one of the residents bedrooms on the second floor and a urine stained mattress was observed in the closet of one of the residents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-14
The medication storage cabinet was observed unlocked during the investigation inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-14
During the investigation inspection, the electrical socket was observed cracked, granting access to wires, the carpet on the second floor was ripped in one of the residents bedrooms, one of the window blinds had several broken panels, front of the dish washer is missing, paint needs to be replaced in one of the residents bedrooms on the second floor and a urine stained mattress was observed in the closet of one of the residents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-14
The medication storage cabinet was observed unlocked during the investigation inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-14
During the investigation inspection, the electrical socket was observed cracked, granting access to wires, the carpet on the second floor was ripped in one of the residents bedrooms, one of the window blinds had several broken panels, front of the dish washer is missing, paint needs to be replaced in one of the residents bedrooms on the second floor and a urine stained mattress was observed in the closet of one of the residents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-14
The medication storage cabinet was observed unlocked during the investigation inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-14
The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20
The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20
The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20
The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20
The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20
The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20
The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20
The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20
Two legal guardians of the children in care were not notified timely about the unauthorized leave of absence.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
Two legal guardians of the children in care were not notified timely about the unauthorized leave of absence.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
The unauthorized absence of two children in care was not reported timely.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
Two legal guardians of the children in care were not notified timely about the unauthorized leave of absence.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
Two legal guardians of the children in care were not notified timely about the unauthorized leave of absence.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
The unauthorized absence of two children in care was not reported timely.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
The unauthorized absence of two children in care was not reported timely.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
Two legal guardians of the children in care were not notified timely about the unauthorized leave of absence.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
The unauthorized absence of two children in care was not reported timely.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
The unauthorized absence of two children in care was not reported timely.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
The unauthorized absence of two children in care was not reported timely.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
Two legal guardians of the children in care were not notified timely about the unauthorized leave of absence.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19
Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17
The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06
An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06
An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06
An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06
An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06
An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06
An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06
An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06
Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Caring Companions LLC.
Nearby Daycares in Humble
Dreamer Lajoy Edwards
5118 MOONSHADOWS DR
Urban Strategies Early Head Start
4401 THEISS RD
Albertha Guevara
520 ATASCOCITA RD LOT E16
The Karate School
7021 ATASCOCITA RD
Emerald Horizons LLC
17011 DAWN SHADOWS DR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Caring Companions LLC's safety grade?
Caring Companions LLC has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 9.8 out of 100.
How many violations does Caring Companions LLC have?
Caring Companions LLC has 114 total violations on record, including 29 critical, 76 serious, and 9 minor.
When was Caring Companions LLC last inspected?
Caring Companions LLC was last inspected on April 14, 2026.