Caring Companions LLC

The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20

The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20

The operation provided inaccurate information about different incidents involving the children, as well as inaccurate documentation about restraints.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20

The unauthorized absence of two children in care was not reported timely.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12

Two legal guardians of the children in care were not notified timely about the unauthorized leave of absence.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12

The unauthorized absence of two children in care was not reported timely.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12

The unauthorized absence of two children in care was not reported timely.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12

Two legal guardians of the children in care were not notified timely about the unauthorized leave of absence.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12

Two legal guardians of the children in care were not notified timely about the unauthorized leave of absence.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12

The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19

The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19

The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19

The operation completed its annual fire inspection on time; however, the operation did not pass the inspection. The operation must address and correct all identified code violations to achieve compliance.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-19

A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17

Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17

Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17

Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17

Documents provided, such as serious incident and restraint report did not include all required components and information was observed to be missing or not documented.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17

A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17

A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17

A staff member disclosed to law enforcement that a child was restrained with their hands behind their back.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-17

The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

It was determined staff showed as active status since 03/30/25, however this staff was never employed by the operation

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

The child records reviewed during inspection did not include the child orientation. The operation could not provide the child orientation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

During inspection inspector was notified the treatment director had recently left the operation. This time the operation does not have a treatment director.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06

An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06

An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06

An employee that was no longer employeed since the beginning of May still shows active.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-06

An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

Discrepancies were observed in the admission assessment that was evaluated. The front page of the admission assessment is dated 04/29/2025 as the date of the assessment. However, the second page states that the date of the assessment is 11/29/2022 and the expected or actual placement date is 11/29/2022. Additionally, the documentation, on page 7, references a different operation will be meeting the needs of the child instead of the current placement. Similar discrepancies were also observed in the preliminary service plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

An admission assessment was observed to only have the resident's name and date.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26

Resident face sheet indicates a terminated employee is the normalcy designee.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-05-26