Westwood Montessori School
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
46 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 1, 2026
Latest inspection
January 20, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 1, 2026
- Provider
- Westwood Montessori School
- License number
- 826676
- Location
- 1822 SHERWOOD FOREST ST, Houston, TX 77043
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 12.8/100
- Inspection record
- 46 inspections, last inspected January 20, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 1, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
Quality Rating
Rated by Texas Rising Star, the state quality rating and improvement system.
87
Total Violations
Jan 20, 2026
Last Inspection
64
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (87)
The operation did not report to CCR the number of employees who left in 2025 before January 15, 2026.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-20
The operation did not report to CCR the number of employees who left in 2025 before January 15, 2026.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-20
The operation did not report to CCR the number of employees who left in 2025 before January 15, 2026.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-20
The attendance for the directors at the operation was not recorded and available for review during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-09
The children's attendance records were reviewed and found to be inadequately documented, as there were no times of arrival and departure, nor initial signatures of staff responsible for the child during drop-off or pick-up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-09
One child file did not have the immunization record for review during the inspection
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-09
The children's attendance records were reviewed and found to be inadequately documented, as there were no times of arrival and departure, nor initial signatures of staff responsible for the child during drop-off or pick-up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-09
The attendance for the directors at the operation was not recorded and available for review during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-09
One child file did not have the immunization record for review during the inspection
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-09
The children's attendance records were reviewed and found to be inadequately documented, as there were no times of arrival and departure, nor initial signatures of staff responsible for the child during drop-off or pick-up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-09
The attendance for the directors at the operation was not recorded and available for review during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-09
One child file did not have the immunization record for review during the inspection
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-09
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2023 data from January 17, 2025, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-23
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2023 data from January 17, 2025, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-23
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2023 data from January 17, 2025, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2024 by January 15, 2025, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-23
The operation did not share a copy of the Incident Report Form with the parent. There is no parent signature on the incident form.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-19
The operation did not share a copy of the Incident Report Form with the parent. There is no parent signature on the incident form.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-19
The operation did not share a copy of the Incident Report Form with the parent. There is no parent signature on the incident form.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-19
The operation is not notifying parents of less serious injuries.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-20
The operation is not notifying parents of less serious injuries.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-20
The operation is not notifying parents of less serious injuries.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-20
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2023 data from January 17, 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2023 by January 15, 2024, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-26
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2023 data from January 17, 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2023 by January 15, 2024, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-26
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2023 data from January 17, 2024, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2023 by January 15, 2024, as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-01-26
During the review of children's records 2 out of the 4 records evaluated was found to be missing the emergency contact address. Corrected at Inspection: A caregiver reached out to the parents and obtained the addresses for the two emergency contacts listed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-06
During the review of children records 2 out of the 4 records that were evaluated were found to be missing the food allergy emergency plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-27
During the walkthrough of the playgroud I observed exposed nails on the playground fence. Corrected at Inspection: When the director called the maintenance man to cover the exposed nails with a wooden board.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-06
During the review of children's records 2 out of the 4 records evaluated was found to be missing the emergency contact address. Corrected at Inspection: A caregiver reached out to the parents and obtained the addresses for the two emergency contacts listed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-06
During the review of children's records 2 out of the 4 records evaluated was found to be missing the emergency contact address. Corrected at Inspection: A caregiver reached out to the parents and obtained the addresses for the two emergency contacts listed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-06
During the walkthrough of the playgroud I observed exposed nails on the playground fence. Corrected at Inspection: When the director called the maintenance man to cover the exposed nails with a wooden board.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-06
During the review of children records 2 out of the 4 records that were evaluated were found to be missing the food allergy emergency plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-27
During the review of children records 2 out of the 4 records that were evaluated were found to be missing the food allergy emergency plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-27
During the walkthrough of the playgroud I observed exposed nails on the playground fence. Corrected at Inspection: When the director called the maintenance man to cover the exposed nails with a wooden board.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-06
I observed that the SIDS, Shaken Baby Syndrome and Abusive Head Trauma training had expired for a caregiver who was observed working with infants during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
I observed that 3 of the caregivers working with children do not have current certification in first aid.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-21
I observed one caregiver working with 5 infants. The specified age of the group was 10 months and the required child/caregiver ratio for 0-11 months is one caregiver with 4 infants. NOTE: This was corrected during the inspection when one of the older infants was moved to the toddler classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-07
In two different classrooms, the caregivers did not know the ages of the children and there was not a list of children in the room with documentation of their ages.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-07
The enrollment records for four children were evaluated during the inspection. I observed the following information missing from the files: 1. One child did not have documented information indicatiing whether or not he has any special needs. 2. One child did not have the following: A. An address documented for the emergency contact person. B. The name and contact information for their elementary school.** **NOTE: This information was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
I observed that the background check status was still pending for a caregiver who was observed working with children during the inspection. NOTE: This caregiver was sent home during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
I observed that 3 of the caregivers working with children do not have current certification in first aid.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-21
The enrollment records for four children were evaluated during the inspection. I observed the following information missing from the files: 1. One child did not have documented information indicatiing whether or not he has any special needs. 2. One child did not have the following: A. An address documented for the emergency contact person. B. The name and contact information for their elementary school.** **NOTE: This information was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
In two different classrooms, the caregivers did not know the ages of the children and there was not a list of children in the room with documentation of their ages.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-07
I observed that the background check status was still pending for a caregiver who was observed working with children during the inspection. NOTE: This caregiver was sent home during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
I observed one caregiver working with 5 infants. The specified age of the group was 10 months and the required child/caregiver ratio for 0-11 months is one caregiver with 4 infants. NOTE: This was corrected during the inspection when one of the older infants was moved to the toddler classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-07
I observed that the SIDS, Shaken Baby Syndrome and Abusive Head Trauma training had expired for a caregiver who was observed working with infants during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
I observed that 3 of the caregivers working with children do not have current certification in first aid.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-21
The enrollment records for four children were evaluated during the inspection. I observed the following information missing from the files: 1. One child did not have documented information indicatiing whether or not he has any special needs. 2. One child did not have the following: A. An address documented for the emergency contact person. B. The name and contact information for their elementary school.** **NOTE: This information was corrected during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
In two different classrooms, the caregivers did not know the ages of the children and there was not a list of children in the room with documentation of their ages.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-07
I observed that the background check status was still pending for a caregiver who was observed working with children during the inspection. NOTE: This caregiver was sent home during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
I observed one caregiver working with 5 infants. The specified age of the group was 10 months and the required child/caregiver ratio for 0-11 months is one caregiver with 4 infants. NOTE: This was corrected during the inspection when one of the older infants was moved to the toddler classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-07
I observed that the SIDS, Shaken Baby Syndrome and Abusive Head Trauma training had expired for a caregiver who was observed working with infants during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-14
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2021 data from February 23, 2022, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2021 by February 22, 2022, as required
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2021 data from February 23, 2022, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2021 by February 22, 2022, as required
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2021 data from February 23, 2022, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2021 by February 22, 2022, as required
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-02
During review of records 1 out of 10 evaluated did not have a health statement as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-05
During review of record keeping 6 out of 10 evaluated was found to not have all required Emergency contact information.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-05
During review of infants 2 infants not yet eating table food were found to not hae updated feeding instructions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-05
During review of records 1 out of 10 evaluated did not have a health statement as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-05
During review of infants 2 infants not yet eating table food were found to not hae updated feeding instructions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-05
During review of record keeping 6 out of 10 evaluated was found to not have all required Emergency contact information.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-05
During review of records 1 out of 10 evaluated did not have a health statement as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-05
During review of infants 2 infants not yet eating table food were found to not hae updated feeding instructions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-05
During review of record keeping 6 out of 10 evaluated was found to not have all required Emergency contact information.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-05
During the inspection 1 caregiver was found to have been caring for 24 children between 23 months and 11 years old. The SAG was 5 years. Ratio is 1:22 the caregiver was over ratio by 2. This was corrected when a caregiver took the younger children to their classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-09
A caregiver was not able to provide the age of a child in class and did not have information showing age.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-09
During the follow up a caregiver stated she was caring for 16 children when she was found to have 24 children in classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-09
During the inspection 1 caregiver was found to have been caring for 24 children between 23 months and 11 years old. The SAG was 5 years. Ratio is 1:22 the caregiver was over ratio by 2. This was corrected when a caregiver took the younger children to their classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-09
During the follow up a caregiver stated she was caring for 16 children when she was found to have 24 children in classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-09
A caregiver was not able to provide the age of a child in class and did not have information showing age.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-09
During the inspection 1 caregiver was found to have been caring for 24 children between 23 months and 11 years old. The SAG was 5 years. Ratio is 1:22 the caregiver was over ratio by 2. This was corrected when a caregiver took the younger children to their classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-09
During the follow up a caregiver stated she was caring for 16 children when she was found to have 24 children in classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-09
A caregiver was not able to provide the age of a child in class and did not have information showing age.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-09
During the walkthrough a caregiver stated she was caring for 14 children between 3-6 years it was later determined that she was caring for 15 children between 2-6 years.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthroughI observed a 6 year old in the front office area unsupervised. I observed 15 children between the ages 2-6 years old unsupervised during nap time and 8 schoolers in a classroom without a caregiver.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthrough I observed a 14 month old asleep in a restictive device.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthrough I observed a 14 month old asleep in a restictive device.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthrough a caregiver stated she was caring for 14 children between 3-6 years it was later determined that she was caring for 15 children between 2-6 years.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthroughI observed a 6 year old in the front office area unsupervised. I observed 15 children between the ages 2-6 years old unsupervised during nap time and 8 schoolers in a classroom without a caregiver.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthrough a caregiver stated she was caring for 14 children between 3-6 years it was later determined that she was caring for 15 children between 2-6 years.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthroughI observed a 6 year old in the front office area unsupervised. I observed 15 children between the ages 2-6 years old unsupervised during nap time and 8 schoolers in a classroom without a caregiver.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthrough I observed a 14 month old asleep in a restictive device.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthrough I observed a caregiver place toys that were in a childs mouth back into a bucket without setting aside.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-15
During the walkthrough a caregiver was not able to provide the ages of children they were supervising and did not have information to refer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthrough I observed a caregiver place toys that were in a childs mouth back into a bucket without setting aside.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-15
During the walkthrough I observed a caregiver place toys that were in a childs mouth back into a bucket without setting aside.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-15
During the walkthrough a caregiver was not able to provide the ages of children they were supervising and did not have information to refer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
During the walkthrough a caregiver was not able to provide the ages of children they were supervising and did not have information to refer.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-02
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Westwood Montessori School.
Nearby Daycares in Houston
LaTonya Stewart
2902 REDWING GROVE WAY
TRI NGO
8203 ASHLAWN DR
Little People's Creative Academy
9700 RIVERSTONE RANCH RD
Reynolds Head Start
9601 ROSEHAVEN DR
Growing Greatness Academy
14623 SEQUOIA BEND BLVD
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Westwood Montessori School's safety grade?
Westwood Montessori School has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 12.8 out of 100.
How many violations does Westwood Montessori School have?
Westwood Montessori School has 87 total violations on record, including 57 critical, 30 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Westwood Montessori School last inspected?
Westwood Montessori School was last inspected on January 20, 2026.