Mary's Little Lamb Learning Center
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
40 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 6, 2026
Latest inspection
September 4, 2025
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 6, 2026
- Provider
- Mary's Little Lamb Learning Center
- License number
- 1666693
- Location
- 4721 AIRPORT BLVD, Houston, TX 77048
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 12.0/100
- Inspection record
- 40 inspections, last inspected September 4, 2025
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 6, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
72
Total Violations
Sep 4, 2025
Last Inspection
24
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (87)
There was no current fire inspection report available for review during the inspection. Fire inspection was observed last dated 5/22/23.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-10
There was no current fire inspection report available for review during the inspection. Fire inspection was observed last dated 5/22/23.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-10
There was no current fire inspection report available for review during the inspection. Fire inspection was observed last dated 5/22/23.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-10
There was no current fire inspection report available for review during the inspection. Fire inspection was observed last dated 5/22/23.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-10
Fire extinguishers were observed expired, last serviced 03/2023 during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-30
There was no first aid kit observed in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no parent names or emergency contact numbers for children being transported in vehicle during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no fire extinguisher observed in vehicle used for transporting children during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no list of children being transported in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
A 4 year old child was observed not properly secured in a child safety seat while being transported in vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no emergency medical transport and treatment authorization forms for children being transported in vehicle during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no first aid kit observed in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no emergency medical transport and treatment authorization forms for children being transported in vehicle during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
A 4 year old child was observed not properly secured in a child safety seat while being transported in vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no fire extinguisher observed in vehicle used for transporting children during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no list of children being transported in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no parent names or emergency contact numbers for children being transported in vehicle during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
Fire extinguishers were observed expired, last serviced 03/2023 during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-30
Fire extinguishers were observed expired, last serviced 03/2023 during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-30
There was no first aid kit observed in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no emergency medical transport and treatment authorization forms for children being transported in vehicle during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no parent names or emergency contact numbers for children being transported in vehicle during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no emergency medical transport and treatment authorization forms for children being transported in vehicle during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no fire extinguisher observed in vehicle used for transporting children during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
A 4 year old child was observed not properly secured in a child safety seat while being transported in vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no list of children being transported in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no first aid kit observed in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
Fire extinguishers were observed expired, last serviced 03/2023 during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-30
A 4 year old child was observed not properly secured in a child safety seat while being transported in vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no fire extinguisher observed in vehicle used for transporting children during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no parent names or emergency contact numbers for children being transported in vehicle during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no emergency medical transport and treatment authorization forms for children being transported in vehicle during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no list of children being transported in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no first aid kit observed in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
Fire extinguishers were observed expired, last serviced 03/2023 during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-30
There was no list of children being transported in the vehicle used to transport children during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
A 4 year old child was observed not properly secured in a child safety seat while being transported in vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no fire extinguisher observed in vehicle used for transporting children during inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
There was no parent names or emergency contact numbers for children being transported in vehicle during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-16
Based on the DFPS investigation there is enough evidence to suggest that there was not an additional caregiver besides the driver in the vehicle while transporting a child under two years old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that at least one seat belt in the vehicle was not working.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the car seat that a child was riding in was not properly secured into the vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not intervene when necessary to ensure a child?s safety when a child fell from a car safety seat while being transported.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an 11-month-old infant was transported in a booster seat instead of a rear facing car seat as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not intervene when necessary to ensure a child?s safety when a child fell from a car safety seat while being transported.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that at least one seat belt in the vehicle was not working.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the car seat that a child was riding in was not properly secured into the vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an 11-month-old infant was transported in a booster seat instead of a rear facing car seat as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is enough evidence to suggest that there was not an additional caregiver besides the driver in the vehicle while transporting a child under two years old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that at least one seat belt in the vehicle was not working.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the car seat that a child was riding in was not properly secured into the vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not intervene when necessary to ensure a child?s safety when a child fell from a car safety seat while being transported.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an 11-month-old infant was transported in a booster seat instead of a rear facing car seat as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is enough evidence to suggest that there was not an additional caregiver besides the driver in the vehicle while transporting a child under two years old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an 11-month-old infant was transported in a booster seat instead of a rear facing car seat as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not intervene when necessary to ensure a child?s safety when a child fell from a car safety seat while being transported.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that at least one seat belt in the vehicle was not working.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is enough evidence to suggest that there was not an additional caregiver besides the driver in the vehicle while transporting a child under two years old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the car seat that a child was riding in was not properly secured into the vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that neglectful supervision occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is enough evidence to suggest that there was not an additional caregiver besides the driver in the vehicle while transporting a child under two years old.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that at least one seat belt in the vehicle was not working.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not intervene when necessary to ensure a child?s safety when a child fell from a car safety seat while being transported.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the car seat that a child was riding in was not properly secured into the vehicle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
Based on the DFPS investigation there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an 11-month-old infant was transported in a booster seat instead of a rear facing car seat as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-09
One caregiver was observed caring for 7 infants ages 9 months, 10 months, 10 months, 12 months, 13 months, 16 months, and 17 months old. This was corrected during inspection when another caregiver returned to the room to assist with caring for the infants.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Four children files observed were not updated. The childcare facility did not update the children files to portray the updated required information by 09/01/2023. The files observed did not include an updated special care needs section, modifications, and/or the child's swimming ability.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-27
Four children files observed were not updated. The childcare facility did not update the children files to portray the updated required information by 09/01/2023. The files observed did not include an updated special care needs section, modifications, and/or the child's swimming ability.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-27
One caregiver was observed caring for 7 infants ages 9 months, 10 months, 10 months, 12 months, 13 months, 16 months, and 17 months old. This was corrected during inspection when another caregiver returned to the room to assist with caring for the infants.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed caring for 7 infants ages 9 months, 10 months, 10 months, 12 months, 13 months, 16 months, and 17 months old. This was corrected during inspection when another caregiver returned to the room to assist with caring for the infants.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One caregiver was observed caring for 7 infants ages 9 months, 10 months, 10 months, 12 months, 13 months, 16 months, and 17 months old. This was corrected during inspection when another caregiver returned to the room to assist with caring for the infants.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Four children files observed were not updated. The childcare facility did not update the children files to portray the updated required information by 09/01/2023. The files observed did not include an updated special care needs section, modifications, and/or the child's swimming ability.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-27
Four children files observed were not updated. The childcare facility did not update the children files to portray the updated required information by 09/01/2023. The files observed did not include an updated special care needs section, modifications, and/or the child's swimming ability.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-27
One infants had a pacifier attached to clothing while asleep in the crib. Corrected: Caregiver removed the pacifier from the infants clothes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
One caregiver was at the operation without an eligible background check. Another citation related to background checks within the next 6 months may result in an additional penalty and other enforcement actions. Corrected: The caregiver left the operation during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
One infants had a pacifier attached to clothing while asleep in the crib. Corrected: Caregiver removed the pacifier from the infants clothes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
One caregiver was at the operation without an eligible background check. Another citation related to background checks within the next 6 months may result in an additional penalty and other enforcement actions. Corrected: The caregiver left the operation during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
One infants had a pacifier attached to clothing while asleep in the crib. Corrected: Caregiver removed the pacifier from the infants clothes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
One caregiver was at the operation without an eligible background check. Another citation related to background checks within the next 6 months may result in an additional penalty and other enforcement actions. Corrected: The caregiver left the operation during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
One caregiver was at the operation without an eligible background check. Another citation related to background checks within the next 6 months may result in an additional penalty and other enforcement actions. Corrected: The caregiver left the operation during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
One infants had a pacifier attached to clothing while asleep in the crib. Corrected: Caregiver removed the pacifier from the infants clothes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
One caregiver was at the operation without an eligible background check. Another citation related to background checks within the next 6 months may result in an additional penalty and other enforcement actions. Corrected: The caregiver left the operation during the inspection.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
One infants had a pacifier attached to clothing while asleep in the crib. Corrected: Caregiver removed the pacifier from the infants clothes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Mary's Little Lamb Learning Center.
Nearby Daycares in Houston
Brautigam Center Day Care
13102 JONES RD
Reynolds Head Start
9601 ROSEHAVEN DR
Lafaye Boys Home
15603 GROVESPRING DR
Little People's Creative Academy
9700 RIVERSTONE RANCH RD
LaTonya Stewart
2902 REDWING GROVE WAY
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mary's Little Lamb Learning Center's safety grade?
Mary's Little Lamb Learning Center has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 12.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Mary's Little Lamb Learning Center have?
Mary's Little Lamb Learning Center has 72 total violations on record, including 72 critical, 0 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Mary's Little Lamb Learning Center last inspected?
Mary's Little Lamb Learning Center was last inspected on September 4, 2025.