Mary's Little Lamb Academy
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
36 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
February 5, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Mary's Little Lamb Academy
- License number
- 1792044
- Location
- 13450 CULLEN BLVD, Houston, TX 77047
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 36 inspections, last inspected February 5, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
104
Total Violations
Feb 5, 2026
Last Inspection
71
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (104)
There were less than 24 hours of training for seven out of eight employee files.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
There were four out of eight children's files missing emergency contact info.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-25
There was a four year old child who walked into the office by himself.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-22
There were less than 24 hours of training for seven out of eight employee files.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
There were less than 24 hours of training for seven out of eight employee files.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
There was a four year old child who walked into the office by himself.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-22
There were four out of eight children's files missing emergency contact info.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-25
There was a four year old child who walked into the office by himself.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-22
There were four out of eight children's files missing emergency contact info.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-25
There was a four year old child who walked into the office by himself.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-22
There were four out of eight children's files missing emergency contact info.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-25
There were less than 24 hours of training for seven out of eight employee files.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-31
There were 16 children between the ages of 16 months to two years old with one caregiver. This was corrected when a second caregiver entered the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
Two children were not strapped in correctly to a highchair. This was corrected when the caregiver properly strapped in the children.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
A teacher was using bleach on the floor where children were playing. This was corrected when the teacher put the bleach away.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was an infant seven months old in a bouncer for 25 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
There was a child aged 8 by himself in a classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
There were 16 children between the ages of 16 months to two years old with one caregiver. This was corrected when a second caregiver entered the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
Two children were not strapped in correctly to a highchair. This was corrected when the caregiver properly strapped in the children.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was a child aged 8 by himself in a classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
A teacher was using bleach on the floor where children were playing. This was corrected when the teacher put the bleach away.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There were 16 children between the ages of 16 months to two years old with one caregiver. This was corrected when a second caregiver entered the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
There was an infant seven months old in a bouncer for 25 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
There were 16 children between the ages of 16 months to two years old with one caregiver. This was corrected when a second caregiver entered the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
There was an infant seven months old in a bouncer for 25 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
A teacher was using bleach on the floor where children were playing. This was corrected when the teacher put the bleach away.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two children were not strapped in correctly to a highchair. This was corrected when the caregiver properly strapped in the children.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was a child aged 8 by himself in a classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
There was an infant seven months old in a bouncer for 25 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
A teacher was using bleach on the floor where children were playing. This was corrected when the teacher put the bleach away.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two children were not strapped in correctly to a highchair. This was corrected when the caregiver properly strapped in the children.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was a child aged 8 by himself in a classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that personal devices are being used by caregivers.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-21
There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that personal devices are being used by caregivers.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-21
There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that personal devices are being used by caregivers.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-21
There is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that personal devices are being used by caregivers.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-21
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a restrictive device for more than 15 minutes
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver aggressively grabbed and pulled a child by both arms and then again by one arm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was not adequately supervised when they were able to fall out of a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an infant classroom was left out of ratio on numerous occasions when a caregiver left the room leave one caregiver alone with six, seven, eight, and nine children at different times of the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that good judgement was not used when a caregiver lied to a child?s parents and the DFPS investigator, as well as falsified an incident report regarding how a child received an injury
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a crib on numerous occasions for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was placed in a crib as a form of discipline and made to remain in the crib for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not comfort an upset infant when the infant was left upset and crying while the caregiver ignored the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not comfort an upset infant when the infant was left upset and crying while the caregiver ignored the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not comfort an upset infant when the infant was left upset and crying while the caregiver ignored the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was not adequately supervised when they were able to fall out of a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver aggressively grabbed and pulled a child by both arms and then again by one arm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a restrictive device for more than 15 minutes
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a crib on numerous occasions for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an infant classroom was left out of ratio on numerous occasions when a caregiver left the room leave one caregiver alone with six, seven, eight, and nine children at different times of the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was placed in a crib as a form of discipline and made to remain in the crib for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that good judgement was not used when a caregiver lied to a child?s parents and the DFPS investigator, as well as falsified an incident report regarding how a child received an injury
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver did not comfort an upset infant when the infant was left upset and crying while the caregiver ignored the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was not adequately supervised when they were able to fall out of a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver aggressively grabbed and pulled a child by both arms and then again by one arm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a restrictive device for more than 15 minutes
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a crib on numerous occasions for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an infant classroom was left out of ratio on numerous occasions when a caregiver left the room leave one caregiver alone with six, seven, eight, and nine children at different times of the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was placed in a crib as a form of discipline and made to remain in the crib for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that good judgement was not used when a caregiver lied to a child?s parents and the DFPS investigator, as well as falsified an incident report regarding how a child received an injury
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was placed in a crib as a form of discipline and made to remain in the crib for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a caregiver aggressively grabbed and pulled a child by both arms and then again by one arm.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a restrictive device for more than 15 minutes
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that good judgement was not used when a caregiver lied to a child?s parents and the DFPS investigator, as well as falsified an incident report regarding how a child received an injury
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a child was not adequately supervised when they were able to fall out of a crib.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that a 16-month-old infant was left in a crib on numerous occasions for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
Based on the DFPS investigation, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that an infant classroom was left out of ratio on numerous occasions when a caregiver left the room leave one caregiver alone with six, seven, eight, and nine children at different times of the day.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-11
An infant was observed sleeping with a bottle in the crib This was corrected during the inspection when I observed the caregiver remove the bottle from the crib.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
An infant was observed sleeping with a bottle in the crib This was corrected during the inspection when I observed the caregiver remove the bottle from the crib.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
An infant was observed sleeping with a bottle in the crib This was corrected during the inspection when I observed the caregiver remove the bottle from the crib.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
An infant was observed sleeping with a bottle in the crib This was corrected during the inspection when I observed the caregiver remove the bottle from the crib.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two infants were observed not strapped in there high chairs. One out of the two children actually got out of the seat and was standing on top on the high chair. This was corrected during inspection when the caregiver removed all the children from the high chairs.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two infants were observed not strapped in there high chairs. One out of the two children actually got out of the seat and was standing on top on the high chair. This was corrected during inspection when the caregiver removed all the children from the high chairs.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two infants were observed not strapped in there high chairs. One out of the two children actually got out of the seat and was standing on top on the high chair. This was corrected during inspection when the caregiver removed all the children from the high chairs.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Two infants were observed not strapped in there high chairs. One out of the two children actually got out of the seat and was standing on top on the high chair. This was corrected during inspection when the caregiver removed all the children from the high chairs.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
One staff member was observed to be present at the operation without notification of eligibility from the Centralized Background Check Unit. This was corrected during the inspection when the director had the caregiver leave the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-22
One staff member was observed to be present at the operation without notification of eligibility from the Centralized Background Check Unit. This was corrected during the inspection when the director had the caregiver leave the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-22
One staff member was observed to be present at the operation without notification of eligibility from the Centralized Background Check Unit. This was corrected during the inspection when the director had the caregiver leave the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-22
One staff member was observed to be present at the operation without notification of eligibility from the Centralized Background Check Unit. This was corrected during the inspection when the director had the caregiver leave the operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-22
During the follow-up inspection a 17 month old infant was observed napping in a classroom with 31 children. The specified age group for the classroom is two. The max number of children that can be present is twenty two. Due to the infant being under 18 months, the nap time ratio can not be reduced by 50 percent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-14
During the follow-up inspection a 17 month old infant was observed napping in a classroom with 31 children. The specified age group for the classroom is two. The max number of children that can be present is twenty two. Due to the infant being under 18 months, the nap time ratio can not be reduced by 50 percent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-14
During the follow-up inspection a 17 month old infant was observed napping in a classroom with 31 children. The specified age group for the classroom is two. The max number of children that can be present is twenty two. Due to the infant being under 18 months, the nap time ratio can not be reduced by 50 percent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-14
During the follow-up inspection a 17 month old infant was observed napping in a classroom with 31 children. The specified age group for the classroom is two. The max number of children that can be present is twenty two. Due to the infant being under 18 months, the nap time ratio can not be reduced by 50 percent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-14
During the inspection two infant classrooms were grouped together during nap time. There was a total of nineteen infants with three caregivers. The youngest child was eight months old and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The specified age group was fifteen months old. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-06
An infant classroom had nineteen infants with three caregivers during nap time. The youngest child was eight months and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The classrooms specified age group was fifteen months. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-06
An infant classroom had nineteen infants with three caregivers during nap time. The youngest child was eight months and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The classrooms specified age group was fifteen months. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-06
During the inspection two infant classrooms were grouped together during nap time. There was a total of nineteen infants with three caregivers. The youngest child was eight months old and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The specified age group was fifteen months old. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-06
An infant classroom had nineteen infants with three caregivers during nap time. The youngest child was eight months and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The classrooms specified age group was fifteen months. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-06
During the inspection two infant classrooms were grouped together during nap time. There was a total of nineteen infants with three caregivers. The youngest child was eight months old and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The specified age group was fifteen months old. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-06
During the inspection two infant classrooms were grouped together during nap time. There was a total of nineteen infants with three caregivers. The youngest child was eight months old and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The specified age group was fifteen months old. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-06
An infant classroom had nineteen infants with three caregivers during nap time. The youngest child was eight months and the oldest child was seventeen months old. The classrooms specified age group was fifteen months. This was corrected during inspection when the infant class moved back to there classroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-05-06
Three live ant beds were observed outside on the playground.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-15
Three live ant beds were observed outside on the playground.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-15
Three live ant beds were observed outside on the playground.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-15
Three live ant beds were observed outside on the playground.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-15
It was found that the fire inspection was not completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-09
It was observed that the outside play structure does not have surfacing. Note: Picture was taken.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-01
It was found that the fire inspection was not completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-09
It was observed that the outside play structure does not have surfacing. Note: Picture was taken.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-01
It was found that the fire inspection was not completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-09
It was found that the fire inspection was not completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-09
It was observed that the outside play structure does not have surfacing. Note: Picture was taken.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-01
It was observed that the outside play structure does not have surfacing. Note: Picture was taken.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-01
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Mary's Little Lamb Academy.
Nearby Daycares in Houston
Brautigam Center Day Care
13102 JONES RD
Little People's Creative Academy
9700 RIVERSTONE RANCH RD
Lafaye Boys Home
15603 GROVESPRING DR
Kidventure After School at Travis Elementary
3311 BEAUCHAMP ST
Reynolds Head Start
9601 ROSEHAVEN DR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mary's Little Lamb Academy's safety grade?
Mary's Little Lamb Academy has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Mary's Little Lamb Academy have?
Mary's Little Lamb Academy has 104 total violations on record, including 84 critical, 20 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Mary's Little Lamb Academy last inspected?
Mary's Little Lamb Academy was last inspected on February 5, 2026.