Homes With Hope
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
84 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 6, 2026
Latest inspection
January 15, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 6, 2026
- Provider
- Homes With Hope
- License number
- 835683- 1787
- Location
- 1035 E 11TH ST, Houston, TX 77009
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 3.0/100
- Inspection record
- 84 inspections, last inspected January 15, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 6, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
100
Total Violations
Jan 15, 2026
Last Inspection
0
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (100)
One of the three children's service plans reviewed indicated that the service plan was completed past the 45 days initial period.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
One out of the three children's records reviewed indicated that the plan to address the child's high risk behaviors was missing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
During the monitoring inspection, it was observed the Foster Parent(s)/Agency Agreement For The Child/Youth document was missing the signature from the foster dad.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
One of the three children's service plans reviewed indicated that the service plan was completed past the 45 days initial period.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
During the monitoring inspection, it was observed the Foster Parent(s)/Agency Agreement For The Child/Youth document was missing the signature from the foster dad.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
One out of the three children's records reviewed indicated that the plan to address the child's high risk behaviors was missing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
One of the three children's service plans reviewed indicated that the service plan was completed past the 45 days initial period.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
During the monitoring inspection, it was observed the Foster Parent(s)/Agency Agreement For The Child/Youth document was missing the signature from the foster dad.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
One out of the three children's records reviewed indicated that the plan to address the child's high risk behaviors was missing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
One of the three children's service plans reviewed indicated that the service plan was completed past the 45 days initial period.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
During the monitoring inspection, it was observed the Foster Parent(s)/Agency Agreement For The Child/Youth document was missing the signature from the foster dad.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
One out of the three children's records reviewed indicated that the plan to address the child's high risk behaviors was missing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21
During the investigation, the administrator confirmed the agency chose to call the parent (caseworker) the following day, as opposed to notifying them immediately upon confirming the safety of the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
During the investigation, the administrator confirmed the agency chose to call the parent (caseworker) the following day, as opposed to notifying them immediately upon confirming the safety of the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
During the investigation, the administrator confirmed the agency chose to call the parent (caseworker) the following day, as opposed to notifying them immediately upon confirming the safety of the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
During the investigation, the administrator confirmed the agency chose to call the parent (caseworker) the following day, as opposed to notifying them immediately upon confirming the safety of the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22
Three out three child files reviewed admission assessment was missing the address of the managing conservator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
One out of the three child files reviewed did not have dental Maintenace records for 2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
Three out of three child files reviewed did not include the religion or gender
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
Three out of three child files reviewed did not include the religion or gender
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
Three out three child files reviewed admission assessment was missing the address of the managing conservator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
Three out of three child files reviewed did not include the religion or gender
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
One out of the three child files reviewed did not have dental Maintenace records for 2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
Three out three child files reviewed admission assessment was missing the address of the managing conservator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
Three out of three child files reviewed did not include the religion or gender
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
One out of the three child files reviewed did not have dental Maintenace records for 2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
One out of the three child files reviewed did not have dental Maintenace records for 2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
Three out three child files reviewed admission assessment was missing the address of the managing conservator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10
Two out of the four child files reviewed did not have the completed initial service plan that is required by the minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-21
Two out of the four child files reviewed did not have the completed initial service plan that is required by the minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-21
Two out of the four child files reviewed did not have the completed initial service plan that is required by the minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-21
Two out of the four child files reviewed did not have the completed initial service plan that is required by the minimum standards.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-21
5 out of the 6 files reviewed received the annual psychotropic medication late.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
5 out of the 6 files reviewed had late TIC training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
no documentation to support the caseworker being notified of the service plan meeting at least 14 days prior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
5 out of the 6 files reviewed had late TIC training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
5 out of the 6 files reviewed received the annual psychotropic medication late.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
5 out of the 6 files reviewed received the annual psychotropic medication late.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
5 out of the 6 files reviewed had late TIC training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
no documentation to support the caseworker being notified of the service plan meeting at least 14 days prior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
5 out of the 6 files reviewed received the annual psychotropic medication late.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
5 out of the 6 files reviewed had late TIC training.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
no documentation to support the caseworker being notified of the service plan meeting at least 14 days prior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
no documentation to support the caseworker being notified of the service plan meeting at least 14 days prior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07
A child in care was inappropriately touch due to lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
FP did not provide the operation the information to do a requirement background check to be around children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
2 children in care were left with a former adoptive parent and no paperwork was provided which resulted in a child being at the emergency care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
A child in care was inappropriately touch due to lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
A child in care was inappropriately touch due to lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
2 children in care were left with a former adoptive parent and no paperwork was provided which resulted in a child being at the emergency care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
FP did not provide the operation the information to do a requirement background check to be around children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
A child in care was inappropriately touch due to lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
2 children in care were left with a former adoptive parent and no paperwork was provided which resulted in a child being at the emergency care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
FP did not provide the operation the information to do a requirement background check to be around children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
2 children in care were left with a former adoptive parent and no paperwork was provided which resulted in a child being at the emergency care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
FP did not provide the operation the information to do a requirement background check to be around children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05
A caregiver left three youth in care under the age 7 inside a car unattended for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22
A caregiver didn't consider the risks of leaving youth in care under the age of 7 in a non-running car for over 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-28
A caregiver left three youth in care under the age 7 inside a car unattended for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22
A caregiver left three youth in care under the age 7 inside a car unattended for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22
A caregiver didn't consider the risks of leaving youth in care under the age of 7 in a non-running car for over 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-28
A caregiver left three youth in care under the age 7 inside a car unattended for more than 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22
A caregiver didn't consider the risks of leaving youth in care under the age of 7 in a non-running car for over 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-28
A caregiver didn't consider the risks of leaving youth in care under the age of 7 in a non-running car for over 30 minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-28
Three out of four child files reviewed did not contain known allergies or medical conditions of each child in an easily accessible place in the file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
One out of two employee files reviewed did not contain a signed affidavit for employment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Two out of three agency home files reviewed had health inspection checklists that had been completed over one year ago.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
One out of four youth files reviewed did not contain a discharge summary.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Four out of four child files reviewed did not contain a service plan in the file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
One out of four youth files reviewed did not contain a discharge summary.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
One out of two employee files reviewed did not contain a signed affidavit for employment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Four out of four child files reviewed did not contain a service plan in the file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Two out of three agency home files reviewed had health inspection checklists that had been completed over one year ago.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
One out of four youth files reviewed did not contain a discharge summary.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Three out of four child files reviewed did not contain known allergies or medical conditions of each child in an easily accessible place in the file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
One out of two employee files reviewed did not contain a signed affidavit for employment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Four out of four child files reviewed did not contain a service plan in the file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Two out of three agency home files reviewed had health inspection checklists that had been completed over one year ago.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Two out of three agency home files reviewed had health inspection checklists that had been completed over one year ago.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Three out of four child files reviewed did not contain known allergies or medical conditions of each child in an easily accessible place in the file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
One out of four youth files reviewed did not contain a discharge summary.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
One out of two employee files reviewed did not contain a signed affidavit for employment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Four out of four child files reviewed did not contain a service plan in the file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
Three out of four child files reviewed did not contain known allergies or medical conditions of each child in an easily accessible place in the file.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18
An agency home did not have the verification certificate and was not available upon request. The Ombudsman posting was also not posted or available.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20
An agency home caregiver reports never having unannounced visits to the home by the child-placing agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20
An agency home caregiver reports never having unannounced visits to the home by the child-placing agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20
An agency home caregiver reports never having unannounced visits to the home by the child-placing agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20
An agency home did not have the verification certificate and was not available upon request. The Ombudsman posting was also not posted or available.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20
An agency home did not have the verification certificate and was not available upon request. The Ombudsman posting was also not posted or available.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20
An agency home caregiver reports never having unannounced visits to the home by the child-placing agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20
An agency home did not have the verification certificate and was not available upon request. The Ombudsman posting was also not posted or available.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20
A child of opposite sex older than 6 years old shares a bedroom with her brother.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
Cleaning supplies were observed during the walkthrough under the bathroom sink accessible to children in care. A can of wasp spray was also observed on the grill in the backyard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12
Cleaning supplies were observed during the walkthrough under the bathroom sink accessible to children in care. A can of wasp spray was also observed on the grill in the backyard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12
Cleaning supplies were observed during the walkthrough under the bathroom sink accessible to children in care. A can of wasp spray was also observed on the grill in the backyard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12
A child of opposite sex older than 6 years old shares a bedroom with her brother.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
Cleaning supplies were observed during the walkthrough under the bathroom sink accessible to children in care. A can of wasp spray was also observed on the grill in the backyard.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12
A child of opposite sex older than 6 years old shares a bedroom with her brother.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
A child of opposite sex older than 6 years old shares a bedroom with her brother.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Homes With Hope.
Nearby Daycares in Houston
Brautigam Center Day Care
13102 JONES RD
Reynolds Head Start
9601 ROSEHAVEN DR
Lafaye Boys Home
15603 GROVESPRING DR
Little People's Creative Academy
9700 RIVERSTONE RANCH RD
LaTonya Stewart
2902 REDWING GROVE WAY
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Homes With Hope's safety grade?
Homes With Hope has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 3.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Homes With Hope have?
Homes With Hope has 100 total violations on record, including 56 critical, 32 serious, and 12 minor.
When was Homes With Hope last inspected?
Homes With Hope was last inspected on January 15, 2026.