Homes With Hope

1035 E 11TH ST, Houston, TX 77009Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

84 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 6, 2026

Latest inspection

January 15, 2026

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 6, 2026

Provider
Homes With Hope
License number
835683- 1787
Location
1035 E 11TH ST, Houston, TX 77009
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 3.0/100
Inspection record
84 inspections, last inspected January 15, 2026
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 6, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor3.0 / 100
Health0/100
Safety10/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

100

Total Violations

Jan 15, 2026

Last Inspection

0

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (100)

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Aug 14, 2025

One of the three children's service plans reviewed indicated that the service plan was completed past the 45 days initial period.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1309(b)(1)(H)(i)Aug 14, 2025

One out of the three children's records reviewed indicated that the plan to address the child's high risk behaviors was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2487(a)Aug 14, 2025

During the monitoring inspection, it was observed the Foster Parent(s)/Agency Agreement For The Child/Youth document was missing the signature from the foster dad.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Aug 14, 2025

One of the three children's service plans reviewed indicated that the service plan was completed past the 45 days initial period.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2487(a)Aug 14, 2025

During the monitoring inspection, it was observed the Foster Parent(s)/Agency Agreement For The Child/Youth document was missing the signature from the foster dad.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1309(b)(1)(H)(i)Aug 14, 2025

One out of the three children's records reviewed indicated that the plan to address the child's high risk behaviors was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Aug 14, 2025

One of the three children's service plans reviewed indicated that the service plan was completed past the 45 days initial period.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2487(a)Aug 14, 2025

During the monitoring inspection, it was observed the Foster Parent(s)/Agency Agreement For The Child/Youth document was missing the signature from the foster dad.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1309(b)(1)(H)(i)Aug 14, 2025

One out of the three children's records reviewed indicated that the plan to address the child's high risk behaviors was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Aug 14, 2025

One of the three children's service plans reviewed indicated that the service plan was completed past the 45 days initial period.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2487(a)Aug 14, 2025

During the monitoring inspection, it was observed the Foster Parent(s)/Agency Agreement For The Child/Youth document was missing the signature from the foster dad.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1309(b)(1)(H)(i)Aug 14, 2025

One out of the three children's records reviewed indicated that the plan to address the child's high risk behaviors was missing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-21

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(B)Jan 7, 2025

During the investigation, the administrator confirmed the agency chose to call the parent (caseworker) the following day, as opposed to notifying them immediately upon confirming the safety of the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(B)Jan 6, 2025

During the investigation, the administrator confirmed the agency chose to call the parent (caseworker) the following day, as opposed to notifying them immediately upon confirming the safety of the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(B)Jan 6, 2025

During the investigation, the administrator confirmed the agency chose to call the parent (caseworker) the following day, as opposed to notifying them immediately upon confirming the safety of the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22

CRITICALHEALTH749.503(a)(2)(B)Jan 6, 2025

During the investigation, the administrator confirmed the agency chose to call the parent (caseworker) the following day, as opposed to notifying them immediately upon confirming the safety of the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-22

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1107(a)(2)Jun 3, 2024

Three out three child files reviewed admission assessment was missing the address of the managing conservator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

CRITICALHEALTH749.1409(a)(4)Jun 3, 2024

One out of the three child files reviewed did not have dental Maintenace records for 2023.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1107(a)(1)Jun 3, 2024

Three out of three child files reviewed did not include the religion or gender

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1107(a)(1)Jun 3, 2024

Three out of three child files reviewed did not include the religion or gender

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1107(a)(2)Jun 3, 2024

Three out three child files reviewed admission assessment was missing the address of the managing conservator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1107(a)(1)Jun 3, 2024

Three out of three child files reviewed did not include the religion or gender

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

CRITICALHEALTH749.1409(a)(4)Jun 3, 2024

One out of the three child files reviewed did not have dental Maintenace records for 2023.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1107(a)(2)Jun 3, 2024

Three out three child files reviewed admission assessment was missing the address of the managing conservator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1107(a)(1)Jun 3, 2024

Three out of three child files reviewed did not include the religion or gender

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

CRITICALHEALTH749.1409(a)(4)Jun 3, 2024

One out of the three child files reviewed did not have dental Maintenace records for 2023.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

CRITICALHEALTH749.1409(a)(4)Jun 3, 2024

One out of the three child files reviewed did not have dental Maintenace records for 2023.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1107(a)(2)Jun 3, 2024

Three out three child files reviewed admission assessment was missing the address of the managing conservator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Nov 14, 2023

Two out of the four child files reviewed did not have the completed initial service plan that is required by the minimum standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Nov 14, 2023

Two out of the four child files reviewed did not have the completed initial service plan that is required by the minimum standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Nov 14, 2023

Two out of the four child files reviewed did not have the completed initial service plan that is required by the minimum standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1307Nov 14, 2023

Two out of the four child files reviewed did not have the completed initial service plan that is required by the minimum standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-21

CRITICALHEALTH749.930(c)(4)Oct 3, 2022

5 out of the 6 files reviewed received the annual psychotropic medication late.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

CRITICALSTAFFING749.931(b)(2)Oct 3, 2022

5 out of the 6 files reviewed had late TIC training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(b)Oct 3, 2022

no documentation to support the caseworker being notified of the service plan meeting at least 14 days prior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

CRITICALSTAFFING749.931(b)(2)Oct 2, 2022

5 out of the 6 files reviewed had late TIC training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

CRITICALHEALTH749.930(c)(4)Oct 2, 2022

5 out of the 6 files reviewed received the annual psychotropic medication late.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

CRITICALHEALTH749.930(c)(4)Oct 2, 2022

5 out of the 6 files reviewed received the annual psychotropic medication late.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

CRITICALSTAFFING749.931(b)(2)Oct 2, 2022

5 out of the 6 files reviewed had late TIC training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(b)Oct 2, 2022

no documentation to support the caseworker being notified of the service plan meeting at least 14 days prior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

CRITICALHEALTH749.930(c)(4)Oct 2, 2022

5 out of the 6 files reviewed received the annual psychotropic medication late.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

CRITICALSTAFFING749.931(b)(2)Oct 2, 2022

5 out of the 6 files reviewed had late TIC training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(b)Oct 2, 2022

no documentation to support the caseworker being notified of the service plan meeting at least 14 days prior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(b)Oct 2, 2022

no documentation to support the caseworker being notified of the service plan meeting at least 14 days prior.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-07

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(4)Aug 1, 2022

A child in care was inappropriately touch due to lack of supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Aug 1, 2022

FP did not provide the operation the information to do a requirement background check to be around children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2635(2)Aug 1, 2022

2 children in care were left with a former adoptive parent and no paperwork was provided which resulted in a child being at the emergency care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(4)Aug 1, 2022

A child in care was inappropriately touch due to lack of supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(4)Aug 1, 2022

A child in care was inappropriately touch due to lack of supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2635(2)Aug 1, 2022

2 children in care were left with a former adoptive parent and no paperwork was provided which resulted in a child being at the emergency care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Aug 1, 2022

FP did not provide the operation the information to do a requirement background check to be around children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(4)Aug 1, 2022

A child in care was inappropriately touch due to lack of supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2635(2)Aug 1, 2022

2 children in care were left with a former adoptive parent and no paperwork was provided which resulted in a child being at the emergency care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Aug 1, 2022

FP did not provide the operation the information to do a requirement background check to be around children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2635(2)Aug 1, 2022

2 children in care were left with a former adoptive parent and no paperwork was provided which resulted in a child being at the emergency care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Aug 1, 2022

FP did not provide the operation the information to do a requirement background check to be around children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-05

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)Mar 6, 2022

A caregiver left three youth in care under the age 7 inside a car unattended for more than 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(b)(4)Mar 6, 2022

A caregiver didn't consider the risks of leaving youth in care under the age of 7 in a non-running car for over 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-28

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)Mar 6, 2022

A caregiver left three youth in care under the age 7 inside a car unattended for more than 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)Mar 6, 2022

A caregiver left three youth in care under the age 7 inside a car unattended for more than 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(b)(4)Mar 6, 2022

A caregiver didn't consider the risks of leaving youth in care under the age of 7 in a non-running car for over 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-28

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)Mar 6, 2022

A caregiver left three youth in care under the age 7 inside a car unattended for more than 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-22

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(b)(4)Mar 6, 2022

A caregiver didn't consider the risks of leaving youth in care under the age of 7 in a non-running car for over 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-28

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(b)(4)Mar 6, 2022

A caregiver didn't consider the risks of leaving youth in care under the age of 7 in a non-running car for over 30 minutes.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.577(2)Jan 11, 2022

Three out of four child files reviewed did not contain known allergies or medical conditions of each child in an easily accessible place in the file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.553(6)Jan 11, 2022

One out of two employee files reviewed did not contain a signed affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

CRITICALHEALTH749.2905(b)Jan 11, 2022

Two out of three agency home files reviewed had health inspection checklists that had been completed over one year ago.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.1373(b)(1)Jan 11, 2022

One out of four youth files reviewed did not contain a discharge summary.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.535(a)(1)Jan 11, 2022

Four out of four child files reviewed did not contain a service plan in the file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.1373(b)(1)Jan 11, 2022

One out of four youth files reviewed did not contain a discharge summary.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.553(6)Jan 11, 2022

One out of two employee files reviewed did not contain a signed affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.535(a)(1)Jan 11, 2022

Four out of four child files reviewed did not contain a service plan in the file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

CRITICALHEALTH749.2905(b)Jan 11, 2022

Two out of three agency home files reviewed had health inspection checklists that had been completed over one year ago.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.1373(b)(1)Jan 11, 2022

One out of four youth files reviewed did not contain a discharge summary.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.577(2)Jan 11, 2022

Three out of four child files reviewed did not contain known allergies or medical conditions of each child in an easily accessible place in the file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.553(6)Jan 11, 2022

One out of two employee files reviewed did not contain a signed affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.535(a)(1)Jan 11, 2022

Four out of four child files reviewed did not contain a service plan in the file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

CRITICALHEALTH749.2905(b)Jan 11, 2022

Two out of three agency home files reviewed had health inspection checklists that had been completed over one year ago.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

CRITICALHEALTH749.2905(b)Jan 11, 2022

Two out of three agency home files reviewed had health inspection checklists that had been completed over one year ago.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.577(2)Jan 11, 2022

Three out of four child files reviewed did not contain known allergies or medical conditions of each child in an easily accessible place in the file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.1373(b)(1)Jan 11, 2022

One out of four youth files reviewed did not contain a discharge summary.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.553(6)Jan 11, 2022

One out of two employee files reviewed did not contain a signed affidavit for employment.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.535(a)(1)Jan 11, 2022

Four out of four child files reviewed did not contain a service plan in the file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.577(2)Jan 11, 2022

Three out of four child files reviewed did not contain known allergies or medical conditions of each child in an easily accessible place in the file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-18

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2481(b)Jul 13, 2021

An agency home did not have the verification certificate and was not available upon request. The Ombudsman posting was also not posted or available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2815(b)Jul 13, 2021

An agency home caregiver reports never having unannounced visits to the home by the child-placing agency.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2815(b)Jul 13, 2021

An agency home caregiver reports never having unannounced visits to the home by the child-placing agency.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2815(b)Jul 13, 2021

An agency home caregiver reports never having unannounced visits to the home by the child-placing agency.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2481(b)Jul 13, 2021

An agency home did not have the verification certificate and was not available upon request. The Ombudsman posting was also not posted or available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2481(b)Jul 13, 2021

An agency home did not have the verification certificate and was not available upon request. The Ombudsman posting was also not posted or available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2815(b)Jul 13, 2021

An agency home caregiver reports never having unannounced visits to the home by the child-placing agency.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2481(b)Jul 13, 2021

An agency home did not have the verification certificate and was not available upon request. The Ombudsman posting was also not posted or available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-20

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3029Jul 12, 2021

A child of opposite sex older than 6 years old shares a bedroom with her brother.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Jul 12, 2021

Cleaning supplies were observed during the walkthrough under the bathroom sink accessible to children in care. A can of wasp spray was also observed on the grill in the backyard.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Jul 12, 2021

Cleaning supplies were observed during the walkthrough under the bathroom sink accessible to children in care. A can of wasp spray was also observed on the grill in the backyard.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Jul 12, 2021

Cleaning supplies were observed during the walkthrough under the bathroom sink accessible to children in care. A can of wasp spray was also observed on the grill in the backyard.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3029Jul 12, 2021

A child of opposite sex older than 6 years old shares a bedroom with her brother.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Jul 12, 2021

Cleaning supplies were observed during the walkthrough under the bathroom sink accessible to children in care. A can of wasp spray was also observed on the grill in the backyard.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3029Jul 12, 2021

A child of opposite sex older than 6 years old shares a bedroom with her brother.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3029Jul 12, 2021

A child of opposite sex older than 6 years old shares a bedroom with her brother.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Homes With Hope.

Nearby Daycares in Houston

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Homes With Hope's safety grade?

Homes With Hope has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 3.0 out of 100.

How many violations does Homes With Hope have?

Homes With Hope has 100 total violations on record, including 56 critical, 32 serious, and 12 minor.

When was Homes With Hope last inspected?

Homes With Hope was last inspected on January 15, 2026.

Parent Resources