Best Care 4 Kidz Inc
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
85 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
March 31, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Best Care 4 Kidz Inc
- License number
- 1715499- 14412
- Location
- 16100 CAIRNWAY DR STE 365, Houston, TX 77084
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 85 inspections, last inspected March 31, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
90
Total Violations
Mar 31, 2026
Last Inspection
N/A
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (90)
In the home study only one community reference was documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
In the home study only one community reference was documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
In the home study only one community reference was documented.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-03-12
During an investigation it was found that a child whose service plan requires 168 hours per week of nursing care was not receiving the required level of nursing services.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-18
During an investigation it was found that a child whose service plan requires 168 hours per week of nursing care was not receiving the required level of nursing services.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-18
During an investigation it was found that a child whose service plan requires 168 hours per week of nursing care was not receiving the required level of nursing services.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-18
During an investigation monitoring visit to the home, a child not placed at the home was discovered living in the home 6 days a week which resulted to the foster home going above it approved total capacity
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
It was observed that foster parent was not abiding by a child's service plan. According to the plan, child is to receive 1 on 1 supervision at all times but foster parent admitting that child has not been receiving 1 on 1 supervision since last month.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
During an investigation monitoring visit to the home, a child not placed at the home was discovered living in the home 6 days a week which resulted to the foster home going above it approved total capacity
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
According to placement contract, initial service plan and reviewed service plan, a child placed at the foster home requires 1 on 1 supervision at all times. However, foster parent stopped proving the child with the 1 on 1 supervision without notifying or receiving approval from her CPA that signed the placement agreement with a State Agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
Multiple children are placed in the foster home. However, foster parent who is a registered nurse accepted another nursing assignment through another agency caring for a special needs child at her home 6 days a week without her CPA notice.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
It was observed that foster parent was not abiding by a child's service plan. According to the plan, child is to receive 1 on 1 supervision at all times but foster parent admitting that child has not been receiving 1 on 1 supervision since last month.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
Multiple children are placed in the foster home. However, foster parent who is a registered nurse accepted another nursing assignment through another agency caring for a special needs child at her home 6 days a week without her CPA notice.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
It was observed that foster parent was not abiding by a child's service plan. According to the plan, child is to receive 1 on 1 supervision at all times but foster parent admitting that child has not been receiving 1 on 1 supervision since last month.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
According to placement contract, initial service plan and reviewed service plan, a child placed at the foster home requires 1 on 1 supervision at all times. However, foster parent stopped proving the child with the 1 on 1 supervision without notifying or receiving approval from her CPA that signed the placement agreement with a State Agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
During an investigation monitoring visit to the home, a child not placed at the home was discovered living in the home 6 days a week which resulted to the foster home going above it approved total capacity
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
Multiple children are placed in the foster home. However, foster parent who is a registered nurse accepted another nursing assignment through another agency caring for a special needs child at her home 6 days a week without her CPA notice.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
According to placement contract, initial service plan and reviewed service plan, a child placed at the foster home requires 1 on 1 supervision at all times. However, foster parent stopped proving the child with the 1 on 1 supervision without notifying or receiving approval from her CPA that signed the placement agreement with a State Agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-18
It was found through the course of the investigation that foster parent was not cooperative with the Child Care Investigator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
It was found through the course of the investigation that foster parent was not cooperative with the Child Care Investigator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
It was found through the course of the investigation that foster parent was not cooperative with the Child Care Investigator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-22
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-10
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-10
It was found through the course of the investigation that the foster parent admitted to spanking a child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-10
It was found through the course of the investigation that the foster parent admitted to spanking a child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-10
It was found through the course of the investigation that the foster parent admitted to spanking a child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-10
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-10
During an inspection at a foster home, medication logs for one child were incorrectly documented and others were blank.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-23
During an inspection at a foster home, medication logs for one child were incorrectly documented and others were blank.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-23
During an inspection at a foster home, medication logs for one child were incorrectly documented and others were blank.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-23
During an inspection conducted on 2/27/2025. It was determined that an agency home did not have two quarterly unannounced visits for year 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-07
During an inspection conducted on 2/27/2025. It was determined that an agency home did not have two quarterly unannounced visits for year 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-07
During an inspection conducted on 2/27/2025. It was determined that an agency home did not have two quarterly unannounced visits for year 2024.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-07
Foster Parent left the 2-year-old unattended for 20-25 minutes while she went to get another child from the bus stop.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-15
Foster Parent left the 2-year-old unattended for 20-25 minutes while she went to get another child from the bus stop.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-15
Foster Parent left the 2-year-old unattended for 20-25 minutes while she went to get another child from the bus stop.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-15
Multiple medication logs were observed not to be up to date with documentation of adminstered doses.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-20
Multiple medication logs were observed not to be up to date with documentation of adminstered doses.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-20
Multiple medication logs were observed not to be up to date with documentation of adminstered doses.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-20
A PMN toddler child was observed being fed in the bedroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-13
A PMN toddler child was observed being fed in the bedroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-13
A PMN toddler child was observed being fed in the bedroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-13
One of the four foster parent files was observed to be delinquent in this annual training, last taken 02/05/2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08
One of the four foster parent files was observed to be delinquent in this annual training, last taken 02/05/2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08
One of the four foster parent files was observed to be delinquent in this annual training, last taken 02/05/2023.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08
One of two reviewed home screenings did not contain an interview with all household members present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-09
One of two reviewed home screenings did not document an assessment of information obtained for verification.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-09
One of two reviewed home screenings did not contain an interview with all household members present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-09
One of two reviewed home screenings did not document an assessment of information obtained for verification.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-09
One of two reviewed home screenings did not document an assessment of information obtained for verification.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-09
One of two reviewed home screenings did not contain an interview with all household members present.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-09
5 of 5 service plan reviews did not include the child's signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-18
Four of five children in the home stated they do not get a snack if they are in trouble. Both Caregivers gave an example of a reason a child would not be provided a snack being their refusal to come downstairs for snack, when prompted.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-18
Caregivers were not implementing the service plan supervision requirements when they stated they were home, but did not see, when a child received a carpet burn on his chest from being dragged across the carpet by another child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-18
5 of 5 service plan reviews did not include the child's signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-18
Four of five children in the home stated they do not get a snack if they are in trouble. Both Caregivers gave an example of a reason a child would not be provided a snack being their refusal to come downstairs for snack, when prompted.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-18
Caregivers were not implementing the service plan supervision requirements when they stated they were home, but did not see, when a child received a carpet burn on his chest from being dragged across the carpet by another child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-18
Four of five children in the home stated they do not get a snack if they are in trouble. Both Caregivers gave an example of a reason a child would not be provided a snack being their refusal to come downstairs for snack, when prompted.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-18
Caregivers were not implementing the service plan supervision requirements when they stated they were home, but did not see, when a child received a carpet burn on his chest from being dragged across the carpet by another child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-18
5 of 5 service plan reviews did not include the child's signature.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-18
The caregiver has a total of four PMN children; two of which are total needs. The is a one caregiver household; with no 24 hr assistance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15
The caregiver has a total of four PMN children; two of which are total needs. The is a one caregiver household; with no 24 hr assistance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15
The caregiver has a total of four PMN children; two of which are total needs. The is a one caregiver household; with no 24 hr assistance.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15
The single fire extinguisher present in the home has no indication of being serviced within the last annual year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15
The single fire extinguisher present in the home has no indication of being serviced within the last annual year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15
The single fire extinguisher present in the home has no indication of being serviced within the last annual year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-15
Two of two children interviewed confirmed they felt the foster parents treat their biological child better than the foster children placed in the home are treated.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The caregivers content that they have always worked very closely together in fostering children in care. Both caregivers in the home on a very regular basis. Initially only one foster parent was verified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
Two of two children in care reported that their conversations with approved contacts are monitored. The legal parent nor the service plan indicated approved monitoring.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The home screening did not initially include one of the adult caregivers information; the request for any addendums only addressed the caregiver becoming a household member; there was no mention of the mandatory perspectives on specific topics such as supporting religious differences, being mindful of biological family, personal childhood experiences.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The verification was amended during the course of an open investigation; and back dated to one month prior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
Two of two children interviewed confirmed they felt the foster parents treat their biological child better than the foster children placed in the home are treated.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The caregivers content that they have always worked very closely together in fostering children in care. Both caregivers in the home on a very regular basis. Initially only one foster parent was verified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
Two of two children in care reported that their conversations with approved contacts are monitored. The legal parent nor the service plan indicated approved monitoring.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The home screening did not initially include one of the adult caregivers information; the request for any addendums only addressed the caregiver becoming a household member; there was no mention of the mandatory perspectives on specific topics such as supporting religious differences, being mindful of biological family, personal childhood experiences.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The verification was amended during the course of an open investigation; and back dated to one month prior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The home screening did not initially include one of the adult caregivers information; the request for any addendums only addressed the caregiver becoming a household member; there was no mention of the mandatory perspectives on specific topics such as supporting religious differences, being mindful of biological family, personal childhood experiences.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The caregivers content that they have always worked very closely together in fostering children in care. Both caregivers in the home on a very regular basis. Initially only one foster parent was verified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
Two of two children interviewed confirmed they felt the foster parents treat their biological child better than the foster children placed in the home are treated.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
Two of two children in care reported that their conversations with approved contacts are monitored. The legal parent nor the service plan indicated approved monitoring.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The verification was amended during the course of an open investigation; and back dated to one month prior.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-29
The Clinical Coordinator does not have adequate professional experience.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-24
Inaccurately documented dates of actions, children's paperwork, and documents from a previous agency were observed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-24
Three children's ISP was not signed by all members of the CMPS.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-24
Inaccurately documented dates of actions, children's paperwork, and documents from a previous agency were observed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-24
The Clinical Coordinator does not have adequate professional experience.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-24
Three children's ISP was not signed by all members of the CMPS.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-24
The Clinical Coordinator does not have adequate professional experience.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-24
Three children's ISP was not signed by all members of the CMPS.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-24
Inaccurately documented dates of actions, children's paperwork, and documents from a previous agency were observed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-24
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Best Care 4 Kidz Inc.
Nearby Daycares in Houston
Brautigam Center Day Care
13102 JONES RD
Little People's Creative Academy
9700 RIVERSTONE RANCH RD
Lafaye Boys Home
15603 GROVESPRING DR
Kidventure After School at Travis Elementary
3311 BEAUCHAMP ST
Reynolds Head Start
9601 ROSEHAVEN DR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Best Care 4 Kidz Inc's safety grade?
Best Care 4 Kidz Inc has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Best Care 4 Kidz Inc have?
Best Care 4 Kidz Inc has 90 total violations on record, including 54 critical, 30 serious, and 6 minor.
When was Best Care 4 Kidz Inc last inspected?
Best Care 4 Kidz Inc was last inspected on March 31, 2026.