Accompanied by Gods Love

14340 TORREY CHASE BLVD STE 170, Houston, TX 77014Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

34 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 6, 2026

Latest inspection

September 24, 2025

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 6, 2026

Provider
Accompanied by Gods Love
License number
1730621- 15051
Location
14340 TORREY CHASE BLVD STE 170, Houston, TX 77014
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 10.8/100
Inspection record
34 inspections, last inspected September 24, 2025
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 6, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor10.8 / 100
Health3/100
Safety0/100
Staffing40/100
Compliance0/100

57

Total Violations

Sep 24, 2025

Last Inspection

N/A

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (66)

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1153(b)Sep 24, 2025

During the inspection it was found that 1 of 5 children?s files reviewed did not contain a dental appointment scheduled within the first 30 days and not completed within the first 90 days of admission.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1427(b)Sep 24, 2025

During the inspection it was found that 1 of 5 children?s files reviewed did not contain a record that vision and hearing was done.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1153(b)Sep 24, 2025

During the inspection it was found that 1 of 5 children?s files reviewed did not contain a dental appointment scheduled within the first 30 days and not completed within the first 90 days of admission.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1427(b)Sep 24, 2025

During the inspection it was found that 1 of 5 children?s files reviewed did not contain a record that vision and hearing was done.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1153(b)Sep 24, 2025

During the inspection it was found that 1 of 5 children?s files reviewed did not contain a dental appointment scheduled within the first 30 days and not completed within the first 90 days of admission.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1427(b)Sep 24, 2025

During the inspection it was found that 1 of 5 children?s files reviewed did not contain a record that vision and hearing was done.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(2)May 21, 2025

Refrigerator not properly sanitized.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(2)May 21, 2025

Refrigerator not properly sanitized.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(2)May 21, 2025

Refrigerator not properly sanitized.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Jan 6, 2025

The foster home did not have access to the medication logs as they are online and did not have a way to access it due to the system giving an error notice.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-10

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Jan 6, 2025

The foster home did not have access to the medication logs as they are online and did not have a way to access it due to the system giving an error notice.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-10

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Jan 6, 2025

The foster home did not have access to the medication logs as they are online and did not have a way to access it due to the system giving an error notice.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-10

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Jan 6, 2025

The foster home did not have access to the medication logs as they are online and did not have a way to access it due to the system giving an error notice.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-10

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(b)Dec 23, 2024

A child's medication log was not updated within 24 hours of administering medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(11)(A)Dec 23, 2024

A child in care was hospitalized and tested positive for a communicable disease and notification protocols were not followed per the minimum standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-27

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(b)Dec 23, 2024

A child's medication log was not updated within 24 hours of administering medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(11)(A)Dec 23, 2024

A child in care was hospitalized and tested positive for a communicable disease and notification protocols were not followed per the minimum standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(11)(A)Dec 23, 2024

A child in care was hospitalized and tested positive for a communicable disease and notification protocols were not followed per the minimum standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-27

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(b)Dec 23, 2024

A child's medication log was not updated within 24 hours of administering medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-27

CRITICALHEALTH749.1401(d)Feb 21, 2024

The follow up was not completed timely as directed by the medical professional.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-13

CRITICALHEALTH749.1401(d)Feb 21, 2024

The follow up was not completed timely as directed by the medical professional.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-13

CRITICALHEALTH749.1401(d)Feb 21, 2024

The follow up was not completed timely as directed by the medical professional.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-13

SERIOUSSTAFFING745.651(2)(A)Feb 8, 2023

The operation has not validated their background check since 4/5/2022. Validation should be done every 3 months.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)Feb 8, 2023

Home study approved to provide foster and adoptive care services but the verification certificate states only emergency and respite services. Likewise, CLASS states only adoption services.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING745.619Feb 8, 2023

Two foster parent's background checks submitted stated that they had the role of unverified respite worker but said foster parents' roles are that of foster/adoptive care.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)Feb 8, 2023

Home study approved to provide foster and adoptive care services but the verification certificate states only emergency and respite services. Likewise, CLASS states only adoption services.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING745.619Feb 8, 2023

Two foster parent's background checks submitted stated that they had the role of unverified respite worker but said foster parents' roles are that of foster/adoptive care.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSTAFFING745.651(2)(A)Feb 8, 2023

The operation has not validated their background check since 4/5/2022. Validation should be done every 3 months.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSTAFFING745.651(2)(A)Feb 8, 2023

The operation has not validated their background check since 4/5/2022. Validation should be done every 3 months.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(F)Feb 8, 2023

Home study approved to provide foster and adoptive care services but the verification certificate states only emergency and respite services. Likewise, CLASS states only adoption services.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING745.619Feb 8, 2023

Two foster parent's background checks submitted stated that they had the role of unverified respite worker but said foster parents' roles are that of foster/adoptive care.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Nov 7, 2022

A youth in care was observed to be hit on their leg multiple times by a foster parent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Nov 7, 2022

A youth in care was observed to be hit on their leg multiple times by a foster parent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Nov 7, 2022

A youth in care was observed to be hit on their leg multiple times by a foster parent.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-13

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(8)(A)May 14, 2022

There was no serious incident report notifying that the child in care (who is developmentally and chronologically under 6 years) left the house unauthorized.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(3)May 14, 2022

The caregiver left the child in the backyard without supervision, thus the child was able to leave the house without him being noticed by the caregiver. The child was out in the neighborhood for about 15 minutes and was spotted by a neighbor who lived 10 houses away from the child's house. Considering his age, the child was exposed to possible harm and hazard which could have been prevented had the caregiver exercised the diligence required thereof.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)May 14, 2022

The child in care, (of vulnerable age), was able to leave the caregiver's house. This shows an utter disregard for the child's safety and well being and is tantamount to abuse and neglect.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.509(b)May 14, 2022

The caregiver did not make a report directly to the Texas Abuse Hotline relative to child's unauthorized absence.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(8)(A)May 14, 2022

There was no serious incident report notifying that the child in care (who is developmentally and chronologically under 6 years) left the house unauthorized.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(8)(A)May 14, 2022

There was no serious incident report notifying that the child in care (who is developmentally and chronologically under 6 years) left the house unauthorized.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)May 14, 2022

The child in care, (of vulnerable age), was able to leave the caregiver's house. This shows an utter disregard for the child's safety and well being and is tantamount to abuse and neglect.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.509(b)May 14, 2022

The caregiver did not make a report directly to the Texas Abuse Hotline relative to child's unauthorized absence.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(3)May 14, 2022

The caregiver left the child in the backyard without supervision, thus the child was able to leave the house without him being noticed by the caregiver. The child was out in the neighborhood for about 15 minutes and was spotted by a neighbor who lived 10 houses away from the child's house. Considering his age, the child was exposed to possible harm and hazard which could have been prevented had the caregiver exercised the diligence required thereof.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)May 14, 2022

The child in care, (of vulnerable age), was able to leave the caregiver's house. This shows an utter disregard for the child's safety and well being and is tantamount to abuse and neglect.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(8)(A)May 14, 2022

There was no serious incident report notifying that the child in care (who is developmentally and chronologically under 6 years) left the house unauthorized.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.509(b)May 14, 2022

The caregiver did not make a report directly to the Texas Abuse Hotline relative to child's unauthorized absence.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(3)May 14, 2022

The caregiver left the child in the backyard without supervision, thus the child was able to leave the house without him being noticed by the caregiver. The child was out in the neighborhood for about 15 minutes and was spotted by a neighbor who lived 10 houses away from the child's house. Considering his age, the child was exposed to possible harm and hazard which could have been prevented had the caregiver exercised the diligence required thereof.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.509(b)May 14, 2022

The caregiver did not make a report directly to the Texas Abuse Hotline relative to child's unauthorized absence.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALSAFETY749.2593(a)(3)May 14, 2022

The caregiver left the child in the backyard without supervision, thus the child was able to leave the house without him being noticed by the caregiver. The child was out in the neighborhood for about 15 minutes and was spotted by a neighbor who lived 10 houses away from the child's house. Considering his age, the child was exposed to possible harm and hazard which could have been prevented had the caregiver exercised the diligence required thereof.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALSAFETY749.1003(b)(1)(B)May 14, 2022

The child in care, (of vulnerable age), was able to leave the caregiver's house. This shows an utter disregard for the child's safety and well being and is tantamount to abuse and neglect.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-04

CRITICALSAFETY749.2051(b)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver used a mechanical restraint with a child in care by using zip-ties to restrain to prevent the child from kicking the interior of the caregiver's vehicle and breaking the car window.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSAFETY749.2055(a)(1)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver did not attempt to a de-escalate a child's behavior before implementing an inappropriate restraint technique of carrying the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)Feb 12, 2022

A child in care was subjected to unusual punishment by being zip-tied at the wrists and ankles, instead of using the approved redirection methods when the child engaged in a tantrum.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSTAFFING749.607(1)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver did not demonstrate appropriate judgment and control when the caregiver used inappropriate restraint and discipline techniques with a child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)Feb 12, 2022

A child in care was subjected to unusual punishment by being zip-tied at the wrists and ankles, instead of using the approved redirection methods when the child engaged in a tantrum.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSAFETY749.2055(a)(1)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver did not attempt to a de-escalate a child's behavior before implementing an inappropriate restraint technique of carrying the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSAFETY749.2051(b)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver used a mechanical restraint with a child in care by using zip-ties to restrain to prevent the child from kicking the interior of the caregiver's vehicle and breaking the car window.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSAFETY749.2055(a)(1)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver did not attempt to a de-escalate a child's behavior before implementing an inappropriate restraint technique of carrying the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSAFETY749.2051(b)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver used a mechanical restraint with a child in care by using zip-ties to restrain to prevent the child from kicking the interior of the caregiver's vehicle and breaking the car window.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSAFETY749.2051(b)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver used a mechanical restraint with a child in care by using zip-ties to restrain to prevent the child from kicking the interior of the caregiver's vehicle and breaking the car window.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSAFETY749.2055(a)(1)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver did not attempt to a de-escalate a child's behavior before implementing an inappropriate restraint technique of carrying the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSTAFFING749.607(1)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver did not demonstrate appropriate judgment and control when the caregiver used inappropriate restraint and discipline techniques with a child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)Feb 12, 2022

A child in care was subjected to unusual punishment by being zip-tied at the wrists and ankles, instead of using the approved redirection methods when the child engaged in a tantrum.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)Feb 12, 2022

A child in care was subjected to unusual punishment by being zip-tied at the wrists and ankles, instead of using the approved redirection methods when the child engaged in a tantrum.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSTAFFING749.607(1)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver did not demonstrate appropriate judgment and control when the caregiver used inappropriate restraint and discipline techniques with a child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

CRITICALSTAFFING749.607(1)Feb 12, 2022

A caregiver did not demonstrate appropriate judgment and control when the caregiver used inappropriate restraint and discipline techniques with a child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-27

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Accompanied by Gods Love.

Nearby Daycares in Houston

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Accompanied by Gods Love's safety grade?

Accompanied by Gods Love has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 10.8 out of 100.

How many violations does Accompanied by Gods Love have?

Accompanied by Gods Love has 57 total violations on record, including 36 critical, 18 serious, and 3 minor.

When was Accompanied by Gods Love last inspected?

Accompanied by Gods Love was last inspected on September 24, 2025.

Parent Resources