Primrose School of Georgetown

2205 WOLF RANCH PKWY, Georgetown, TX 78628Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

46 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

June 25, 2025

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
Primrose School of Georgetown
License number
1726443
Location
2205 WOLF RANCH PKWY, Georgetown, TX 78628
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 38.5/100
Inspection record
46 inspections, last inspected June 25, 2025
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor38.5 / 100
Health50/100
Safety70/100
Staffing10/100
Compliance0/100

44

Total Violations

Jun 25, 2025

Last Inspection

249

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

No violations recorded in the last 3 years.

All Violations (44)

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2421(b)Nov 3, 2022

There were 4 infants that did not have updated infant feeding instructions on file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2421(b)Nov 3, 2022

There were 4 infants that did not have updated infant feeding instructions on file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2421(b)Nov 3, 2022

There were 4 infants that did not have updated infant feeding instructions on file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.2421(b)Nov 3, 2022

There were 4 infants that did not have updated infant feeding instructions on file.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-11

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Oct 6, 2022

Based on the preponderance of evidence, a caregiver did not use good judgement when they did not provide the full details of the child's injuries on the incident and did not inform the parent or director when the child's injuries became worse.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-21

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Oct 6, 2022

Based on the preponderance of evidence, a caregiver did not use good judgement when they did not provide the full details of the child's injuries on the incident and did not inform the parent or director when the child's injuries became worse.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-21

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Oct 6, 2022

Based on the preponderance of evidence, a caregiver did not use good judgement when they did not provide the full details of the child's injuries on the incident and did not inform the parent or director when the child's injuries became worse.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-21

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Oct 6, 2022

Based on the preponderance of evidence, a caregiver did not use good judgement when they did not provide the full details of the child's injuries on the incident and did not inform the parent or director when the child's injuries became worse.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-21

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(10)Aug 12, 2022

A child was placed in a restrictive device (high chair) for discipline. It was explained to the caregiver that highchairs cannot be used for time out. The child was removed from the high chair

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALSTAFFING745.635(3)Aug 12, 2022

During a walk through of the operation, two caregivers were in the same classroom and both of the caregivers had conditions stating that they could only be supervised by other persons without conditions. This was corrected when one caregiver was moved into another classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426Aug 12, 2022

Observed 2 infants sleeping in restrictive devices. This was corrected when the caregivers removed the infants.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426Aug 12, 2022

Observed 2 infants sleeping in restrictive devices. This was corrected when the caregivers removed the infants.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALSTAFFING745.635(3)Aug 12, 2022

During a walk through of the operation, two caregivers were in the same classroom and both of the caregivers had conditions stating that they could only be supervised by other persons without conditions. This was corrected when one caregiver was moved into another classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(10)Aug 12, 2022

A child was placed in a restrictive device (high chair) for discipline. It was explained to the caregiver that highchairs cannot be used for time out. The child was removed from the high chair

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426Aug 12, 2022

Observed 2 infants sleeping in restrictive devices. This was corrected when the caregivers removed the infants.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALSTAFFING745.635(3)Aug 12, 2022

During a walk through of the operation, two caregivers were in the same classroom and both of the caregivers had conditions stating that they could only be supervised by other persons without conditions. This was corrected when one caregiver was moved into another classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(10)Aug 12, 2022

A child was placed in a restrictive device (high chair) for discipline. It was explained to the caregiver that highchairs cannot be used for time out. The child was removed from the high chair

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2426Aug 12, 2022

Observed 2 infants sleeping in restrictive devices. This was corrected when the caregivers removed the infants.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALSTAFFING745.635(3)Aug 12, 2022

During a walk through of the operation, two caregivers were in the same classroom and both of the caregivers had conditions stating that they could only be supervised by other persons without conditions. This was corrected when one caregiver was moved into another classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.2805(10)Aug 12, 2022

A child was placed in a restrictive device (high chair) for discipline. It was explained to the caregiver that highchairs cannot be used for time out. The child was removed from the high chair

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-12

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1315(b)(1)Apr 13, 2022

Observed one caregiver past their 90 days of employment with CPR training that was completed online. I explained that within 90 days of employment, CPR must be completed and the training must utilize the use of a manikin. This was corrected, as the employee no longer works at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1315(b)(1)Apr 13, 2022

Observed one caregiver past their 90 days of employment with CPR training that was completed online. I explained that within 90 days of employment, CPR must be completed and the training must utilize the use of a manikin. This was corrected, as the employee no longer works at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1315(b)(1)Apr 13, 2022

Observed one caregiver past their 90 days of employment with CPR training that was completed online. I explained that within 90 days of employment, CPR must be completed and the training must utilize the use of a manikin. This was corrected, as the employee no longer works at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1315(b)(1)Apr 13, 2022

Observed one caregiver past their 90 days of employment with CPR training that was completed online. I explained that within 90 days of employment, CPR must be completed and the training must utilize the use of a manikin. This was corrected, as the employee no longer works at the operation.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSHEALTH746.701(5)Apr 12, 2022

An incident report was not completed for the incident until 4/13/2022. The incident occured on 4/11/2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.1203(4)Apr 12, 2022

A child was left outside without supervision from an caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13

CRITICALSAFETY746.1203(4)Apr 12, 2022

A child was left outside without supervision from an caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13

CRITICALSAFETY746.1203(4)Apr 12, 2022

A child was left outside without supervision from an caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13

SERIOUSHEALTH746.701(5)Apr 12, 2022

An incident report was not completed for the incident until 4/13/2022. The incident occured on 4/11/2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY746.1203(4)Apr 12, 2022

A child was left outside without supervision from an caregiver.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-13

SERIOUSHEALTH746.701(5)Apr 12, 2022

An incident report was not completed for the incident until 4/13/2022. The incident occured on 4/11/2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSHEALTH746.701(5)Apr 12, 2022

An incident report was not completed for the incident until 4/13/2022. The incident occured on 4/11/2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.303(b)Feb 25, 2022

A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2021 data from February 23, 2022, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2021 by February 22, 2022, as required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.303(b)Feb 25, 2022

A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2021 data from February 23, 2022, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2021 by February 22, 2022, as required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.303(b)Feb 25, 2022

A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2021 data from February 23, 2022, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2021 by February 22, 2022, as required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.303(b)Feb 25, 2022

A review of the Employees Who Left Employment in 2021 data from February 23, 2022, revealed that the center had not reported the number of employees who left employment in 2021 by February 22, 2022, as required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4135(b)Sep 22, 2021

The operation did not have a current CPSC form certified for the current year.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-08

CRITICALHEALTH746.3401(a)Sep 22, 2021

The operation did not have an annual sanitation inspection completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-08

CRITICALHEALTH746.3401(a)Sep 22, 2021

The operation did not have an annual sanitation inspection completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-08

CRITICALHEALTH746.3401(a)Sep 22, 2021

The operation did not have an annual sanitation inspection completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-08

CRITICALHEALTH746.3401(a)Sep 22, 2021

The operation did not have an annual sanitation inspection completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4135(b)Sep 22, 2021

The operation did not have a current CPSC form certified for the current year.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4135(b)Sep 22, 2021

The operation did not have a current CPSC form certified for the current year.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.4135(b)Sep 22, 2021

The operation did not have a current CPSC form certified for the current year.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-08

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Primrose School of Georgetown.

Nearby Daycares in Georgetown

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Primrose School of Georgetown's safety grade?

Primrose School of Georgetown has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 38.5 out of 100.

How many violations does Primrose School of Georgetown have?

Primrose School of Georgetown has 44 total violations on record, including 28 critical, 16 serious, and 0 minor.

When was Primrose School of Georgetown last inspected?

Primrose School of Georgetown was last inspected on June 25, 2025.

Parent Resources