The Grandberry Intervention Foundation (TGIF)

4109 MANSFIELD HWY, Forest Hill, TX 76119Unknown
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

113 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Unknown

Last refreshed

April 1, 2026

Latest inspection

January 15, 2026

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 1, 2026

Provider
The Grandberry Intervention Foundation (TGIF)
License number
830623- 1567
Location
4109 MANSFIELD HWY, Forest Hill, TX 76119
Status
Unknown
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 24.0/100
Inspection record
113 inspections, last inspected January 15, 2026
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 1, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor24.0 / 100
Health5/100
Safety75/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

118

Total Violations

Jan 15, 2026

Last Inspection

0

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (118)

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Jan 15, 2026

A caregiver spanked children in care with a belt and hit them with an open hand.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-19

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Jan 15, 2026

A caregiver spanked children in care with a belt and hit them with an open hand.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-19

SERIOUSSTAFFING745.651(1)Nov 2, 2023

An staff member's last day of employment with the operation was 10/12/2023 and their background check has not been inactivated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-03

SERIOUSSTAFFING745.651(1)Nov 2, 2023

An staff member's last day of employment with the operation was 10/12/2023 and their background check has not been inactivated.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-03

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 8, 2023

As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on July 28, 2023, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on July 28, 2023. Specifically, the operation was cited for 745.621(a)(7) AP Initial background checks submitted - At the time you become aware of anyone requiring a background check under 745.605. The operation met compliance on July 31, 2023. Choose all that apply and delete the other(s): - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-08

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 8, 2023

As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on July 28, 2023, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on July 28, 2023. Specifically, the operation was cited for 745.621(a)(7) AP Initial background checks submitted - At the time you become aware of anyone requiring a background check under 745.605. The operation met compliance on July 31, 2023. Choose all that apply and delete the other(s): - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations Finding: 749.635(2) ? The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(3)Sep 7, 2023

A foster parent has not administered a prescribed medication to a child since placement began.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-21

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(3)Sep 7, 2023

A foster parent has not administered a prescribed medication to a child since placement began.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-09-21

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1131Aug 10, 2023

An admission assessment was not completed for a child placed on 7/12/2023.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-17

SERIOUSSAFETY749.1131Aug 10, 2023

An admission assessment was not completed for a child placed on 7/12/2023.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-17

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Jun 7, 2023

A household member lived outside of the state in 2019 at the time their initial background check was completed and the agency did not have an out-of-state background check conducted.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-05

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2453(a)(2)Jun 7, 2023

A household member moved into the home over 30 days ago and the home screening has not been updated to reflect the change in household composition.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-07-14

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Jun 7, 2023

A household member lived outside of the state in 2019 at the time their initial background check was completed and the agency did not have an out-of-state background check conducted.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-05

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2453(a)(2)Jun 7, 2023

A household member moved into the home over 30 days ago and the home screening has not been updated to reflect the change in household composition.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1337May 18, 2023

The most recent service plan for a child in care does have any signatures for persons that attended the service plan meeting.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-25

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(3)May 18, 2023

Medication logs reviewed show that a child in care is taking a new psychotropic medication. There is no medical documentation in the child's record indicating that this child was prescribed the new medication or directions for how the medication should be administered.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1337May 18, 2023

The most recent service plan for a child in care does have any signatures for persons that attended the service plan meeting.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-25

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(3)May 18, 2023

Medication logs reviewed show that a child in care is taking a new psychotropic medication. There is no medical documentation in the child's record indicating that this child was prescribed the new medication or directions for how the medication should be administered.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1331(1)May 4, 2023

The service plan for a child in care was due to be updated by 4/27/2023 and has not been completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-25

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1331(1)May 4, 2023

The service plan for a child in care was due to be updated by 4/27/2023 and has not been completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-25

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE745.8641Mar 9, 2023

Condition #1 was unmet due to no documentation on the log verifying that a LCPAA was present at the operation for a minimum of 16 hours during the month of February. Condition #6 was unmet due to two tasks on the Heightened Monitoring tasks being unmet on February 23, 2023.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE745.8641Mar 9, 2023

Condition #1 was unmet due to no documentation on the log verifying that a LCPAA was present at the operation for a minimum of 16 hours during the month of February. Condition #6 was unmet due to two tasks on the Heightened Monitoring tasks being unmet on February 23, 2023.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 6, 2023

During a review conducted on March 6, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on December 14, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a low-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on December 14, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.1313 (b) Initial Service Planning Team-The child's record must include documentation of advance notice to parents and any responses. The operation met compliance on December 29, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring An administrative penalty will be assessed as a result of this citation, per HRC 42.078(a-1). The maximum daily amount of a penalty for your operation is $100.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-07

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 6, 2023

During a review conducted on March 6, 2023, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on December 14, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a low-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on December 14, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.1313 (b) Initial Service Planning Team-The child's record must include documentation of advance notice to parents and any responses. The operation met compliance on December 29, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring An administrative penalty will be assessed as a result of this citation, per HRC 42.078(a-1). The maximum daily amount of a penalty for your operation is $100.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-07

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Feb 23, 2023

A child in care's medication logs for November 2022 were incomplete. The child is prescribed 5 medications, but the log only shows administration for 3.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-02

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1543(b)Feb 23, 2023

A child in care's record did not include medication logs for the month of December 2022.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-02

CRITICALHEALTH749.1541(a)Feb 23, 2023

A child in care's medication logs for November 2022 were incomplete. The child is prescribed 5 medications, but the log only shows administration for 3.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-02

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1543(b)Feb 23, 2023

A child in care's record did not include medication logs for the month of December 2022.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-02

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(b)Dec 14, 2022

A child in care's record did not include documentation of the notice to the child's parents and foster parents for the initial service plan meeting.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.1313(b)Dec 14, 2022

A child in care's record did not include documentation of the notice to the child's parents and foster parents for the initial service plan meeting.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2489(4)Nov 29, 2022

A foster family adopted two children on 11/18/22. Licensing was not notified of this change in capacities until 11/29/22.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2453(a)(3)Nov 29, 2022

According to their background checks in CLASS, a family's adult daughters are now frequent visitors instead of household members. Their background checks were submitted as frequent visitors on 10/19/22. The agency's case manager confirmed that the adult daughters are no longer living in the home. There is not a home screening addendum in the file for this change in household composition.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2489(4)Nov 29, 2022

A foster family adopted two children on 11/18/22. Licensing was not notified of this change in capacities until 11/29/22.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2453(a)(3)Nov 29, 2022

According to their background checks in CLASS, a family's adult daughters are now frequent visitors instead of household members. Their background checks were submitted as frequent visitors on 10/19/22. The agency's case manager confirmed that the adult daughters are no longer living in the home. There is not a home screening addendum in the file for this change in household composition.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-06

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE745.8641Oct 20, 2022

Condition #1 was met. Condition #2 was met. Condition #3 was met. Condition #4 was unmet because inspections from 08/09/22 and 09/22/22 were not listed on the system for tracking deficiencies, and the system does not include information on corrections or follow-ups. Condition #5 was met. Condition #6 was met.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE745.8641Oct 20, 2022

Condition #1 was met. Condition #2 was met. Condition #3 was met. Condition #4 was unmet because inspections from 08/09/22 and 09/22/22 were not listed on the system for tracking deficiencies, and the system does not include information on corrections or follow-ups. Condition #5 was met. Condition #6 was met.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-03

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(c)(3)Oct 20, 2022

The reason the medication was prescribed to a child in care is not listed on any of his medication logs for the months of August and September 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(c)(3)Oct 20, 2022

The reason the medication was prescribed to a child in care is not listed on any of his medication logs for the months of August and September 2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.553(8)Sep 22, 2022

One employee file did not have form signed

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.553(8)Sep 22, 2022

One employee file did not have form signed

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.151(3)Sep 22, 2022

A foster home liscenced in 2018 did not have pictures of the outside of the home and pictures were obtained of the home during inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.1291(g)Sep 22, 2022

The monthly contacts for two children in care files did not have enough detail.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.151(3)Sep 22, 2022

A foster home liscenced in 2018 did not have pictures of the outside of the home and pictures were obtained of the home during inspection.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.1291(g)Sep 22, 2022

The monthly contacts for two children in care files did not have enough detail.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-10-06

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 2, 2022

During a review conducted on September 2, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on June 20, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on August 9, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.1463 (b)(3) AP Administration of Medication-Administer medications according to label instructions or a prescribing health-care professional's subsequent orders. The operation met compliance on August 15, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-03

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 2, 2022

During a review conducted on September 2, 2022, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) more than 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the original 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation was unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring by the original ?planned end date? necessitating previous extension. Furthermore, due to your recent citations issued on June 20, 2022, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised again, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended again. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on August 9, 2022. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.1463 (b)(3) AP Administration of Medication-Administer medications according to label instructions or a prescribing health-care professional's subsequent orders. The operation met compliance on August 15, 2022. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-03

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(3)Aug 9, 2022

The child in care is prescribed Escitalopram Oxalate 5mg tablet 3 tablets once daily by a physician per the 3/28/2022 Texas Health Physicians Group After Visit Summary. The May 2022 medication log shows the child in care received 1 tablet two times a day. The child in care is prescribed Escitalopram Oxalate 5mg tablet 3 tablets once daily by a physician per the 5/27/2022 Texas Health Physicians Group After Visit Summary. In June 2022 medication log shows the child received one tablet a day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-11

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(3)Aug 9, 2022

The child in care is prescribed Escitalopram Oxalate 5mg tablet 3 tablets once daily by a physician per the 3/28/2022 Texas Health Physicians Group After Visit Summary. The May 2022 medication log shows the child in care received 1 tablet two times a day. The child in care is prescribed Escitalopram Oxalate 5mg tablet 3 tablets once daily by a physician per the 5/27/2022 Texas Health Physicians Group After Visit Summary. In June 2022 medication log shows the child received one tablet a day.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-11

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2489(4)Jul 11, 2022

The newest Addendum dated 8/24/21 shows the Foster Capacity at 4 kinship foster children and total Capacity at 4 children. In Class, it shows Foster Capacity at 3 foster children and a Total Capacity of 5 children. The addendum date 1/26/21 also shows a total of 4 kinship foster children with a total capacity of 4.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2489(4)Jul 11, 2022

The newest Addendum dated 8/24/21 shows the Foster Capacity at 4 kinship foster children and total Capacity at 4 children. In Class, it shows Foster Capacity at 3 foster children and a Total Capacity of 5 children. The addendum date 1/26/21 also shows a total of 4 kinship foster children with a total capacity of 4.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.2815(c)(4)Jun 30, 2022

One foster home file did not address stess level of the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(11)Jun 30, 2022

Foster parent experienced corporal punishment as a child, said she agreed with its use. Further the biological and adoptive children admitted to physical discipline including stating hit with a belt in HS, The home screening did not asses this.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2470(3)(A)Jun 30, 2022

One home file did not have dimensions for the home. Two home file had no pictures of outside areas.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(18)Jun 30, 2022

Home screening not address involvement of any of the family members.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(6)(B)(ii)Jun 30, 2022

One home proof of income did not match up with "2500 a month" claim. The budget had 0 listed for medical/dental/auto/clothing/rec entertainment, rent was listed as 900, either 1605 or 1307. The foster parent owned 2 cars but did not have any payments, gas or maintenance listed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.2815(c)(4)Jun 30, 2022

One foster home file did not address stess level of the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2807(1)Jun 30, 2022

There were 3 investigations involving allegations of inappropriate discipline. Compliance was not addressed in any of them.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE745.8641Jun 30, 2022

Condition 3 was not met there were no signature for administrator for 4-28-22 meeting. There was no documentation for May meeting. Condition 4 did not meet due to not have a completed attendance log. Condition 6 did not meet because citations for 5-5-22 were not address.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(11)Jun 30, 2022

Foster parent experienced corporal punishment as a child, said she agreed with its use. Further the biological and adoptive children admitted to physical discipline including stating hit with a belt in HS, The home screening did not asses this.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2470(3)(A)Jun 30, 2022

One home file did not have dimensions for the home. Two home file had no pictures of outside areas.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(18)Jun 30, 2022

Home screening not address involvement of any of the family members.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(6)(B)(ii)Jun 30, 2022

One home proof of income did not match up with "2500 a month" claim. The budget had 0 listed for medical/dental/auto/clothing/rec entertainment, rent was listed as 900, either 1605 or 1307. The foster parent owned 2 cars but did not have any payments, gas or maintenance listed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2807(1)Jun 30, 2022

There were 3 investigations involving allegations of inappropriate discipline. Compliance was not addressed in any of them.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE745.8641Jun 30, 2022

Condition 3 was not met there were no signature for administrator for 4-28-22 meeting. There was no documentation for May meeting. Condition 4 did not meet due to not have a completed attendance log. Condition 6 did not meet because citations for 5-5-22 were not address.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(23)(B)(i)Jun 13, 2022

There is no conversation with Ms. Williams during the home screening regarding closures with previous CPA s.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(23)(A)Jun 13, 2022

There is no documentation in the home screening regarding information being requested or assessed from previous CPA s.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(23)(A)Jun 13, 2022

There is no documentation in the home screening regarding information being requested or assessed from previous CPA s.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(23)(B)(i)Jun 13, 2022

There is no conversation with Ms. Williams during the home screening regarding closures with previous CPA s.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-28

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2931(b)May 18, 2022

A caregiver admitted to smoking cigarettes inside of the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-01

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2931(b)May 18, 2022

A caregiver admitted to smoking cigarettes inside of the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-01

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.2817(a)May 5, 2022

An active home did not have any supervisory visits completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-12

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.2817(a)May 5, 2022

An active home did not have any supervisory visits completed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-12

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)May 3, 2022

The specific results of the Foster Parents Background Check was not document or assessed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)May 3, 2022

The specific results of the Foster Parents Background Check was not document or assessed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-10

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(ii)Apr 7, 2022

The home screening did not document the agency inquiring to foster parent if there were any service calls made within two years.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.949(b)(4)Apr 7, 2022

There were several trainings that did not include the qualifications of the trainer.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(19)Apr 7, 2022

The home screening did document any person that would provide support to the foster parent in case of an emergency or need to provide care for foster youth.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(4)Apr 7, 2022

The home screening did not show how the foster parent relationships ended and how she coped with the relationship.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(ii)Apr 7, 2022

The home screening did not document the agency inquiring to foster parent if there were any service calls made within two years.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(19)Apr 7, 2022

The home screening did document any person that would provide support to the foster parent in case of an emergency or need to provide care for foster youth.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.949(b)(4)Apr 7, 2022

There were several trainings that did not include the qualifications of the trainer.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(4)Apr 7, 2022

The home screening did not show how the foster parent relationships ended and how she coped with the relationship.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-14

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2453(b)Jan 15, 2022

A foster parent moved out of the home June 2021.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-24

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2453(b)Jan 15, 2022

A foster parent moved out of the home June 2021.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-24

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.511(3)Aug 26, 2021

Serious incident reports did not include the age, date of birth, and date of admission.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-02

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.511(3)Aug 26, 2021

Serious incident reports did not include the age, date of birth, and date of admission.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-02

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(6)(B)(iii)Aug 20, 2021

Pet expenses are not listed on the foster home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2807(3)Aug 20, 2021

The foster parent became unemployed in 2019, yet no addendum was completed to evaluate her financial status and ability to continue caring for foster children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-03

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.3027(a)(2)Aug 20, 2021

An 18-year-old is sharing a bedroom with a 3 year old in care when she stays at the residence a few times per week.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3021(a)Aug 20, 2021

Four children are sharing one bedroom, which is 147.58 square feet according to the home screening and floor plan. Minimum standards requires 40 square feet per occupant, so the room would need to be at least 160 square feet.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2807(3)Aug 20, 2021

The foster parent became unemployed in 2019, yet no addendum was completed to evaluate her financial status and ability to continue caring for foster children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(6)(B)(iii)Aug 20, 2021

Pet expenses are not listed on the foster home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-03

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.3027(a)(2)Aug 20, 2021

An 18-year-old is sharing a bedroom with a 3 year old in care when she stays at the residence a few times per week.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3021(a)Aug 20, 2021

Four children are sharing one bedroom, which is 147.58 square feet according to the home screening and floor plan. Minimum standards requires 40 square feet per occupant, so the room would need to be at least 160 square feet.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1421(b)Jun 24, 2021

1 out of 6 children file did not have immunization record in the file. Note: This was corrected at inspection due to the child being discharged on 6-21-2021.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(5)Jun 24, 2021

1 out of 6 children was not administered one medication as perscribed by doctor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-22

CRITICALHEALTH749.1463(b)(5)Jun 24, 2021

1 out of 6 children was not administered one medication as perscribed by doctor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-22

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1421(b)Jun 24, 2021

1 out of 6 children file did not have immunization record in the file. Note: This was corrected at inspection due to the child being discharged on 6-21-2021.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(5)(A)Jun 24, 2021

An allegation of inappropriate touching of a child by another child was not reported to the hotline. Note: This standard was corrected due to being called in on 5-27-2021.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1133(a)Jun 24, 2021

1 child's file did not indicate if it were an emergency placement. The admissions assessment did not document the reason the child was placed in substitute care, neonatal history, religion, placement goals, and other services required. The admissions assesment for one file does not show the date it was completed, does not state if it was a non-emergency placement or emergency placeemnt and other required information is completed on the form.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-22

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1133(a)Jun 24, 2021

1 child's file did not indicate if it were an emergency placement. The admissions assessment did not document the reason the child was placed in substitute care, neonatal history, religion, placement goals, and other services required. The admissions assesment for one file does not show the date it was completed, does not state if it was a non-emergency placement or emergency placeemnt and other required information is completed on the form.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-22

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.503(a)(5)(A)Jun 24, 2021

An allegation of inappropriate touching of a child by another child was not reported to the hotline. Note: This standard was corrected due to being called in on 5-27-2021.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.675Jun 3, 2021

The CPMS has a bachelors degree in business. The case file does not support that courses related to the family were obtained.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.553(6)Jun 3, 2021

The affidavit for employment was not filled out completely.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2815(a)(1)Jun 3, 2021

One out of 4 home files reviewed had 2 quarterly visits during 2020. One document from the quarterly visits did not entail if the visit was announced or unannounced.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2497(2)Jun 3, 2021

One out of 4 home files reviewed did not have a closing summary of the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1301(a)Jun 3, 2021

One out of 3 child files reviewed did not address supervision requirements or immediate needs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1133(a)Jun 3, 2021

1 child's file did not indicate if it were an emergency placement. The admissions assessment did not document the reason the child was placed in substitute care, neonatal history, religion, placement goals, and other services required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2815(a)(1)Jun 3, 2021

One out of 4 home files reviewed had 2 quarterly visits during 2020. One document from the quarterly visits did not entail if the visit was announced or unannounced.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2497(2)Jun 3, 2021

One out of 4 home files reviewed did not have a closing summary of the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1301(a)Jun 3, 2021

One out of 3 child files reviewed did not address supervision requirements or immediate needs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.675Jun 3, 2021

The CPMS has a bachelors degree in business. The case file does not support that courses related to the family were obtained.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1133(a)Jun 3, 2021

1 child's file did not indicate if it were an emergency placement. The admissions assessment did not document the reason the child was placed in substitute care, neonatal history, religion, placement goals, and other services required.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.553(6)Jun 3, 2021

The affidavit for employment was not filled out completely.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-10

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Jun 2, 2021

A bed for a child in care was observed to not have a mattress cover or protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-30

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Jun 2, 2021

The room where two girls in care sleep was observed to have a stain of a liquid in the wall beside the closet. The carpet was observed to have stains. The clothes of a child in care were all over the room.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-30

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.3031(c)Jun 2, 2021

A bed for a child in care was observed to not have a mattress cover or protector.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-30

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Jun 2, 2021

The room where two girls in care sleep was observed to have a stain of a liquid in the wall beside the closet. The carpet was observed to have stains. The clothes of a child in care were all over the room.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-30

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for The Grandberry Intervention Foundation (TGIF).

Nearby Daycares in Forest Hill

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The Grandberry Intervention Foundation (TGIF)'s safety grade?

The Grandberry Intervention Foundation (TGIF) has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 24.0 out of 100.

How many violations does The Grandberry Intervention Foundation (TGIF) have?

The Grandberry Intervention Foundation (TGIF) has 118 total violations on record, including 42 critical, 74 serious, and 2 minor.

When was The Grandberry Intervention Foundation (TGIF) last inspected?

The Grandberry Intervention Foundation (TGIF) was last inspected on January 15, 2026.

Parent Resources