Callier Child Development Program
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
56 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
November 19, 2025
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Callier Child Development Program
- License number
- 302295
- Location
- 1966 INWOOD RD, Dallas, TX 75235
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 32.5/100
- Inspection record
- 56 inspections, last inspected November 19, 2025
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
36
Total Violations
Nov 19, 2025
Last Inspection
300
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (36)
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, it was determined that a child with a documented food allergy was served a food item containing an identified allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-30
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, it was determined that a child with a documented food allergy was served a food item containing an identified allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-30
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, it was determined that a child with a documented food allergy was served a food item containing an identified allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-30
Based on the information obtained during the investigation, it was determined that a child with a documented food allergy was served a food item containing an identified allergen.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-30
Staff did not use good judgment in this case when they allowed a child to remain in care with an injury instead of notifying the director or the child's parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-01
Staff did not notify the parents of a child who received an injury while in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-01
Staff did not use good judgment in this case when they allowed a child to remain in care with an injury instead of notifying the director or the child's parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-01
Staff did not use good judgment in this case when they allowed a child to remain in care with an injury instead of notifying the director or the child's parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-01
Staff did not notify the parents of a child who received an injury while in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-01
Staff did not notify the parents of a child who received an injury while in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-01
Staff did not use good judgment in this case when they allowed a child to remain in care with an injury instead of notifying the director or the child's parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-01
Staff did not notify the parents of a child who received an injury while in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-01
Staff members did not use good judgment when they assumed a child was faking an injury instead of communicating to the director or the child's parents of their observations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
A young child in care was injured in a manner that required medical attention, however, none of his direct caregivers were saw the injury or knew how it occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
During the investigation, it was determined that a child was injured while in care, however, the caregivers did not disclose this to the parents as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
During the investigation, it was determined that a child was injured while in care, however, the caregivers did not disclose this to the parents as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
During the investigation, it was determined that a child was injured while in care, however, the caregivers did not disclose this to the parents as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
A young child in care was injured in a manner that required medical attention, however, none of his direct caregivers were saw the injury or knew how it occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
Staff members did not use good judgment when they assumed a child was faking an injury instead of communicating to the director or the child's parents of their observations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
During the investigation, it was determined that a child was injured while in care, however, the caregivers did not disclose this to the parents as required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
Staff members did not use good judgment when they assumed a child was faking an injury instead of communicating to the director or the child's parents of their observations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
A young child in care was injured in a manner that required medical attention, however, none of his direct caregivers were saw the injury or knew how it occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
Staff members did not use good judgment when they assumed a child was faking an injury instead of communicating to the director or the child's parents of their observations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
A young child in care was injured in a manner that required medical attention, however, none of his direct caregivers were saw the injury or knew how it occurred.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-29
The daycare received notification of a positive COVID case on 8/29 but it was not reported until 9/1. Per minimum standards the operation has 2 days to report the illness to the department.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-07
The daycare received notification of a positive COVID case on 8/29 but it was not reported until 9/1. Per minimum standards the operation has 2 days to report the illness to the department.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-07
The daycare received notification of a positive COVID case on 8/29 but it was not reported until 9/1. Per minimum standards the operation has 2 days to report the illness to the department.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-07
The daycare received notification of a positive COVID case on 8/29 but it was not reported until 9/1. Per minimum standards the operation has 2 days to report the illness to the department.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-07
A child was able to leave the operation without the caregiver knowing. The child was subsequently found by a stranger as a result. The operation was notified of the incident and did not notify the department of the incident in the time required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03
Based in the information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a child was able to leave the operation without being noticed by staff. As a result, a violation of the minimum standards as they pertain to supervision was identified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-30
Based in the information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a child was able to leave the operation without being noticed by staff. As a result, a violation of the minimum standards as they pertain to supervision was identified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-30
A child was able to leave the operation without the caregiver knowing. The child was subsequently found by a stranger as a result. The operation was notified of the incident and did not notify the department of the incident in the time required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03
Based in the information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a child was able to leave the operation without being noticed by staff. As a result, a violation of the minimum standards as they pertain to supervision was identified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-30
Based in the information obtained during a DFPS investigation, a child was able to leave the operation without being noticed by staff. As a result, a violation of the minimum standards as they pertain to supervision was identified.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-30
A child was able to leave the operation without the caregiver knowing. The child was subsequently found by a stranger as a result. The operation was notified of the incident and did not notify the department of the incident in the time required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03
A child was able to leave the operation without the caregiver knowing. The child was subsequently found by a stranger as a result. The operation was notified of the incident and did not notify the department of the incident in the time required.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-03
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Callier Child Development Program.
Nearby Daycares in Dallas
Redeemers Child Care Center
8519 CRAIGHILL AVE
Myshundre Davis
1324 THORNE ST
Vogel Redbird Childcare Center
3662 W CAMP WISDOM RD
La Escuelita Spanish Immersion Preschool at 10th Street Hist
366 S FLEMING AVE
Kidz Paradize Spanish Preschool
2520 DAYBREAK DR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Callier Child Development Program's safety grade?
Callier Child Development Program has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 32.5 out of 100.
How many violations does Callier Child Development Program have?
Callier Child Development Program has 36 total violations on record, including 36 critical, 0 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Callier Child Development Program last inspected?
Callier Child Development Program was last inspected on November 19, 2025.