Bridges Child Placing Agency

4144 N CENTRAL EXPY STE 110, Dallas, TX 75204Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

86 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

March 10, 2026

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
Bridges Child Placing Agency
License number
1775976- 16011
Location
4144 N CENTRAL EXPY STE 110, Dallas, TX 75204
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 0.0/100
Inspection record
86 inspections, last inspected March 10, 2026
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor0.0 / 100
Health0/100
Safety0/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

48

Total Violations

Mar 10, 2026

Last Inspection

N/A

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (48)

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.151(3)Feb 3, 2026

A review of the home study revealed inconsistent information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-11

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.151(3)Feb 3, 2026

A review of the home study revealed inconsistent information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-11

SERIOUSSTAFFING749.151(3)Feb 3, 2026

A review of the home study revealed inconsistent information.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-11

CRITICALSAFETY749.2908(a)(2)Jan 6, 2026

The foster home file reviewed did not have an annual fire drill for 2025.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-13

CRITICALSAFETY749.2908(a)(2)Jan 6, 2026

The foster home file reviewed did not have an annual fire drill for 2025.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-13

CRITICALSAFETY749.2908(a)(2)Jan 6, 2026

The foster home file reviewed did not have an annual fire drill for 2025.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-13

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 11, 2025

During a review conducted on September 11, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-11

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 11, 2025

During a review conducted on September 11, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-11

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Sep 11, 2025

During a review conducted on September 11, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-11

SERIOUSHEALTH749.2595(b)(2)Jun 26, 2025

A nine-year-old child in care has a video camera in his bedroom that is used as a means to monitor the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

SERIOUSHEALTH749.2595(b)(2)Jun 26, 2025

A nine-year-old child in care has a video camera in his bedroom that is used as a means to monitor the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)(vii)Jun 26, 2025

A child in care was intimidated by a caregiver, who used the child's fear of the juvenile detention system as a means to get the child to be compliant.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

SERIOUSHEALTH749.2595(b)(2)Jun 26, 2025

A nine-year-old child in care has a video camera in his bedroom that is used as a means to monitor the child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)(vii)Jun 26, 2025

A child in care was intimidated by a caregiver, who used the child's fear of the juvenile detention system as a means to get the child to be compliant.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1003(b)(4)(A)(vii)Jun 26, 2025

A child in care was intimidated by a caregiver, who used the child's fear of the juvenile detention system as a means to get the child to be compliant.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 7, 2025

During a review conducted on March 7, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on February 20, 2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 745.619-Background Checks. The operation is pending compliance. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-07

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 7, 2025

During a review conducted on March 7, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on February 20, 2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 745.619-Background Checks. The operation is pending compliance. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-07

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Mar 7, 2025

During a review conducted on March 7, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on February 20, 2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 745.619-Background Checks. The operation is pending compliance. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-07

CRITICALHEALTH749.3079(6)Mar 7, 2025

Uncovered food was being stored in the refrigerator. Mold was growing inside the refrigerator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Mar 7, 2025

There were poison/household products stored under the kitchen sink that were accessible to children in care. Dish washing pods were being stored in a cabinet under the kitchen sink and there was no safety lock preventing young children from gaining access to the pods.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 7, 2025

Multiple bedrooms had clutter on the floor and accessible to children resulting in a possible injury. Two bedrooms was storing open containers of food. One bedroom had fruit flies in the bedroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

CRITICALHEALTH749.3079(6)Mar 7, 2025

Uncovered food was being stored in the refrigerator. Mold was growing inside the refrigerator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Mar 7, 2025

There were poison/household products stored under the kitchen sink that were accessible to children in care. Dish washing pods were being stored in a cabinet under the kitchen sink and there was no safety lock preventing young children from gaining access to the pods.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 7, 2025

Multiple bedrooms had clutter on the floor and accessible to children resulting in a possible injury. Two bedrooms was storing open containers of food. One bedroom had fruit flies in the bedroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3041(7)Mar 7, 2025

There were poison/household products stored under the kitchen sink that were accessible to children in care. Dish washing pods were being stored in a cabinet under the kitchen sink and there was no safety lock preventing young children from gaining access to the pods.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 7, 2025

Multiple bedrooms had clutter on the floor and accessible to children resulting in a possible injury. Two bedrooms was storing open containers of food. One bedroom had fruit flies in the bedroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

CRITICALHEALTH749.3079(6)Mar 7, 2025

Uncovered food was being stored in the refrigerator. Mold was growing inside the refrigerator.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

CRITICALSTAFFING745.619Feb 20, 2025

The home file reviewed resided out of state within the past five years. Those addresses were not included in the background check.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-08

CRITICALSTAFFING745.619Feb 20, 2025

The home file reviewed resided out of state within the past five years. Those addresses were not included in the background check.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-08

CRITICALSTAFFING745.619Feb 20, 2025

The home file reviewed resided out of state within the past five years. Those addresses were not included in the background check.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.2913(b)(2)Dec 5, 2024

During a visit to a foster home a fire extinguisher was observed with an expired service tag (expired Nov. 2024).

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-11

CRITICALSAFETY749.2913(b)(2)Dec 5, 2024

During a visit to a foster home a fire extinguisher was observed with an expired service tag (expired Nov. 2024).

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-11

CRITICALSAFETY749.2913(b)(2)Dec 5, 2024

During a visit to a foster home a fire extinguisher was observed with an expired service tag (expired Nov. 2024).

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-11

CRITICALSAFETY749.2907(A)(1)Jul 10, 2024

A foster home's emergency/disaster plan does not include specific procedures for evacuating children who are under 24 months of age, who have limited mobility, or who otherwise may need assistance in an emergency, such as children who have mental, visual, or hearing impairment, or a medical condition that requires assistance

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-24

CRITICALSAFETY749.2907(A)(1)Jul 10, 2024

A foster home's emergency/disaster plan does not include specific procedures for evacuating children who are under 24 months of age, who have limited mobility, or who otherwise may need assistance in an emergency, such as children who have mental, visual, or hearing impairment, or a medical condition that requires assistance

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-24

CRITICALSAFETY749.2907(A)(1)Jul 10, 2024

A foster home's emergency/disaster plan does not include specific procedures for evacuating children who are under 24 months of age, who have limited mobility, or who otherwise may need assistance in an emergency, such as children who have mental, visual, or hearing impairment, or a medical condition that requires assistance

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-24

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2470(3)(A)Mar 20, 2024

A foster home's floor plan does not show the dimensions of all rooms in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(D)Mar 20, 2024

A foster home's verification certificate had the incorrect foster care capacity listed.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2470(3)(A)Mar 20, 2024

A foster home's floor plan does not show the dimensions of all rooms in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(D)Mar 20, 2024

A foster home's verification certificate had the incorrect foster care capacity listed.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2470(3)(A)Mar 20, 2024

A foster home's floor plan does not show the dimensions of all rooms in the home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03

MINORCOMPLIANCE749.2470(9)(D)Mar 20, 2024

A foster home's verification certificate had the incorrect foster care capacity listed.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(6)(B)(iii)Mar 20, 2024

There was no documentation in two home screenings regarding obtaining and reviewing two consecutive itemized bank statements and/or the previous year's tax return.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(6)(B)(iii)Mar 20, 2024

There was no documentation in two home screenings regarding obtaining and reviewing two consecutive itemized bank statements and/or the previous year's tax return.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(6)(B)(iii)Mar 20, 2024

There was no documentation in two home screenings regarding obtaining and reviewing two consecutive itemized bank statements and/or the previous year's tax return.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Mar 7, 2024

During a visit conducted at a foster home on 2.25.24 medication was observed to not be in a locked container, pictures were taken.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Mar 7, 2024

During a visit conducted at a foster home on 2.25.24 medication was observed to not be in a locked container, pictures were taken.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Mar 7, 2024

During a visit conducted at a foster home on 2.25.24 medication was observed to not be in a locked container, pictures were taken.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Bridges Child Placing Agency.

Nearby Daycares in Dallas

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Bridges Child Placing Agency's safety grade?

Bridges Child Placing Agency has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.

How many violations does Bridges Child Placing Agency have?

Bridges Child Placing Agency has 48 total violations on record, including 33 critical, 12 serious, and 3 minor.

When was Bridges Child Placing Agency last inspected?

Bridges Child Placing Agency was last inspected on March 10, 2026.

Parent Resources