Bridges Child Placing Agency
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
86 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
March 10, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Bridges Child Placing Agency
- License number
- 1775976- 16011
- Location
- 4144 N CENTRAL EXPY STE 110, Dallas, TX 75204
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 86 inspections, last inspected March 10, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
48
Total Violations
Mar 10, 2026
Last Inspection
N/A
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (48)
A review of the home study revealed inconsistent information.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-11
A review of the home study revealed inconsistent information.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-11
A review of the home study revealed inconsistent information.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-11
The foster home file reviewed did not have an annual fire drill for 2025.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-13
The foster home file reviewed did not have an annual fire drill for 2025.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-13
The foster home file reviewed did not have an annual fire drill for 2025.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-13
During a review conducted on September 11, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-11
During a review conducted on September 11, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-11
During a review conducted on September 11, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring, including having an open investigation(s). Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-11
A nine-year-old child in care has a video camera in his bedroom that is used as a means to monitor the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
A nine-year-old child in care has a video camera in his bedroom that is used as a means to monitor the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
A child in care was intimidated by a caregiver, who used the child's fear of the juvenile detention system as a means to get the child to be compliant.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
A nine-year-old child in care has a video camera in his bedroom that is used as a means to monitor the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
A child in care was intimidated by a caregiver, who used the child's fear of the juvenile detention system as a means to get the child to be compliant.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
A child in care was intimidated by a caregiver, who used the child's fear of the juvenile detention system as a means to get the child to be compliant.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
During a review conducted on March 7, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on February 20, 2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 745.619-Background Checks. The operation is pending compliance. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-07
During a review conducted on March 7, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on February 20, 2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 745.619-Background Checks. The operation is pending compliance. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-07
During a review conducted on March 7, 2025, it was determined that: (1) your operation?s administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan(s); and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. As you know, the heightened monitoring plans for your operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which your operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with heightened monitoring plans, your operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, your operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the failure of your operation?s administrator to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a High weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on February 20, 2025. Specifically, the operation was cited for 745.619-Background Checks. The operation is pending compliance. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations. Finding: 749.635(2)?AP CPA administrator responsibilities- Ensure that the operation complies with current heightened monitoring plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-07
Uncovered food was being stored in the refrigerator. Mold was growing inside the refrigerator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
There were poison/household products stored under the kitchen sink that were accessible to children in care. Dish washing pods were being stored in a cabinet under the kitchen sink and there was no safety lock preventing young children from gaining access to the pods.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Multiple bedrooms had clutter on the floor and accessible to children resulting in a possible injury. Two bedrooms was storing open containers of food. One bedroom had fruit flies in the bedroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Uncovered food was being stored in the refrigerator. Mold was growing inside the refrigerator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
There were poison/household products stored under the kitchen sink that were accessible to children in care. Dish washing pods were being stored in a cabinet under the kitchen sink and there was no safety lock preventing young children from gaining access to the pods.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Multiple bedrooms had clutter on the floor and accessible to children resulting in a possible injury. Two bedrooms was storing open containers of food. One bedroom had fruit flies in the bedroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
There were poison/household products stored under the kitchen sink that were accessible to children in care. Dish washing pods were being stored in a cabinet under the kitchen sink and there was no safety lock preventing young children from gaining access to the pods.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Multiple bedrooms had clutter on the floor and accessible to children resulting in a possible injury. Two bedrooms was storing open containers of food. One bedroom had fruit flies in the bedroom.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
Uncovered food was being stored in the refrigerator. Mold was growing inside the refrigerator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14
The home file reviewed resided out of state within the past five years. Those addresses were not included in the background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-08
The home file reviewed resided out of state within the past five years. Those addresses were not included in the background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-08
The home file reviewed resided out of state within the past five years. Those addresses were not included in the background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-08
During a visit to a foster home a fire extinguisher was observed with an expired service tag (expired Nov. 2024).
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-11
During a visit to a foster home a fire extinguisher was observed with an expired service tag (expired Nov. 2024).
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-11
During a visit to a foster home a fire extinguisher was observed with an expired service tag (expired Nov. 2024).
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-11
A foster home's emergency/disaster plan does not include specific procedures for evacuating children who are under 24 months of age, who have limited mobility, or who otherwise may need assistance in an emergency, such as children who have mental, visual, or hearing impairment, or a medical condition that requires assistance
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-24
A foster home's emergency/disaster plan does not include specific procedures for evacuating children who are under 24 months of age, who have limited mobility, or who otherwise may need assistance in an emergency, such as children who have mental, visual, or hearing impairment, or a medical condition that requires assistance
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-24
A foster home's emergency/disaster plan does not include specific procedures for evacuating children who are under 24 months of age, who have limited mobility, or who otherwise may need assistance in an emergency, such as children who have mental, visual, or hearing impairment, or a medical condition that requires assistance
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-24
A foster home's floor plan does not show the dimensions of all rooms in the home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03
A foster home's verification certificate had the incorrect foster care capacity listed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
A foster home's floor plan does not show the dimensions of all rooms in the home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03
A foster home's verification certificate had the incorrect foster care capacity listed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
A foster home's floor plan does not show the dimensions of all rooms in the home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03
A foster home's verification certificate had the incorrect foster care capacity listed.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was no documentation in two home screenings regarding obtaining and reviewing two consecutive itemized bank statements and/or the previous year's tax return.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03
There was no documentation in two home screenings regarding obtaining and reviewing two consecutive itemized bank statements and/or the previous year's tax return.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03
There was no documentation in two home screenings regarding obtaining and reviewing two consecutive itemized bank statements and/or the previous year's tax return.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-03
During a visit conducted at a foster home on 2.25.24 medication was observed to not be in a locked container, pictures were taken.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08
During a visit conducted at a foster home on 2.25.24 medication was observed to not be in a locked container, pictures were taken.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08
During a visit conducted at a foster home on 2.25.24 medication was observed to not be in a locked container, pictures were taken.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Bridges Child Placing Agency.
Nearby Daycares in Dallas
Redeemers Child Care Center
8519 CRAIGHILL AVE
Myshundre Davis
1324 THORNE ST
Vogel Redbird Childcare Center
3662 W CAMP WISDOM RD
La Escuelita Spanish Immersion Preschool at 10th Street Hist
366 S FLEMING AVE
Kidz Paradize Spanish Preschool
2520 DAYBREAK DR
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Bridges Child Placing Agency's safety grade?
Bridges Child Placing Agency has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Bridges Child Placing Agency have?
Bridges Child Placing Agency has 48 total violations on record, including 33 critical, 12 serious, and 3 minor.
When was Bridges Child Placing Agency last inspected?
Bridges Child Placing Agency was last inspected on March 10, 2026.