Lifeline Children & Family Services

5301 W HIGHWAY 31, Corsicana, TX 75110Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

147 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

March 30, 2026

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
Lifeline Children & Family Services
License number
861745- 3730
Location
5301 W HIGHWAY 31, Corsicana, TX 75110
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 12.0/100
Inspection record
147 inspections, last inspected March 30, 2026
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor12.0 / 100
Health0/100
Safety40/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

99

Total Violations

Mar 30, 2026

Last Inspection

0

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (99)

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Dec 22, 2025

During a review conducted on December 22, 2025, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Dec 22, 2025

During a review conducted on December 22, 2025, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Dec 22, 2025

During a review conducted on December 22, 2025, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Aug 18, 2025

It was discovered that inappropriate discipline was used on children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-23

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Aug 18, 2025

It was discovered that inappropriate discipline was used on children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-23

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Aug 18, 2025

It was discovered that inappropriate discipline was used on children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-23

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1953(a)Aug 18, 2025

It was discovered that inappropriate discipline was used on children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-23

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Jun 19, 2025

During a review conducted on June 19, 2025, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Jun 19, 2025

During a review conducted on June 19, 2025, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Jun 19, 2025

During a review conducted on June 19, 2025, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Jun 19, 2025

During a review conducted on June 19, 2025, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Dec 18, 2024

During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 10/17/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2447(7)(A). During an inspection, it was found that a home screening did not have documentation of a background check that needed to be assessed. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Dec 18, 2024

During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 10/17/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2447(7)(A). During an inspection, it was found that a home screening did not have documentation of a background check that needed to be assessed. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Dec 18, 2024

During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 10/17/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2447(7)(A). During an inspection, it was found that a home screening did not have documentation of a background check that needed to be assessed. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19

CRITICALSTAFFING749.635(2)Dec 18, 2024

During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: Your operation received a high-weighted citation in a pattern/trend category on 10/17/2024. Specifically, the operation was cited for 749.2447(7)(A). During an inspection, it was found that a home screening did not have documentation of a background check that needed to be assessed. - Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan. - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring. - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Dec 6, 2024

Two prescription medications were not stored in a locked container and were accessible to children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Dec 6, 2024

Two prescription medications were not stored in a locked container and were accessible to children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Dec 6, 2024

Two prescription medications were not stored in a locked container and were accessible to children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06

CRITICALHEALTH749.1521(1)Dec 6, 2024

Two prescription medications were not stored in a locked container and were accessible to children in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-06

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(9)Oct 16, 2024

A caregiver had criminal background history of substance abuse that was not discussed nor assessed in the home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-21

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)Oct 16, 2024

The home screening did not have documentation of a background check that needed to be assessed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-21

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)Oct 16, 2024

The home screening did not have documentation of a background check that needed to be assessed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(9)Oct 16, 2024

A caregiver had criminal background history of substance abuse that was not discussed nor assessed in the home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-21

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)Oct 16, 2024

The home screening did not have documentation of a background check that needed to be assessed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(9)Oct 16, 2024

A caregiver had criminal background history of substance abuse that was not discussed nor assessed in the home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-21

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2447(9)Oct 16, 2024

A caregiver had criminal background history of substance abuse that was not discussed nor assessed in the home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-21

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)Oct 16, 2024

The home screening did not have documentation of a background check that needed to be assessed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-21

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)Aug 7, 2024

The foster home screening does not include an assessment of the foster parent's criminal history or household member's criminal history.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(iii)Aug 7, 2024

The foster home screening does not include an assessment of the information obtained from law enforcement service calls or any discussion with the prospective foster parent regarding law enforcement service calls in the foster home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(iii)Aug 7, 2024

The foster home screening does not include an assessment of the information obtained from law enforcement service calls or any discussion with the prospective foster parent regarding law enforcement service calls in the foster home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-14

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)Aug 7, 2024

The foster home screening does not include an assessment of the foster parent's criminal history or household member's criminal history.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-14

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)Aug 7, 2024

The foster home screening does not include an assessment of the foster parent's criminal history or household member's criminal history.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(iii)Aug 7, 2024

The foster home screening does not include an assessment of the information obtained from law enforcement service calls or any discussion with the prospective foster parent regarding law enforcement service calls in the foster home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-14

CRITICALSTAFFING749.2447(7)(A)Aug 7, 2024

The foster home screening does not include an assessment of the foster parent's criminal history or household member's criminal history.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(iii)Aug 7, 2024

The foster home screening does not include an assessment of the information obtained from law enforcement service calls or any discussion with the prospective foster parent regarding law enforcement service calls in the foster home screening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-08-14

CRITICALHEALTH749.3079(5)Mar 1, 2024

During a home sampling the inspector observed an open jar of mayonnaise stored in the pantry despite being labeled Refrigerate After Opening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(4)Mar 1, 2024

During the walkthrough of a home sampling, the inspector observed a pile of T-posts in the yard with rusty sharp edges upturned and accessible to the toddler in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 1, 2024

During a home sampling the inspector observed stains on the carpets in the master bedroom, which the foster mother indicated have not been cleaned; grime on the three-tier plastic shelving unit in the kitchen, and excessive clutter in the laundry room as clothing was piled upon the floor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.3079(5)Mar 1, 2024

During a home sampling the inspector observed an open jar of mayonnaise stored in the pantry despite being labeled Refrigerate After Opening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(4)Mar 1, 2024

During the walkthrough of a home sampling, the inspector observed a pile of T-posts in the yard with rusty sharp edges upturned and accessible to the toddler in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 1, 2024

During a home sampling the inspector observed stains on the carpets in the master bedroom, which the foster mother indicated have not been cleaned; grime on the three-tier plastic shelving unit in the kitchen, and excessive clutter in the laundry room as clothing was piled upon the floor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.3079(5)Mar 1, 2024

During a home sampling the inspector observed an open jar of mayonnaise stored in the pantry despite being labeled Refrigerate After Opening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(4)Mar 1, 2024

During the walkthrough of a home sampling, the inspector observed a pile of T-posts in the yard with rusty sharp edges upturned and accessible to the toddler in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 1, 2024

During a home sampling the inspector observed stains on the carpets in the master bedroom, which the foster mother indicated have not been cleaned; grime on the three-tier plastic shelving unit in the kitchen, and excessive clutter in the laundry room as clothing was piled upon the floor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALHEALTH749.3079(5)Mar 1, 2024

During a home sampling the inspector observed an open jar of mayonnaise stored in the pantry despite being labeled Refrigerate After Opening.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(4)Mar 1, 2024

During the walkthrough of a home sampling, the inspector observed a pile of T-posts in the yard with rusty sharp edges upturned and accessible to the toddler in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

CRITICALSAFETY749.3041(1)Mar 1, 2024

During a home sampling the inspector observed stains on the carpets in the master bedroom, which the foster mother indicated have not been cleaned; grime on the three-tier plastic shelving unit in the kitchen, and excessive clutter in the laundry room as clothing was piled upon the floor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-08

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1005(d)Jun 21, 2023

Child rights form stated child is to young to signed however the child is 6 years old and was able to signed his orientation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALHEALTH749.1107(a)(9)Jun 21, 2023

A child s admissions were not completed or were missing information such as know allergies, bio parents information chronic condition or know contradictions

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1309(a)Jun 21, 2023

A child record did not have a service plan completed while placed in the foster home and a second active child record did not provided detailed specific supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Jun 21, 2023

A household member did not have an active background with the operation.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1301(a)Jun 21, 2023

One child record did not have a preliminary service plan completed and the second child record did not have the preliminary service plan completed with in the 72hrs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1373(b)(1)(A)Jun 21, 2023

A Child Adoption Record and Child Discharge Record did not have a discharge summary for either child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3623(13)Jun 21, 2023

The operation did not complete an post adoption addendum that would specify the adoption.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Jun 21, 2023

A household member did not have an active background with the operation.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1309(a)Jun 21, 2023

A child record did not have a service plan completed while placed in the foster home and a second active child record did not provided detailed specific supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALHEALTH749.1107(a)(9)Jun 21, 2023

A child s admissions were not completed or were missing information such as know allergies, bio parents information chronic condition or know contradictions

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1373(b)(1)(A)Jun 21, 2023

A Child Adoption Record and Child Discharge Record did not have a discharge summary for either child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1005(d)Jun 21, 2023

Child rights form stated child is to young to signed however the child is 6 years old and was able to signed his orientation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3623(13)Jun 21, 2023

The operation did not complete an post adoption addendum that would specify the adoption.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Jun 21, 2023

A household member did not have an active background with the operation.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1301(a)Jun 21, 2023

One child record did not have a preliminary service plan completed and the second child record did not have the preliminary service plan completed with in the 72hrs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1309(a)Jun 21, 2023

A child record did not have a service plan completed while placed in the foster home and a second active child record did not provided detailed specific supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALHEALTH749.1107(a)(9)Jun 21, 2023

A child s admissions were not completed or were missing information such as know allergies, bio parents information chronic condition or know contradictions

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1373(b)(1)(A)Jun 21, 2023

A Child Adoption Record and Child Discharge Record did not have a discharge summary for either child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1005(d)Jun 21, 2023

Child rights form stated child is to young to signed however the child is 6 years old and was able to signed his orientation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3623(13)Jun 21, 2023

The operation did not complete an post adoption addendum that would specify the adoption.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALSTAFFING745.621(a)(7)Jun 21, 2023

A household member did not have an active background with the operation.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1301(a)Jun 21, 2023

One child record did not have a preliminary service plan completed and the second child record did not have the preliminary service plan completed with in the 72hrs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1005(d)Jun 21, 2023

Child rights form stated child is to young to signed however the child is 6 years old and was able to signed his orientation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALHEALTH749.1107(a)(9)Jun 21, 2023

A child s admissions were not completed or were missing information such as know allergies, bio parents information chronic condition or know contradictions

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1301(a)Jun 21, 2023

One child record did not have a preliminary service plan completed and the second child record did not have the preliminary service plan completed with in the 72hrs.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1373(b)(1)(A)Jun 21, 2023

A Child Adoption Record and Child Discharge Record did not have a discharge summary for either child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.1309(a)Jun 21, 2023

A child record did not have a service plan completed while placed in the foster home and a second active child record did not provided detailed specific supervision.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.3623(13)Jun 21, 2023

The operation did not complete an post adoption addendum that would specify the adoption.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.591(c)Aug 3, 2022

The agency did not have an unauthorized absence log for review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-17

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.591(c)Aug 3, 2022

The agency did not have an unauthorized absence log for review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-17

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.591(c)Aug 3, 2022

The agency did not have an unauthorized absence log for review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-17

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.591(c)Aug 3, 2022

The agency did not have an unauthorized absence log for review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(8)Apr 26, 2022

A video was viewed where the caregiver is heard yelling at a child in care. Several other children in care reported the caregiver yells as well.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(8)Apr 26, 2022

A video was viewed where the caregiver is heard yelling at a child in care. Several other children in care reported the caregiver yells as well.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(8)Apr 26, 2022

A video was viewed where the caregiver is heard yelling at a child in care. Several other children in care reported the caregiver yells as well.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-01

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.1957(8)Apr 26, 2022

A video was viewed where the caregiver is heard yelling at a child in care. Several other children in care reported the caregiver yells as well.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-01

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(b)Mar 15, 2022

Two of the childrens medication logs had not been started as of today, 3-15-22

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(b)Mar 15, 2022

Two of the childrens medication logs had not been started as of today, 3-15-22

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(b)Mar 15, 2022

Two of the childrens medication logs had not been started as of today, 3-15-22

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(b)Mar 15, 2022

Two of the childrens medication logs had not been started as of today, 3-15-22

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-03-28

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2451(b)Oct 20, 2021

The home study did not document the date or method of contact for adult children interviews or references.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(i)Oct 20, 2021

There was no documentation that local law enforcement was contacted to verify service calls to the foster home in 2 home studies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(c)(3)Oct 20, 2021

The August medication logs for one child in care did not document the reason the medication was prescribed for 4 different medications.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2451(b)Oct 20, 2021

The home study did not document the date or method of contact for adult children interviews or references.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(c)(3)Oct 20, 2021

The August medication logs for one child in care did not document the reason the medication was prescribed for 4 different medications.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(i)Oct 20, 2021

There was no documentation that local law enforcement was contacted to verify service calls to the foster home in 2 home studies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2451(b)Oct 20, 2021

The home study did not document the date or method of contact for adult children interviews or references.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(c)(3)Oct 20, 2021

The August medication logs for one child in care did not document the reason the medication was prescribed for 4 different medications.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE749.2451(b)Oct 20, 2021

The home study did not document the date or method of contact for adult children interviews or references.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(i)Oct 20, 2021

There was no documentation that local law enforcement was contacted to verify service calls to the foster home in 2 home studies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

SERIOUSHEALTH749.1541(c)(3)Oct 20, 2021

The August medication logs for one child in care did not document the reason the medication was prescribed for 4 different medications.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE749.2447(7)(B)(i)Oct 20, 2021

There was no documentation that local law enforcement was contacted to verify service calls to the foster home in 2 home studies.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-01-27

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Lifeline Children & Family Services.

Nearby Daycares in Corsicana

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Lifeline Children & Family Services's safety grade?

Lifeline Children & Family Services has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 12.0 out of 100.

How many violations does Lifeline Children & Family Services have?

Lifeline Children & Family Services has 99 total violations on record, including 63 critical, 36 serious, and 0 minor.

When was Lifeline Children & Family Services last inspected?

Lifeline Children & Family Services was last inspected on March 30, 2026.

Parent Resources