Punkin Patch Day Care
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
39 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
March 31, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Punkin Patch Day Care
- License number
- 304909
- Location
- 602 EUCLID ST, Cleburne, TX 76033
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 32.5/100
- Inspection record
- 39 inspections, last inspected March 31, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
Quality Rating
Rated by Texas Rising Star, the state quality rating and improvement system.
48
Total Violations
Mar 31, 2026
Last Inspection
140
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (48)
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined during a DFPS investigation that staff were rough when handling children. This was discussed in previous CCR inspections with the director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined staff did not intervene when a child tipped over in a jumper and the mother had to pick the child up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. Two caregivers in the classroom failed to provide age-appropriate activities to children in care. Evidence shows a caregiver placing a child in play equipment that was not age appropriate. Also, a 2nd child was seen idling walking around the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-30
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined that a caregiver did not use a baby bouncer per manufacturer?s instructions. Instructions state to only use for a child who is unable to walk or climb out of product. Evidence shows that the child was able to walk and was further seen to be able to knock the bouncer to the floor while sitting in it.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. Two caregivers in the classroom failed to provide age-appropriate activities to children in care. Evidence shows a caregiver placing a child in play equipment that was not age appropriate. Also, a 2nd child was seen idling walking around the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-30
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined that a caregiver did not use a baby bouncer per manufacturer?s instructions. Instructions state to only use for a child who is unable to walk or climb out of product. Evidence shows that the child was able to walk and was further seen to be able to knock the bouncer to the floor while sitting in it.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined during a DFPS investigation that staff were rough when handling children. This was discussed in previous CCR inspections with the director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined staff did not intervene when a child tipped over in a jumper and the mother had to pick the child up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. Two caregivers in the classroom failed to provide age-appropriate activities to children in care. Evidence shows a caregiver placing a child in play equipment that was not age appropriate. Also, a 2nd child was seen idling walking around the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-30
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined that a caregiver did not use a baby bouncer per manufacturer?s instructions. Instructions state to only use for a child who is unable to walk or climb out of product. Evidence shows that the child was able to walk and was further seen to be able to knock the bouncer to the floor while sitting in it.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined during a DFPS investigation that staff were rough when handling children. This was discussed in previous CCR inspections with the director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined staff did not intervene when a child tipped over in a jumper and the mother had to pick the child up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined that a caregiver did not use a baby bouncer per manufacturer?s instructions. Instructions state to only use for a child who is unable to walk or climb out of product. Evidence shows that the child was able to walk and was further seen to be able to knock the bouncer to the floor while sitting in it.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined during a DFPS investigation that staff were rough when handling children. This was discussed in previous CCR inspections with the director.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. It was determined staff did not intervene when a child tipped over in a jumper and the mother had to pick the child up.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-26
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation. Two caregivers in the classroom failed to provide age-appropriate activities to children in care. Evidence shows a caregiver placing a child in play equipment that was not age appropriate. Also, a 2nd child was seen idling walking around the room.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-07-30
During the inspection an infant was observed sleeping in a swing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-02
During the inspection infants were observed in restrictive devices for more than fifteen minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-02
During the inspection infants were observed in restrictive devices for more than fifteen minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-02
During the inspection infants were observed in restrictive devices for more than fifteen minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-02
During the inspection infants were observed in restrictive devices for more than fifteen minutes.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-02
During the inspection an infant was observed sleeping in a swing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-02
During the inspection an infant was observed sleeping in a swing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-02
During the inspection an infant was observed sleeping in a swing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-02
Two infants in care not ready for table food had feeding instructions that were not updated since May and June of 2022.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-19
Two infants in care not ready for table food had feeding instructions that were not updated since May and June of 2022.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-19
Two infants in care not ready for table food had feeding instructions that were not updated since May and June of 2022.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-19
Two infants in care not ready for table food had feeding instructions that were not updated since May and June of 2022.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-08-19
Infant classroom had 11 children with two caregivers. The specified age group was 0-11 months. The classroom was over ratio by one child. This was corrected at inspection when a child was move to a different classroom, which allowed the classroom to be in ratio.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Infant classroom had 11 children with two caregivers. The specified age group was 0-11 months. The classroom was over ratio by one child. This was corrected at inspection when a child was move to a different classroom, which allowed the classroom to be in ratio.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Infant classroom had 11 children with two caregivers. The specified age group was 0-11 months. The classroom was over ratio by one child. This was corrected at inspection when a child was move to a different classroom, which allowed the classroom to be in ratio.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Infant classroom had 11 children with two caregivers. The specified age group was 0-11 months. The classroom was over ratio by one child. This was corrected at inspection when a child was move to a different classroom, which allowed the classroom to be in ratio.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Out of ten children files reviewed, one child was not current on it's immunizations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
Out of ten children files reviewed, one child was not current on it's immunizations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
Out of ten children files reviewed, one child was not current on it's immunizations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
Out of ten children files reviewed, one child was not current on it's immunizations.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-03
The loose fill on the schoolers playground was not nine inches and needed to be maintained.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-17
Based on interviews caregivers were aware the child was injured and did not administer first aid until after the parent arrived.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-17
The loose fill on the schoolers playground was not nine inches and needed to be maintained.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-17
Based on interviews caregivers were aware the child was injured and did not administer first aid until after the parent arrived.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-17
Based on interviews caregivers were aware the child was injured and did not administer first aid until after the parent arrived.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-17
The loose fill on the schoolers playground was not nine inches and needed to be maintained.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-17
The loose fill on the schoolers playground was not nine inches and needed to be maintained.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-17
Based on interviews caregivers were aware the child was injured and did not administer first aid until after the parent arrived.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-17
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Punkin Patch Day Care.
Nearby Daycares in Cleburne
Bright Beginnings Learning Center
1431 W HENDERSON ST
Sherri Willis
2304 COUNTY ROAD 314
Upbring Head Start (Cleburne)
602 OLIVE ST
Stepping Stones Learning Academy
921 N NOLAN RIVER RD
First Baptist Cleburne Preschool
105 E WILLINGHAM ST
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Punkin Patch Day Care's safety grade?
Punkin Patch Day Care has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 32.5 out of 100.
How many violations does Punkin Patch Day Care have?
Punkin Patch Day Care has 48 total violations on record, including 40 critical, 8 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Punkin Patch Day Care last inspected?
Punkin Patch Day Care was last inspected on March 31, 2026.