Safe Life Journey
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
86 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Unknown
Last refreshed
April 1, 2026
Latest inspection
January 16, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 1, 2026
- Provider
- Safe Life Journey
- License number
- 1702778- 13831
- Location
- 610 UPTOWN BLVD STE 203, Cedar Hill, TX 75104
- Status
- Unknown
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 86 inspections, last inspected January 16, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 1, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
80
Total Violations
Jan 16, 2026
Last Inspection
N/A
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (80)
This agency did not provide background information for one of its foster homes when requested by another CPA.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-30
This agency did not provide background information for one of its foster homes when requested by another CPA.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-30
Background checks for several individuals no longer associated with the operation have not been inactive by the operation.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
There was no monthly face-to-face contact made with a child in care by qualified child placement staff during the month of January 2024. The child has not been seen since 12/5/2024, which is longer than 60 days without face-to-face contact.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-20
The people list has not been validated on 10/21/2024, not within the last 3 months.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The people list has not been validated on 10/21/2024, not within the last 3 months.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Background checks for several individuals no longer associated with the operation have not been inactive by the operation.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
The operation does not have a full time administrator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
There was no monthly face-to-face contact made with a child in care by qualified child placement staff during the month of January 2024. The child has not been seen since 12/5/2024, which is longer than 60 days without face-to-face contact.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-20
The operation does not have a full time administrator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-06
The quarterly inspection was not completed by child placement staff and documentation did not include all requried information.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-05
The quarterly inspection was not completed by child placement staff and documentation did not include all requried information.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-05
Fire and severe weather drill did not document the discussions from the drill.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-05
Fire and severe weather drill did not document the discussions from the drill.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-05
The child's worker was not aware of the kid's being placed in a home for respite.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26
During this course of this investigation, children were in respite home for more than 14 consecutive days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26
The child's worker was not aware of the kid's being placed in a home for respite.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26
During this course of this investigation, children were in respite home for more than 14 consecutive days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-26
During a review conducted on December 19, 2024, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
During a review conducted on December 19, 2024, it was determined that: (1) the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and (2) 12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: - Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and - Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-20
Interviews completed indicate foster parents were pressured to take the current placement with promises of an infant being placed in the home at a later date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-14
Home screening evaluation was completed over the phone but home screening documents states interviews were completed face to face.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-14
Home screening evaluation was completed over the phone but home screening documents states interviews were completed face to face.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-14
Interviews completed indicate foster parents were pressured to take the current placement with promises of an infant being placed in the home at a later date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-14
Child placement management staff did not sign or approve foster home screening addendums.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-13
The fire inspection was not completed prior to home verification.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-13
The fire inspection was not completed prior to home verification.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-13
Child placement management staff did not sign or approve foster home screening addendums.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-13
Operation staff did not report to Licensing when there was suspicion of drug use by the foster parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-23
Operation staff did not report to Licensing when there was suspicion of drug use by the foster parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-23
An investigator was not allowed access to a bedroom in a foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-23
An investigator was not allowed access to a bedroom in a foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-23
One caregiver did not intervene when another caregiver used a "stun gun pen," which delivers an electric jolt, on a child in care as a form of discipline.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-16
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-16
A caregiver used a "stun gun pen," which delivers an electric jolt, on a child's hand as a form of discipline.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-16
A "stun pen" which delivers an electrical jolt was not locked and was accessible to children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-25
Children were hit with a shoe by a caregiver as a form of punishment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-25
One caregiver did not intervene when another caregiver used a "stun gun pen," which delivers an electric jolt, on a child in care as a form of discipline.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-16
This standard was found deficient as part of a DFPS investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-16
A caregiver used a "stun gun pen," which delivers an electric jolt, on a child's hand as a form of discipline.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-16
A "stun pen" which delivers an electrical jolt was not locked and was accessible to children in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-25
Children were hit with a shoe by a caregiver as a form of punishment.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-25
One child was not given administered one medication as prescribed by the physician.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-20
One child was not given administered one medication as prescribed by the physician.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-20
One home file did not include training certificates, a letter or a signed statement from the training source indicating that several required trainings had been completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-19
One home file did not include training certificates, a letter or a signed statement from the training source indicating that several required trainings had been completed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-09-19
The caregiver was not using the car seats appropriately to secure children in care when transporting.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-06
The caregiver was not using the car seats appropriately to secure children in care when transporting.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-06
Over-the-counter medication was not stored in a locked container in the master bedroom and master bathroom. The master bedroom door was unlocked leaving it accessible to children in care. Note: This was corrected during the inspection and noted by the inspector.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-28
Over-the-counter medication was not stored in a locked container in the master bedroom and master bathroom. The master bedroom door was unlocked leaving it accessible to children in care. Note: This was corrected during the inspection and noted by the inspector.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-03-28
One medication was not given to the child every 6 hours as prescribed
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-12
One medication was not given to the child every 6 hours as prescribed
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-12
Two adult biological children were not interviewed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-15
Home screening reviewed does not discuss the foster parent's parent or relationship with their parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-15
Background check results for three frequent visitors were not discussed in the home screening.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-08
Home screening reviewed does not discuss the foster parent's parent or relationship with their parents.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-15
Two adult biological children were not interviewed.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-15
Background check results for three frequent visitors were not discussed in the home screening.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-08
One foster child did not have a TB test completed within the first 30 days of admission.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-14
One foster child did not have a TB test completed within the first 30 days of admission.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-14
There were two firearms discovered at the foster home that were not documented in the foster home record.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-27
Two loaded firearms were observed by law enforcement to be stored unsecured on the top of the foster parent's bedroom closet.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-27
There were two firearms discovered at the foster home that were not documented in the foster home record.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-27
Two loaded firearms were observed by law enforcement to be stored unsecured on the top of the foster parent's bedroom closet.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-02-27
During a sampling inspection, foster parent indicated that her son is a frequent visitor, he does not have a required background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
During a sampling inspection, foster parent indicated that her son is a frequent visitor, he does not have a required background check.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-26
One child did not receive their medication for two days. Another child did not receive their medication for three days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-05
One child did not receive their medication for two days. Another child did not receive their medication for three days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-05
A review of an employee file showed that previous employee who was rehired failed to get an updated TB test.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-28
A review of an employee file showed that previous employee who was rehired failed to get an updated TB test.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-28
A review of a foster home file did not have the required dimensions listed on the sketch of the floor plan
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-01
A review of an employee file indicated that the employee did not meet the educational requirements of the job description.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-01
A review of a foster home file did not have the required dimensions listed on the sketch of the floor plan
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-01
A review of an employee file indicated that the employee did not meet the educational requirements of the job description.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-01
A child's medication logs did not document the reason why a PMN medication was given to the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
One medication log did not document the reason the medication was prescribed to the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
One medication log did not document the reason the medication was prescribed to the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
Multiple medication logs did not document the time the medication was given to the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
A child's medication logs did not document the reason why a PMN medication was given to the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
Multiple medication logs did not document the time the medication was given to the child.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-19
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Safe Life Journey.
Nearby Daycares in Cedar Hill
StoryTime Overnight Child Care Services LLC
1715 MADISON DR
Hillcrest Development Center
265 W PLEASANT RUN RD
Trinity Christian Preschool
1231 E PLEASANT RUN RD
Right at School at Plummer Elementary
1203 S CLARK RD
Kidz Towne Home Childcare
1154 WEAVER ST
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Safe Life Journey's safety grade?
Safe Life Journey has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Safe Life Journey have?
Safe Life Journey has 80 total violations on record, including 46 critical, 32 serious, and 2 minor.
When was Safe Life Journey last inspected?
Safe Life Journey was last inspected on January 16, 2026.