Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction

121 OLD SAN ANTONIO RD, Boerne, TX 78006Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

379 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

March 23, 2026

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction
License number
251707
Location
121 OLD SAN ANTONIO RD, Boerne, TX 78006
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 0.0/100
Inspection record
379 inspections, last inspected March 23, 2026
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor0.0 / 100
Health0/100
Safety0/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

101

Total Violations

Mar 23, 2026

Last Inspection

16

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (101)

SERIOUSSAFETY748.191(2)Jan 15, 2026

During a walkthrough of the cabin, the "Keeping Children Safe" poster was not posted. It was posted after the walkthrough.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSAFETY748.191(2)Jan 15, 2026

During a walkthrough of the cabin, the "Keeping Children Safe" poster was not posted. It was posted after the walkthrough.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

SERIOUSSAFETY748.191(2)Jan 15, 2026

During a walkthrough of the cabin, the "Keeping Children Safe" poster was not posted. It was posted after the walkthrough.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Dec 22, 2025

748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 12/22/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Dec 22, 2025

748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 12/22/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Dec 22, 2025

748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 12/22/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Dec 22, 2025

748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 12/22/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23

CRITICALHEALTH748.2203(c)Nov 26, 2025

A report was not document for a medication error within 24 hours of the operation, becoming aware of a child in care receiving another child's inhaler to take on an outing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-06

CRITICALHEALTH748.2203(c)Nov 26, 2025

A report was not document for a medication error within 24 hours of the operation, becoming aware of a child in care receiving another child's inhaler to take on an outing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-06

CRITICALHEALTH748.2203(c)Nov 26, 2025

A report was not document for a medication error within 24 hours of the operation, becoming aware of a child in care receiving another child's inhaler to take on an outing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-06

CRITICALHEALTH748.2203(c)Nov 26, 2025

A report was not document for a medication error within 24 hours of the operation, becoming aware of a child in care receiving another child's inhaler to take on an outing.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-06

CRITICALHEALTH748.2003(b)(3)Nov 19, 2025

A child's prescribed medication was not reorder in a timely manner, resulting in the child going without 3 required doses.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.2003(b)(3)Nov 19, 2025

A child's prescribed medication was not reorder in a timely manner, resulting in the child going without 3 required doses.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.2003(b)(3)Nov 19, 2025

A child's prescribed medication was not reorder in a timely manner, resulting in the child going without 3 required doses.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.2003(b)(3)Nov 19, 2025

A child's prescribed medication was not reorder in a timely manner, resulting in the child going without 3 required doses.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-27

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Jun 19, 2025

748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 6/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Jun 19, 2025

748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 6/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Jun 19, 2025

748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 6/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Jun 19, 2025

748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 6/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.507(1)Feb 25, 2025

Staff had knowledge a child in care had vape pen and did not remove from possession immediately.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1661(a)Feb 25, 2025

Staff was aware of the vape being on campus and did not say anything.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1661(a)Feb 25, 2025

Staff was aware of the vape being on campus and did not say anything.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1661(a)Feb 25, 2025

Staff was aware of the vape being on campus and did not say anything.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.507(1)Feb 25, 2025

Staff had knowledge a child in care had vape pen and did not remove from possession immediately.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.507(1)Feb 25, 2025

Staff had knowledge a child in care had vape pen and did not remove from possession immediately.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.507(1)Feb 25, 2025

Staff had knowledge a child in care had vape pen and did not remove from possession immediately.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1661(a)Feb 25, 2025

Staff was aware of the vape being on campus and did not say anything.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Dec 18, 2024

During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Dec 18, 2024

During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Dec 18, 2024

During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19

CRITICALSTAFFING748.535(2)Dec 18, 2024

During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19

CRITICALSTAFFING748.685(c)(1)Oct 21, 2024

Children in care with history of self-harming behaviors were given unsupervised access to scissors.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(4)(A)Oct 21, 2024

Child in care was given restrictions for completing an activity that was authorized by a staff member.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03

CRITICALSTAFFING748.685(c)(1)Oct 21, 2024

Children in care with history of self-harming behaviors were given unsupervised access to scissors.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(4)(A)Oct 21, 2024

Child in care was given restrictions for completing an activity that was authorized by a staff member.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(4)(A)Oct 21, 2024

Child in care was given restrictions for completing an activity that was authorized by a staff member.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03

CRITICALSTAFFING748.685(c)(1)Oct 21, 2024

Children in care with history of self-harming behaviors were given unsupervised access to scissors.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03

CRITICALSTAFFING748.685(c)(1)Oct 21, 2024

Children in care with history of self-harming behaviors were given unsupervised access to scissors.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(4)(A)Oct 21, 2024

Child in care was given restrictions for completing an activity that was authorized by a staff member.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.685(c)(6)Aug 15, 2024

it was discovered that staff did not conduct night checks within the appropriate 10-15minute time frames.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.685(c)(6)Aug 15, 2024

it was discovered that staff did not conduct night checks within the appropriate 10-15minute time frames.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.685(c)(6)Aug 15, 2024

it was discovered that staff did not conduct night checks within the appropriate 10-15minute time frames.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-18

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE748.685(c)(6)Aug 15, 2024

it was discovered that staff did not conduct night checks within the appropriate 10-15minute time frames.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-18

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Jul 3, 2024

During the review of medication record, there were two (2) prescribed medication with incorrect pill counts documented on the med logs.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Jul 3, 2024

During the review of medication record, there were two (2) prescribed medication with incorrect pill counts documented on the med logs.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Jul 3, 2024

During the review of medication record, there were two (2) prescribed medication with incorrect pill counts documented on the med logs.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(d)Jul 3, 2024

During the review of medication record, there were two (2) prescribed medication with incorrect pill counts documented on the med logs.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

CRITICALSAFETY748.2851(d)Apr 23, 2024

Reviewed two EBI reports. One report is missing supervisors/administrative signature indicating the EBI report was reviewed. The second report was signed by the employee involved in the restraint not their supervisor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30

CRITICALSAFETY748.2851(d)Apr 23, 2024

Reviewed two EBI reports. One report is missing supervisors/administrative signature indicating the EBI report was reviewed. The second report was signed by the employee involved in the restraint not their supervisor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30

CRITICALSAFETY748.2851(d)Apr 23, 2024

Reviewed two EBI reports. One report is missing supervisors/administrative signature indicating the EBI report was reviewed. The second report was signed by the employee involved in the restraint not their supervisor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30

CRITICALSAFETY748.2851(d)Apr 23, 2024

Reviewed two EBI reports. One report is missing supervisors/administrative signature indicating the EBI report was reviewed. The second report was signed by the employee involved in the restraint not their supervisor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30

CRITICALHEALTH748.2101(3)Nov 15, 2023

During the course of an investigation the doors to the medication room were seen opened and unattended by staff, leaving psychotropic mediations only single-locked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.1531(a)(2)Nov 15, 2023

During the course of an investigation the child in care reported not receiving medical attention after reporting to staff of possibly having a concussion and needing to go to the hospital to be check after being restraint. There was no evidence to support the child had a concussion or that staff cause the child to hit their head during the implementation of a restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.1531(a)(2)Nov 14, 2023

During the course of an investigation the child in care reported not receiving medical attention after reporting to staff of possibly having a concussion and needing to go to the hospital to be check after being restraint. There was no evidence to support the child had a concussion or that staff cause the child to hit their head during the implementation of a restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.2101(3)Nov 14, 2023

During the course of an investigation the doors to the medication room were seen opened and unattended by staff, leaving psychotropic mediations only single-locked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.2101(3)Nov 14, 2023

During the course of an investigation the doors to the medication room were seen opened and unattended by staff, leaving psychotropic mediations only single-locked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.1531(a)(2)Nov 14, 2023

During the course of an investigation the child in care reported not receiving medical attention after reporting to staff of possibly having a concussion and needing to go to the hospital to be check after being restraint. There was no evidence to support the child had a concussion or that staff cause the child to hit their head during the implementation of a restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.2101(3)Nov 14, 2023

During the course of an investigation the doors to the medication room were seen opened and unattended by staff, leaving psychotropic mediations only single-locked.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27

CRITICALHEALTH748.1531(a)(2)Nov 14, 2023

During the course of an investigation the child in care reported not receiving medical attention after reporting to staff of possibly having a concussion and needing to go to the hospital to be check after being restraint. There was no evidence to support the child had a concussion or that staff cause the child to hit their head during the implementation of a restraint.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(5)(A)Sep 21, 2023

Incident occurred on 8/28 and was reported to the hotline on 9/21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-08

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(5)(A)Sep 21, 2023

Incident occurred on 8/28 and was reported to the hotline on 9/21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-08

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(5)(A)Sep 21, 2023

Incident occurred on 8/28 and was reported to the hotline on 9/21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-08

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.303(a)(5)(A)Sep 21, 2023

Incident occurred on 8/28 and was reported to the hotline on 9/21.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-08

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Aug 18, 2022

It was confirmed through interviews, staff members did not ensure child made it to school from medical evaluations regardless of runaway risk in child's service plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-30

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Aug 18, 2022

It was confirmed through interviews, staff members did not ensure child made it to school from medical evaluations regardless of runaway risk in child's service plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-30

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Aug 18, 2022

It was confirmed through interviews, staff members did not ensure child made it to school from medical evaluations regardless of runaway risk in child's service plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-30

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Aug 18, 2022

It was confirmed through interviews, staff members did not ensure child made it to school from medical evaluations regardless of runaway risk in child's service plan.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-30

CRITICALSAFETY748.3601(9)Jun 24, 2022

Emergency procedures were not posted in swimming pool area.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-06

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.3391(a)Jun 24, 2022

The following was observed that a faucet was loose, tiles were missing in the shower, there was a hole in the wall and a sink drain was clogged.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08

CRITICALSAFETY748.3471(4)Jun 24, 2022

It was observed that the playground equipment had protruding screws.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08

CRITICALSAFETY748.3601(9)Jun 24, 2022

Emergency procedures were not posted in swimming pool area.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-06

CRITICALSAFETY748.3471(4)Jun 24, 2022

It was observed that the playground equipment had protruding screws.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08

CRITICALSAFETY748.3471(4)Jun 24, 2022

It was observed that the playground equipment had protruding screws.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.3391(a)Jun 24, 2022

The following was observed that a faucet was loose, tiles were missing in the shower, there was a hole in the wall and a sink drain was clogged.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.3391(a)Jun 24, 2022

The following was observed that a faucet was loose, tiles were missing in the shower, there was a hole in the wall and a sink drain was clogged.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08

CRITICALSAFETY748.3601(9)Jun 24, 2022

Emergency procedures were not posted in swimming pool area.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-06

CRITICALSAFETY748.3601(9)Jun 24, 2022

Emergency procedures were not posted in swimming pool area.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-06

CRITICALSAFETY748.3471(4)Jun 24, 2022

It was observed that the playground equipment had protruding screws.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.3391(a)Jun 24, 2022

The following was observed that a faucet was loose, tiles were missing in the shower, there was a hole in the wall and a sink drain was clogged.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(c)(5)Mar 21, 2022

The time was missing on 2 children's medication records.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-04

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(c)(5)Mar 21, 2022

The time was missing on 2 children's medication records.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-04

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(c)(5)Mar 21, 2022

The time was missing on 2 children's medication records.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-04

CRITICALHEALTH748.2151(c)(5)Mar 21, 2022

The time was missing on 2 children's medication records.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-04

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Dec 31, 2021

According to video footage, a staff member left children in care unattended for approximately 9 minutes and in addition, did not complete their 30 minute checks on the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Dec 31, 2021

According to video footage, a staff member left children in care unattended for approximately 9 minutes and in addition, did not complete their 30 minute checks on the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Dec 31, 2021

According to video footage, a staff member left children in care unattended for approximately 9 minutes and in addition, did not complete their 30 minute checks on the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Dec 31, 2021

According to video footage, a staff member left children in care unattended for approximately 9 minutes and in addition, did not complete their 30 minute checks on the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Oct 31, 2021

A child in care was able to crawl passed the window of the office area without staff noticing. During the walk-thru of the cabin it was found when staff are in the office they do not have a clear view of outside of the office. The video of the incident also shows that the staff did not have a clear view of the outside area.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Oct 30, 2021

A child in care was able to crawl passed the window of the office area without staff noticing. During the walk-thru of the cabin it was found when staff are in the office they do not have a clear view of outside of the office. The video of the incident also shows that the staff did not have a clear view of the outside area.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Oct 30, 2021

A child in care was able to crawl passed the window of the office area without staff noticing. During the walk-thru of the cabin it was found when staff are in the office they do not have a clear view of outside of the office. The video of the incident also shows that the staff did not have a clear view of the outside area.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10

CRITICALSAFETY748.685(a)(4)Oct 30, 2021

A child in care was able to crawl passed the window of the office area without staff noticing. During the walk-thru of the cabin it was found when staff are in the office they do not have a clear view of outside of the office. The video of the incident also shows that the staff did not have a clear view of the outside area.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(7)Aug 15, 2021

A child in care requested to call the Texas Abuse Hotline but was not allowed to do so.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(7)Aug 15, 2021

A child in care requested to call the Texas Abuse Hotline but was not allowed to do so.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(7)Aug 15, 2021

A child in care requested to call the Texas Abuse Hotline but was not allowed to do so.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(7)Aug 15, 2021

A child in care requested to call the Texas Abuse Hotline but was not allowed to do so.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-17

CRITICALSAFETY748.3301(i)Jun 8, 2021

One top bunk bedrailing was damaged posing a risk to the health and safety of a child in care

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-11

CRITICALSAFETY748.3301(i)Jun 8, 2021

One top bunk bedrailing was damaged posing a risk to the health and safety of a child in care

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-11

CRITICALSAFETY748.3301(i)Jun 8, 2021

One top bunk bedrailing was damaged posing a risk to the health and safety of a child in care

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-11

CRITICALSAFETY748.3301(i)Jun 8, 2021

One top bunk bedrailing was damaged posing a risk to the health and safety of a child in care

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-11

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.2307(9)Feb 25, 2021

Staff member used inappropriate language to a child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-14

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE748.1101(b)(1)(B)Feb 25, 2021

A child in care was inappropriately disciplined by a staff member. Staff member grabbed a child in care by the shirt and then proceeded to pull the child in care to the floor. Staff member also dragged the child by one arm across the floor.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-05

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction.

Nearby Daycares in Boerne

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction's safety grade?

Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.

How many violations does Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction have?

Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction has 101 total violations on record, including 94 critical, 7 serious, and 0 minor.

When was Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction last inspected?

Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction was last inspected on March 23, 2026.

Parent Resources