Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
379 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
March 23, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction
- License number
- 251707
- Location
- 121 OLD SAN ANTONIO RD, Boerne, TX 78006
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 0.0/100
- Inspection record
- 379 inspections, last inspected March 23, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
101
Total Violations
Mar 23, 2026
Last Inspection
16
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (101)
During a walkthrough of the cabin, the "Keeping Children Safe" poster was not posted. It was posted after the walkthrough.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During a walkthrough of the cabin, the "Keeping Children Safe" poster was not posted. It was posted after the walkthrough.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During a walkthrough of the cabin, the "Keeping Children Safe" poster was not posted. It was posted after the walkthrough.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 12/22/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 12/22/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 12/22/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 12/22/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-12-23
A report was not document for a medication error within 24 hours of the operation, becoming aware of a child in care receiving another child's inhaler to take on an outing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-06
A report was not document for a medication error within 24 hours of the operation, becoming aware of a child in care receiving another child's inhaler to take on an outing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-06
A report was not document for a medication error within 24 hours of the operation, becoming aware of a child in care receiving another child's inhaler to take on an outing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-06
A report was not document for a medication error within 24 hours of the operation, becoming aware of a child in care receiving another child's inhaler to take on an outing.
Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-06
A child's prescribed medication was not reorder in a timely manner, resulting in the child going without 3 required doses.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-27
A child's prescribed medication was not reorder in a timely manner, resulting in the child going without 3 required doses.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-27
A child's prescribed medication was not reorder in a timely manner, resulting in the child going without 3 required doses.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-27
A child's prescribed medication was not reorder in a timely manner, resulting in the child going without 3 required doses.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-27
748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 6/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20
748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 6/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20
748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 6/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20
748.535(2): The licensed administrator must ensure the operation complies with the current heightened monitoring plan. During a review conducted on 6/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-20
Staff had knowledge a child in care had vape pen and did not remove from possession immediately.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30
Staff was aware of the vape being on campus and did not say anything.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30
Staff was aware of the vape being on campus and did not say anything.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30
Staff was aware of the vape being on campus and did not say anything.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30
Staff had knowledge a child in care had vape pen and did not remove from possession immediately.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30
Staff had knowledge a child in care had vape pen and did not remove from possession immediately.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30
Staff had knowledge a child in care had vape pen and did not remove from possession immediately.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30
Staff was aware of the vape being on campus and did not say anything.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-04-30
During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19
During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19
During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19
During a review conducted on 12/18/2024 it was determined that: -the Administrator failed to ensure compliance with the current HM Plan; and -12 months had elapsed since the effective date of the plan. The heightened monitoring plan for this operation included a specific ?planned end date? at the 12-month mark by which the operation was expected to meet all heightened monitoring criteria necessary to move out of active heightened monitoring to a phase of ?post plan monitoring?. As a direct result of the administrator?s failure to ensure timely compliance with the heightened monitoring plan, this operation is now unable to successfully move to post-plan monitoring. Furthermore, the operation?s ?planned end date? must now be revised, and the period of heightened monitoring must be extended. Further details of the administrator?s failure to ensure compliance include the following: -Operation failed to satisfy the conditions of the plan -Operation failed to demonstrate 6 months of successive compliance with the standard and contract requirements that led to heightened monitoring; and -Operation was unable to meet compliance with Medium-High or High weighted licensing citations, including having an open investigation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-12-19
Children in care with history of self-harming behaviors were given unsupervised access to scissors.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03
Child in care was given restrictions for completing an activity that was authorized by a staff member.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03
Children in care with history of self-harming behaviors were given unsupervised access to scissors.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03
Child in care was given restrictions for completing an activity that was authorized by a staff member.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03
Child in care was given restrictions for completing an activity that was authorized by a staff member.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03
Children in care with history of self-harming behaviors were given unsupervised access to scissors.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03
Children in care with history of self-harming behaviors were given unsupervised access to scissors.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03
Child in care was given restrictions for completing an activity that was authorized by a staff member.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-01-03
it was discovered that staff did not conduct night checks within the appropriate 10-15minute time frames.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-18
it was discovered that staff did not conduct night checks within the appropriate 10-15minute time frames.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-18
it was discovered that staff did not conduct night checks within the appropriate 10-15minute time frames.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-18
it was discovered that staff did not conduct night checks within the appropriate 10-15minute time frames.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-10-18
During the review of medication record, there were two (2) prescribed medication with incorrect pill counts documented on the med logs.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the review of medication record, there were two (2) prescribed medication with incorrect pill counts documented on the med logs.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the review of medication record, there were two (2) prescribed medication with incorrect pill counts documented on the med logs.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
During the review of medication record, there were two (2) prescribed medication with incorrect pill counts documented on the med logs.
Resolution: Corrected at inspection
Reviewed two EBI reports. One report is missing supervisors/administrative signature indicating the EBI report was reviewed. The second report was signed by the employee involved in the restraint not their supervisor.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30
Reviewed two EBI reports. One report is missing supervisors/administrative signature indicating the EBI report was reviewed. The second report was signed by the employee involved in the restraint not their supervisor.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30
Reviewed two EBI reports. One report is missing supervisors/administrative signature indicating the EBI report was reviewed. The second report was signed by the employee involved in the restraint not their supervisor.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30
Reviewed two EBI reports. One report is missing supervisors/administrative signature indicating the EBI report was reviewed. The second report was signed by the employee involved in the restraint not their supervisor.
Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30
During the course of an investigation the doors to the medication room were seen opened and unattended by staff, leaving psychotropic mediations only single-locked.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27
During the course of an investigation the child in care reported not receiving medical attention after reporting to staff of possibly having a concussion and needing to go to the hospital to be check after being restraint. There was no evidence to support the child had a concussion or that staff cause the child to hit their head during the implementation of a restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27
During the course of an investigation the child in care reported not receiving medical attention after reporting to staff of possibly having a concussion and needing to go to the hospital to be check after being restraint. There was no evidence to support the child had a concussion or that staff cause the child to hit their head during the implementation of a restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27
During the course of an investigation the doors to the medication room were seen opened and unattended by staff, leaving psychotropic mediations only single-locked.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27
During the course of an investigation the doors to the medication room were seen opened and unattended by staff, leaving psychotropic mediations only single-locked.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27
During the course of an investigation the child in care reported not receiving medical attention after reporting to staff of possibly having a concussion and needing to go to the hospital to be check after being restraint. There was no evidence to support the child had a concussion or that staff cause the child to hit their head during the implementation of a restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27
During the course of an investigation the doors to the medication room were seen opened and unattended by staff, leaving psychotropic mediations only single-locked.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27
During the course of an investigation the child in care reported not receiving medical attention after reporting to staff of possibly having a concussion and needing to go to the hospital to be check after being restraint. There was no evidence to support the child had a concussion or that staff cause the child to hit their head during the implementation of a restraint.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-27
Incident occurred on 8/28 and was reported to the hotline on 9/21.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-08
Incident occurred on 8/28 and was reported to the hotline on 9/21.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-08
Incident occurred on 8/28 and was reported to the hotline on 9/21.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-08
Incident occurred on 8/28 and was reported to the hotline on 9/21.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-11-08
It was confirmed through interviews, staff members did not ensure child made it to school from medical evaluations regardless of runaway risk in child's service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-30
It was confirmed through interviews, staff members did not ensure child made it to school from medical evaluations regardless of runaway risk in child's service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-30
It was confirmed through interviews, staff members did not ensure child made it to school from medical evaluations regardless of runaway risk in child's service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-30
It was confirmed through interviews, staff members did not ensure child made it to school from medical evaluations regardless of runaway risk in child's service plan.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-30
Emergency procedures were not posted in swimming pool area.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-06
The following was observed that a faucet was loose, tiles were missing in the shower, there was a hole in the wall and a sink drain was clogged.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08
It was observed that the playground equipment had protruding screws.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08
Emergency procedures were not posted in swimming pool area.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-06
It was observed that the playground equipment had protruding screws.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08
It was observed that the playground equipment had protruding screws.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08
The following was observed that a faucet was loose, tiles were missing in the shower, there was a hole in the wall and a sink drain was clogged.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08
The following was observed that a faucet was loose, tiles were missing in the shower, there was a hole in the wall and a sink drain was clogged.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08
Emergency procedures were not posted in swimming pool area.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-06
Emergency procedures were not posted in swimming pool area.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-06
It was observed that the playground equipment had protruding screws.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08
The following was observed that a faucet was loose, tiles were missing in the shower, there was a hole in the wall and a sink drain was clogged.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-07-08
The time was missing on 2 children's medication records.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-04
The time was missing on 2 children's medication records.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-04
The time was missing on 2 children's medication records.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-04
The time was missing on 2 children's medication records.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-04
According to video footage, a staff member left children in care unattended for approximately 9 minutes and in addition, did not complete their 30 minute checks on the children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23
According to video footage, a staff member left children in care unattended for approximately 9 minutes and in addition, did not complete their 30 minute checks on the children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23
According to video footage, a staff member left children in care unattended for approximately 9 minutes and in addition, did not complete their 30 minute checks on the children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23
According to video footage, a staff member left children in care unattended for approximately 9 minutes and in addition, did not complete their 30 minute checks on the children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23
A child in care was able to crawl passed the window of the office area without staff noticing. During the walk-thru of the cabin it was found when staff are in the office they do not have a clear view of outside of the office. The video of the incident also shows that the staff did not have a clear view of the outside area.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10
A child in care was able to crawl passed the window of the office area without staff noticing. During the walk-thru of the cabin it was found when staff are in the office they do not have a clear view of outside of the office. The video of the incident also shows that the staff did not have a clear view of the outside area.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10
A child in care was able to crawl passed the window of the office area without staff noticing. During the walk-thru of the cabin it was found when staff are in the office they do not have a clear view of outside of the office. The video of the incident also shows that the staff did not have a clear view of the outside area.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10
A child in care was able to crawl passed the window of the office area without staff noticing. During the walk-thru of the cabin it was found when staff are in the office they do not have a clear view of outside of the office. The video of the incident also shows that the staff did not have a clear view of the outside area.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-12-10
A child in care requested to call the Texas Abuse Hotline but was not allowed to do so.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-17
A child in care requested to call the Texas Abuse Hotline but was not allowed to do so.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-17
A child in care requested to call the Texas Abuse Hotline but was not allowed to do so.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-17
A child in care requested to call the Texas Abuse Hotline but was not allowed to do so.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-09-17
One top bunk bedrailing was damaged posing a risk to the health and safety of a child in care
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-11
One top bunk bedrailing was damaged posing a risk to the health and safety of a child in care
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-11
One top bunk bedrailing was damaged posing a risk to the health and safety of a child in care
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-11
One top bunk bedrailing was damaged posing a risk to the health and safety of a child in care
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-11
Staff member used inappropriate language to a child in care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-14
A child in care was inappropriately disciplined by a staff member. Staff member grabbed a child in care by the shirt and then proceeded to pull the child in care to the floor. Staff member also dragged the child by one arm across the floor.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-04-05
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction.
Nearby Daycares in Boerne
EdQuisitive Montessori of Fair Oaks
27521 IH 10 W
Hill Country Montessori School
50 STONE WALL DR
Innovative Network of Knowledge Boerne EHS CCP
316 W HIGHLAND DR STE 300
Y School Age Kendall Elementary
141 OLD SAN ANTONIO RD
Courtney Brothers
27823 ROCKY MTN
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction's safety grade?
Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 0.0 out of 100.
How many violations does Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction have?
Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction has 101 total violations on record, including 94 critical, 7 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction last inspected?
Roy Maas Youth Alternative - Girlsville/Junction was last inspected on March 23, 2026.