TEXAS DEPT OF FPS REG 05
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
159 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
May 19, 2025
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- TEXAS DEPT OF FPS REG 05
- License number
- 66558- 210
- Location
- 3105 EXECUTIVE BLVD, Beaumont, TX 77705
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 12.0/100
- Inspection record
- 159 inspections, last inspected May 19, 2025
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
92
Total Violations
May 19, 2025
Last Inspection
0
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (92)
Children in care were hit on their legs and feet with different objects and made to kneel for extended periods of time as a form of discipline.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-27
A caregiver did not demonstrate prudent judgement when leaving children in care with an unauthorized babysitter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-27
A caregiver did not demonstrate prudent judgement when leaving children in care with an unauthorized babysitter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-27
A caregiver did not demonstrate prudent judgement when leaving children in care with an unauthorized babysitter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-27
Children in care were hit on their legs and feet with different objects and made to kneel for extended periods of time as a form of discipline.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-27
A caregiver did not demonstrate prudent judgement when leaving children in care with an unauthorized babysitter.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-27
Children in care were hit on their legs and feet with different objects and made to kneel for extended periods of time as a form of discipline.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-27
Children in care were hit on their legs and feet with different objects and made to kneel for extended periods of time as a form of discipline.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-08-27
During the investigation, it was noted that the child received a drug test in the home. It was shared that result was a faint positive. The child was not taken to see a doctor to ensure no negative reactions or adverse effects.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
It was noted in interviews that foster parents were speaking negatively towards the child's biological family in front of the child and other parties. It was found that the children of the home were hearing the negative remarks and were repeating them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
Per Texas Family Code CPS Policy 1936.3 Children and Youth in DFPS Conservatorship: - If a caseworker or medical consenter suspects that a child or youth may be misusing or abusing substances, the caseworker or medical consenter may have the child or youth drug tested only by a medical provider. - The caseworker and medical consenter do not conduct drug tests on the child or youth. - If the child or youth appears to require immediate medical care, the caseworker must take the child or youth to an emergency medical facility. - To have a child or youth drug tested by a medical provider, the caseworker or medical consenter makes an appointment with the child or youth?s health care provider or primary care physician (PCP). - The caseworker or medical consenter then informs the health care provider or PCP about the concern for the child or youth?s possible use of or exposure to substances. During the course of the investigation, it was shared that the child returned from a visit with family and was suspected to have been exposed to illegal substances. It was shared that the child was given an at-home drug test administered in the home. Per Texas Family Code, at-home drug tests are not to be administered to children and youth in DFPS Conservatorship.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
During the investigation, it was noted that the child received a drug test in the home. It was shared that result was a faint positive. The child was not taken to see a doctor to ensure no negative reactions or adverse effects.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
It was noted in interviews that foster parents were speaking negatively towards the child's biological family in front of the child and other parties. It was found that the children of the home were hearing the negative remarks and were repeating them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
Per Texas Family Code CPS Policy 1936.3 Children and Youth in DFPS Conservatorship: - If a caseworker or medical consenter suspects that a child or youth may be misusing or abusing substances, the caseworker or medical consenter may have the child or youth drug tested only by a medical provider. - The caseworker and medical consenter do not conduct drug tests on the child or youth. - If the child or youth appears to require immediate medical care, the caseworker must take the child or youth to an emergency medical facility. - To have a child or youth drug tested by a medical provider, the caseworker or medical consenter makes an appointment with the child or youth?s health care provider or primary care physician (PCP). - The caseworker or medical consenter then informs the health care provider or PCP about the concern for the child or youth?s possible use of or exposure to substances. During the course of the investigation, it was shared that the child returned from a visit with family and was suspected to have been exposed to illegal substances. It was shared that the child was given an at-home drug test administered in the home. Per Texas Family Code, at-home drug tests are not to be administered to children and youth in DFPS Conservatorship.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
Per Texas Family Code CPS Policy 1936.3 Children and Youth in DFPS Conservatorship: - If a caseworker or medical consenter suspects that a child or youth may be misusing or abusing substances, the caseworker or medical consenter may have the child or youth drug tested only by a medical provider. - The caseworker and medical consenter do not conduct drug tests on the child or youth. - If the child or youth appears to require immediate medical care, the caseworker must take the child or youth to an emergency medical facility. - To have a child or youth drug tested by a medical provider, the caseworker or medical consenter makes an appointment with the child or youth?s health care provider or primary care physician (PCP). - The caseworker or medical consenter then informs the health care provider or PCP about the concern for the child or youth?s possible use of or exposure to substances. During the course of the investigation, it was shared that the child returned from a visit with family and was suspected to have been exposed to illegal substances. It was shared that the child was given an at-home drug test administered in the home. Per Texas Family Code, at-home drug tests are not to be administered to children and youth in DFPS Conservatorship.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
It was noted in interviews that foster parents were speaking negatively towards the child's biological family in front of the child and other parties. It was found that the children of the home were hearing the negative remarks and were repeating them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
Per Texas Family Code CPS Policy 1936.3 Children and Youth in DFPS Conservatorship: - If a caseworker or medical consenter suspects that a child or youth may be misusing or abusing substances, the caseworker or medical consenter may have the child or youth drug tested only by a medical provider. - The caseworker and medical consenter do not conduct drug tests on the child or youth. - If the child or youth appears to require immediate medical care, the caseworker must take the child or youth to an emergency medical facility. - To have a child or youth drug tested by a medical provider, the caseworker or medical consenter makes an appointment with the child or youth?s health care provider or primary care physician (PCP). - The caseworker or medical consenter then informs the health care provider or PCP about the concern for the child or youth?s possible use of or exposure to substances. During the course of the investigation, it was shared that the child returned from a visit with family and was suspected to have been exposed to illegal substances. It was shared that the child was given an at-home drug test administered in the home. Per Texas Family Code, at-home drug tests are not to be administered to children and youth in DFPS Conservatorship.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
It was noted in interviews that foster parents were speaking negatively towards the child's biological family in front of the child and other parties. It was found that the children of the home were hearing the negative remarks and were repeating them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
During the investigation, it was noted that the child received a drug test in the home. It was shared that result was a faint positive. The child was not taken to see a doctor to ensure no negative reactions or adverse effects.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
During the investigation, it was noted that the child received a drug test in the home. It was shared that result was a faint positive. The child was not taken to see a doctor to ensure no negative reactions or adverse effects.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-08-04
A caregiver admitted that she did not report her firearms to the agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-27
Children in care reported being yelled at by the foster parent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-20
A caregiver admitted that she did not report her firearms to the agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-27
Children in care reported being yelled at by the foster parent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-20
A caregiver admitted that she did not report her firearms to the agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-27
Children in care reported being yelled at by the foster parent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-20
Children in care reported being yelled at by the foster parent.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-20
A caregiver admitted that she did not report her firearms to the agency.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-27
During an inspection, the foster parent did not have a copy of the children in placement's service plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-21
During an inspection, the foster parent did not have a copy of the children in placement's service plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-21
During an inspection, the foster parent did not have a copy of the children in placement's service plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-21
During an inspection, the foster parent did not have a copy of the children in placement's service plans.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-21
Based on information obtained in interviews, label instructions on an adolescent's medication bottle, medication logs as well as the Intake Report, it was determined a foster parent did not administer medication according to label instructions resulting in an adolescent missing several dosages of medication on several occasions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-19
Based on information obtained in interviews as well as Infraction Documentation in IMPACT, it was determined a foster parent did not store medication inaccessible to adolescents in care. An adolescent in care had access to a brand-new bottle of pills consuming all the pills in the bottle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-19
Based on information obtained in interviews as well as Infraction Documentation in IMPACT, it was determined a foster parent did not store medication inaccessible to adolescents in care. An adolescent in care had access to a brand-new bottle of pills consuming all the pills in the bottle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-19
Based on information obtained in interviews, label instructions on an adolescent's medication bottle, medication logs as well as the Intake Report, it was determined a foster parent did not administer medication according to label instructions resulting in an adolescent missing several dosages of medication on several occasions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-19
Based on information obtained in interviews, label instructions on an adolescent's medication bottle, medication logs as well as the Intake Report, it was determined a foster parent did not administer medication according to label instructions resulting in an adolescent missing several dosages of medication on several occasions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-19
Based on information obtained in interviews as well as Infraction Documentation in IMPACT, it was determined a foster parent did not store medication inaccessible to adolescents in care. An adolescent in care had access to a brand-new bottle of pills consuming all the pills in the bottle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-19
Based on information obtained in interviews as well as Infraction Documentation in IMPACT, it was determined a foster parent did not store medication inaccessible to adolescents in care. An adolescent in care had access to a brand-new bottle of pills consuming all the pills in the bottle.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-19
Based on information obtained in interviews, label instructions on an adolescent's medication bottle, medication logs as well as the Intake Report, it was determined a foster parent did not administer medication according to label instructions resulting in an adolescent missing several dosages of medication on several occasions.
Resolution: Corrected: 2023-01-19
Foster parents stated that they had used running as a form of discipline for their two foster children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-09
Foster parents stated that they had used running as a form of discipline for their two foster children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-09
Foster parents stated that they had used running as a form of discipline for their two foster children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-09
Foster parents stated that they had used running as a form of discipline for their two foster children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-09
During the inspection, Foster home studies did not document a discussion with the family of whether there had been service calls from law enforcement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-26
During the inspection, Foster home studies did not document a discussion with the family of whether there had been service calls from law enforcement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-26
During the inspection, Foster home studies did not document a discussion with the family of whether there had been service calls from law enforcement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-26
During the inspection, Foster home studies did not document a discussion with the family of whether there had been service calls from law enforcement.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-09-26
One child mattress did not have the required cover/protector on the mattress.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-24
One child mattress did not have the required cover/protector on the mattress.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-24
One child mattress did not have the required cover/protector on the mattress.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-24
One child mattress did not have the required cover/protector on the mattress.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-24
Foster parents were utilizing ear pulling in a home as a form of discipline. Walking to school is being used as a form of punishment in a foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-24
Foster parents were utilizing ear pulling in a home as a form of discipline. Walking to school is being used as a form of punishment in a foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-24
Foster parents were utilizing ear pulling in a home as a form of discipline. Walking to school is being used as a form of punishment in a foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-24
Foster parents were utilizing ear pulling in a home as a form of discipline. Walking to school is being used as a form of punishment in a foster home.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-06-24
A caregiver failed to report incident of alleged sexual abuse of a children in his care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
Children in care were sexually abused.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
Children in care experienced ongoing sexual abuse due to a lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
A caregiver failed to report incident of alleged sexual abuse of a children in his care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
Children in care were sexually abused.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
A caregiver failed to report incident of alleged sexual abuse of a children in his care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
Children in care experienced ongoing sexual abuse due to a lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
Children in care were sexually abused.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
Children in care experienced ongoing sexual abuse due to a lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
A caregiver failed to report incident of alleged sexual abuse of a children in his care.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
Children in care were sexually abused.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
Children in care experienced ongoing sexual abuse due to a lack of supervision.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-04-11
Foster parent did not allow children to be interviewed in private, despite two requests. Foster parent instructed the children that they did not have to talk to the investigator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23
Foster parent did not allow children to be interviewed in private, despite two requests. Foster parent instructed the children that they did not have to talk to the investigator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23
Foster parent did not allow children to be interviewed in private, despite two requests. Foster parent instructed the children that they did not have to talk to the investigator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23
Foster parent did not allow children to be interviewed in private, despite two requests. Foster parent instructed the children that they did not have to talk to the investigator.
Resolution: Corrected: 2022-02-23
The agency failed to report an incident in which a child contracted a communicable disease in a timely manner.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-20
The agency failed to report an incident in which a child contracted a communicable disease in a timely manner.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-20
The agency failed to report an incident in which a child contracted a communicable disease in a timely manner.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-20
The agency failed to report an incident in which a child contracted a communicable disease in a timely manner.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-20
One child's file reviewed did not have documentation that the child received a copy of rights in the required timeframe. the child was placed on 12/11/2020. Documented child's rights were dated 4/19/2021.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
During the review of a child's service plan, the document stated the parent was present, then later stated that the parent was not present. The document stated that the parent was present on the date of the meeting however a copy of the service plan was not given to the parent until a later date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
In 4 case files reviewed. There was no documentation that there was a 2 week notification given to the parents for an initial service plan for 1 child and the service plan review for 3 children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
During the review of a child's service plan, the document stated the parent was present, then later stated that the parent was not present. The document stated that the parent was present on the date of the meeting however a copy of the service plan was not given to the parent until a later date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
During the review of a child's service plan, the document stated the parent was present, then later stated that the parent was not present. The document stated that the parent was present on the date of the meeting however a copy of the service plan was not given to the parent until a later date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
One child's file reviewed did not have documentation that the child received a copy of rights in the required timeframe. the child was placed on 12/11/2020. Documented child's rights were dated 4/19/2021.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
One child's file reviewed did not have documentation that the child received a copy of rights in the required timeframe. the child was placed on 12/11/2020. Documented child's rights were dated 4/19/2021.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
In 4 case files reviewed. There was no documentation that there was a 2 week notification given to the parents for an initial service plan for 1 child and the service plan review for 3 children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
During the review of a child's service plan, the document stated the parent was present, then later stated that the parent was not present. The document stated that the parent was present on the date of the meeting however a copy of the service plan was not given to the parent until a later date.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
In 4 case files reviewed. There was no documentation that there was a 2 week notification given to the parents for an initial service plan for 1 child and the service plan review for 3 children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
One child's file reviewed did not have documentation that the child received a copy of rights in the required timeframe. the child was placed on 12/11/2020. Documented child's rights were dated 4/19/2021.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
In 4 case files reviewed. There was no documentation that there was a 2 week notification given to the parents for an initial service plan for 1 child and the service plan review for 3 children.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-10-18
An incident/injury that occurred was not reported to licensing within the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-05-07
An incident/injury that occurred was not reported to licensing within the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-05-07
An incident/injury that occurred was not reported to licensing within the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-05-07
An incident/injury that occurred was not reported to licensing within the required time frame.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-05-07
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for TEXAS DEPT OF FPS REG 05.
Nearby Daycares in Beaumont
Marie Lewis
1520 TURNER RD
Texas Karate Academy
7310 HIGHWAY 105
MET Early Head Start Beaumont
4380 FANNETT RD
Discovery Learning Center, LLC
6130 MUELA CREEK DR
Beaumont Creative Learning Center
7495 CALDER AVE
Frequently Asked Questions
What is TEXAS DEPT OF FPS REG 05's safety grade?
TEXAS DEPT OF FPS REG 05 has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 12.0 out of 100.
How many violations does TEXAS DEPT OF FPS REG 05 have?
TEXAS DEPT OF FPS REG 05 has 92 total violations on record, including 60 critical, 32 serious, and 0 minor.
When was TEXAS DEPT OF FPS REG 05 last inspected?
TEXAS DEPT OF FPS REG 05 was last inspected on May 19, 2025.