The SAFE Alliance

The incident report reviewed did not document the operation's phone number or list the adults involved.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-23

The incident report reviewed did not document the operation's phone number or list the adults involved.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-23

The incident report reviewed did not document the operation's phone number or list the adults involved.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-23

The incident report reviewed did not document the operation's phone number or list the adults involved.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-23

During the course of this investigation, it was determined that foster parents conducted random searches of the children in care?s belongings and a child in care?s bedroom while they were not present and without notification.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-20

During the course of this investigation, it was determined that foster parents conducted random searches of the children in care?s belongings and a child in care?s bedroom while they were not present and without notification.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-20

During the course of this investigation, it was determined that foster parents conducted random searches of the children in care?s belongings and a child in care?s bedroom while they were not present and without notification.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-20

During the course of this investigation, it was determined that foster parents conducted random searches of the children in care?s belongings and a child in care?s bedroom while they were not present and without notification.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-10-20

This standard was found to be deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

It was found the foster parents engaged in a verbal argument with the child in care, including yelling.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

This standard was found to be deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

It was found the foster parents engaged in a verbal argument with the child in care, including yelling.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

This standard was found to be deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

It was found the foster parents engaged in a verbal argument with the child in care, including yelling.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

This standard was found to be deficient as part of a DFPS Investigation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

It was found the foster parents engaged in a verbal argument with the child in care, including yelling.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-09-22

During the review of the records it was observed the medication prescribed to the child on 2/8/25 was not written on the medication log.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

During the review of the records it was observed the medication prescribed to the child on 2/8/25 was not written on the medication log.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

During the review of the records it was observed the medication prescribed to the child on 2/8/25 was not written on the medication log.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

During the review of the records it was observed the medication prescribed to the child on 2/8/25 was not written on the medication log.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-14

During the monitoring inspected, three of six incident reports were either incorrectly documented or documented late.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30

During the monitoring inspected, three of six incident reports were either incorrectly documented or documented late.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30

During the monitoring inspected, three of six incident reports were either incorrectly documented or documented late.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30

During the monitoring inspected, three of six incident reports were either incorrectly documented or documented late.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-04-30

It was determined that a frequent visitor does not have the required background check.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22

It was determined that a frequent visitor does not have the required background check.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22

It was determined that a frequent visitor does not have the required background check.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22

It was determined that a frequent visitor does not have the required background check.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-12-22

It was found that two caregivers engaged in an altercation with their child in front of other children in care. It was also found that these caregivers argue loudly together in front of children they are providing care to.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-25

It was found that two caregivers engaged in an altercation with their child in front of other children in care. It was also found that these caregivers argue loudly together in front of children they are providing care to.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-25

It was found that two caregivers engaged in an altercation with their child in front of other children in care. It was also found that these caregivers argue loudly together in front of children they are providing care to.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-25

It was found that two caregivers engaged in an altercation with their child in front of other children in care. It was also found that these caregivers argue loudly together in front of children they are providing care to.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-10-25

1 child file was found to have a medication log for the month of October 2022, showing that the medication was skipped over every weekend that month. There was no documentation showing a med change, and no med error report found documenting why the medication was missed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-09

1 child file was found to have a medication log for the month of October 2022, showing that the medication was skipped over every weekend that month. There was no documentation showing a med change, and no med error report found documenting why the medication was missed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-09

1 child file was found to have a medication log for the month of October 2022, showing that the medication was skipped over every weekend that month. There was no documentation showing a med change, and no med error report found documenting why the medication was missed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-09

1 child file was found to have a medication log for the month of October 2022, showing that the medication was skipped over every weekend that month. There was no documentation showing a med change, and no med error report found documenting why the medication was missed.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-06-09

It was found that a foster parent conducted an improper restraint on a child in care. The restraint used was not an approved method by the agency.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-12

It was found that a foster parent conducted an improper restraint on a child in care. The restraint used was not an approved method by the agency.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-12

It was found that a foster parent conducted an improper restraint on a child in care. The restraint used was not an approved method by the agency.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-12

It was found that a foster parent conducted an improper restraint on a child in care. The restraint used was not an approved method by the agency.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-05-12

It was found during the investigation that the foster parent attempted a short personal restraint by grabbing the child in a bear hug to remove her from a vehicle.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

During interviews with the foster parents, it was said that this incident took place on a Monday, and foster parents stated that post discussion took place the following Thursday, exceeding the 48-hour time frame required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

During interviews, foster parents admitted to administering a restraint to a child in a non-emergency situation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

It was found during the investigation that the foster parent attempted a short personal restraint by grabbing the child in a bear hug to remove her from a vehicle.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

During interviews, foster parents admitted to administering a restraint to a child in a non-emergency situation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

During interviews with the foster parents, it was said that this incident took place on a Monday, and foster parents stated that post discussion took place the following Thursday, exceeding the 48-hour time frame required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

It was found during the investigation that the foster parent attempted a short personal restraint by grabbing the child in a bear hug to remove her from a vehicle.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

During interviews, foster parents admitted to administering a restraint to a child in a non-emergency situation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

During interviews with the foster parents, it was said that this incident took place on a Monday, and foster parents stated that post discussion took place the following Thursday, exceeding the 48-hour time frame required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

It was found during the investigation that the foster parent attempted a short personal restraint by grabbing the child in a bear hug to remove her from a vehicle.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

During interviews, foster parents admitted to administering a restraint to a child in a non-emergency situation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

During interviews with the foster parents, it was said that this incident took place on a Monday, and foster parents stated that post discussion took place the following Thursday, exceeding the 48-hour time frame required by Minimum Standards.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-04-17

It was found during the investigation that one foster parent had used the term "Ms. Piggy" in reference two children in care in a joking manner. Although it was reported that this term was not used in a malicious way, it was inappropriate to use towards a child(ren) in care. It was also reported that one foster parent made an inappropriate comment toward one child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-24

It was found during the investigation that one foster parent had used the term "Ms. Piggy" in reference two children in care in a joking manner. Although it was reported that this term was not used in a malicious way, it was inappropriate to use towards a child(ren) in care. It was also reported that one foster parent made an inappropriate comment toward one child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-24

It was found during the investigation that one foster parent had used the term "Ms. Piggy" in reference two children in care in a joking manner. Although it was reported that this term was not used in a malicious way, it was inappropriate to use towards a child(ren) in care. It was also reported that one foster parent made an inappropriate comment toward one child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-24

It was found during the investigation that one foster parent had used the term "Ms. Piggy" in reference two children in care in a joking manner. Although it was reported that this term was not used in a malicious way, it was inappropriate to use towards a child(ren) in care. It was also reported that one foster parent made an inappropriate comment toward one child in care.

Resolution: Corrected: 2023-03-24

During the course of the investigation, it was determined a foster parent failed to supervise a child in her care adequately.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-09

During the course of the investigation, it was determined a foster parent failed to supervise a child in her care adequately.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-09

During the course of the investigation, it was determined a foster parent failed to supervise a child in her care adequately.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-09

During the course of the investigation, it was determined a foster parent failed to supervise a child in her care adequately.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-12-09

It was found that during this investigation, foster parent(s) conducted an aggressive restraint that raised concern for abusive behavior. These actions were a breach of duty by the foster parents that placed the child involved in a genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury. One foster parent restrained the child in a manner described by dragging the child by the limbs through the house and outside where the restraint continued in a supine position. At one point, foster parent was reported to be chest to chest w/ the child during the restraint and/or having one knee on the child's chest. The other foster parent admitted to slapping the child on a vital body part, the face. Although there are some variances to the history provided by foster parents, collaterals reported there was a struggle between the child and the foster parents that resulted in the child getting injured by being slammed onto the ground, sustaining scratches/bruising on the back, and bumping their head onto the ground.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that one foster parent slapped the child in care across a vital part of the body, the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that one foster parent "dragged" the child involved from the inside of the house to the outside of the house and into the yard onto the concrete ground. It was found that during this incident the child was placed in a supine restraint by foster parent during what was reported to be a short personal restraint, which is prohibited. It was also reported that the child hit their head outside during this restraint and the child sustained scratches/marks/bruises on their back due to this incident as well. No foster parent was monitoring the restraint inside or outside the home. It was reported that at one point foster parent was chest to chest with the child during the restraint and/or had their knee on the child. Overall, foster parent(s) conducted inappropriate and improper restraints on the child in care. Foster parents did not minimize harm to the child which caused injuries.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that one foster parent slapped the child in care across a vital part of the body, the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that one foster parent slapped the child in care across a vital part of the body, the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that during this investigation, foster parent(s) conducted an aggressive restraint that raised concern for abusive behavior. These actions were a breach of duty by the foster parents that placed the child involved in a genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury. One foster parent restrained the child in a manner described by dragging the child by the limbs through the house and outside where the restraint continued in a supine position. At one point, foster parent was reported to be chest to chest w/ the child during the restraint and/or having one knee on the child's chest. The other foster parent admitted to slapping the child on a vital body part, the face. Although there are some variances to the history provided by foster parents, collaterals reported there was a struggle between the child and the foster parents that resulted in the child getting injured by being slammed onto the ground, sustaining scratches/bruising on the back, and bumping their head onto the ground.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that one foster parent "dragged" the child involved from the inside of the house to the outside of the house and into the yard onto the concrete ground. It was found that during this incident the child was placed in a supine restraint by foster parent during what was reported to be a short personal restraint, which is prohibited. It was also reported that the child hit their head outside during this restraint and the child sustained scratches/marks/bruises on their back due to this incident as well. No foster parent was monitoring the restraint inside or outside the home. It was reported that at one point foster parent was chest to chest with the child during the restraint and/or had their knee on the child. Overall, foster parent(s) conducted inappropriate and improper restraints on the child in care. Foster parents did not minimize harm to the child which caused injuries.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that one foster parent slapped the child in care across a vital part of the body, the face.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that during this investigation, foster parent(s) conducted an aggressive restraint that raised concern for abusive behavior. These actions were a breach of duty by the foster parents that placed the child involved in a genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury. One foster parent restrained the child in a manner described by dragging the child by the limbs through the house and outside where the restraint continued in a supine position. At one point, foster parent was reported to be chest to chest w/ the child during the restraint and/or having one knee on the child's chest. The other foster parent admitted to slapping the child on a vital body part, the face. Although there are some variances to the history provided by foster parents, collaterals reported there was a struggle between the child and the foster parents that resulted in the child getting injured by being slammed onto the ground, sustaining scratches/bruising on the back, and bumping their head onto the ground.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that one foster parent "dragged" the child involved from the inside of the house to the outside of the house and into the yard onto the concrete ground. It was found that during this incident the child was placed in a supine restraint by foster parent during what was reported to be a short personal restraint, which is prohibited. It was also reported that the child hit their head outside during this restraint and the child sustained scratches/marks/bruises on their back due to this incident as well. No foster parent was monitoring the restraint inside or outside the home. It was reported that at one point foster parent was chest to chest with the child during the restraint and/or had their knee on the child. Overall, foster parent(s) conducted inappropriate and improper restraints on the child in care. Foster parents did not minimize harm to the child which caused injuries.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that during this investigation, foster parent(s) conducted an aggressive restraint that raised concern for abusive behavior. These actions were a breach of duty by the foster parents that placed the child involved in a genuine threat of substantial harm from physical injury. One foster parent restrained the child in a manner described by dragging the child by the limbs through the house and outside where the restraint continued in a supine position. At one point, foster parent was reported to be chest to chest w/ the child during the restraint and/or having one knee on the child's chest. The other foster parent admitted to slapping the child on a vital body part, the face. Although there are some variances to the history provided by foster parents, collaterals reported there was a struggle between the child and the foster parents that resulted in the child getting injured by being slammed onto the ground, sustaining scratches/bruising on the back, and bumping their head onto the ground.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was found that one foster parent "dragged" the child involved from the inside of the house to the outside of the house and into the yard onto the concrete ground. It was found that during this incident the child was placed in a supine restraint by foster parent during what was reported to be a short personal restraint, which is prohibited. It was also reported that the child hit their head outside during this restraint and the child sustained scratches/marks/bruises on their back due to this incident as well. No foster parent was monitoring the restraint inside or outside the home. It was reported that at one point foster parent was chest to chest with the child during the restraint and/or had their knee on the child. Overall, foster parent(s) conducted inappropriate and improper restraints on the child in care. Foster parents did not minimize harm to the child which caused injuries.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-05-09

It was noted in a variance the agency submitted on 1/7/2022 that two caregiver tested positive for COVID-19 but a report to the hotline was not received upon review of CLASS until 1/28/2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was noted in a variance the agency submitted on 1/7/2022 that two caregiver tested positive for COVID-19 but a report to the hotline was not received upon review of CLASS until 1/28/2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was noted in a variance the agency submitted on 1/7/2022 that two caregiver tested positive for COVID-19 but a report to the hotline was not received upon review of CLASS until 1/28/2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

It was noted in a variance the agency submitted on 1/7/2022 that two caregiver tested positive for COVID-19 but a report to the hotline was not received upon review of CLASS until 1/28/2022.

Resolution: Corrected at inspection

During the walk through of the interior of the foster home, it was noted that the house was in disararray. There was organic plant feed next to the rice and hardware items in the kitchen area. On the exterior of the foster home, the grass and weeds were overgrown to approximately a foot to three feet. There was also debris in the immediate vicinity of the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-16

During the walk through of the interior of the foster home, it was noted that the house was in disararray. There was organic plant feed next to the rice and hardware items in the kitchen area. On the exterior of the foster home, the grass and weeds were overgrown to approximately a foot to three feet. There was also debris in the immediate vicinity of the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-16

During the walk through of the interior of the foster home, it was noted that the house was in disararray. There was organic plant feed next to the rice and hardware items in the kitchen area. On the exterior of the foster home, the grass and weeds were overgrown to approximately a foot to three feet. There was also debris in the immediate vicinity of the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-16

During the walk through of the interior of the foster home, it was noted that the house was in disararray. There was organic plant feed next to the rice and hardware items in the kitchen area. On the exterior of the foster home, the grass and weeds were overgrown to approximately a foot to three feet. There was also debris in the immediate vicinity of the foster home.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-16

A child in care had been using over the counter lice treatment for over 3 months and still had reoccurring lice causing the child discomfort.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-26

A child in care had been using over the counter lice treatment for over 3 months and still had reoccurring lice causing the child discomfort.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-26

A child in care had been using over the counter lice treatment for over 3 months and still had reoccurring lice causing the child discomfort.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-26

A child in care had been using over the counter lice treatment for over 3 months and still had reoccurring lice causing the child discomfort.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-08-26

One of the two child files reviewed had a service plan that was not reviewed with in 180 days.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-25

Four of the four home screenings reviewed did not have the method used to interview references. Three of the four did not have the date the references were obtained.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-25

Four of the four home screenings reviewed did not have the method used to interview references. Three of the four did not have the date the references were obtained.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-25

Four of the four home screenings reviewed did not have the method used to interview references. Three of the four did not have the date the references were obtained.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-25

Four of the four home screenings reviewed did not have the method used to interview references. Three of the four did not have the date the references were obtained.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-25

One of the two child files reviewed had a service plan that was not reviewed with in 180 days.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-25

One of the two child files reviewed had a service plan that was not reviewed with in 180 days.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-25

One of the two child files reviewed had a service plan that was not reviewed with in 180 days.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-06-25

A child in care was able to gain access and ingest to prescription medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-15

Multiple sources stated a caregiver cursed at a child in care and called them a derogatory name.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-15

A child in care was able to gain access and ingest to prescription medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-15

Multiple sources stated a caregiver cursed at a child in care and called them a derogatory name.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-15

Multiple sources stated a caregiver cursed at a child in care and called them a derogatory name.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-15

A child in care was able to gain access and ingest to prescription medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-15

Multiple sources stated a caregiver cursed at a child in care and called them a derogatory name.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-15

A child in care was able to gain access and ingest to prescription medication.

Resolution: Corrected: 2021-07-15