The Nest at Anderson Mill

11812 MILLWRIGHT PKWY, Austin, TX 78750Open
F

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

68 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: Open

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

March 10, 2026

Provenance

Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
The Nest at Anderson Mill
License number
1755070
Location
11812 MILLWRIGHT PKWY, Austin, TX 78750
Status
Open
Safety grade
F (Poor), score 3.0/100
Inspection record
68 inspections, last inspected March 10, 2026
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

F
Poor3.0 / 100
Health10/100
Safety0/100
Staffing0/100
Compliance0/100

48

Total Violations

Mar 10, 2026

Last Inspection

216

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (48)

SERIOUSSTAFFING746.1309(e)Jan 8, 2026

Out of 4 staff files reviewed, 4 staff were missing proof of the annual trainings for emergency preparedness, administering medications, food allergies, and hazardous materials.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-29

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1309(d)Jan 8, 2026

Out of 4 staff files reviewed, 4 staff were missing proof of the annual SIDS/Shaken Baby/Early Brain Development Training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-15

SERIOUSHEALTH746.3809Jan 8, 2026

One child's medication expired on 7/2025.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-22

CRITICALSAFETY746.5101(a)Jan 8, 2026

The annual fire inspection was not available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1309(d)Jan 8, 2026

Out of 4 staff files reviewed, 4 staff were missing proof of the annual SIDS/Shaken Baby/Early Brain Development Training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-15

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1309(d)Jan 8, 2026

Out of 4 staff files reviewed, 4 staff were missing proof of the annual SIDS/Shaken Baby/Early Brain Development Training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-15

SERIOUSSTAFFING746.1309(e)Jan 8, 2026

Out of 4 staff files reviewed, 4 staff were missing proof of the annual trainings for emergency preparedness, administering medications, food allergies, and hazardous materials.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-29

CRITICALSAFETY746.5101(a)Jan 8, 2026

The annual fire inspection was not available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20

SERIOUSHEALTH746.3809Jan 8, 2026

One child's medication expired on 7/2025.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-22

CRITICALSAFETY746.5101(a)Jan 8, 2026

The annual fire inspection was not available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20

SERIOUSSTAFFING746.1309(e)Jan 8, 2026

Out of 4 staff files reviewed, 4 staff were missing proof of the annual trainings for emergency preparedness, administering medications, food allergies, and hazardous materials.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-29

SERIOUSHEALTH746.3809Jan 8, 2026

One child's medication expired on 7/2025.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-22

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1309(d)Jan 8, 2026

Out of 4 staff files reviewed, 4 staff were missing proof of the annual SIDS/Shaken Baby/Early Brain Development Training.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-15

CRITICALSAFETY746.5101(a)Jan 8, 2026

The annual fire inspection was not available.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-02-20

SERIOUSSTAFFING746.1309(e)Jan 8, 2026

Out of 4 staff files reviewed, 4 staff were missing proof of the annual trainings for emergency preparedness, administering medications, food allergies, and hazardous materials.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-29

SERIOUSHEALTH746.3809Jan 8, 2026

One child's medication expired on 7/2025.

Resolution: Corrected: 2026-01-22

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.1203(3)(D)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be in deficient. A caregiver used a personal cell phone in the classroom to take photos of the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.305(a)(6)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found deficient. The operation did not report to Child Care Regulation when they became aware that a caregiver was using a cell phone inappropriately in the classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. There was sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver did not use good judgement when the caregiver used a personal cell phone to take photos of the classroom, some with children in the photo, and send the photos to a person not related to the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.305(a)(6)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found deficient. The operation did not report to Child Care Regulation when they became aware that a caregiver was using a cell phone inappropriately in the classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.1203(3)(D)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be in deficient. A caregiver used a personal cell phone in the classroom to take photos of the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.305(a)(6)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found deficient. The operation did not report to Child Care Regulation when they became aware that a caregiver was using a cell phone inappropriately in the classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.1203(3)(D)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be in deficient. A caregiver used a personal cell phone in the classroom to take photos of the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. There was sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver did not use good judgement when the caregiver used a personal cell phone to take photos of the classroom, some with children in the photo, and send the photos to a person not related to the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.305(a)(6)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found deficient. The operation did not report to Child Care Regulation when they became aware that a caregiver was using a cell phone inappropriately in the classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. There was sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver did not use good judgement when the caregiver used a personal cell phone to take photos of the classroom, some with children in the photo, and send the photos to a person not related to the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE746.1203(3)(D)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegation and found to be in deficient. A caregiver used a personal cell phone in the classroom to take photos of the children.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1201(1)Nov 7, 2025

This standard was reviewed in relation to the reported allegations and found to be deficient. There was sufficient evidence to support that the caregiver did not use good judgement when the caregiver used a personal cell phone to take photos of the classroom, some with children in the photo, and send the photos to a person not related to the operation.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-11-17

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Feb 7, 2025

One classroom was out of ratio by one child when they had 6 children with a specified age of 12-17 months with one caregiver. This was corrected at inspection by moving one child to another classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-07

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Feb 7, 2025

One classroom was out of ratio by one child when they had 6 children with a specified age of 12-17 months with one caregiver. This was corrected at inspection by moving one child to another classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-07

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Feb 7, 2025

One classroom was out of ratio by one child when they had 6 children with a specified age of 12-17 months with one caregiver. This was corrected at inspection by moving one child to another classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-07

CRITICALSTAFFING746.1601Feb 7, 2025

One classroom was out of ratio by one child when they had 6 children with a specified age of 12-17 months with one caregiver. This was corrected at inspection by moving one child to another classroom.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-02-07

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Feb 3, 2025

During an investigation it was found that a child was left unattended.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-03

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Feb 3, 2025

During an investigation it was found that a child was left unattended.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-03

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Feb 3, 2025

During an investigation it was found that a child was left unattended.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-03

CRITICALSAFETY746.1205(a)(4)Feb 3, 2025

During an investigation it was found that a child was left unattended.

Resolution: Corrected: 2025-03-03

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Oct 17, 2024

A parent was not notified of an injury when it happened or upon pick-up of their child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Oct 16, 2024

A parent was not notified of an injury when it happened or upon pick-up of their child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Oct 16, 2024

A parent was not notified of an injury when it happened or upon pick-up of their child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE746.307(c)Oct 16, 2024

A parent was not notified of an injury when it happened or upon pick-up of their child.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-11-07

CRITICALSTAFFING746.2101(a)Jun 14, 2024

The child-to-caregiver ratio was exceeded during water play activities on a splash pad containing water two feet deep or less.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-14

CRITICALSTAFFING746.2101(a)Jun 14, 2024

The child-to-caregiver ratio was exceeded during water play activities on a splash pad containing water two feet deep or less.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-14

CRITICALSTAFFING746.2101(a)Jun 14, 2024

The child-to-caregiver ratio was exceeded during water play activities on a splash pad containing water two feet deep or less.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-14

CRITICALSTAFFING746.2101(a)Jun 14, 2024

The child-to-caregiver ratio was exceeded during water play activities on a splash pad containing water two feet deep or less.

Resolution: Corrected: 2024-06-14

CRITICALHEALTH746.3401(a)Oct 19, 2022

Sanitation inspection was not available for review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-04

CRITICALHEALTH746.3401(a)Oct 19, 2022

Sanitation inspection was not available for review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-04

CRITICALHEALTH746.3401(a)Oct 19, 2022

Sanitation inspection was not available for review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-04

CRITICALHEALTH746.3401(a)Oct 19, 2022

Sanitation inspection was not available for review.

Resolution: Corrected: 2022-11-04

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for The Nest at Anderson Mill.

Nearby Daycares in Austin

Frequently Asked Questions

What is The Nest at Anderson Mill's safety grade?

The Nest at Anderson Mill has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 3.0 out of 100.

How many violations does The Nest at Anderson Mill have?

The Nest at Anderson Mill has 48 total violations on record, including 36 critical, 12 serious, and 0 minor.

When was The Nest at Anderson Mill last inspected?

The Nest at Anderson Mill was last inspected on March 10, 2026.

Parent Resources