Kinder Elite Academy II
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
29 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: Open
Last refreshed
May 6, 2026
Latest inspection
April 30, 2026
Provenance
Texas licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated May 6, 2026
- Provider
- Kinder Elite Academy II
- License number
- 1517452
- Location
- 202 S WILLIAM ST, Atlanta, TX 75551
- Status
- Open
- Safety grade
- F (Poor), score 36.3/100
- Inspection record
- 29 inspections, last inspected April 30, 2026
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed May 6, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
Quality Rating
Rated by Texas Rising Star, the state quality rating and improvement system.
99
Total Violations
Apr 30, 2026
Last Inspection
67
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (99)
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
Four of six children's files were lacking all the compents required in their children records requirements. A list of children and missing information was left with operation.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-24
All infants requiring feeding instructions had not been update in over 30-45 days.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-07-18
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. During the investigation it was discovered that a child who had been threatened with harm by a staff had not been notified by the operation for six days after incident.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered during the investigation that the operation did not report timely when they became aware of two separate incidents at the operation that placed a child at risk.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
This standard was reviewed as part of an investigation and found non-compliant. It was discovered that the same child was threatened by two different staff with harm to them.
Resolution: Corrected: 2025-06-30
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed were lacking a complete address for a health professional who has examined the child in past year.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Three of six children's files reviewed was lacking a complete name, address and phone number for either the physician or medical facility.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Four of six children's files reviewed at inspection was lacking a complete address for their emergency contact person.
Resolution: Corrected: 2021-11-11
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for Kinder Elite Academy II.
Nearby Daycares in Atlanta
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Kinder Elite Academy II's safety grade?
Kinder Elite Academy II has a safety grade of F (Poor) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 36.3 out of 100.
How many violations does Kinder Elite Academy II have?
Kinder Elite Academy II has 99 total violations on record, including 49 critical, 50 serious, and 0 minor.
When was Kinder Elite Academy II last inspected?
Kinder Elite Academy II was last inspected on April 30, 2026.