PRESCHOOL ON THE HILL (FIRST BAPTIST DAY NURSERY)

5500 ALESSANDRO BLVD, Riverside, CA 92506LICENSED
D

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

6 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: LICENSED

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

May 2, 2025

Provenance

California licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
PRESCHOOL ON THE HILL (FIRST BAPTIST DAY NURSERY)
License number
Not listed
Location
5500 ALESSANDRO BLVD, Riverside, CA 92506
Status
LICENSED
Safety grade
D (Below Average), score 64.8/100
Inspection record
6 inspections, last inspected May 2, 2025
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

D
Below Average64.8 / 100
Health100/100
Safety70/100
Staffing55/100
Compliance0/100

21

Total Violations

May 2, 2025

Last Inspection

85

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (21)

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.7995(a)(1)Type BMay 2, 2025

California Lead Action Level at Child Care Centers 101700.3 (b)(2): Licensees shall maintain a lead value at or below the Action Level of 5 ppb in all outlets subject to the testing requirements ... for the health and safety of children in care. This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on records review of required lead testing, the facility had lead values of 5.0 or above on water outlets :( F-5.6 ppb); (I-8.7 ppb); (L -95 ppb); and (N- 64 ppb). This is a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.8662(b)(1)May 2, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101217(a)May 2, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSSTAFFING101221(b)(6)May 2, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.7995(a)(1)May 2, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101216(g)(1)May 2, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101216(g)(1)Type BMay 2, 2025

Based on (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that S5 and S6 do not have a health screen on file for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101217(a)Type BMay 2, 2025

Based on (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that 2 out of 5 files did not have a signed admission agreement available for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSSTAFFING101221(b)(6)Type BMay 2, 2025

Based on (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that 2 out of 5 files did not have a signed admission agreement available for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.7995(a)(1)Type BMay 2, 2025

Based on (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that S5 did not have immunizations on file for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101216(g)(1)Type BMay 2, 2025

Based on interview and (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that 2 out of 5 files did not have mandated reporter for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSSTAFFING101221(b)(6)Type BMay 2, 2025

Based on (interview) and (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that there was no file for review for S2 which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101217(a)Type BMay 2, 2025

Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that lead testing was not completed from an ELAP vendor nor were there any records for lead testing available for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.8662(b)(1)Type BMay 2, 2025

Based on (interview) and (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that there was no file for review for S2 which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.8662(b)(1)Type BMay 2, 2025

(1) The center shall give each authorized representative a copy of the Personal Rights form (LIC 613A [9/96]).

SERIOUSSAFETY101700.3(b)(2):Type BComplaintFeb 21, 2025

Based on (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that S5 and S6 do not have a health screen on file for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1597.16(a)(1)Type BComplaintFeb 21, 2025

Based on interview and (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that 2 out of 5 files did not have mandated reporter for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSSAFETY101700.3(b)(2):ComplaintFeb 21, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1597.16(a)(1)ComplaintFeb 21, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1597.16(a)(1)Type BComplaintFeb 21, 2025

Based on record review and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that lead testing was not completed from an ELAP vendor nor were there any records for lead testing available for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSSAFETY101700.3(b)(2):Type BComplaintFeb 21, 2025

Based on (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that S5 did not have immunizations on file for review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for PRESCHOOL ON THE HILL (FIRST BAPTIST DAY NURSERY).

Nearby Daycares in Riverside

Frequently Asked Questions

What is PRESCHOOL ON THE HILL (FIRST BAPTIST DAY NURSERY)'s safety grade?

PRESCHOOL ON THE HILL (FIRST BAPTIST DAY NURSERY) has a safety grade of D (Below Average) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 64.8 out of 100.

How many violations does PRESCHOOL ON THE HILL (FIRST BAPTIST DAY NURSERY) have?

PRESCHOOL ON THE HILL (FIRST BAPTIST DAY NURSERY) has 21 total violations on record, including 0 critical, 21 serious, and 0 minor.

When was PRESCHOOL ON THE HILL (FIRST BAPTIST DAY NURSERY) last inspected?

PRESCHOOL ON THE HILL (FIRST BAPTIST DAY NURSERY) was last inspected on May 2, 2025.

Parent Resources