LOS ANGELES CHEDER

801 N. LA BREA AVENUE, Los Angeles, CA 90038LICENSED
D

Data Freshness & Provenance

Inspection coverage

2 inspections on record

Active providers

License status: LICENSED

Last refreshed

April 3, 2026

Latest inspection

September 11, 2025

Provenance

California licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring

Quick Facts

These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.

Updated April 3, 2026

Provider
LOS ANGELES CHEDER
License number
Not listed
Location
801 N. LA BREA AVENUE, Los Angeles, CA 90038
Status
LICENSED
Safety grade
D (Below Average), score 62.5/100
Inspection record
2 inspections, last inspected September 11, 2025
Provenance
Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.

Safety Scorecard

D
Below Average62.5 / 100
Health100/100
Safety100/100
Staffing10/100
Compliance0/100

21

Total Violations

Sep 11, 2025

Last Inspection

70

Capacity

Violation Timeline

Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.

All Violations (21)

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101217(d)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on interview record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in facility did not provide LPA 6 out of 11 files for review, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE1596.871(c)(1)(A)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as in facility has not completed a Disaster drills within the last 6 months, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSSTAFFING101226(e)(1)(A)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on observation interview record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the facility did not make available for review proof of their granted waivers, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101174(d)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in child #3 and child #5 did not contain physicians report in file which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.954Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on observation and interview review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as in the facility does not obtain a smoke and carbon monoxide detector at the facility which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101174(d)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, Per director last drill was conducted 12 months ago which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSSTAFFING101238(a)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on observation and interview, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above a the bathroom in room 106 was not kept clean for children in care which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.7995(a)(1)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as in Staff 3 did not obtain immunizations against influenza, pertussis, and measles in their file for LPA to review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.954Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above inLPAs reviewed staff files and did not observe staff #5, #6 and staff #7 to have Mandated Reporter training in file which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSSTAFFING101238(a)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, LPAs conducted childrens file review, files for child #1 and child #2 did not contain in writing instructions from the childs authorized representatives for the administration of medication to the child. which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.7995(a)(1)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on observation, interview, record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as in Staff 3 did not obtain immunizations against influenza, pertussis, and measles in their file for LPA to review which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSSTAFFING101226(e)(1)(A)Type ASep 11, 2025

Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, LPAs observed two Epi- pens and Benadryl in childrens cubby located in the restroom in Pre nursery classroom, Room #2 which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE1596.871(c)(1)(A)Sep 11, 2025

Type A citation - immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights

SERIOUSSTAFFING101226(e)(1)(A)Sep 11, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.954Sep 11, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101174(d)Sep 11, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSSTAFFING101238(a)Sep 11, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE1596.7995(a)(1)Sep 11, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101217(d)Sep 11, 2025

Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected

CRITICALCOMPLIANCE1596.871(c)(1)(A)Type ASep 11, 2025

Based on observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as in S12 and an armed guard do not obtain criminal record clearance which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

SERIOUSCOMPLIANCE101217(d)Type BSep 11, 2025

Based on interview record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in facility did not provide LPA 6 out of 11 files for review, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.

Get Inspection Alerts

Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for LOS ANGELES CHEDER.

Nearby Daycares in Los Angeles

Frequently Asked Questions

What is LOS ANGELES CHEDER's safety grade?

LOS ANGELES CHEDER has a safety grade of D (Below Average) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 62.5 out of 100.

How many violations does LOS ANGELES CHEDER have?

LOS ANGELES CHEDER has 21 total violations on record, including 3 critical, 18 serious, and 0 minor.

When was LOS ANGELES CHEDER last inspected?

LOS ANGELES CHEDER was last inspected on September 11, 2025.

Parent Resources