KUM RAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL
Data Freshness & Provenance
Inspection coverage
4 inspections on record
Active providers
License status: LICENSED
Last refreshed
April 3, 2026
Latest inspection
October 16, 2025
Provenance
California licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring
Quick Facts
These facts are normalized from the official record so they can be quoted directly.
Updated April 3, 2026
- Provider
- KUM RAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL
- License number
- Not listed
- Location
- 3153 W. MARINE AVE, Gardena, CA 90249
- Status
- LICENSED
- Safety grade
- B (Good), score 85.0/100
- Inspection record
- 4 inspections, last inspected October 16, 2025
- Provenance
- Official state licensing inspections and DaycareCheck scoring. Last refreshed April 3, 2026.
Safety Scorecard
39
Total Violations
Oct 16, 2025
Last Inspection
48
Capacity
Violation Timeline
Violations by month over the last 3 years, colored by severity.
All Violations (39)
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA Wheatley's observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that three staff members (cook, piano teacher, art teacher) are not fingerprinted or live scanned. LPA called the El Segundo office and verified that the staff do not have a fingerprint clearance. The cook is around the children daily. The piano teacher was supervising children alone today. The art teacher is here once a week however she teaches the children piano lessons without a fingerprint clearance. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation and interview with lead teacher, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that two staff members (piano teacher and art teacher) were supervising children without education/units. These staff members are to work under the direct supervision of a teacher. The children were awake and not napping when this was observed. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that 2 staff do not have a health screening on file. LPA observed the two staff supervising children. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that three employees do not have a required file with required documents. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that three employees do not have a TB Test on file. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that three employees do not have a TB Test on file. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that 4 out of 5 employees do not have the required Mandated Reporter Training. LPA observed the certificates expired. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Type A citation - immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights
Type A citation - immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Type B citation - potential risk if not corrected
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that 4 out of 5 employees do not have the required Mandated Reporter Training. LPA observed the certificates expired. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA Wheatley's observation, interview and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that three staff members (cook, piano teacher, art teacher) are not fingerprinted or live scanned. LPA called the El Segundo office and verified that the staff do not have a fingerprint clearance. The cook is around the children daily. The piano teacher was supervising children alone today. The art teacher is here once a week however she teaches the children piano lessons without a fingerprint clearance. This poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation and interview with lead teacher, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that two staff members (piano teacher and art teacher) were supervising children without education/units. These staff members are to work under the direct supervision of a teacher. The children were awake and not napping when this was observed. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that three employees do not have a required file with required documents. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on [(observation) (interview) (record review)], the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in [count] out of [total count] [(objects) (persons)] [identifiers] which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Based on LPA's observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in that 2 staff do not have a health screening on file. LPA observed the two staff supervising children. This poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.
Get Inspection Alerts
Be the first to know when new inspections or violations are reported for KUM RAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL.
Nearby Daycares in Gardena
RAJAPAKSE FAMILY CHILD CARE
GARDENA, CA 90249
REYNOLDS FAMILY CHILD CARE
GARDENA, CA 90249
ARMIJOS FAMILY CHILD CARE
GARDENA, CA 90249
SPRY FAMILY CHILD CARE
GARDENA, CA 90249
GUNAWARDANA FAMILY CHILD CARE
GARDENA, CA 90249
Frequently Asked Questions
What is KUM RAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL's safety grade?
KUM RAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL has a safety grade of B (Good) based on state inspection data. The composite score is 85.0 out of 100.
How many violations does KUM RAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL have?
KUM RAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL has 39 total violations on record, including 6 critical, 33 serious, and 0 minor.
When was KUM RAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL last inspected?
KUM RAN CHURCH PRESCHOOL was last inspected on October 16, 2025.