OPTIONS FOR LEARNING SCHOOL AGE BALDWIN

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Nolan Tcheng and Caroline Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management inspection for the purpose of following up on an incident self reported to the Department on 01/28/2026. Upon arrival at 2pm, LPAs met with Facility Representative Yuliana Chacon, to whom the purpose of the inspection was explained. A tour of the facility was conducted and census was taken. There were 17 children with 4 staff members. On 01/26/2026, two children in care were sent to the elementary school front office to pick up food for Staff #1 (S1) . During their walk to the office, and back to the group, the children were without staff supervision. They arrived at the front of the school and received the food from the delivery driver. LPAs interviewed two staff members and two children. Staff #1 was contacted via telephone regarding the incident and disclosed, "I was outside with the kids and I sent two [kids] to the front without supervision." Staff #1 continued to explain that they were picking up food from an order for them (S1). Child #2 corroborated that they, and Child #1, were sent to the front to pick up food for Staff #1. When asked who did they receive the food from, Child #2 stated that they got it from the delivery person. LPAs obtained written statements from staff and children involved in the incident. A written statement from Child #1 disclosed they picked up food "at front office, by the small little front gate, right outside the office. A person came and gave us the order at the small front gate." LPAs reviewed disclosed information. The children were sent to the front of the elementary school without any supervision from adult staff and the facility. They were sent by Staff #1 to pick up ordered food from a stranger (delivery person) who is not associated with the facility. Based on the information above, facility is in violation of lack of supervision, and personal rights. REPORT CONTINUES PAGE 1 of 2 NAME OF LICENSING PROGRAM MANAGER: Ana Chico NAME OF LICENSING PROGRAM ANALYST: Nolan Tcheng LICENSING PROGRAM ANALYST SIGNATURE: DATE: 02/03/2026 I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: DATE: 02/03/2026 This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC809 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of 4 FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT California law requires a public report of each licensing visit/inspection. This report is a record for the facility and the licensing agency. This report is available for public review; therefore, care is taken not to disclose personal or confidential information. Inquiries concerning the location, maintenance, and contents of these reports may be directed to the Licensing Program Analyst or Regional Office whose address and telephone number are listed on the front of this form. DEFICIENCIES A deficiency is an instance of noncompliance with licensing requirements, including applicable statutes, regulations, interim licensing standards, operating standards, and written directives. Applicants/ licensees must be notified in writing of all licensing deficiencies. Deficiencies are listed on the left side of this form, and the applicable licensing requirement upon which the deficiency is identified. There are two types of deficiencies: Type A deficiencies are violations of licensing requirements that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care. Type B deficiencies are violations of licensing requirements that, without correction, could become a risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care, a recordkeeping violation that could impact the care of said persons and/or protection of their resources, or a violation that could impact those services required to meet the needs of persons in care. PLANS OF CORRECTION (POCs) The licensing agency is required to establish a reasonable length of time to correct a deficiency. In order to set the time, the licensing agency must take into consideration the seriousness of the violation, the number of persons in care involved, and the availability of equipment and personnel necessary to correct the violation. Applicants/licensees are requested to provide a specific plan for each violation on the right side of the form across from each deficiency. The more specific the plan, the less chance exists for any misunderstanding in setting time limits and reviewing corrections. The applicant/licensee who encounters problems beyond their control in completing the corrections within the specified time frame may request and may be granted an extension of the correction due date by the licensing agency. CORRECTION NOTIFICATION The applicant/licensee is responsible for completing all corrections and

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Nolan Tcheng and Caroline Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management inspection for the purpose of following up on an incident self reported to the Department on 01/28/2026. Upon arrival at 2pm, LPAs met with Facility Representative Yuliana Chacon, to whom the purpose of the inspection was explained. A tour of the facility was conducted and census was taken. There were 17 children with 4 staff members. On 01/26/2026, two children in care were sent to the elementary school front office to pick up food for Staff #1 (S1) . During their walk to the office, and back to the group, the children were without staff supervision. They arrived at the front of the school and received the food from the delivery driver. LPAs interviewed two staff members and two children. Staff #1 was contacted via telephone regarding the incident and disclosed, "I was outside with the kids and I sent two [kids] to the front without supervision." Staff #1 continued to explain that they were picking up food from an order for them (S1). Child #2 corroborated that they, and Child #1, were sent to the front to pick up food for Staff #1. When asked who did they receive the food from, Child #2 stated that they got it from the delivery person. LPAs obtained written statements from staff and children involved in the incident. A written statement from Child #1 disclosed they picked up food "at front office, by the small little front gate, right outside the office. A person came and gave us the order at the small front gate." LPAs reviewed disclosed information. The children were sent to the front of the elementary school without any supervision from adult staff and the facility. They were sent by Staff #1 to pick up ordered food from a stranger (delivery person) who is not associated with the facility. Based on the information above, facility is in violation of lack of supervision, and personal rights. REPORT CONTINUES PAGE 1 of 2 NAME OF LICENSING PROGRAM MANAGER: Ana Chico NAME OF LICENSING PROGRAM ANALYST: Nolan Tcheng LICENSING PROGRAM ANALYST SIGNATURE: DATE: 02/03/2026 I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: DATE: 02/03/2026 This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC809 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of 4 FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT California law requires a public report of each licensing visit/inspection. This report is a record for the facility and the licensing agency. This report is available for public review; therefore, care is taken not to disclose personal or confidential information. Inquiries concerning the location, maintenance, and contents of these reports may be directed to the Licensing Program Analyst or Regional Office whose address and telephone number are listed on the front of this form. DEFICIENCIES A deficiency is an instance of noncompliance with licensing requirements, including applicable statutes, regulations, interim licensing standards, operating standards, and written directives. Applicants/ licensees must be notified in writing of all licensing deficiencies. Deficiencies are listed on the left side of this form, and the applicable licensing requirement upon which the deficiency is identified. There are two types of deficiencies: Type A deficiencies are violations of licensing requirements that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care. Type B deficiencies are violations of licensing requirements that, without correction, could become a risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care, a recordkeeping violation that could impact the care of said persons and/or protection of their resources, or a violation that could impact those services required to meet the needs of persons in care. PLANS OF CORRECTION (POCs) The licensing agency is required to establish a reasonable length of time to correct a deficiency. In order to set the time, the licensing agency must take into consideration the seriousness of the violation, the number of persons in care involved, and the availability of equipment and personnel necessary to correct the violation. Applicants/licensees are requested to provide a specific plan for each violation on the right side of the form across from each deficiency. The more specific the plan, the less chance exists for any misunderstanding in setting time limits and reviewing corrections. The applicant/licensee who encounters problems beyond their control in completing the corrections within the specified time frame may request and may be granted an extension of the correction due date by the licensing agency. CORRECTION NOTIFICATION The applicant/licensee is responsible for completing all corrections and

Type A citation - immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights

Type A citation - immediate risk to health, safety, or personal rights

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Nolan Tcheng and Caroline Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management inspection for the purpose of following up on an incident self reported to the Department on 01/28/2026. Upon arrival at 2pm, LPAs met with Facility Representative Yuliana Chacon, to whom the purpose of the inspection was explained. A tour of the facility was conducted and census was taken. There were 17 children with 4 staff members. On 01/26/2026, two children in care were sent to the elementary school front office to pick up food for Staff #1 (S1) . During their walk to the office, and back to the group, the children were without staff supervision. They arrived at the front of the school and received the food from the delivery driver. LPAs interviewed two staff members and two children. Staff #1 was contacted via telephone regarding the incident and disclosed, "I was outside with the kids and I sent two [kids] to the front without supervision." Staff #1 continued to explain that they were picking up food from an order for them (S1). Child #2 corroborated that they, and Child #1, were sent to the front to pick up food for Staff #1. When asked who did they receive the food from, Child #2 stated that they got it from the delivery person. LPAs obtained written statements from staff and children involved in the incident. A written statement from Child #1 disclosed they picked up food "at front office, by the small little front gate, right outside the office. A person came and gave us the order at the small front gate." LPAs reviewed disclosed information. The children were sent to the front of the elementary school without any supervision from adult staff and the facility. They were sent by Staff #1 to pick up ordered food from a stranger (delivery person) who is not associated with the facility. Based on the information above, facility is in violation of lack of supervision, and personal rights. REPORT CONTINUES PAGE 1 of 2 NAME OF LICENSING PROGRAM MANAGER: Ana Chico NAME OF LICENSING PROGRAM ANALYST: Nolan Tcheng LICENSING PROGRAM ANALYST SIGNATURE: DATE: 02/03/2026 I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: DATE: 02/03/2026 This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC809 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of 4 FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT California law requires a public report of each licensing visit/inspection. This report is a record for the facility and the licensing agency. This report is available for public review; therefore, care is taken not to disclose personal or confidential information. Inquiries concerning the location, maintenance, and contents of these reports may be directed to the Licensing Program Analyst or Regional Office whose address and telephone number are listed on the front of this form. DEFICIENCIES A deficiency is an instance of noncompliance with licensing requirements, including applicable statutes, regulations, interim licensing standards, operating standards, and written directives. Applicants/ licensees must be notified in writing of all licensing deficiencies. Deficiencies are listed on the left side of this form, and the applicable licensing requirement upon which the deficiency is identified. There are two types of deficiencies: Type A deficiencies are violations of licensing requirements that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care. Type B deficiencies are violations of licensing requirements that, without correction, could become a risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care, a recordkeeping violation that could impact the care of said persons and/or protection of their resources, or a violation that could impact those services required to meet the needs of persons in care. PLANS OF CORRECTION (POCs) The licensing agency is required to establish a reasonable length of time to correct a deficiency. In order to set the time, the licensing agency must take into consideration the seriousness of the violation, the number of persons in care involved, and the availability of equipment and personnel necessary to correct the violation. Applicants/licensees are requested to provide a specific plan for each violation on the right side of the form across from each deficiency. The more specific the plan, the less chance exists for any misunderstanding in setting time limits and reviewing corrections. The applicant/licensee who encounters problems beyond their control in completing the corrections within the specified time frame may request and may be granted an extension of the correction due date by the licensing agency. CORRECTION NOTIFICATION The applicant/licensee is responsible for completing all corrections and

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Nolan Tcheng and Caroline Nguyen conducted an unannounced Case Management inspection for the purpose of following up on an incident self reported to the Department on 01/28/2026. Upon arrival at 2pm, LPAs met with Facility Representative Yuliana Chacon, to whom the purpose of the inspection was explained. A tour of the facility was conducted and census was taken. There were 17 children with 4 staff members. On 01/26/2026, two children in care were sent to the elementary school front office to pick up food for Staff #1 (S1) . During their walk to the office, and back to the group, the children were without staff supervision. They arrived at the front of the school and received the food from the delivery driver. LPAs interviewed two staff members and two children. Staff #1 was contacted via telephone regarding the incident and disclosed, "I was outside with the kids and I sent two [kids] to the front without supervision." Staff #1 continued to explain that they were picking up food from an order for them (S1). Child #2 corroborated that they, and Child #1, were sent to the front to pick up food for Staff #1. When asked who did they receive the food from, Child #2 stated that they got it from the delivery person. LPAs obtained written statements from staff and children involved in the incident. A written statement from Child #1 disclosed they picked up food "at front office, by the small little front gate, right outside the office. A person came and gave us the order at the small front gate." LPAs reviewed disclosed information. The children were sent to the front of the elementary school without any supervision from adult staff and the facility. They were sent by Staff #1 to pick up ordered food from a stranger (delivery person) who is not associated with the facility. Based on the information above, facility is in violation of lack of supervision, and personal rights. REPORT CONTINUES PAGE 1 of 2 NAME OF LICENSING PROGRAM MANAGER: Ana Chico NAME OF LICENSING PROGRAM ANALYST: Nolan Tcheng LICENSING PROGRAM ANALYST SIGNATURE: DATE: 02/03/2026 I acknowledge receipt of this form and understand my licensing appeal rights as explained and received. FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE SIGNATURE: DATE: 02/03/2026 This report must be available at Child Care and Group Home facilities for public review for 3 years. LIC809 (FAS) - (06/04)Page: 1 of 4 FACILITY EVALUATION REPORT California law requires a public report of each licensing visit/inspection. This report is a record for the facility and the licensing agency. This report is available for public review; therefore, care is taken not to disclose personal or confidential information. Inquiries concerning the location, maintenance, and contents of these reports may be directed to the Licensing Program Analyst or Regional Office whose address and telephone number are listed on the front of this form. DEFICIENCIES A deficiency is an instance of noncompliance with licensing requirements, including applicable statutes, regulations, interim licensing standards, operating standards, and written directives. Applicants/ licensees must be notified in writing of all licensing deficiencies. Deficiencies are listed on the left side of this form, and the applicable licensing requirement upon which the deficiency is identified. There are two types of deficiencies: Type A deficiencies are violations of licensing requirements that, if not corrected, have a direct and immediate risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care. Type B deficiencies are violations of licensing requirements that, without correction, could become a risk to the health, safety, or personal rights of persons in care, a recordkeeping violation that could impact the care of said persons and/or protection of their resources, or a violation that could impact those services required to meet the needs of persons in care. PLANS OF CORRECTION (POCs) The licensing agency is required to establish a reasonable length of time to correct a deficiency. In order to set the time, the licensing agency must take into consideration the seriousness of the violation, the number of persons in care involved, and the availability of equipment and personnel necessary to correct the violation. Applicants/licensees are requested to provide a specific plan for each violation on the right side of the form across from each deficiency. The more specific the plan, the less chance exists for any misunderstanding in setting time limits and reviewing corrections. The applicant/licensee who encounters problems beyond their control in completing the corrections within the specified time frame may request and may be granted an extension of the correction due date by the licensing agency. CORRECTION NOTIFICATION The applicant/licensee is responsible for completing all corrections and